someee
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 05, 2013, 06:03:29 AM |
|
I've gotten some interesting results: On an i3 (sandy bridge 3.1 Ghz) x64 machine, it was reporting over 250 kh/s using AVX! Alas, none of the 6000+ blocks (after running overnight) appeared in the p2pool I was pointing to (nor did my address). Haven't had time to try another pool with that machine yet. On an i7 (older) laptop (no AVX), it's reporting only 7 or 8 kh/s (using ssse3), lower than 'generic' minerd did (before the AV at work blew it away). I should add this is with the x86 version as we are still using XP  At least these are getting reported! So was the 250kh/s a reporting error or is the i3 (or AVX) that amazing? Similarly, is the i7's ssse3 that bad? - well, now my i3 is running a 'normal' sub-14 kh/s rate on 3 different sites using either avx or ssse3 no, it's just part of YAC algorithm: hash rate gradually decrease over time. But 64-bit AVX indeed faster (not so much as you think) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2069
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
|
June 05, 2013, 07:10:06 AM |
|
Maybe you have forgotten to add the -scrypt-jane flag.
|
|
|
|
|
Thirtybird
|
|
June 05, 2013, 02:43:00 PM |
|
I've gotten some interesting results: On an i3 (sandy bridge 3.1 Ghz) x64 machine, it was reporting over 250 kh/s using AVX! Alas, none of the 6000+ blocks (after running overnight) appeared in the p2pool I was pointing to (nor did my address). Haven't had time to try another pool with that machine yet. On an i7 (older) laptop (no AVX), it's reporting only 7 or 8 kh/s (using ssse3), lower than 'generic' minerd did (before the AV at work blew it away). I should add this is with the x86 version as we are still using XP At least these are getting reported! So was the 250kh/s a reporting error or is the i3 (or AVX) that amazing? Similarly, is the i7's ssse3 that bad? - well, now my i3 is running a 'normal' sub-14 kh/s rate on 3 different sites using either avx or ssse3 I think you might have picked the wrong algorithm on your i3. I've got several machines I can report hash rates on, an i5, two (different generations) i7's, a Core2 and a dual Xeon. The current fastest machine is my Coire i7 3610 (Ivy Bridge) and it gets around 24 KHash/sec (using 7 of 8 threads). The Core 2 (which your laptop probably is) is around 6 KH/sec. The others fall in between those. |
|
|
|
BlazinBeaches
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 08, 2013, 01:19:00 AM |
|
Has anyone tried this with Haswell's AVX2?
I know the nfactor has destroyed these numbers, but I am still curious if AVX2 would make a difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
pornluver
|
|
June 08, 2013, 08:00:27 AM |
|
Why accepted rate is so low?
How to mine solo then?
And why my screenshot is different?
|
|
|
|
|
|
karsy
|
|
June 08, 2013, 05:33:34 PM |
|
is there a way to download the miner allready compiled?
|
|
|
|
smilez
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2013, 05:51:02 PM |
|
It is already compiled.
|
|
|
|
|
djkakadu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:47:24 PM |
|
Work someone a x86 miner on Windows XP???
|
|
|
|
|
bforbitcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2013, 09:48:16 PM |
|
I wonder what is the best (= most efficient) CPU for YAC mining (= scrypt-jane algo) at the moment? Is Quad Core preferred over Dual Core?
I'd like to assemble a sweet little YACoin Miner and have an older Asus P5B Deluxe board (Socket LGA775) with Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 on hand.
So, should I stick to the X6800 or upgrade to an E8600 (dual core)/Q9650 (quad core) for best mining performance? TIA!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
June 28, 2013, 06:17:37 AM |
|
Has anyone tried this with Haswell's AVX2?
I know the nfactor has destroyed these numbers, but I am still curious if AVX2 would make a difference
I'd love to see that...my next cpu will be a 4770k. I guess someone would have to create a new avx2 optimized miner, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
June 28, 2013, 07:27:37 AM |
|
Maybe you have forgotten to add the -scrypt-jane flag.
ok possibly best Avatar ever. AGD |
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2069
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
|
June 28, 2013, 02:59:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1896
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 10, 2013, 06:17:38 PM |
|
One more request for Haswell AVX2 support...
cpuminer for scrypt just released AVX2 version which is 85% faster...
|
|
|
|
|
diskodasa
|
|
July 23, 2013, 11:13:36 PM |
|
Why can't I start -avx on neither machine? Win8 64bit-
1)C2D T7500-0,60kh/s
2)Celeron IB G1610-1.02kh/s
3)Pentium D960-0.2kh/s
on all 3 of them only sse2 or ssse3 but no avx?
|
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
July 23, 2013, 11:32:44 PM |
|
Why can't I start -avx on neither machine? Win8 64bit-
1)C2D T7500-0,60kh/s
2)Celeron IB G1610-1.02kh/s
3)Pentium D960-0.2kh/s
on all 3 of them only sse2 or ssse3 but no avx?
Well, those cpus don't have AVX instruction sets, google the model and look at cpu-world or intel ark info. |
|
|
|
|
|
diskodasa
|
|
July 24, 2013, 02:46:13 PM |
|
Why can't I start -avx on neither machine? Win8 64bit-
1)C2D T7500-0,60kh/s
2)Celeron IB G1610-1.02kh/s
3)Pentium D960-0.2kh/s
on all 3 of them only sse2 or ssse3 but no avx?
Well, those cpus don't have AVX instruction sets, google the model and look at cpu-world or intel ark info. Thank You Bon Jovi! |
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
July 24, 2013, 05:28:42 PM |
|
I'm a cowboy on a cryptographic horse I ride lol  |
|
|
|
|
|
diskodasa
|
|
September 05, 2013, 11:53:46 AM |
|
Guys I need some help!
I have reinstalled windows and there is no way to sync the wallet. I have tried -resync and -rescan but nothing. Trying for 3 days strait and my wallet cannot be syncronised. Same is for 32 and 64bit one, it just come to the some point and stops, no sync no activity just stands there. Removed, several times, all yacoin data from win registry and folders, but nothing helps. Please help!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
ilostcoins
|
|
September 06, 2013, 01:33:23 PM |
|
Guys I need some help!
I have reinstalled windows and there is no way to sync the wallet. I have tried -resync and -rescan but nothing. Trying for 3 days strait and my wallet cannot be syncronised. Same is for 32 and 64bit one, it just come to the some point and stops, no sync no activity just stands there. Removed, several times, all yacoin data from win registry and folders, but nothing helps. Please help!!!!
May be you should ask your question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206577.0That's the de facto official thread these days. |
LTC: LSyqwk4YbhBRtkrUy8NRdKXFoUcgVpu8Qb NVC: 4HtynfYVyRYo6yM8BTAqyNYwqiucfoPqFW TAG id: 4313
CMC: CAHrzqveVm9UxGm7PZtT4uj6su4suxKzZv YAC: Y9m5S7M24sdkjdwxnA9GZpPez6k6EqUjUt
|
|
|
havardr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2013, 08:50:24 PM |
|
What would be the optimized settings for 2670QM ?
Currenty i get:
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] thread 2: 585 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] thread 3: 581 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] thread 5: 583 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] thread 0: 583 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] thread 1: 582 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:43] thread 4: 576 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:48] thread 4: 372 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:49:50] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 0.39 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-11-27 21:50:08] thread 5: 1663 hashes, 0.07 khash/s
[2013-11-27 21:50:08] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 0.39 khash/s (yay!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
