Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2018, 04:13:29 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 171 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!  (Read 166127 times)
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
July 01, 2017, 10:29:40 AM
 #1421

Back to the point.  How big is the blockchain on disk as of today?

Just have a look at the full snapshots in the first post.
But, if you start a new wallet, the data size will be a lot smaller, because of the mini-blockchain technology.

1516335209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516335209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516335209
Reply with quote  #2

1516335209
Report to moderator
1516335209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516335209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516335209
Reply with quote  #2

1516335209
Report to moderator
1516335209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516335209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516335209
Reply with quote  #2

1516335209
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1516335209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516335209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516335209
Reply with quote  #2

1516335209
Report to moderator
1516335209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516335209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516335209
Reply with quote  #2

1516335209
Report to moderator
1516335209
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516335209

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516335209
Reply with quote  #2

1516335209
Report to moderator
romasalah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
July 01, 2017, 11:58:34 AM
 #1422

And.... the pool is down.

which pool? suprnova is still working. have you managed to create one?
xibeijan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


View Profile
July 01, 2017, 01:33:07 PM
 #1423

Back to the point.  How big is the blockchain on disk as of today?

Just have a look at the full snapshots in the first post.
But, if you start a new wallet, the data size will be a lot smaller, because of the mini-blockchain technology.

Just would like to know without installing it.  I've always been interested in this project.

romasalah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
July 01, 2017, 08:18:38 PM
 #1424

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs


pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
July 01, 2017, 08:25:17 PM
 #1425

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs




The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

romasalah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
July 01, 2017, 08:42:41 PM
 #1426

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs




The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

Not that I can think of. when I start it, the splash screen says "loading block index". I leave it in the background, then it gives that error after a while. btw, the client worked before and downloaded the transactions.
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
July 01, 2017, 09:42:23 PM
 #1427

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs




The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

Not that I can think of. when I start it, the splash screen says "loading block index". I leave it in the background, then it gives that error after a while. btw, the client worked before and downloaded the transactions.

Then probably the block db got corrupted for some reason.
Try running with "-resync" or use a blockchain snapshot, as in the first post.

HamiltonWDS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
July 01, 2017, 11:39:41 PM
 #1428

And.... the pool is down.

which pool? suprnova is still working. have you managed to create one?
It was Suprnova, and the dashboard was reflecting no workers.
I had spent a few hours doing upgrades and wanting to do some testing... which didn't have good timing with the pool being down.
But fortunately was back up.

Still haven't finished completing a new pool as of yet.

Sign off,
Hamilton
HamiltonWDS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
July 01, 2017, 11:47:32 PM
 #1429

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

Sign off,
Hamilton
romasalah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
July 02, 2017, 12:46:12 AM
 #1430

I'm getting this error whenever I try to run the client. on 2 separate PCs




The error is a failed block read from disk.
It usually happens when the initial sync is interrupted before finishing.
Is this your case?

Not that I can think of. when I start it, the splash screen says "loading block index". I leave it in the background, then it gives that error after a while. btw, the client worked before and downloaded the transactions.

Then probably the block db got corrupted for some reason.
Try running with "-resync" or use a blockchain snapshot, as in the first post.

Thanks, it worked after using the snapshot
e6ug
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


Bitcore (BTX) - The Future is Now


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 03:39:08 AM
 #1431

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  Huh

romasalah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
July 02, 2017, 06:59:01 AM
 #1432

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  Huh

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 08:01:46 AM
 #1433

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

Yes, I think it´s mostly cpu time. Surely the code can be improved to make it faster. It´s one of the bounties.
For the pool, the limitation is the same.
I don´t think the qt version makes a difference: I would use the headless version on a server anyways.
Paper wallet: you still need a wallet running, to check the blocks and broadcast them on the network.

pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 08:02:30 AM
 #1434

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  Huh

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

with the current network hashrate, I guess some days.

w03038817l
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 08:08:32 AM
 #1435

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  Huh

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

with the current network hashrate, I guess some days.
Thank you for doing the job for xcn

Spectiv: VR Video Streaming | Website | Crowdsale: August 14th
e6ug
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


Bitcore (BTX) - The Future is Now


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 08:12:28 AM
 #1436

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  Huh

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

i found 6 in 24 hours half of witch were orpan.  210 mh/s

HamiltonWDS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 08:55:51 AM
 #1437

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

Yes, I think it´s mostly cpu time. Surely the code can be improved to make it faster. It´s one of the bounties.
For the pool, the limitation is the same.
I don´t think the qt version makes a difference: I would use the headless version on a server anyways.
Paper wallet: you still need a wallet running, to check the blocks and broadcast them on the network.
Hummm...
Sorry if this comes across as a dumb question, but could a possibility exist for the wallet be coded to use the GPU's, much like miners?
If possible, I think could open up solo mining to become quite popular.

Sign off,
Hamilton
gnasirator
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 09:07:47 AM
 #1438

Thanks pallas, I managed to get it imported and it seems to work.
Great! Gifting time Smiley

Btw, just tested trading on btc38 - but btc trading was suspended. I think I read about that a while ago here already.
So there's no place to trade it really atm?

Does anyone have connections to maybe an english speaking exchange? I think we need a better option here.

XCN: CJSECkHi7tTTTA1ze9qYRkkUCKfFiF8EEG
HamiltonWDS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 09:15:54 AM
 #1439

With the wallets...

When conducting solo mining operations, the bottleneck in terms of performance is with the wallet in generating blocks correct?
- If so, is this due to CPU limitation, network latency or the coding?
For Pool Mining, is the pool's wallet, still a limiting factor?

In performance, is the QT and Paper Wallet different?

i tried solo and found nothing but orphans  Huh

how long does it take to find a block if you for example solve with 100MH/s?

i found 6 in 24 hours half of witch were orpan.  210 mh/s
Why not, I'll give it a shot. I'm only at 100 MH/s with miners for now (with block message having "net" being displayed at 15 GH/s), so see if that comes at 50% (or less ... or more... who knows...)

Sign off,
Hamilton
HamiltonWDS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 10:27:48 AM
 #1440

Thanks pallas, I managed to get it imported and it seems to work.
Great! Gifting time Smiley

Btw, just tested trading on btc38 - but btc trading was suspended. I think I read about that a while ago here already.
So there's no place to trade it really atm?

Does anyone have connections to maybe an english speaking exchange? I think we need a better option here.
There is Nova Exchange, but has low volume currently.
https://novaexchange.com/market/BTC_XCN/

Sign off,
Hamilton
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 171 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!