becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
September 17, 2016, 12:40:56 AM |
|
This tx has such a low fee that it is basically treated as tx spam and deserves to never be confirmed. What wallet are you using?
|
|
|
|
VC George
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Carpe noctem
|
|
September 17, 2016, 12:56:48 AM |
|
This tx has such a low fee that it is basically treated as tx spam and deserves to never be confirmed. What wallet are you using? It's just a regular payment from Purse.io and was sent to blockchain.info Since this never happened before (I've cashed out more than 95 BTC from them) I'll just bash them if it doesn't get confirmed and they will send another one or something. G night and ty for all the answers
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
September 17, 2016, 12:59:37 AM |
|
[edited out]
.......The $66 value, or whatev, has absolutely zero impact on the priority of a transaction, JJG might be surprised to hear. [/quote] Why do you seem to feel some kind of insecurity in that you want to try to battle with me regarding some point that I did not make? For your edumacation, BMBG, that's referred to as a strawman argument, which by definition is a creature of your own creation. I would like to point out, however, that frequently folks raise the issue of transaction amount and fee amount in the same sentence in order to clarify the current fee situation within bitcoin in which, as you pointed out BMBG, largely the fee amounts are not synchronized with the transaction amount - and so a transaction will receive a very similar levels of priority in processing based on the pure fee amount (which could be anywhere between $.02 and $.20), yet the value of of the transaction could be $66 or $66,000 .. yet people still like to disclose the value of the transaction in order to consider the value of the bitcoin network and to compare fees that may exist in mainstream fiat institutions or some kinds of attempts to electronically transmit value outside of mainstream fiat institutions.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:03:52 AM |
|
This tx has such a low fee that it is basically treated as tx spam and deserves to never be confirmed. What wallet are you using? That's a bit harsh to suggest that "no fee" transactions should "never" be confirmed. Maybe sometime in the future bitcoin will evolve to such a state in which no fee transactions are not confirmed, yet at this point, that seems to be a long way into the future.
|
|
|
|
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:56:06 AM |
|
This tx has such a low fee that it is basically treated as tx spam and deserves to never be confirmed. What wallet are you using? That's a bit harsh to suggest that "no fee" transactions should "never" be confirmed. Maybe sometime in the future bitcoin will evolve to such a state in which no fee transactions are not confirmed, yet at this point, that seems to be a long way into the future. i wonder when was the last 0fee TX that was confirmed ( and not generated by the miner himself ) anyway... 1cent isn't half bad for 226 bytes... considering 5cents for 226 bytes TX is high priority 1 cents doesn't "deserves to never be confirmed"
|
|
|
|
beastmodeBiscuitGravy
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:57:51 AM |
|
.......The $66 value, or whatev, has absolutely zero impact on the priority of a transaction, JJG might be surprised to hear.
Why do you seem to feel some kind of insecurity in that you want to try to battle with me regarding some point that I did not make? For your edumacation, BMBG, that's referred to as a strawman argument, which by definition is a creature of your own creation. I would like to point out, however, that frequently folks raise the issue of transaction amount and fee amount in the same sentence in order to clarify the current fee situation within bitcoin in which, as you pointed out BMBG, largely the fee amounts are not synchronized with the transaction amount - and so a transaction will receive a very similar levels of priority in processing based on the pure fee amount (which could be anywhere between $.02 and $.20), yet the value of of the transaction could be $66 or $66,000 .. yet people still like to disclose the value of the transaction in order to consider the value of the bitcoin network and to compare fees that may exist in mainstream fiat institutions or some kinds of attempts to electronically transmit value outside of mainstream fiat institutions. Go home JJG, ur drunk. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=994.msg12168#msg12168
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:36:35 AM |
|
Nice cup and handle
800 soon
|
|
|
|
pennywise
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2016, 07:20:54 AM Last edit: September 17, 2016, 09:54:39 AM by pennywise |
|
Hmmmm This really looks like it. May your words be true! https://snag.gy/Idl7Vz.jpg
|
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
|
September 17, 2016, 10:05:22 AM |
|
It's pretty quiet nowadays...
|
|
|
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:08:50 PM |
|
Buttcoin is dead. Long live <insert shitcoin you want to hype here>.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:37:43 PM |
|
This tx has such a low fee that it is basically treated as tx spam and deserves to never be confirmed. What wallet are you using? That's a bit harsh to suggest that "no fee" transactions should "never" be confirmed. Maybe sometime in the future bitcoin will evolve to such a state in which no fee transactions are not confirmed, yet at this point, that seems to be a long way into the future. i wonder when was the last 0fee TX that was confirmed ( and not generated by the miner himself ) anyway... 1cent isn't half bad for 226 bytes... considering 5cents for 226 bytes TX is high priority 1 cents doesn't "deserves to never be confirmed" My understanding is that zero fee transactions are confirmed on a daily basis. Those transactions just have the lowest priority - You could even perform a test of this, and I am pretty sure that these days your zero fee transaction has a decent chance of going through within 24 hours. I have done such test zero fee transactions myself, but I must admit that it has been several months since I last sent a zero fee transaction...
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:44:25 PM |
|
.......The $66 value, or whatev, has absolutely zero impact on the priority of a transaction, JJG might be surprised to hear.
Why do you seem to feel some kind of insecurity in that you want to try to battle with me regarding some point that I did not make? For your edumacation, BMBG, that's referred to as a strawman argument, which by definition is a creature of your own creation. I would like to point out, however, that frequently folks raise the issue of transaction amount and fee amount in the same sentence in order to clarify the current fee situation within bitcoin in which, as you pointed out BMBG, largely the fee amounts are not synchronized with the transaction amount - and so a transaction will receive a very similar levels of priority in processing based on the pure fee amount (which could be anywhere between $.02 and $.20), yet the value of of the transaction could be $66 or $66,000 .. yet people still like to disclose the value of the transaction in order to consider the value of the bitcoin network and to compare fees that may exist in mainstream fiat institutions or some kinds of attempts to electronically transmit value outside of mainstream fiat institutions. Go home JJG, ur drunk. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=994.msg12168#msg12168Thanks for your historical reference and your attempt at an appeal to authority, yet what does your linked reference have to do with my discussion of the matter and various points that I made? Like I suggested before, you seem to be a bit deluded and you do not seem to be tawking in dee engwish... Can you splain a bit regarding what you are talking about and how it relates to any of my recent posts?
|
|
|
|
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
|
September 17, 2016, 08:47:10 PM |
|
Chinese overlords are ready for many green dildos... :3
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 17, 2016, 09:44:38 PM |
|
This is how you Bitcoin: (I had to make this picture for MatTheMat)
|
|
|
|
|
savetherainforest
|
|
September 18, 2016, 07:59:23 AM Last edit: September 18, 2016, 09:07:13 AM by savetherainforest |
|
This is just unpleasing... and the silence is unbearable! *Edit: ... Look! Look! .. stuff is happening!!.. *Edit2: ... Nope!... too slow... nothing special..
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 18, 2016, 09:06:59 AM |
|
you all ded ?
|
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
|
September 18, 2016, 09:09:54 AM |
|
i'm alive and kicking. everyone is poised with their rocket or train crash gifs ready to unleash if there's a direction on the horizon. maybe they're gonna have a long wait.
|
|
|
|
savetherainforest
|
|
September 18, 2016, 09:10:48 AM |
|
you all ded ?
everyone is "ded!" ... (check out later... most of them are sleeping now... its night in their timezones & stuff)
|
|
|
|
|