bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3029
Merit: 2930
$220000 in one hour confirmed
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 12:25:34 PM |
|
So if this is true then it's possible to hack/crack a Trezor?  I'm not so sure having such a physical device is actually a good idea regardless. You can be sure that anyone you see owning a Trezor has probably got crypto. Just a random dude with a computer not necessarily so /most probably not. the exploit only affects old firmware apparently
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6920
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 12:27:52 PM |
|
So if this is true then it's possible to hack/crack a Trezor?  I'm not so sure having such a physical device is actually a good idea regardless. You can be sure that anyone you see owning a Trezor has probably got crypto. Just a random dude with a computer not necessarily so /most probably not. They fixed that hole in f/w ver. 1.5.2. As for the potential for future holes, it's always going to be there. It's still far better than a paper wallet though. With a paper wallet everything is out in the open, just a photo of your private key QR code and your coins are lost. With a TREZOR a thief needs to jump through many hoops to have some hope of getting to your keys. It took that guy 1.5 years to get access to his coins.
|
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1772
Self made HODLER ✓
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:07:54 PM |
|
So if this is true then it's possible to hack/crack a Trezor?  I'm not so sure having such a physical device is actually a good idea regardless. You can be sure that anyone you see owning a Trezor has probably got crypto. Just a random dude with a computer not necessarily so /most probably not. A physical attack against the device will always be possible with more or less complexity and cost of exploit. In this instance it was somewhat simple to extract the SRAM contents but anyway it required physical access to the device. It has since been hardened in newer firmwares. If you are completely paranoid about your coins, just add a passphrase that will derive the stored keywords into a completely different private key which is NOT stored any where in the device. No physical attack possible in that case. Also, there is no need for anyone to see you own a Trezor, same as there is no need for anyone to know you have paperwallets stored somewhere in your premises.
|
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1359
Merit: 2457
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:09:49 PM |
|
So if this is true then it's possible to hack/crack a Trezor?  I'm not so sure having such a physical device is actually a good idea regardless. You can be sure that anyone you see owning a Trezor has probably got crypto. Just a random dude with a computer not necessarily so /most probably not. They fixed that hole in f/w ver. 1.5.2. As for the potential for future holes, it's always going to be there. It's still far better than a paper wallet though. With a paper wallet everything is out in the open, just a photo of your private key QR code and your coins are lost. With a TREZOR a thief needs to jump through many hoops to have some hope of getting to your keys. It took that guy 1.5 years to get access to his coins. I'm very happy with my ledger nano s. It would wipe the device after the 3rd failed PIN attempt. Also there is no known exploit (fixed or unfixed) right now unlike trezor 
|
|
|
|
|
|
PORN_coin
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:11:56 PM |
|
I can assume that everyone thinks that the rate will be above 6000 
|
|
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:12:41 PM |
|
I'm very happy with my ledger nano s. It would wipe the device after the 3rd failed PIN attempt. Also there is no known exploit (fixed or unfixed) right now unlike trezor  i'm wondering why the trezor gets so much more bad publicity than the ledger. there must be exploits but you never hear about them. either they're killing hackers off or it is the perfect device.
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6920
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:18:50 PM |
|
So if this is true then it's possible to hack/crack a Trezor?  I'm not so sure having such a physical device is actually a good idea regardless. You can be sure that anyone you see owning a Trezor has probably got crypto. Just a random dude with a computer not necessarily so /most probably not. They fixed that hole in f/w ver. 1.5.2. As for the potential for future holes, it's always going to be there. It's still far better than a paper wallet though. With a paper wallet everything is out in the open, just a photo of your private key QR code and your coins are lost. With a TREZOR a thief needs to jump through many hoops to have some hope of getting to your keys. It took that guy 1.5 years to get access to his coins. I'm very happy with my ledger nano s. It would wipe the device after the 3rd failed PIN attempt. Also there is no known exploit (fixed or unfixed) right now unlike trezor  The Ledger Nano S is a good choice. But this thing you mentioned about the device wiping itself after the 3rd failed PIN attempt would have me worried... What if you temporarily can't recall the PIN and you've lost the seed? You'll then lose access to your coins forever, even if you later remember the PIN. If that guy in the Wired story had a Ledger Nano S he would have lost access to his coins forever. I think the way TREZOR deals with the PIN is smarter and gives the owner the chance to try several times, with a geometrically increasing delay between retries, to the point where at some point it essentially locks him out.
|
|
|
|
|
European Central Bank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:20:05 PM |
|
What if you temporarily can't recall the PIN and you've lost the seed?
then you're stupid and you deserve to lose the coins. you shouldn't put one satoshi into it until your seed is backed up to hell and back.
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6920
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:23:25 PM |
|
What if you temporarily can't recall the PIN and you've lost the seed?
then you're stupid and you deserve to lose the coins. you shouldn't put one satoshi into it until your seed is backed up to hell and back. Well, the part about backing up the seed I fully agree with, but temporarily forgetting the PIN can happen, even to the smartest people.
|
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1359
Merit: 2457
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:24:58 PM |
|
I'm very happy with my ledger nano s. It would wipe the device after the 3rd failed PIN attempt. Also there is no known exploit (fixed or unfixed) right now unlike trezor  The Ledger Nano S is a good choice. But this thing you mentioned about the device wiping itself after the 3rd failed PIN attempt would have me worried... What if you temporarily can't recall the PIN and you've lost the seed? You'll then lose access to your coins forever, even if you later remember the PIN. If that guy in the Wired story had a Ledger Nano S he would have lost access to his coins. I think the way TREZOR deals with the PIN is smarter and gives the owner the chance to try several times, with a geometrically increasing delay between retries, to the point where at some point it essentially locks him out. That's true. if PIN and seed are lost, the coins on the device can not be recovered. I hope ledger will release an update and let the user chose his preferred type of PIN security.
|
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1359
Merit: 2457
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:26:03 PM |
|
What if you temporarily can't recall the PIN and you've lost the seed?
then you're stupid and you deserve to lose the coins. you shouldn't put one satoshi into it until your seed is backed up to hell and back. Well, the part about backing up the seed I fully agree with, but temporarily forgetting the PIN can happen, even to the smartest people. if you forget the pin, recover the device with your seed and chose a new pin 
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6920
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:35:06 PM |
|
What if you temporarily can't recall the PIN and you've lost the seed?
then you're stupid and you deserve to lose the coins. you shouldn't put one satoshi into it until your seed is backed up to hell and back. Well, the part about backing up the seed I fully agree with, but temporarily forgetting the PIN can happen, even to the smartest people. if you forget the pin, recover the device with your seed and chose a new pin  Well, this is an advantage of the Ledger (stricter security), so long as one makes absolutely sure he can have access to the seed (which he/she should). TREZOR gives you a few more chances (for a while), then shuts you out.
|
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3080
Merit: 6920
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 01:39:16 PM |
|
I want to post a CCMF meme, but can't (because of the slight drop).
Come on BTC...
|
|
|
|
|
Arriemoller
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1830
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 02:05:56 PM |
|
It always works: I sell a bit-dime and the price skyrockets as a result.
Maybe I should start a donation wallet: Donate bitpennies to me, I'll sell it, and the price will skyrocket as a result.
Thoughts?
For me it's the opposite, every time I buy the price goes down.
|
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1359
Merit: 2457
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 02:07:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabiorem
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 02:43:35 PM |
|
Its dead. And I here thinking the floor would be $6000 by now...
|
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4690
Merit: 6165
You're never too old to think young.
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 04:43:55 PM |
|
A late and slightly hungover good morning Bitcoinland.
I see we're still over $6k despite the profit-taking/correction following yesterday's ATH... currently $6075USD/$7804CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
AltCash slipped a bit as well at $451USD/$578CAD (Coinmarketcap).
It would be nice if $6k was the new bottom but I'm not counting on that quite yet. Getting over $8kCAD was fun yesterday though. It's another milestone. This time last year we were looking forward to just getting back to $1k.
What a difference a year makes. Go Bitcoin go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 04:53:28 PM |
|
ATH @ Kraken!
5311 €
Diz iz gentlemen!
False start to this rally, perhaps? 24 hours more of engine revving needed? Already broken! 5335 € now... I can't explain it, I just enjoy it... Great!!!! Wonderful!!!! But that is not the point of my question which may have been a slightly different topic regarding our seemingly pending and imminent rally, whether it is going to happen now, or take a bit longer to commence? Are we going to get to $6800 in the coming day or two or will it take us until next week before we arrive there? pfmpf, so little time, so much to do . . . C´m on bitcoin, do something Joking aside, i´m for a slow and steady rise, otherwise we´ll come into the radar of goverments, and such, to quickly. But we´ll have to step on some toes anyway, on the way.
|
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 05:24:35 PM |
|
The slower it goes up right now, the more bullish it will be later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
soullyG
|
 |
October 30, 2017, 05:30:21 PM |
|
The slower it goes up right now, the more bullish it will be later.
Exactly, even if we drop to $5k now it's still bullish as fuck because we're establishing support for extra fuel on the next rise 
|
|
|
|
|
|