[ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!

[romasalah]

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs

[1714197216]

1714197216

[1714197216]

1714197216

[1714197216]

1714197216

[1714197216]

1714197216

[1714197216]

1714197216

[pallas]

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs

The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

[romasalah]

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs

The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

Not that I can think of. when I start it, the splash screen says "loading block index". I leave it in the background, then it gives that error after a while. btw, the client worked before and downloaded the transactions.

[pallas]

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs

The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

Not that I can think of. when I start it, the splash screen says "loading block index". I leave it in the background, then it gives that error after a while. btw, the client worked before and downloaded the transactions.

Then probably the block db got corrupted for some reason.
Try running with "-resync" or use a blockchain snapshot, as in the first post.

[HamiltonWDS]

And.... the pool is down.

which pool? suprnova is still working. have you managed to create one?

It was Suprnova, and the dashboard was reflecting no workers.
I had spent a few hours doing upgrades and wanting to do some testing... which didn't have good timing with the pool being down.
But fortunately was back up.

Still haven't finished completing a new pool as of yet.

[HamiltonWDS]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

[romasalah]

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs

The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

Not that I can think of. when I start it, the splash screen says "loading block index". I leave it in the background, then it gives that error after a while. btw, the client worked before and downloaded the transactions.

Then probably the block db got corrupted for some reason.
Try running with "-resync" or use a blockchain snapshot, as in the first post.

Thanks, it worked after using the snapshot

[e6ug]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans 

[romasalah]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans 

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

[pallas]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

Yes, I think it´s mostly cpu time. Surely the code can be improved to make it faster. It´s one of the bounties.
For the pool, the limitation is the same.
I don´t think the qt version makes a difference: I would use the headless version on a server anyways.
Paper wallet: you still need a wallet running, to check the blocks and broadcast them on the network.

[pallas]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans 

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

with the current network hashrate, I guess some days.

[w03038817l]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans 

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

with the current network hashrate, I guess some days.

Thank you for doing the job for xcn

[e6ug]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

i found 6 in 24 hours half of witch were orpan.  210 mh/s

[HamiltonWDS]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

Yes, I think it´s mostly cpu time. Surely the code can be improved to make it faster. It´s one of the bounties.
For the pool, the limitation is the same.
I don´t think the qt version makes a difference: I would use the headless version on a server anyways.
Paper wallet: you still need a wallet running, to check the blocks and broadcast them on the network.

Hummm...
Sorry if this comes across as a dumb question, but could a possibility exist for the wallet be coded to use the GPU's, much like miners?
If possible, I think could open up solo mining to become quite popular.

[gnasirator]

Thanks pallas, I managed to get it imported and it seems to work.
Great! Gifting time

Btw, just tested trading on btc38 - but btc trading was suspended. I think I read about that a while ago here already.
So there's no place to trade it really atm?

Does anyone have connections to maybe an english speaking exchange? I think we need a better option here.

[HamiltonWDS]

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

i found 6 in 24 hours half of witch were orpan.  210 mh/s

Why not, I'll give it a shot. I'm only at 100 MH/s with miners for now (with block message having "net" being displayed at 15 GH/s), so see if that comes at 50% (or less ... or more... who knows...)

[HamiltonWDS]

Thanks pallas, I managed to get it imported and it seems to work.
Great! Gifting time

Btw, just tested trading on btc38 - but btc trading was suspended. I think I read about that a while ago here already.
So there's no place to trade it really atm?

Does anyone have connections to maybe an english speaking exchange? I think we need a better option here.

There is Nova Exchange, but has low volume currently.
https://novaexchange.com/market/BTC_XCN/

[pallas]

Thanks pallas, I managed to get it imported and it seems to work.
Great! Gifting time

Btw, just tested trading on btc38 - but btc trading was suspended. I think I read about that a while ago here already.
So there's no place to trade it really atm?

Does anyone have connections to maybe an english speaking exchange? I think we need a better option here.

Btc38 stopped all btc pairs.
But, you can always trade using the cny pair + btc/cny.

[romasalah]

I don't know if  Solomining would solve this discrepancy between expectations and actual rewards. I'd like to try it. I was trying to find out what the block reward is but the only info I got was 200 XCN from whattomine.com. I'm not sure if it is up to date though.

[valth]

the pool is down again I think