ChuckBuck
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:11:46 PM |
|
Okay Beartrolls, now's your time to shine. You can come out of hiding and tell us how much you love Bitcoin! 
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:13:12 PM |
|
Fortress Investment bought some number of bitcoins directly in 2013. Bitcoin was the only red stain in their 2014 quarterly reports. Fortress quicky got rid of their bitcoins, swapping them for equity in the Pantera subsidiary that runs the PBP bitcoin fund. (Note: not shares of the fund, but shares of the managing company).
While I see articles noting that Fortress rolled their $20m bitcoin stake into Pantera, their latest 10K indicates they still seem to own bitcoin directly, and it traces back to the $20m original investment in 2013. Go to link below and search for bitcoin, and you will see the $20m investment in 2012, the year end 2013 value of $16.298m, and year-end 2014 value of $6.828m, a 58% decline, which is consistent with the market decline from 12/31/13 to 12/31/14. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1380393/000138039315000003/fig-20141231x10k.htmThanks for the link! Indeed, those amounts match 6828 k / ~315 and 16298 k / ~725 are approximately equal to 22'000 BTC. You saw those articles too, so I was not dreaming. Perhaps the deal got sour after it was announced? Or perhaps Fortress actually swapped the raw BTC for PBP fund shares, not for Pantera equity; which, being pegged to BTC, are counted as BTC for the purposes of the report? EDIT: since they spent 20 M$ on those coins, they must have bought when the price was ~910 $/BTC, i.e. around 2013-11-26 --- only 3 days before the peak. (They could have bought in early or mid Dec/2013, near the peak of the first reboud; but that seems rather unlikely.) It is comforting to know that big whales make mistakes too...
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:14:50 PM |
|
Okay Beartrolls, now's your time to shine. You can come out of hiding and tell us how much you love Bitcoin!  *cough* timestamp Have this nagging feeling I'll soon be seeing many "Bitcoin value has nothing to do with exchange price" & "It's not about profits, it's about mah freedomz" posts. Not sure why, just a hunch 
|
|
|
|
uhoh
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:15:17 PM |
|
Finex still looking pretty healthy... back to $280 within 2 hours is my bet.
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:16:29 PM |
|
Okay Beartrolls, now's your time to shine. You can come out of hiding and tell us how much you love Bitcoin!  Lamb is posting regardless of the price bumps n dumps. Same ponies and Wile E Coyote gifs and stuff like that. I still have him on ignore (together with ALL his other accounts - he added one just today) and I can predict easily what he's posting. Pathetically relentless piece of Chop.
|
|
|
|
KryptoFoo
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:16:53 PM |
|
wow that dipped a lot more than expected! scary shit right there. Still say we recover.
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:16:57 PM |
|
the bull seems pissed off. 
|
|
|
|
SnokkomBTC
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:17:25 PM |
|
Thnx for the cheap coins NLC 
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:17:57 PM |
|
the bull seems pissed off.  Damn... exciting times!!! 
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:19:22 PM |
|
the bull seems pissed off.  noone's taking him seriously yet ... time to get mean?
|
|
|
|
Xiaoxiao
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
The Golden Rule Rules
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:19:25 PM |
|
Support held at 267, now it is going back up.
|
|
|
|
NotHatinJustTrollin
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 107
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:21:56 PM |
|
Gooooooooooooooooood evening bulltards gentlemen!
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:22:27 PM |
|
wow that dipped a lot more than expected! scary shit right there. Still say we recover.
Still, you called that pretty good.
|
|
|
|
uhoh
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:23:17 PM |
|
1.5k to 280
|
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:30:29 PM |
|
Okay Beartrolls, now's your time to shine. You can come out of hiding and tell us how much you love Bitcoin!  Lamb is posting regardless of the price bumps n dumps. Same ponies and Wile E Coyote gifs and stuff like that. I still have him on ignore (together with ALL his other accounts - he added one just today) and I can predict easily what he's posting. Pathetically relentless piece of Chop. 
|
|
|
|
bobabouey2
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:31:35 PM |
|
Fortress Investment bought some number of bitcoins directly in 2013. Bitcoin was the only red stain in their 2014 quarterly reports. Fortress quicky got rid of their bitcoins, swapping them for equity in the Pantera subsidiary that runs the PBP bitcoin fund. (Note: not shares of the fund, but shares of the managing company).
While I see articles noting that Fortress rolled their $20m bitcoin stake into Pantera, their latest 10K indicates they still seem to own bitcoin directly, and it traces back to the $20m original investment in 2013. Go to link below and search for bitcoin, and you will see the $20m investment in 2012, the year end 2013 value of $16.298m, and year-end 2014 value of $6.828m, a 58% decline, which is consistent with the market decline from 12/31/13 to 12/31/14. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1380393/000138039315000003/fig-20141231x10k.htmThanks for the link! Indeed, those amounts match 6828 k / ~315 and 16298 k / ~725 are approximately equal to 22'000 BTC. You saw those articles too, so I was not dreaming. Perhaps the deal got sour after it was announced? Or perhaps Fortress actually swapped the raw BTC for PBP fund shares, not for Pantera equity; which, being pegged to BTC, are counted as BTC for the purposes of the report? I had the same thought that it could reflect indirect holdings via a swap of the raw BTC for fund shares, but I don't think that could be the case, as Pantera doesn't just hold bitcoin, it also invests in bitcoin companies: https://panteracapital.com/portfolio/ So there couldn't be a one for one match. And regardless, the Pantera website describes Fortress as a shareholder, so its investment in that entity would be treated just the same as any other shareholding. So I think it must have fallen through, or just have been speculation. Quite frankly, it never really made much sense. By May 2014 when the deal was happening, Fortress' bitcoin were already underwater from a tax perspective, so if they wanted to get out of them, it would have made more sense to sell them and take the tax loss, and put new money into Pantera, than to try and roll them over. Also, it would have complicated all the deal documents, as others investors would be paying dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
uhoh
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 09:36:39 PM |
|
I'm not sure that you've drawn enough lines on that chart, it's still almost readable.
|
|
|
|
|
|