ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2292
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 06:02:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
rjclarke2000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1016
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 06:11:44 AM |
|
I have no choice but to post this to break up chart buddy's party.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2292
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 07:02:28 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
cyclotronmajesty
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 07:21:54 AM |
|
unproductive comments such as your's Mr. Lama are the ones which should get lost. The option of support for 0 transaction spending and lightwallets is a great benefit to bitcoin. Otherwise this technology will be left to rot away, as nobody will be able to use it. If you really support bitcoin then you ought to see the need for XT type improvements. All this paranoid conspiracy theory garbage about the NSA or the CIA centralizing through XT isn't respectable. Even if they were trying to hijack bitcoin for their own reign it would still be a benefit at least in the short term. "Even if the gingerbread witch is just going to eat me some day, at least she will let me eat cookies in the meantime..." Seriously weak shilling for the state dude. You need to practice more. Common gimmie some credit. I called you a conspiracy theorist! 
|
|
|
|
mavericklm
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 07:28:45 AM |
|
xt shills everywhere! xt shills everywhere! xt shills everywhere!
stay strong people!
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 07:48:01 AM |
|
keep strong, and "just say NO" to bigger blocks. 
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 07:49:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 07:53:32 AM Last edit: August 22, 2015, 08:04:36 AM by Cconvert2G36 |
|
'Cause as we've discovered. Moderation by a single empowered individual is sublime... (Checks price, yep, still low $230's) edit: Should I use Bit-X as a Professional Crypto and GHash Exchange? All signs point to... YES!
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2292
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 08:02:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 08:12:53 AM |
|
I see you chartbuddy kill streak... and raise you: Around 10 days left of 0% trading!
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2292
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 09:02:30 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4158
Merit: 12614
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 09:48:18 AM |
|
Yes, good luck... on getting 13k pages, plus a bit.... ... This thread is GREAT because it talks about a lot of things related to bitcoin, including politics, religion, sex and even what color is the sky... 
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2292
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 10:02:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feri22
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 10:23:54 AM |
|
keep strong, and "just say NO" to bigger blocks.  I say yes
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 10:35:33 AM |
|
WE need a faster bitcoin. Because we need people to invest in bitcoin, make it apart of their daily lives. Minute to minute. We need stupid people like me and Mike Tyson, to buy bitcoin. Drive up that damn price. And Mike Tyson ain't got time to wait dem 10 minutes.
What you are asking already exists: Just buy litecoin or dogecoin man. LTC 4x block frequency / 4x capacity / cheaper to transact DOGE 10x block frequency / 10x capacity / practically free to transact
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 10:44:05 AM |
|
WE need a faster bitcoin. Because we need people to invest in bitcoin, make it apart of their daily lives. Minute to minute. We need stupid people like me and Mike Tyson, to buy bitcoin. Drive up that damn price. And Mike Tyson ain't got time to wait dem 10 minutes.
What you are asking already exists: Just buy litecoin or dogecoin man. LTC 4x block frequency / 4x capacity / cheaper to transact DOGE 10x block frequency / 10x capacity / practically free to transact Litecoin: not developed enough (merchant acceptance, users, services). Dogecoin: basically a joke currency/for the fun.
|
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 10:59:13 AM |
|
WE need a faster bitcoin. Because we need people to invest in bitcoin, make it apart of their daily lives. Minute to minute. We need stupid people like me and Mike Tyson, to buy bitcoin. Drive up that damn price. And Mike Tyson ain't got time to wait dem 10 minutes.
What you are asking already exists: Just buy litecoin or dogecoin man. LTC 4x block frequency / 4x capacity / cheaper to transact DOGE 10x block frequency / 10x capacity / practically free to transact Litecoin: not developed enough (merchant acceptance, users, services). Dogecoin: basically a joke currency/for the fun. And the solution is to change bitcoin's parameter with a TV-ads approach of "bigger is better" and "faster is better" pseudo-campaign? So next thing we know, people will be forking bitcoin because - it has small blocks that "don't scale" (fork already provided in the form of XT- check) - it has 10 minute blocks (" should be 5minutes or 2 minutes, so we'll fork it for the lolz, because, yeah, people can't wait 10minutes or 60 minutes if a block is late... that can't rival visa that way" - (once the price goes over 5-10.000$ and transactions are done in 0.00x - 0.000x btc) "it has too many decimals, most people don't like them, let's fork it with proper integer units to adequately reflect value!". - it is very centralized due to asic manufacturers etc... "we need to shift from sha256 to an asic-resistant algorithm... we'll fork it right away". - (after the block size increase doesn't provide adequate fee compensation for the miners): " We need to increase inflation to keep our network secure, so the 21m coin cap will be no more. The alternative of non-scaling can't be sacrificed, so we'll sacrifice the fixed cap. Fork it..." No thanks. I prefer intelligent dialogue between the core team until they have consensus. This is a multi-billion project, you can't go like a raging bull around the place.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2292
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 11:02:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
August 22, 2015, 11:06:51 AM |
|
WE need a faster bitcoin. Because we need people to invest in bitcoin, make it apart of their daily lives. Minute to minute. We need stupid people like me and Mike Tyson, to buy bitcoin. Drive up that damn price. And Mike Tyson ain't got time to wait dem 10 minutes.
What you are asking already exists: Just buy litecoin or dogecoin man. LTC 4x block frequency / 4x capacity / cheaper to transact DOGE 10x block frequency / 10x capacity / practically free to transact Litecoin: not developed enough (merchant acceptance, users, services). Dogecoin: basically a joke currency/for the fun. And the solution is to change bitcoin's parameter with a TV-ads approach of "bigger is better" and "faster is better" pseudo-campaign? So next thing we know, people will be forking bitcoin because - it has small blocks that "don't scale" (fork already provided in the form of XT- check) - it has 10 minute blocks (" should be 5minutes or 2 minutes, so we'll fork it for the lolz, because, yeah, people can't wait 10minutes or 60 minutes if a block is late... that can't rival visa that way" - (once the price goes over 5-10.000$ and transactions are done in 0.00x - 0.000x btc) "it has too many decimals, most people don't like them, let's fork it with proper integer units to adequately reflect value!". - it is very centralized due to asic manufacturers etc... "we need to shift from sha256 to an asic-resistant algorithm... we'll fork it right away". - (after the block size increase doesn't provide adequate fee compensation for the miners): " We need to increase inflation to keep our network secure, so the 21m coin cap will be no more. The alternative of non-scaling can't be sacrificed, so we'll sacrifice the fixed cap. Fork it..." No thanks. I prefer intelligent dialogue between the core team until they have consensus. This is a multi-billion project, you can't go like a raging bull around the place. This fork is about bigger blocks, right now. Why keep pushing straw man arguments? It's not the last update to the Bitcoin protocol. It's not the final version of the Bitcoin protocol.
|
|
|
|
|