hisslyness
|
|
October 17, 2021, 11:16:18 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Go buy a blow farm and a hooker farm. Now we're talking! I once knew a guy that started his own brothel.. He became pretty successful.. He was such a hard working go getter, he ran the place by hand until he could get enough employees.. Crap! I just imagined him running around helping out.... jerking guys off!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:01:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7858
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:12:43 AM |
|
Oh gawd... you are amazing.. if you do not say so ur lil selfie. I know u guys love bitcoin. But it's flawed. U can't love math, it's just math. It's like loving a rock. Or those rock NFT jpgs. You can love math. To say that you can't love math is tantamount to admitting you don't understand math. As a kid they gave us a math text book in first grade. It had the work in it from sept 1962 to June 1963. I loved math so much that I finish all the chapters with all the problems by October 1st. Back in the day there were no calculators so multiplication tables were supposed to be memorized from 1 x 1 up to 12 x 12 a grid that was 12 by 12. once I memorized it I made a multiplication table from 1 x 1 to 20 x 20 and memorized it. So yeah math lovers do exist . Now to defend savetherainforest i suspect BTC will have issues of scaling and shit coins will always be here. But what do I know not much.
|
|
|
|
UnDerDoG81
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2179
Merit: 1201
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:15:38 AM |
|
Gotta love those little flash crashes.
Especially if you have PTSD after 8 years of Bitcoin holding
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2119
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:21:49 AM |
|
As a kid they gave us a math text book in first grade. It had the work in it from sept 1962 to June 1963. I loved math so much that I finish all the chapters with all the problems by October 1st.
We had a book called "7 a day" with 7 problems in each section. I'd usually run through multiple sections each lesson and then they put me in the "8 a day" book. I learned then that hard work is often rewarded only by more hard work. The teacher would also chastise me for not showing my workings but to me, there were no workings in something like 42/7. Back in the day there were no calculators so multiplication tables were supposed to be memorized from 1 x 1 up to 12 x 12
a grid that was 12 by 12.
once I memorized it I made a multiplication table from 1 x 1 to 20 x 20 and memorized it.
Yep, we had those. For some reason I had a blind spot for 7x7. Long since remedied, of course. Once you get beyond the 12x12 table, you can usually work them out in your head pretty quickly but nothing wrong with a bit of memorization.
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:34:51 AM |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:37:48 AM |
|
Back in the day there were no calculators so multiplication tables were supposed to be memorized from 1 x 1 up to 12 x 12
a grid that was 12 by 12.
We had classroom contests to complete the worksheet fastest. The speed of my handwriting was the limiting factor in how fast I could complete it.
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:41:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 2494
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:41:28 AM Merited by BobLawblaw (1) |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
Probably. I just look at Rachel Riley's ass whilst she solves it.
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 2239
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:42:06 AM |
|
Got to say I'm a bit disappointed: We just closed the weekly ATH a few minutes ago, are at 62,500 and there is not one picture of a train anywhere on this forum.
What happened?
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2119
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:42:08 AM |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
Yes, I found the same thing. It looks weird but that's because the optimizations I made in my head were not the same as the way I was taught to do it on paper.
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2119
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:45:36 AM |
|
We had classroom contests to complete the worksheet fastest. The speed of my handwriting was the limiting factor in how fast I could complete it.
Ever do that one where the first instruction is to read all the questions and the last question is to ignore all those other questions, write your name on the sheet and then do nothing else? I made myself look like a high-speed jackass on that one. No regrets though
|
|
|
|
savetherainforest
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:47:35 AM |
|
Got to say I'm a bit disappointed: We just closed the weekly ATH a few minutes ago, are at 62,500 and there is not one picture of a train anywhere on this forum.
What happened?
There will be more enthusiasm at $70K.
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
October 18, 2021, 12:49:24 AM |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
Probably. I just look at Rachel Riley's ass whilst she solves it. ... how much btc to clone Rachel Riley? (asking for a friend)
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 2494
|
|
October 18, 2021, 01:00:10 AM |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
Probably. I just look at Rachel Riley's ass whilst she solves it. ... how much btc to clone Rachel Riley? (asking for a friend) 2000*66/100+1 BTC Though the Rachel Riley clone will probably behave like the real thing and leave you for an expert Russian male dancer as soon as she gets the chance.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
October 18, 2021, 01:01:24 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
October 18, 2021, 01:02:28 AM |
|
what time does this weekly candle close?
Yall say closing above $60k would be a big deal, not that i really think that, but it looks like its about to..
Does it close on sunday?
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7858
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 18, 2021, 01:06:00 AM |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
yep same way for me. I am not as sharp as I used to be but I can do 1x1 to 99 x99 exactly the way you said. when young I could do 1x1 to 999 x 999 with that method about as fast as you could punch the numbers in on a calculator. But life moved on and in my teen to twenties far too much weed and psychedelics shifted me into other pursuits than math. Now at 64 still like it along with pc’s and gear tinkering. If I did not know better I would say BTC was built for me to expand my wealth and my consciousness kind of a perfect thing. Almost dreamlike and too good to be true. damn buddy with a power lift to 62k+ damn
|
|
|
|
Sayeds56
Copper Member
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 708
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
|
|
October 18, 2021, 01:15:51 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Arriemoller
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
|
|
October 18, 2021, 01:28:35 AM |
|
Common core math..
I think it’s rediculous how they try to teach solving math like that in the first place, but when I look at common core teachings it is like the processes I use to do math in my head..
132X50?
(132/2)100=66x100=6600 <in my head
Does that make sense?
I hate math, I do 132x100=13200/2=6600
|
|
|
|
|