Bitcoin Forum
August 01, 2025, 01:29:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 15203 15204 15205 15206 15207 15208 15209 15210 15211 15212 15213 15214 15215 15216 15217 15218 15219 15220 15221 15222 15223 15224 15225 15226 15227 15228 15229 15230 15231 15232 15233 15234 15235 15236 15237 15238 15239 15240 15241 15242 15243 15244 15245 15246 15247 15248 15249 15250 15251 15252 [15253] 15254 15255 15256 15257 15258 15259 15260 15261 15262 15263 15264 15265 15266 15267 15268 15269 15270 15271 15272 15273 15274 15275 15276 15277 15278 15279 15280 15281 15282 15283 15284 15285 15286 15287 15288 15289 15290 15291 15292 15293 15294 15295 15296 15297 15298 15299 15300 15301 15302 15303 ... 34779 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26817385 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 11, 2016, 05:48:32 PM

Have we destroyed the Satoshi coins yet? Just checking...

I've seen some recent discussion of such.. ..

Whoever came up with that....Huh

   Dumb idea...

If he really wanted there to have been confidence in the economics of a deflationary currency he ought to have done it himself. The fact he didn’t leads one to believe he wants the dough. And I suppose he’s entitled to it. Either way it’s an ungodly hoard of coins that’s impossible to ignore.

I don't think that's what the discussion is about.

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable. At that point, millions of BTC can be looted for the lolz by those having the tech to do it. The question is what can you do about it so that they can be moved to safety, locked, etc. Otherwise you'll have millions of BTC looted AND a PR fiasco like "ohhh Bitcoin got HACKED AND PEOPLE LOST THEIR MONEY!!! ITS UNSAFE, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES". So you have hackers dumping, people panicking, etc etc. It's a complex issue.
whored
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 05:51:05 PM

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable.

Whelp, that certainly puts my mind at rest Cheesy Seriously tho, isn't our money protected by maths and stuff? Wasn't that factually and scientifically proven and rhythmically guaranteed?

But if you say bitscoin doesn't scale and is easily h4xx0rable, I guess I'm all in (but u gotta promise not to hax9r me, K?)
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 11, 2016, 05:58:23 PM

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable.

Whelp, that certainly puts my mind at rest Cheesy Seriously tho, isn't our money protected by maths and stuff? Wasn't that factually and scientifically proven and rhythmically guaranteed?

It is a safe assumption that cryptography can be broken (at some future X point) so you just have an arms race where you upgrade your cryptography and move your coins to better cryptographic schemes when vulnerabilities appear - or ever earlier. In any case, preferably, before you get cracked Cheesy

It's no different for governments or banks really. You just have to be ahead of the game.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
May 11, 2016, 06:00:29 PM

Have we destroyed the Satoshi coins yet? Just checking...

I've seen some recent discussion of such.. ..

Whoever came up with that....Huh

   Dumb idea...

If he really wanted there to have been confidence in the economics of a deflationary currency he ought to have done it himself. The fact he didn’t leads one to believe he wants the dough. And I suppose he’s entitled to it. Either way it’s an ungodly hoard of coins that’s impossible to ignore.

I don't think that's what the discussion is about.

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable. At that point, millions of BTC can be looted for the lolz by those having the tech to do it. The question is what can you do about it so that they can be moved to safety, locked, etc. Otherwise you'll have millions of BTC looted AND a PR fiasco like "ohhh Bitcoin got HACKED AND PEOPLE LOST THEIR MONEY!!! ITS UNSAFE, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES". So you have hackers dumping, people panicking, etc etc. It's a complex issue.

I know there's a difference between hackers dumping stolen coins and Satoshi legitimately cashing out. But the difference will be cold comfort if you happen to be hodling at the time.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4158
Merit: 12614


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 06:24:10 PM

Have we destroyed the Satoshi coins yet? Just checking...

I've seen some recent discussion of such.. ..

Whoever came up with that....Huh

   Dumb idea...

If he really wanted there to have been confidence in the economics of a deflationary currency he ought to have done it himself. The fact he didn’t leads one to believe he wants the dough. And I suppose he’s entitled to it. Either way it’s an ungodly hoard of coins that’s impossible to ignore.

I don't think that's what the discussion is about.

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable. At that point, millions of BTC can be looted for the lolz by those having the tech to do it. The question is what can you do about it so that they can be moved to safety, locked, etc. Otherwise you'll have millions of BTC looted AND a PR fiasco like "ohhh Bitcoin got HACKED AND PEOPLE LOST THEIR MONEY!!! ITS UNSAFE, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES". So you have hackers dumping, people panicking, etc etc. It's a complex issue.

I know there's a difference between hackers dumping stolen coins and Satoshi legitimately cashing out. But the difference will be cold comfort if you happen to be hodling at the time.

There seems to be something wrong with the distinction you are attempting to make here, as if the impact is the same.

If we only consider the matter regarding the impact of dumping coins, then there is little to no difference; however, if we are talking about coin security that is a bit of a different scenario.. with potentially more justification.

Personally, it seems like a bad precedent to attempt to back protect security, and possibly, the only exception could be Satoshi's coins, since there is such a large quantity of coins that were mined in a relatively short (early) period of time... however, in the end, it seems to me to be the better practice to not attempt to acquire or freeze those coins, even if there is some kind of future security risk that may come to fruition. 

I will concede that when we discuss in terms of hackability, rather than dump effect, this is a much better and important discussion point in which reasonable people will likely differ.... and consensus based decisions here would be important, rather than any small group deciding how to proceed. 


TLDR:  In my opinion, mere dump effect of Satoshi's coins is not a sufficient reason to take action in freezing or protecting those coins; however, future hackability is potentially a sufficient reason - though I am still personally inclined to error on the side of leaving the coins as potentially fungible.... bitcoin is consensus based, so ultimately, changes to the status (or fungibility of those coins would be based on achieving consensus).


DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3104
Merit: 2007


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 06:33:11 PM

Have we destroyed the Satoshi coins yet? Just checking...

I've seen some recent discussion of such.. ..

Whoever came up with that....Huh

   Dumb idea...

If he really wanted there to have been confidence in the economics of a deflationary currency he ought to have done it himself. The fact he didn’t leads one to believe he wants the dough. And I suppose he’s entitled to it. Either way it’s an ungodly hoard of coins that’s impossible to ignore.

I don't think that's what the discussion is about.

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable. At that point, millions of BTC can be looted for the lolz by those having the tech to do it. The question is what can you do about it so that they can be moved to safety, locked, etc. Otherwise you'll have millions of BTC looted AND a PR fiasco like "ohhh Bitcoin got HACKED AND PEOPLE LOST THEIR MONEY!!! ITS UNSAFE, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES". So you have hackers dumping, people panicking, etc etc. It's a complex issue.

That call should be in the hands of the individual priv key owner and not some entity deciding that your coins are not safe enough so we'll just destroy them for you.
UngratefulTony
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 06:39:07 PM

Have we destroyed the Satoshi coins yet? Just checking...

I've seen some recent discussion of such.. ..

Whoever came up with that....Huh

   Dumb idea...

If he really wanted there to have been confidence in the economics of a deflationary currency he ought to have done it himself. The fact he didn’t leads one to believe he wants the dough. And I suppose he’s entitled to it. Either way it’s an ungodly hoard of coins that’s impossible to ignore.

I don't think that's what the discussion is about.

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable. At that point, millions of BTC can be looted for the lolz by those having the tech to do it. The question is what can you do about it so that they can be moved to safety, locked, etc. Otherwise you'll have millions of BTC looted AND a PR fiasco like "ohhh Bitcoin got HACKED AND PEOPLE LOST THEIR MONEY!!! ITS UNSAFE, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES". So you have hackers dumping, people panicking, etc etc. It's a complex issue.

That call should be in the hands of the individual priv key owner and not some entity deciding that your coins are not safe enough so we'll just destroy them for you.

Bbbbbut, it would only be trading one person's liberty for the security of a great many people... seems worth it.

Besides, it could be done with a soft fork.

Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2016, 06:49:02 PM

the world of Amir Taaki --> https://youtu.be/B9j9AXSwfjg

better times --> https://youtu.be/I-DVOYyx_6U
Blacula X
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 07:03:57 PM

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable.

Whelp, that certainly puts my mind at rest Cheesy Seriously tho, isn't our money protected by maths and stuff? Wasn't that factually and scientifically proven and rhythmically guaranteed?

It is a safe assumption that cryptography can be broken (at some future X point) so you just have an arms race where you upgrade your cryptography and move your coins to better cryptographic schemes when vulnerabilities appear - or ever earlier. In any case, preferably, before you get cracked Cheesy

It's no different for governments or banks really. You just have to be ahead of the game.

Oy! For this I left legacy finance? Cry
bitebits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2317
Merit: 3791


Flippin' burgers since 1163.


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 07:32:12 PM
Last edit: May 11, 2016, 09:01:16 PM by bitebits

If you truly believe that, and I believe you do + I am not saying you are wrong, why are you then still publicly trading for a few bucks profit per bitcoin? Is it the rush you are getting when the price runs away from you in either direction? Are you hedging against your own bullish judgement? This seems like a dangerous strategy believing what you are saying is sincere.

Yes, I attempted to make my above highlighted statement to be within what I really believe, and I framed my statement general enough that it is reflective of what I believe at the moment to be within reasonable possibilities.  

Contrary to what you seem to be asserting (or implying) bitebits, I don't see my BTC trading strategy to be contrary to my view that BTC prices have decent probabilities of reaching $25k to $250k within 5-10 years.  Decent probabilities can mean a lot of things including beliefs of anything between a 10% chance and a 90% chance [...]

Somehow to me, bitebits, I get the impression from your above comment that you believe that in order for me to be consistent with my views, I should be buying more and more BTC and even leveraging more in order to buy BTC because the present value of such a view (if I really believe it) would seem to dictate that I invest more financial resources into BTC.  

Really, I don't think so.

[...]  

I hope that makes sense to clear up what seems to be a kind of inconsistency in my position from your point of view.

By the way, in a nut shell, what are you doing in terms of attempting to prepare your BTC holdings in a way that you believe is consistent with your view of BTC's future and in light of your own financial circumstances?


Thanks for trying to explain JJG, appreciated. Not sure if I fully understand or agree though.

According to you own logic, even with your lowest estimate of a 10% chance on your lowest estimate of $25k per bitcoin, you should not be selling any bitcoin under 2500$. But I am not judging or telling you what to do, just noticed the inconstancy. Psychological it might be hard to not trade when you watch the price closely and have bitcoins / fiat on an exchange. Like Warren Buffett recently said during the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting: "A full wallet is like a full bladder — you may have the urge to pee it away very quickly".

My 'strategy' is simple since I have a certain percentage of my wealth invested in Bitcoin where I feel comfortable with. Don't care whether it's short term manipulated dollar value abruptly decreases or increases. Do care when I would lose bits in the trading process. When/if the dollar value of a single bitcoin gets >$2k I am probably forced to rebalance my portfolio, even though I share your believe that the future dollar value of a bitcoin is likely way higher.
var53
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 08:56:47 PM

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable.

Whelp, that certainly puts my mind at rest Cheesy Seriously tho, isn't our money protected by maths and stuff? Wasn't that factually and scientifically proven and rhythmically guaranteed?

It is a safe assumption that cryptography can be broken (at some future X point) so you just have an arms race where you upgrade your cryptography and move your coins to better cryptographic schemes when vulnerabilities appear - or ever earlier. In any case, preferably, before you get cracked Cheesy

It's no different for governments or banks really. You just have to be ahead of the game.

The speed of quantum computer development took the NSA and everyone else by surprise. Nobody thought Bitcoin's cryptography could be broken when Bitcoin was invented. The whole internet depends on that same type of cryptography, and quantum computers could break it.

There's a scramble to develop new quantum computer resistant cryptography now. Bitcoin will have to swap to it sooner or later, at which point a decision will need making about Satoshi's coins if he doesn't claim them by then.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 09:18:56 PM

Where does this 1 million coin figure come from? I've no doubt he has a ton but there are probably a few other people who aren't too far behind.

Sergio's analysis. There're several posts on his blog to read through.
whored
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 09:26:31 PM

There's a scramble to develop new quantum computer resistant cryptography now. Bitcoin will have to swap to it sooner or later, at which point a decision will need making about Satoshi's coins if he doesn't claim them by then.

>develop new quantum computer resistant cryptography
Huh, think we'll come to an agreement re. blocksize by then? Will the new algo work with Blockstream Lightning Network?

>a decision will need making about Satoshi's coins if he doesn't claim them by then.
I bet a decision is being made right now about your coins. Hurry up and find a new store of value before Thermos pockets protects it for you Cheesy
Ted E. Bare
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Bear with me


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 10:49:07 PM

Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown:
Only 60 more days!
whored
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 11:08:58 PM

Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown:
Only 60 more days!

t = (new algo => Manchurian Mining Rebellion Disaster => End_Of_Bitscoin) = 3110400 = 36 days Shocked

Seriously, with rumblings like https://news.bitcoin.com/theymos-bitcoins-satoshi-destroyed/
 and http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012652.html , I just don't understand why no one is panicking Undecided

http://s32.postimg.org/wwzuhongl/Capture.jpg
http://s32.postimg.org/qxc3e12o5/luke.png
http://s32.postimg.org/v7vcncx51/look.png


Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012



View Profile
May 11, 2016, 11:23:46 PM

LFC_Bitcoin
Diamond Hands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3976
Merit: 11729


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 11:25:30 PM

Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown:
Only 60 more days!

Getting very close, I hope to see fireworks post halving Smiley
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012



View Profile
May 11, 2016, 11:32:41 PM



Need fuel.

OK, i find it.

whored
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2016, 11:37:44 PM

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4158
Merit: 12614


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
May 12, 2016, 12:02:11 AM
Last edit: May 12, 2016, 05:52:01 AM by JayJuanGee

If you truly believe that, and I believe you do + I am not saying you are wrong, why are you then still publicly trading for a few bucks profit per bitcoin? Is it the rush you are getting when the price runs away from you in either direction? Are you hedging against your own bullish judgement? This seems like a dangerous strategy believing what you are saying is sincere.

Yes, I attempted to make my above highlighted statement to be within what I really believe, and I framed my statement general enough that it is reflective of what I believe at the moment to be within reasonable possibilities.  

Contrary to what you seem to be asserting (or implying) bitebits, I don't see my BTC trading strategy to be contrary to my view that BTC prices have decent probabilities of reaching $25k to $250k within 5-10 years.  Decent probabilities can mean a lot of things including beliefs of anything between a 10% chance and a 90% chance [...]

Somehow to me, bitebits, I get the impression from your above comment that you believe that in order for me to be consistent with my views, I should be buying more and more BTC and even leveraging more in order to buy BTC because the present value of such a view (if I really believe it) would seem to dictate that I invest more financial resources into BTC.  

Really, I don't think so.

[...]  

I hope that makes sense to clear up what seems to be a kind of inconsistency in my position from your point of view.

By the way, in a nut shell, what are you doing in terms of attempting to prepare your BTC holdings in a way that you believe is consistent with your view of BTC's future and in light of your own financial circumstances?


Thanks for trying to explain JJG, appreciated. Not sure if I fully understand or agree though.

I am not sure how to respond further, except maybe by providing a bit of an illustration.

Each of us are going to have to attempt to tailor, as best as we can, to our own expectations and views, and there may be a range of reasonable strategy outcomes, and certainly, some strategy outcomes may prove to work out better than others, but merely because one strategy plays out better than another strategy, that does not necessarily mean that the poorer performing strategy was less reasonable or worse.. only means that the person choosing the worse performing strategy had considered that strategy to be best for his circumstances based on the information that he had at his disposal at the time of the choosing.   And, yeah, we can attempt to learn and adjust our strategies, and I certainly am not opposed to adjusting, if I conclude that adjusting would be the most prudent route for me.

O.k.  let me give you a bit of a description of my trading approach, how it has been playing out in recent months.  I generally attempt to have enough cash in order to buy at least 20% down, if the price were to completely crash in that downward direction.  Usually, such a 20% crash does not happen all at once, so frequently there are going to be ways to preserve enough cash fiat value to be able to buy with even a larger crash.

Currently, as I type, here is exactly my distribution and amounts of buys and sells, as if (hypothetically) I had 100 Bitcoin (approximate current value $45,200) plus about $1,520 in fiat (with about 96.7% of the total in bitcoin and 3.3% in cash) (therefore total value of hypothetical BTC portfolio of $46,720).

I buy on the way down and sell on the way up.


Down for 5% looks approximately like this:

BuyPrice   BTC_tobuy           $Amt_ToBuy

$423.00   0.20263425   $85.71
$426.00   0.20120724   $85.71
$429.00   0.19980020   $85.71
$432.00   0.19841270   $85.71
$435.00   0.19704433   $85.71
$438.00   0.19569472   $85.71
$441.00   0.19436346   $85.71
$443.00   0.19348597   $85.71
$444.50   0.19283304   $85.71
$446.00   0.19218450   $85.71
$447.50   0.19154030   $85.71
$449.00   0.19090041   $85.71


Up for 5% looks approximately like this:

SellPrice   BTC_toSell           $amt_toSell
      
$453.50   0.15750512   $71.43
$455.50   0.18817626   $85.71
$457.50   0.18735363   $85.71
$459.50   0.24871755   $114.29
$462.00   0.24737168   $114.29
$464.50   0.24604029   $114.29
$467.00   0.24472316   $114.29
$469.50   0.24342005   $114.29
$472.00   0.24213075   $114.29
$474.50   0.24085504   $114.29
$477.00   0.23959269   $114.29
$479.50   0.23834351   $114.29


According to you own logic, even with your lowest estimate of a 10% chance on your lowest estimate of $25k per bitcoin, you should not be selling any bitcoin under 2500$.


Even though I am trading, tentatively, I plan to keep buying (without completely cashing out) until at least $2,000.  My plans could change; however, if my viewpoint changes.




But I am not judging or telling you what to do, just noticed the inconstancy.


I really don't think that it is inconsistent, especially, since I am selling such a low percentage just to protect myself a bit more from downside movements, which seem nearly inevitable in bitcoinlandia.

Psychological it might be hard to not trade when you watch the price closely and have bitcoins / fiat on an exchange. Like Warren Buffett recently said during the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting: "A full wallet is like a full bladder — you may have the urge to pee it away very quickly".

I think that I am being more strategic than emotional regarding whether I feel that I have to buy or have to sell.  I think actually going through the process of trading also helps to learn and to exercise more self control regarding what to do under a variety of circumstances (putting the theory to practice, so to speak)..


My 'strategy' is simple since I have a certain percentage of my wealth invested in Bitcoin where I feel comfortable with. Don't care whether it's short term manipulated dollar value abruptly decreases or increases.


In nearly my first two years of buying bitcoins, I believe that my strategy was merely to accumulate; however, I feel much more protected (my total BTC portfolio) after I have been both buying and selling.



Do care when I would lose bits in the trading process.


Surely, no system is completely fool proof, and I have had several instances where I may have attempted to time the market, to get greedy or to just do too much at one time, and then I put myself in a bit of an awkward position because of my rashness.  

Nonetheless, I think that overall, my BTC portfolio has profited considerably from my somewhat measured approach.  In that regard, I have increased my BTC holdings, brought down my average cost per BTC, accumulated a considerable amount of fiat (within my BTC trading portfolio) to hedge somewhat in preparation for downward price movements.


When/if the dollar value of a single bitcoin gets >$2k I am probably forced to rebalance my portfolio, even though I share your believe that the future dollar value of a bitcoin is likely way higher.

You have seen rpietila's thread on Sane Simple Savings...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345065.0

Well, maybe it is a bit much to use sane and rpietila in the same sentence, but his thread gave me quite a few ideas, and probably, I should create my own thread to show how I have improved upon it... .well at least tailored some of the ideas to my own considerations.







Pages: « 1 ... 15203 15204 15205 15206 15207 15208 15209 15210 15211 15212 15213 15214 15215 15216 15217 15218 15219 15220 15221 15222 15223 15224 15225 15226 15227 15228 15229 15230 15231 15232 15233 15234 15235 15236 15237 15238 15239 15240 15241 15242 15243 15244 15245 15246 15247 15248 15249 15250 15251 15252 [15253] 15254 15255 15256 15257 15258 15259 15260 15261 15262 15263 15264 15265 15266 15267 15268 15269 15270 15271 15272 15273 15274 15275 15276 15277 15278 15279 15280 15281 15282 15283 15284 15285 15286 15287 15288 15289 15290 15291 15292 15293 15294 15295 15296 15297 15298 15299 15300 15301 15302 15303 ... 34779 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!