Evolution is a hoax

[Vod]

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

You are the only one stating evolution is a hoax.

We already know that it's not.  This entire thread is stating evolution isn't a hoax.

[1715322980]

1715322980

[1715322980]

1715322980

[1715322980]

1715322980

[1715322980]

1715322980

[1715322980]

1715322980

[BADecker]

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

You are the only one stating evolution is a hoax.

We already know that it's not.  This entire thread is stating evolution isn't a hoax.

I understand. It's so hard accepting, when you find your pet theory doesn't even qualify to be a theory.

[Vod]

I understand. It's so hard accepting, when you find your pet theory doesn't even qualify to be a theory.

What do you mean?  We both agree that evolution is real now - you said entropy proves it.

[BADecker]

I understand. It's so hard accepting, when you find your pet theory doesn't even qualify to be a theory.

What do you mean?  We both agree that evolution is real now - you said entropy proves it.

The word "evolution" was around for a long time before people started thinking about species changing from one to another.

[Vod]

The word "evolution" was around for a long time before people started thinking about species changing from one to another.

So once people noticed animals changing slowly over time, the word itself evolved to include biological change?

[Astargath]

You think yourself so modern.

Your bible is 2,000 years old, and full of things we have proven false.  My science textbooks are just a few years old, and everyone (including you) lives their lives with no issues following nature's laws.

Bible is much older, about 3500 years, I believe.
Also, I didn't find out that Bible have any mistake in the content.
You see, for example, when you read book of Genesis, you will find out perfect explanation about creation.
First, universe was created, than planet earth, than water, than animals and so on.
How simple people 3500 years ago, fisherman or shepherds could know such things?
Scientists find out about this just recently.

The First 5 books of the Bible were written by Moses about 3,500 years ago. The last book of the Bible was written about 1,900 years ago. The only book that might have pre-dated Moses' writings was Job in the O.T.

Moses was a prince of Egypt for the first 40 years of his life. He had access to all kinds of info that we do not have today. His incorporation of the creation story in Genesis looks like it was taken verbatim from some other writing.

The important point is, God spiritually instructed Moses what to write.

Evolution is not included. Evolution is a hoax.

Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Yep, it's clear your book is written thousands of years ago because it's trash, dishonest, immoral and pure evil.

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

Unfortunately for you, evolution theory does not contradict the second law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics simply says that the entropy of a closed system will tend to increase with time. "Entropy" is a technical term with a precise physical definition, but for most purposes it is okay to think of it as equivalent to "disorder". Therefore, the second law of thermodynamics basically says that the universe as a whole gets more disordered and random as time goes on.

However, the most important part of the second law of thermodynamics is that it only applies to a closed system - one that does not have anything going in or out of it. There is nothing about the second law that prevents one part of a closed system from getting more ordered, as long as another part of the system is getting more disordered.

There are many examples from everyday life that prove it is possible to create order! For example, you'd certainly agree that a person is capable of taking a pile of wood and nails and constructing a building out of it. The wood and nails have become more ordered, but in doing the work required to make the building, the person has generated heat which goes into increasing the overall entropy of the universe.

[BADecker]

The underlying scientific reason evolution is false is, approximately 100% of every scientific thing that is attributed to evolution by scientists, can be attributed to other things by science, as well. This alone might not falsify evolution, because some scientifically found "things" can be attributed to many different things. The thing that falsifies evolution is, multitudes of evolution points are not factually known to be part of evolution rather than something else. And this is entirely why science correctly assigns evolution to the realm of theory.

Here is more reason why evolution is a hoax. Aside from what is listed above, there are at least several scientific things that show evolution is impossible. Among them are:
- Probability math shows that molecular and cellular changes that are great enough to make evolution happen are impossible;
- There has never been any natural species change witnessed in nature;
- Science might not be able to create species change in the lab, showing how difficult it is;
- Nobody can point to an evolution change happening in nature with proof that that is what it is;
- Evolution proponents suggest that every change in nature is an evolution change, without being able to prove that even one of them is an evolution change.

In addition:
From Why Evolution is Impossible:

Of course, the evolutionist must explain the source of the information that makes up what we know as DNA.

Was information part of the original primordial world?

Did information arise spontaneously?

How did information organize itself to bring about our designed world?

The computer analogy.

The components of a computer did not arise randomly.

Computers didn’t just put themselves together.

The non-material information needed to run a computer was designed.

Without the program, a computer is worthless.

There is no program without a programmer.

What’s true in the lesser case (a machine) is true in the greater case (a human being and all living things).

To begin with chemicals and end with humans (let alone everything in between) requires changes that increase the genetic information up the evolutionary ladder. This would be like claiming 2 plus 2 equals 5000.

“ONE of the mysteries of the universe is why it should speak the language of mathematics. Numbers and the relationships between them are, after all, just abstract reasoning. Yet mathematics has shown itself to be particularly adept at describing both the contents of the universe and the forces that act on them. Now comes a paper which argues that one branch of the subject—geometry—could form the basis of all the laws of physics.” So where did the math come from?

[Xester]

The word "evolution" was around for a long time before people started thinking about species changing from one to another.

So once people noticed animals changing slowly over time, the word itself evolved to include biological change?

But that would mean that you believe you belong to apes, monkeys and the like?  I do not know if that is evolution but that is like changes.  If you want to believe that people indeed came from them then shows respect.  I just do not believe on it because I am carefully analyzing every thing that could and should put in our head.

[BADecker]

You think yourself so modern.

Your bible is 2,000 years old, and full of things we have proven false.  My science textbooks are just a few years old, and everyone (including you) lives their lives with no issues following nature's laws.

Bible is much older, about 3500 years, I believe.
Also, I didn't find out that Bible have any mistake in the content.
You see, for example, when you read book of Genesis, you will find out perfect explanation about creation.
First, universe was created, than planet earth, than water, than animals and so on.
How simple people 3500 years ago, fisherman or shepherds could know such things?
Scientists find out about this just recently.

The First 5 books of the Bible were written by Moses about 3,500 years ago. The last book of the Bible was written about 1,900 years ago. The only book that might have pre-dated Moses' writings was Job in the O.T.

Moses was a prince of Egypt for the first 40 years of his life. He had access to all kinds of info that we do not have today. His incorporation of the creation story in Genesis looks like it was taken verbatim from some other writing.

The important point is, God spiritually instructed Moses what to write.

Evolution is not included. Evolution is a hoax.

Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Yep, it's clear your book is written thousands of years ago because it's trash, dishonest, immoral and pure evil.

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

Unfortunately for you, evolution theory does not contradict the second law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics simply says that the entropy of a closed system will tend to increase with time. "Entropy" is a technical term with a precise physical definition, but for most purposes it is okay to think of it as equivalent to "disorder". Therefore, the second law of thermodynamics basically says that the universe as a whole gets more disordered and random as time goes on.

However, the most important part of the second law of thermodynamics is that it only applies to a closed system - one that does not have anything going in or out of it. There is nothing about the second law that prevents one part of a closed system from getting more ordered, as long as another part of the system is getting more disordered.

There are many examples from everyday life that prove it is possible to create order! For example, you'd certainly agree that a person is capable of taking a pile of wood and nails and constructing a building out of it. The wood and nails have become more ordered, but in doing the work required to make the building, the person has generated heat which goes into increasing the overall entropy of the universe.

The universe is a closed system. Entropy exists throughout. Entropy doesn't mean that the Second Law of Thermodynamics fails. It simply means that there are devolving-type universal changes regarding that law. Complexity becomes less complex. That's devolution, not evolution.

[mirror001]

evolution is not a hoax in my pint of view because there is a scientific evidence and a strong background for their existance and their believe that evolution happend along time. and there are proof and paper documents for their theories that will proof that evlution in not hoax. there are alot of documentries and even films are also present on the evolution of every thing they present in their theories.

[BADecker]

evolution is not a hoax in my pint of view because there is a scientific evidence and a strong background for their existance and their believe that evolution happend along time. and there are proof and paper documents for their theories that will proof that evlution in not hoax. there are alot of documentries and even films are also present on the evolution of every thing they present in their theories.

The reason evolution is a hoax is that science knows that evolution is impossible.

Evolution theory is a closed system that cannot operate within reality, even though it may be completely compatible within itself.

If you want to see why evolution is impossible, simply Google "evolution is impossible" or any similar word groupings.

The "hoax" part comes because all of science knows that evolution is impossible. If anyone DOESN'T KNOW that evolution is impossible, a little research shows that it is at least highly improbable.

On top of this, formal science calls evolution knowledge a scientific theory: "The Theory of Evolution." This means that they KNOW that it isn't fact.

You are being hoaxed by the media and some of the standard scientific community members.

[osmo]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

I think the evolution is a hoax, because I do not think monkeys can turn into human beings. I think evolution can not be scientifically proven. so I'm not sure about evolution

[Astargath]

You think yourself so modern.

Your bible is 2,000 years old, and full of things we have proven false.  My science textbooks are just a few years old, and everyone (including you) lives their lives with no issues following nature's laws.

Bible is much older, about 3500 years, I believe.
Also, I didn't find out that Bible have any mistake in the content.
You see, for example, when you read book of Genesis, you will find out perfect explanation about creation.
First, universe was created, than planet earth, than water, than animals and so on.
How simple people 3500 years ago, fisherman or shepherds could know such things?
Scientists find out about this just recently.

The First 5 books of the Bible were written by Moses about 3,500 years ago. The last book of the Bible was written about 1,900 years ago. The only book that might have pre-dated Moses' writings was Job in the O.T.

Moses was a prince of Egypt for the first 40 years of his life. He had access to all kinds of info that we do not have today. His incorporation of the creation story in Genesis looks like it was taken verbatim from some other writing.

The important point is, God spiritually instructed Moses what to write.

Evolution is not included. Evolution is a hoax.

Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Yep, it's clear your book is written thousands of years ago because it's trash, dishonest, immoral and pure evil.

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

Unfortunately for you, evolution theory does not contradict the second law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics simply says that the entropy of a closed system will tend to increase with time. "Entropy" is a technical term with a precise physical definition, but for most purposes it is okay to think of it as equivalent to "disorder". Therefore, the second law of thermodynamics basically says that the universe as a whole gets more disordered and random as time goes on.

However, the most important part of the second law of thermodynamics is that it only applies to a closed system - one that does not have anything going in or out of it. There is nothing about the second law that prevents one part of a closed system from getting more ordered, as long as another part of the system is getting more disordered.

There are many examples from everyday life that prove it is possible to create order! For example, you'd certainly agree that a person is capable of taking a pile of wood and nails and constructing a building out of it. The wood and nails have become more ordered, but in doing the work required to make the building, the person has generated heat which goes into increasing the overall entropy of the universe.

The universe is a closed system. Entropy exists throughout. Entropy doesn't mean that the Second Law of Thermodynamics fails. It simply means that there are devolving-type universal changes regarding that law. Complexity becomes less complex. That's devolution, not evolution.

Maybe you are a bit slow, I will repeat it again in bold. There is nothing about the second law that prevents one part of a closed system from getting more ordered, as long as another part of the system is getting more disordered. While the universe is indeed getting more disordered parts of it can get more ordered.

[Vod]

Here is more reason why evolution is a hoax. Aside from what is listed above, there are at least several scientific things that show evolution is impossible

You just claimed entropy proves evolution.

You seem to be confused.

[BADecker]

Here is more reason why evolution is a hoax. Aside from what is listed above, there are at least several scientific things that show evolution is impossible

You just claimed entropy proves evolution.

You seem to be confused.

You just claimed that I claimed something that I didn't.

That is to be expected from you and your likes, however. I mean, what else do you have? If you looked at the evidence that proves evolution is a hoax, you would probably go insane for lack of a stable foundation.



EDIT: More insane.

[Vod]

You have a poor memory.  When you lie, you need a GOOD memory.  

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

[BADecker]

You think yourself so modern.

Your bible is 2,000 years old, and full of things we have proven false.  My science textbooks are just a few years old, and everyone (including you) lives their lives with no issues following nature's laws.

Bible is much older, about 3500 years, I believe.
Also, I didn't find out that Bible have any mistake in the content.
You see, for example, when you read book of Genesis, you will find out perfect explanation about creation.
First, universe was created, than planet earth, than water, than animals and so on.
How simple people 3500 years ago, fisherman or shepherds could know such things?
Scientists find out about this just recently.

The First 5 books of the Bible were written by Moses about 3,500 years ago. The last book of the Bible was written about 1,900 years ago. The only book that might have pre-dated Moses' writings was Job in the O.T.

Moses was a prince of Egypt for the first 40 years of his life. He had access to all kinds of info that we do not have today. His incorporation of the creation story in Genesis looks like it was taken verbatim from some other writing.

The important point is, God spiritually instructed Moses what to write.

Evolution is not included. Evolution is a hoax.

Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Yep, it's clear your book is written thousands of years ago because it's trash, dishonest, immoral and pure evil.

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

Unfortunately for you, evolution theory does not contradict the second law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics simply says that the entropy of a closed system will tend to increase with time. "Entropy" is a technical term with a precise physical definition, but for most purposes it is okay to think of it as equivalent to "disorder". Therefore, the second law of thermodynamics basically says that the universe as a whole gets more disordered and random as time goes on.

However, the most important part of the second law of thermodynamics is that it only applies to a closed system - one that does not have anything going in or out of it. There is nothing about the second law that prevents one part of a closed system from getting more ordered, as long as another part of the system is getting more disordered.

There are many examples from everyday life that prove it is possible to create order! For example, you'd certainly agree that a person is capable of taking a pile of wood and nails and constructing a building out of it. The wood and nails have become more ordered, but in doing the work required to make the building, the person has generated heat which goes into increasing the overall entropy of the universe.

The universe is a closed system. Entropy exists throughout. Entropy doesn't mean that the Second Law of Thermodynamics fails. It simply means that there are devolving-type universal changes regarding that law. Complexity becomes less complex. That's devolution, not evolution.

Maybe you are a bit slow, I will repeat it again in bold. There is nothing about the second law that prevents one part of a closed system from getting more ordered, as long as another part of the system is getting more disordered. While the universe is indeed getting more disordered parts of it can get more ordered.

So? We are back to the evidence. No evidence for evolution. Approximately 100% interpretation, some of which is being called evidence.

[BADecker]

You have a poor memory.  When you lie, you need a GOOD memory.  

At least we're finding out devolution isn't a hoax. Oh, but entropy shows us that anyway.

You seem to be in agreement with me and entropy, then, right?   

[Vod]

You seem to be in agreement with me and entropy, then, right?    

Entropy can be used to help prove evolution, as you stated, yes.

[BADecker]

You seem to be in agreement with me and entropy, then, right?    

Entropy can be used to help prove evolution, as you stated, yes.

You are helping to prove no evolution. So, okay.