oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 03:34:48 PM |
|
I already posted this, but there seem to be many new users who may need the information:
The English suffix "-ant" can be attached to some verb roots to yield an adjective or noun that means someone or something who is doing (or just did, or customarily does) the action signified by the verb. The root verbs that take this suffix seem to be mostly of Latin origin, that had infinitive ending in "-are"; those with "-ere" Latin infinitives take the "-ent" suffix instead. Thus for example, while "to solve" gives "solvent", and "to precede" gives "predecent", we have "protestant" from "to protest", "claimant" from "to claim", "entrant" from "to enter" (Latin "entrare"), etc.
Remeber this whenever you feel the urge to click "ignore".
Nice one. Still, the ignore button is your friend, especially when the troll brigade is out in force. What matters really is how you define 'troll'... different opinion than my own: not a troll. Low content posts trying to get a rise out of people: troll, ignore becomes an option if you still want to use the forum for its intended purpose.
|
|
|
|
razibuzouzou
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 03:45:44 PM |
|
I already posted this, but there seem to be many new users who may need the information:
The English suffix "-ant" can be attached to some verb roots to yield an adjective or noun that means someone or something who is doing (or just did, or customarily does) the action signified by the verb. The root verbs that take this suffix seem to be mostly of Latin origin, that had infinitive ending in "-are"; those with "-ere" Latin infinitives take the "-ent" suffix instead. Thus for example, while "to solve" gives "solvent", and "to precede" gives "predecent", we have "protestant" from "to protest", "claimant" from "to claim", "entrant" from "to enter" (Latin "entrare"), etc.
Remeber this whenever you feel the urge to click "ignore".
Nice one. Still, the ignore button is your friend, especially when the troll brigade is out in force. What matters really is how you define 'troll'... different opinion than my own: not a troll. Low content posts trying to get a rise out of people: troll, ignore becomes an option if you still want to use the forum for its intended purpose. Well put.
|
|
|
|
Grafzep
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 03:50:51 PM |
|
Nice one.
Still, the ignore button is your friend, especially when the troll brigade is out in force. What matters really is how you define 'troll'... different opinion than my own: not a troll. Low content posts trying to get a rise out of people: troll, ignore becomes an option if you still want to use the forum for its intended purpose.
You constantly feed the troll Stolfi, which is bad enough, but you also quote his attention-whoring all the time which is both another kind of feeding and staggeringly rude to very many here that have him on ignore. So, "nice one", join him on another ignore.
|
|
|
|
Kipsy89
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Relax!
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 03:50:58 PM |
|
I like the pattern that's currently forming... I predict a sharp increase within the hour! I've seen this pattern many times before and it never fails me 
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2372
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 03:59:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 2614
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:01:14 PM |
|
Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money.
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:02:52 PM |
|
I like the pattern that's currently forming... I predict a sharp increase within the hour! I've seen this pattern many times before and it never fails me  alright everybody did you hear that ?? we are on the 'never fails pattern' sharp increase within the hour pump .....
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1442
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:06:59 PM |
|
Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money. Exactly! Especially if you add that they didn't have to pay anything to use this payment method or keep it on their site. I bet you there was an accountant somewhere with his knickers in a knot.
|
|
|
|
12345mm
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:13:52 PM |
|
Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money. Exactly! Especially if you add that they didn't have to pay anything to use this payment method or keep it on their site. I bet you there was an accountant somewhere with his knickers in a knot. 100 btc payments is not the same thing as 100 btc in payments ... right?
|
|
|
|
Ultros
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:15:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:18:15 PM |
|
Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money. Exactly! Especially if you add that they didn't have to pay anything to use this payment method or keep it on their site. I bet you there was an accountant somewhere with his knickers in a knot. 100 btc payments is not the same thing as 100 btc in payments ... right? Twice a week adds up to more than 100 payments, so I guess they mean 100 btc in payments.
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:18:45 PM |
|
I already posted this, but there seem to be many new users who may need the information:
The English suffix "-ant" can be attached to some verb roots to yield an adjective or noun that means someone or something who is doing (or just did, or customarily does) the action signified by the verb. The root verbs that take this suffix seem to be mostly of Latin origin, that had infinitive ending in "-are"; those with "-ere" Latin infinitives take the "-ent" suffix instead. Thus for example, while "to solve" gives "solvent", and "to precede" gives "predecent", we have "protestant" from "to protest", "claimant" from "to claim", "entrant" from "to enter" (Latin "entrare"), etc.
Remeber this whenever you feel the urge to click "ignore".
Nice one. Still, the ignore button is your friend, especially when the troll brigade is out in force. What matters really is how you define 'troll'... different opinion than my own: not a troll. Low content posts trying to get a rise out of people: troll, ignore becomes an option if you still want to use the forum for its intended purpose. I second that, and for the story, even I don't agree with many people's posts here I don't have them on ignore. I do have on ignore though a LOOOONG list of multiple accounts of -a-one-and-single-user- here... LambYourMotherEtc... 
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1442
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:21:42 PM |
|
Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money. Exactly! Especially if you add that they didn't have to pay anything to use this payment method or keep it on their site. I bet you there was an accountant somewhere with his knickers in a knot. 100 btc payments is not the same thing as 100 btc in payments ... right? They said around two a week, so approx 100 payments in a year.
|
|
|
|
KryptoFoo
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:25:03 PM |
|
interesting article over on TNW http://thenextweb.com/insider/2015/03/03/why-bitcoin-is-changing-how-banks-do-business/“I believe — and this is my personal view — that blockchain technology will not only change the way we do payments but it will change the whole trading and settlement topic.... ...when somebody with a strong brand and security level establishes it as a reliable service, then the whole industry will follow. That is my personal prediction.”
And much much more, have a read. edit: and with JPM hiring bitcoinists and bitcoinmagazine hinting at the largest VC funding of a stealth startup ever, again I wildly speculate that there is already some big money working on the settlement or transactions system for big finance.
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:34:21 PM |
|
I already posted this, but there seem to be many new users who may need the information:
The English suffix "-ant" can be attached to some verb roots to yield an adjective or noun that means someone or something who is doing (or just did, or customarily does) the action signified by the verb. The root verbs that take this suffix seem to be mostly of Latin origin, that had infinitive ending in "-are"; those with "-ere" Latin infinitives take the "-ent" suffix instead. Thus for example, while "to solve" gives "solvent", and "to precede" gives "predecent", we have "protestant" from "to protest", "claimant" from "to claim", "entrant" from "to enter" (Latin "entrare"), etc.
Remeber this whenever you feel the urge to click "ignore".
Nice one. Still, the ignore button is your friend, especially when the troll brigade is out in force. What matters really is how you define 'troll'... different opinion than my own: not a troll. Low content posts trying to get a rise out of people: troll, ignore becomes an option if you still want to use the forum for its intended purpose. I second that, and for the story, even I don't agree with many people's posts here I don't have them on ignore. I do have on ignore though a LOOOONG list of multiple accounts of -a-one-and-single-user- here... LambYourMotherEtc...  Careful. By grafzep's algorithm, you're now on his ignore list as well ^_^
|
|
|
|
noobtrader
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:35:32 PM |
|
price is stable at 270...  trade volume worried me a bit btw
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:44:03 PM |
|
I already posted this, but there seem to be many new users who may need the information:
The English suffix "-ant" can be attached to some verb roots to yield an adjective or noun that means someone or something who is doing (or just did, or customarily does) the action signified by the verb. The root verbs that take this suffix seem to be mostly of Latin origin, that had infinitive ending in "-are"; those with "-ere" Latin infinitives take the "-ent" suffix instead. Thus for example, while "to solve" gives "solvent", and "to precede" gives "predecent", we have "protestant" from "to protest", "claimant" from "to claim", "entrant" from "to enter" (Latin "entrare"), etc.
Remeber this whenever you feel the urge to click "ignore".
Nice one. Still, the ignore button is your friend, especially when the troll brigade is out in force. What matters really is how you define 'troll'... different opinion than my own: not a troll. Low content posts trying to get a rise out of people: troll, ignore becomes an option if you still want to use the forum for its intended purpose. I second that, and for the story, even I don't agree with many people's posts here I don't have them on ignore. I do have on ignore though a LOOOONG list of multiple accounts of -a-one-and-single-user- here... LambYourMotherEtc...   [sorry for quoting "stolfi"]
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:46:20 PM |
|
Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money. This is one of the most common mistakes made by Bitcoiners: Equating revenue with profits. Excluding Bitcoin businesses (which are basically one guy collecting coin from gullible rubes), companies have expenses. Only a fraction of $20k revenue translates into profit, so yeah, hardly folding money.
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 5817
You're never too old to think young.
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 04:56:19 PM |
|
Good morning Bitcoinland.
I see we had the predictable profit-taking/panic after passing $280.
There seems to be support around $270 though. Let's see if it holds.
Can't really complain about going up by $20 and down by $10 since this time yesterday. Slow and steady wins the race.
It was nice here yesterday with all the permabeartard trolls gone back to their home at the garbage dump, but the over-enthusiastic braying and posting of yacht images by the otherwise more intelligent bulls was a bit much.
We're still a long way from $300, let alone quadruple digits. One step at a time.
|
|
|
|
|