Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 11:40:05 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2591625 times)
trouserless
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 12:13:17 AM
 #1081

Been mining with p2pool for about a week or so and am finally feeling comfortable with this new approach to mining. 

First off, great piece of software ckolivas (sent you Pi BTC) the community needs this balance/honesty.

So I'm a bit confused about my MH/s rate.  P2Pool software claims 3800 - 4000MH/s (tailing log), the additive of my miners (cgmier) claims about 3700MH/s and p2pool.info claims as low as 1.72GH/s.  What's to believe?  I've been reading the long thread here for weeks before making the plunge and understand about the stales and efficiency as reported by cgminer, but I could not find a solid answer for this discrepancy. 

In any event, p2pool has all my hashes from now on...a great idea that's well implemented.
1714218005
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714218005

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714218005
Reply with quote  #2

1714218005
Report to moderator
1714218005
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714218005

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714218005
Reply with quote  #2

1714218005
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 12:28:19 AM
 #1082

Been mining with p2pool for about a week or so and am finally feeling comfortable with this new approach to mining.  

First off, great piece of software ckolivas (sent you Pi BTC) the community needs this balance/honesty.

So I'm a bit confused about my MH/s rate.  P2Pool software claims 3800 - 4000MH/s (tailing log), the additive of my miners (cgmier) claims about 3700MH/s and p2pool.info claims as low as 1.72GH/s.  What's to believe?  I've been reading the long thread here for weeks before making the plunge and understand about the stales and efficiency as reported by cgminer, but I could not find a solid answer for this discrepancy.  

In any event, p2pool has all my hashes from now on...a great idea that's well implemented.

Miner = actual hashrate.
p2pool = estimate of hashrate based on shares delivered (subject to share level variance)
p2pool.info = estimate of hashrate based on the shares 24 hours (won't be accurate until at least 24 hours of mining).
chunglam
Donator
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 106



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 12:41:07 AM
 #1083

5 blocks in two weeks, I must be in lucky mode. Grin My farm is 7.5GH/s and only part of it allocated to p2pool. Wink

You should upgrade your bitcoind to support P2SH!
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.6.0/test/

Why, those blocks are blocks I found not p2pool shares. I would like to continue my luck. Smiley I got 1.25 BTC extra bonus from these blocks.  Wink
Dyaheon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 01:29:51 AM
 #1084

Been mining with p2pool for about a week or so and am finally feeling comfortable with this new approach to mining.  

First off, great piece of software ckolivas (sent you Pi BTC) the community needs this balance/honesty.

So I'm a bit confused about my MH/s rate.  P2Pool software claims 3800 - 4000MH/s (tailing log), the additive of my miners (cgmier) claims about 3700MH/s and p2pool.info claims as low as 1.72GH/s.  What's to believe?  I've been reading the long thread here for weeks before making the plunge and understand about the stales and efficiency as reported by cgminer, but I could not find a solid answer for this discrepancy.  

In any event, p2pool has all my hashes from now on...a great idea that's well implemented.

Miner = actual hashrate.
p2pool = estimate of hashrate based on shares delivered (subject to share level variance)
p2pool.info = estimate of hashrate based on the shares 24 hours (won't be accurate until at least 24 hours of mining).
Although if he's been mining for a week, I'd say the estimate should not be that low unless he has been really unlucky.

What's your stale rate / efficiency look like? If those are good, then just trust the Miner hashrate and wait for better luck  Smiley

rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 03:31:57 AM
 #1085

I don't think cgminer splits 1 single getwork across cards.  I am pretty sure it does 1 getwork per thread (so if you are running 8 GPU w/ 2 threads each it pulls 16 getworks).  That would be one useful optimization in cgminer. 
Correct. cgminer really needs a work splitting engine, badly.
This is not remotely true. The only time you may have difficulty getting enough work is immediately after a longpoll, and that is precisely when cgminer splits work. Furthermore, with p2pool, your local p2pool node can generate enough work for 100s of GPUs and cgminer is not remotely a rate limiting component.
I'm so sorry for spreading an inaccuracy. Is there a way I can control the work splitting behavior, or is it only managed automatically? I wish to have cgminer always split work across my GPUs, especially on p2pool. Can I force-enable this as an option?

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
twmz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 04:35:12 AM
 #1086

I wish to have cgminer always split work across my GPUs, especially on p2pool. Can I force-enable this as an option?

Why?

Was I helpful?  1TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs
WoT, GPG

Bitrated user: ewal.
dub0matic
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 05:27:04 AM
 #1087

one thing i dont get is that i have been mining here for a few days now. I have been getting alot of shares in the cgminer window but in the p2pool window i have hardly received any shares

make it rain haha
btc 176MrZ3CCXGb1GqFiGaoqQpaynzYqZsW6n
Vanderbleek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 05:53:02 AM
 #1088

one thing i dont get is that i have been mining here for a few days now. I have been getting alot of shares in the cgminer window but in the p2pool window i have hardly received any shares

p2pool uses 2 types of shares: the ones you are seeing in CGminer are only used for estimating hashrate, and are a much lower difficulty than actual p2pool share. The high difficulty shares are what are added to the chain, and determine payment.
dub0matic
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 08:03:43 AM
 #1089

one thing i dont get is that i have been mining here for a few days now. I have been getting alot of shares in the cgminer window but in the p2pool window i have hardly received any shares

p2pool uses 2 types of shares: the ones you are seeing in CGminer are only used for estimating hashrate, and are a much lower difficulty than actual p2pool share. The high difficulty shares are what are added to the chain, and determine payment.
so the only type of miner that should mine at p2pool are people with alot of hash power. is it even worth it to mine 800mh/s here

make it rain haha
btc 176MrZ3CCXGb1GqFiGaoqQpaynzYqZsW6n
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
March 04, 2012, 08:12:24 AM
 #1090

so the only type of miner that should mine at p2pool are people with alot of hash power. is it even worth it to mine 800mh/s here
I mine with ~600 MH/s fairly effectively. I usually get about 0.1 BTC per block.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 08:48:52 AM
 #1091

one thing i dont get is that i have been mining here for a few days now. I have been getting alot of shares in the cgminer window but in the p2pool window i have hardly received any shares

p2pool uses 2 types of shares: the ones you are seeing in CGminer are only used for estimating hashrate, and are a much lower difficulty than actual p2pool share. The high difficulty shares are what are added to the chain, and determine payment.
so the only type of miner that should mine at p2pool are people with alot of hash power. is it even worth it to mine 800mh/s here
This is a TL;DR but anyone interested ... Smiley

The reality of it is that you need to understand what's happening and ignore the comments like "I get this amount so it's OK" or "I get his amount and it sux" that clearly don't understand what to expect (since those comments are meaningless)

The pool gets blocks with variance.

The variance is a multiplying factor on the expected time to get a block.
e.g. a 300GH/s pool would expect to get 4.0313724038696 blocks a day on average with the current difficulty

What that means of course is it would expect to get a block on average every 5hr 57min 11.907sec

I'm not going to attempt to calculate the expected variances/standard deviations but however point out examples of big pools getting large variances for finding a block.

DeepBit got a block about a week ago at 824% of the expected shares.
You see high % every few weeks on DeepBit.
Yesterday 3-Mar they got a daily average of about 200% for ALL blocks that entire day.

What this means is of course is that those sort of number are not to be considered improbable.

So firstly, the P2Pool could get a block at 800% of the expected share rate - or 1day 23hr 37min 35.259sec
It happens some times, get used to the idea it will happen as it does for everyone.
It also happens some times that blocks appear in a few seconds or a few minutes.
That's the results of using a pseudo-random function to find blocks.

However ... then there is the next step and that is the probability of you finding a share.
Lets just assume that it is currently 500difficulty to find a share.
That means that at 800mh/s you would expect (on average) to find a share every 44 minutes 44.35 seconds
However, you can find a share in a few seconds or even 800% of that (5 hours 57 minutes 54.8 seconds)
You have exactly the same variance issue as any pool or any person has finding a block.

The bit that seems to be ignored or misunderstood a lot is that the variance is applied to your expected time.
If your expected time is 1 hour than it could take 8 hours for you to find a share.
If your expected time is 10 minutes then it could take 80 minutes for you to find a share.

The variance is a multiplier and thus seems to really suck if you have a low hash rate and are unlucky ... but the reality is that you should expect both good and bad luck to happen since it is random.
(and don't forget it is also a multiplier on the pools expected block finding rate)

Bottom line, with a low hash rate you can expect your share of the 49.25+trn of each block to be VERY unstable.
But over a long time it should get close to the expected value.
The effect of variance on you is better than solo mining but worse than 1 difficulty pool mining.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 12:26:41 PM
 #1092

I wish to have cgminer always split work across my GPUs, especially on p2pool. Can I force-enable this as an option?

Why?
To satisfy my OCD. Do you need a better reason?

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 12:34:38 PM
 #1093

I wish to have cgminer always split work across my GPUs, especially on p2pool. Can I force-enable this as an option?

Why?
To satisfy my OCD. Do you need a better reason?
Then it wont happen Tongue

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
trouserless
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 04, 2012, 02:36:52 PM
 #1094

Been mining with p2pool for about a week or so and am finally feeling comfortable with this new approach to mining.  

First off, great piece of software ckolivas (sent you Pi BTC) the community needs this balance/honesty.

So I'm a bit confused about my MH/s rate.  P2Pool software claims 3800 - 4000MH/s (tailing log), the additive of my miners (cgmier) claims about 3700MH/s and p2pool.info claims as low as 1.72GH/s.  What's to believe?  I've been reading the long thread here for weeks before making the plunge and understand about the stales and efficiency as reported by cgminer, but I could not find a solid answer for this discrepancy.  

In any event, p2pool has all my hashes from now on...a great idea that's well implemented.

Miner = actual hashrate.
p2pool = estimate of hashrate based on shares delivered (subject to share level variance)
p2pool.info = estimate of hashrate based on the shares 24 hours (won't be accurate until at least 24 hours of mining).

Thanks D&T, that make sense to me.  I believe I know why p2pool.info was so low yesterday...I was updating p2pool software (3/4 deadline) as well as the bitcoind server to rc2.  Sounds like all that downtime skewed my numbers.  Understanding p2pol.info is not near real-time was what got me.  BTW, I was just checking back into p2pool.info and it is reporting numbers a bit higher than my current miner hashrate.
twmz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 03:03:21 PM
 #1095

I wish to have cgminer always split work across my GPUs, especially on p2pool. Can I force-enable this as an option?

Why?
To satisfy my OCD. Do you need a better reason?

You can't do what you are asking.

I asked because if there were a good reason for wanting this, then it might be worth exploring further and possibly doing the development to make it possible. 

Was I helpful?  1TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs
WoT, GPG

Bitrated user: ewal.
smracer
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1055
Merit: 1020



View Profile
March 04, 2012, 10:58:41 PM
 #1096

I think it is time for some lucky blocks! 
chunglam
Donator
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 106



View Profile
March 05, 2012, 01:13:29 AM
 #1097

It seems p2pool.info miss block 169625 http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000006ca7bb5be0dbd0e2b81ea3b179f17218d6a2ca3116c4678ff78 (2012-03-04 16:03:22)
stevegee58
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 05, 2012, 01:14:52 AM
 #1098

I think it is time for some lucky blocks! 

Beware The Gambler's Fallacy.  Cool

You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
m3ta
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 435
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
March 05, 2012, 01:38:48 AM
 #1099


That block was found by a fork of people who didn't upgrade to the latest version/protocol change, so p2pool.info is not "missing" anything.

Why the frell so many retards spell "ect" as an abbreviation of "Et Cetera"? "ETC", DAMMIT! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_cetera

Host:/# rm -rf /var/forum/trolls
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
March 05, 2012, 01:41:29 AM
 #1100


That block was found by a fork of people who didn't upgrade to the latest version/protocol change, so p2pool.info is not "missing" anything.

fork that.
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!