BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 12:59:38 AM |
|
^Keeps stealing my memes. 
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:01:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:01:39 AM |
|
2nd Classic block mined? Ffs.  Gentlemand, are you ok with this??
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:01:55 AM |
|
just to poke my head in real quick:
i've been absent from here for months. bitcoin xt? classic? gavin jumped ship? wtf is going on?!
and yet the price hasn't gone tits up... confused.
Gavin is grasping at straws to remain relevant, and apparently market finds this entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:02:45 AM |
|
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour
You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you. woot! ok, if price hits >410 within 50mins you pay me 1$ if not i pay you 1$, bitstamps price. I was gonna say BFX, but Stamp works for me. Tic, tic, tic... ~20 mins left and i still need to see 1/2 1/4 million dollars get dumped on stamps.  double or nothing? for >410 in the next hour.
|
|
|
|
|
tex99
Member

Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:02:52 AM |
|
just to poke my head in real quick:
i've been absent from here for months. bitcoin xt? classic? gavin jumped ship? wtf is going on?!
and yet the price hasn't gone tits up... confused.
It's good news that crashes the price, not bad news. If ebay decides to start directly accepting bitcoin as a payment method the price will get crashed down to double digits the same day. Let's hope China bans bitcoin again because it will probably push the price to a new ATH.
|
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3090
Welt Am Draht
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:04:22 AM |
|
2nd Classic block mined? Ffs.  Gentlemand, are you ok with this?? I don't even know how a radio works when you close the window. Best ask someone else.
|
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:06:18 AM |
|
The Chinese government won't confiscate all the mining farms to do a 51% attack. It would give people a bad impression of them. If they were to take any action against bitcoin or the farms it would be to make mining illegal in China and outlawing the possession of bitcoins. They already banned/unbanned bitcoin multiple times and I don't rule out them banning/unbanning it again, but I don't think it's likely.
This is the most ignorant, naive statement I could imagine. Ever heard of the Tiananmen Square massacre? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989You think the ChiComs care more about our impression of them than their sovereignty, you don't know them. If Bitcoin interferes with China's economic/monetary policy, they have the means motive and opportunity to stop us. If Bitcoin DOESN'T interfere with policy, then what's the fucking point? If Bitcoin is needed, it will be fought and possibly killed. If it is not needed, then it will probably die from lack of demand. This is why concentration of mining matters.
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:07:37 AM |
|
The Chinese government won't confiscate all the mining farms to do a 51% attack. It would give people a bad impression of them. If they were to take any action against bitcoin or the farms it would be to make mining illegal in China and outlawing the possession of bitcoins. They already banned/unbanned bitcoin multiple times and I don't rule out them banning/unbanning it again, but I don't think it's likely.
This is the most ignorant, naive statement I could imagine. Ever heard of the Tiananmen Square massacre? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989You think the ChiComs care more about our impression of them than their sovereignty, you don't know them. If Bitcoin interferes with China's economic/monetary policy, they have the means motive and opportunity to stop us. If Bitcoin DOESN'T interfere with policy, then what's the fucking point? If Bitcoin is needed, it will be fought and possibly killed. If it is not needed, then it will probably die from lack of demand. This is why concentration of mining matters. A bunch of wacky double spends? What's the worst that could happen?
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:07:41 AM |
|
just to poke my head in real quick:
i've been absent from here for months. bitcoin xt? classic? gavin jumped ship? wtf is going on?!
and yet the price hasn't gone tits up... confused.
It's good news that crashes the price, not bad news. If ebay decides to start directly accepting bitcoin as a payment method the price will get crashed down to double digits the same day. Let's hope China bans bitcoin again because it will probably push the price to a new ATH. in a bear market, good news can only temporarily hold price from dropping in a bull market, bad news can only temporarily hold price from rising the markets reaction to the "news" is confirming we are in a bull market.
|
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:08:53 AM |
|
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour
You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you. woot! ok, if price hits >410 within 50mins you pay me 1$ if not i pay you 1$, bitstamps price. I was gonna say BFX, but Stamp works for me. Tic, tic, tic... ~20 mins left and i still need to see 1/2 1/4 million dollars get dumped on stamps.  double or nothing? for >410 in the next hour. Done!
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:10:20 AM |
|
ok if I can all get you mofos to buy 10 BTC right now i'd be halfway to getting my 1$ back.
|
|
|
|
|
arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:10:51 AM |
|
ok if I can all get you mofos to buy 10 BTC right now i'd be halfway to getting my 1$ back.
paypal me a few thousand and i'll be happy to. 
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:11:13 AM |
|
OMIGOD. Why wasn't I informed of this? I want Blockstream on the line right now for me refund. "There is general agreement in the Bitcoin community that the system must remain decentralized to prevent the possibility of any company or government controlling the currency." So we decentralize by putting three quarters of our mines in one government's jurisdiction? Why am I the only one apparently concerned by this? Everybody cool with Chinese government's hand on the kill switch? ... at which point a HF does become necessary and a new POW algorithm will be adopted, something more centralising-resistant. >"more centralising-resistant."  you know why mining is consolidating? (hint its not centralizing) It's because efficiencies in algorithm processing are being horded by the ASIC fabricators. As this technology democratizes (natural market competition) mining consolidation will biggin to diversify. It's a lack of understanding that leads to the mental shortcut that mining consolidation can be projected in a linear fashion until there is one cartel. Making the treat to choose a new PoW algorithm is an attack on the very incentive needed to motivate investment to grow and secure the network. I completely agree with this. What is needed is not less mines in China, But more mines outside of China. It should worry all of us that this isn't happening to any meaningful degree. Electrical power is 2 cents/kilowatthour in Eastern Washington, right outside of Microsoft's back door, so why are we letting the Chinese dominate mining? I'll tell you why: The few American chip makers in the space like 21 are indeed hoarding the chips. This is a huge mistake, because they are onboarding all the risk. Sell miners and make money or keep them and mine. And then double down again by keeping the coins instead of selling them. You may be good at speculating/trading You may be good at making ASICS You may be good at mining But the chances are infinitesimal that you can be good at all three very difficult, competitive and specialized skills. i hate to break it to you, but fear of the chinese government confiscating all the mining farm in order to attempt a 51% attack is an irrational fear. short of this highly fantastic sanario, i see no problem having majority of hashing power where the majority of poeple on earth live. Gmax is concerned that they own bitcoin, and bitcoin is controlled by 3 people, not that the government will try and confiscate there technology. he's delusional , but that's what he thinks, yes just 3 people! and if you question him your wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:11:29 AM |
|
ok if I can all get you mofos to buy 10 BTC right now i'd be halfway to getting my 1$ back.
but the blocks are full ... now what?
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:14:17 AM |
|
ok if I can all get you mofos to buy 10 BTC right now i'd be halfway to getting my 1$ back.
but the blocks are full ... now what? please focus on buying and ask questions later.
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4438
Merit: 14368
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:16:08 AM |
|
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour
You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you. woot! ok, if price hits >410 within 50mins you pay me 1$ if not i pay you 1$, bitstamps price. I was gonna say BFX, but Stamp works for me. Tic, tic, tic... ~20 mins left and i still need to see 1/2 1/4 million dollars get dumped on stamps.  double or nothing? for >410 in the next hour. Done! Hahahahahah... I think that this should be a decent example that bets can be small and reasonable in order to show that they are really serious.. rather than betting some bullshit high amount that requires some trust. As far as the bet itself, this may be one way for BJA to make some real money on his bitcoin bets... just keep doubling down, and possibly BJA will become rich.. when he stops at $1024, and requests that Adam pay up... hahahahahaha 
|
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:17:19 AM |
|
The Chinese government won't confiscate all the mining farms to do a 51% attack. It would give people a bad impression of them. If they were to take any action against bitcoin or the farms it would be to make mining illegal in China and outlawing the possession of bitcoins. They already banned/unbanned bitcoin multiple times and I don't rule out them banning/unbanning it again, but I don't think it's likely.
This is the most ignorant, naive statement I could imagine. Ever heard of the Tiananmen Square massacre? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989You think the ChiComs care more about our impression of them than their sovereignty, you don't know them. If Bitcoin interferes with China's economic/monetary policy, they have the means motive and opportunity to stop us. If Bitcoin DOESN'T interfere with policy, then what's the fucking point? If Bitcoin is needed, it will be fought and possibly killed. If it is not needed, then it will probably die from lack of demand. This is why concentration of mining matters. A bunch of wacky double spends? What's the worst that could happen? Um, I don't know, maybe send the same coins to twelve exchanges simultaneously and crash the price down to pennies? and then sell every NEW coin they mine to keep it there?
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4438
Merit: 14368
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
February 17, 2016, 01:17:19 AM |
|
ok if I can all get you mofos to buy 10 BTC right now i'd be halfway to getting my 1$ back.
Yeah,.... hahahahaha No one said that crowd sourcing would be cheating. Good luck with that. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|