Mrpumperitis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1075
|
|
September 09, 2017, 06:30:37 AM |
|
Just a thought... 20-21st sept @Bitkan event ...imagine just before the event 1bitcoin cash is worth lets say $2k+ or even 1-1 with btc Now that would be interesting to see and hear 1-I can't see that happening now 2- what would you do ,IF the chinese exchanges were banned right before bitkan 1- Its going to happen sooner or later. 2- How , by removing their passports and jailing them all lol ps...stop analysing my thoughts
|
Bitcoin - Blockchain 1.0 (2009) Ethereum - Blockchain 2.0 (2015) Partisia - Blockchain 3.0 (2021)
|
|
|
Bitzure
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2017, 07:36:00 AM |
|
Hi everyone! BitcoinCash has been added to Bitzure! Bitzure is a new exchange made by traders for the traders and are actively looking at new digital currencies to add! https://bitzure.com/markets/bccbtcQuick Links:Hi all! We would just like to pop by and thank you to the 1000+ traders that have signed up in the last 2 weeks of Bitzure being launched! We have had a lot of feedback, fixed some bugs and lots of suggestions. We still want to hear from you all though!Nothing is perfect, but we would like Bitzure to be as close to it as possible, so whether you have suggestions, want another currency added, complaints, or just want a friendly chat please let us know! Regards, Martin
|
|
|
|
bek77
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 08:23:39 AM |
|
Just a thought... 20-21st sept @Bitkan event ...imagine just before the event 1bitcoin cash is worth lets say $2k+ or even 1-1 with btc Now that would be interesting to see and hear I can't see that happening now what would you do IF the chinese exchanges were banned right before bitkan Why the chinese exchanges were banned right before bitkan?
|
|
|
|
bek77
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 08:31:36 AM |
|
the price continues to fall
|
|
|
|
winding-coils
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 11:23:12 AM Last edit: September 09, 2017, 12:51:38 PM by winding-coils |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations.
|
|
|
|
Grrizz
|
|
September 09, 2017, 01:26:38 PM |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555
|
|
|
|
wefdi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2017, 01:54:12 PM |
|
anyone know about this problem?? https://imgur.com/a/hbMIWI can't tranfer to other address, so tried make new wallet with my private key. https://ibb.co/fsxNYaas you can see, same public key but old one has 24bcc, and new one no balance. what can I do??
|
|
|
|
winding-coils
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 02:02:37 PM |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555 Were you making some point?
|
|
|
|
Grrizz
|
|
September 09, 2017, 02:05:22 PM |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555 Were you making some point? Just pointing out you either had a typo or your data source was wrong.
|
|
|
|
winding-coils
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 02:12:43 PM |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555 Were you making some point? Just pointing out you either had a typo or your data source was wrong. Can you be more specific to the typo? BCC is currently at .1369 sats and was below .130 sats at the time the China ICO ban came to news... I fail to see the error but it's early and I just started my coffee aah you must be citing "coinmarketcap" well, those prices become valid when they offer a platform to trade at those prices, the prices I listed were realtime trading prices at an exchange that had transactions occurring at those values. Or is it something else still?
|
|
|
|
Grrizz
|
|
September 09, 2017, 02:42:37 PM Last edit: September 09, 2017, 02:54:08 PM by Grrizz |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555 Were you making some point? Just pointing out you either had a typo or your data source was wrong. Can you be more specific to the typo? BCC is currently at .1369 sats and was below .130 sats at the time the China ICO ban came to news... I fail to see the error but it's early and I just started my coffee aah you must be citing "coinmarketcap" well, those prices become valid when they offer a platform to trade at those prices, the prices I listed were realtime trading prices at an exchange that had transactions occurring at those values. Or is it something else still? So basically you're over inflating the prices you are using intentionally or picking and choosing your low and high point sources to spin a half truth that fits your narrative.
|
|
|
|
winding-coils
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 02:55:56 PM |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555 Were you making some point? Just pointing out you either had a typo or your data source was wrong. Can you be more specific to the typo? BCC is currently at .1369 sats and was below .130 sats at the time the China ICO ban came to news... I fail to see the error but it's early and I just started my coffee aah you must be citing "coinmarketcap" well, those prices become valid when they offer a platform to trade at those prices, the prices I listed were realtime trading prices at an exchange that had transactions occurring at those values. Or is it something else still? So basically you're over inflating the prices you are using intentionally or picking and choosing your low and high point sources to spin a half truth that fits your narrative. That is the conclusion you make? That from the actual trading prices I'm intentionally picking low and high? Seriously? You cited a platform that DOESN'T ALLOW TRADING AT THE PRICE YOU CITE, even now BCC is listed at ~$550 on coinmarketcap, where are they selling it for that price may I ask? At Bittrex (where trading actually happens) it is currently selling for $580. Look in a mirror So tell me again, is BCC currently trading at, below, or above the price it was when China announced they are banning ICOs? My whole point was in rebuttal to "the narrative" that BCC is falling... because it isn't.... even amid the China FUD it is holding higher, but you are spinning my rebuttal to somehow foster your untruths.
|
|
|
|
Grrizz
|
|
September 09, 2017, 03:21:22 PM |
|
the price continues to fall
"fall" to $590? For some reference... at the time of the Chinese ICO "ban" BCC was at 13000000sats At the time of this posting of "price continues to fall" BCC is at 13700000sats So as you can see, according to some users (bek77) "price continues to fall" is the equivalent of "up 700ksats or 700,000sats or up 0.007BTC since the announcement of the China ICO ban..." some interesting observations and perceptions and conclusions made from said observations. *~0.127BTC/~$555 Were you making some point? Just pointing out you either had a typo or your data source was wrong. Can you be more specific to the typo? BCC is currently at .1369 sats and was below .130 sats at the time the China ICO ban came to news... I fail to see the error but it's early and I just started my coffee aah you must be citing "coinmarketcap" well, those prices become valid when they offer a platform to trade at those prices, the prices I listed were realtime trading prices at an exchange that had transactions occurring at those values. Or is it something else still? So basically you're over inflating the prices you are using intentionally or picking and choosing your low and high point sources to spin a half truth that fits your narrative. That is the conclusion you make? That from the actual trading prices I'm intentionally picking low and high? Seriously? You cited a platform that DOESN'T ALLOW TRADING AT THE PRICE YOU CITE, even now BCC is listed at ~$550 on coinmarketcap, where are they selling it for that price may I ask? At Bittrex (where trading actually happens) it is currently selling for $580. Look in a mirror So tell me again, is BCC currently trading at, below, or above the price it was when China announced they are banning ICOs? My whole point was in rebuttal to "the narrative" that BCC is falling... because it isn't.... even amid the China FUD it is holding higher, but you are spinning my rebuttal to somehow foster your untruths. FYI CMC is a volume weighted average from exchanges (places that people buy and sell coins), its not just random numbers pulled out of thin air. You can find numbers from whatever corner of the internet you like to fit your narrative but if you want to talk market trends look at the whole market, the current trend right now is down. If you really feel aposed to looking at the market as a whole at least look at high volume exchanges, the top 3 trading BCH/BTC pairs are Bitfinex, Huobi and Bittrex all of which are trending down in the last couple of days. I'm not against people who feel like BCH is something they like but spin doctoring to try and build support from people who dont know any better isn't a good look IMO and I will call it out when I see it
|
|
|
|
winding-coils
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 03:29:19 PM |
|
You failed to call out anything with any valid information. You failed to call out bek77 for his spinning of information, but if I had to guess it fuels your narrative so there's no surprise is there? The fact is that the price of trading of BCC at the time of China announcing ICO bans was lower relative to the price at the time that another poster (bek77) claimed the price was falling.. BCC is still relatively up (from the time of that news) *opposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grrizz
|
|
September 09, 2017, 03:56:02 PM |
|
You failed to call out anything with any valid information. You failed to call out bek77 for his spinning of information, but if I had to guess it fuels your narrative so there's no surprise is there? The fact is that the price of trading of BCC at the time of China announcing ICO bans was lower relative to the price at the time that another poster (bek77) claimed the price was falling.. BCC is still relatively up (from the time of that news) *opposed All he said was "the price continues to fall", which in the current trend is true, if you want to talk about the longer trend then its pretty much sideways. You can pick arbitrary points to make it look any which way you like but I dont see the point in that.
|
|
|
|
winding-coils
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2017, 04:03:59 PM |
|
You failed to call out anything with any valid information. You failed to call out bek77 for his spinning of information, but if I had to guess it fuels your narrative so there's no surprise is there? The fact is that the price of trading of BCC at the time of China announcing ICO bans was lower relative to the price at the time that another poster (bek77) claimed the price was falling.. BCC is still relatively up (from the time of that news) *opposed All he said was "the price continues to fall", which in the current trend is true, if you want to talk about the longer trend then its pretty much sideways. You can pick arbitrary points to make it look any which way you like but I dont see the point in that. Relative to what? Falling from what? You must see some point as you selectively chose to ignore the trading price for a global "normalized" price, yet you fail to use that same global approach to the market as a whole when the ICO China ban slammed the market, and here BCC is up... Today is the 9th, the trading price is near what it was on the 6th, that is 3 days ago. Both of which are ABOVE the price it was at at the time of the ICO ban, which if we note the market tanked as a whole some $30+ Billion... That you chose to minimize said poster, and nitpick what I'm saying says plenty... "don't see the point in that" yet defends someone who does just that when another rebuttals that said someone for doing just that... carry on
|
|
|
|
|
Grrizz
|
|
September 09, 2017, 04:37:44 PM |
|
You failed to call out anything with any valid information. You failed to call out bek77 for his spinning of information, but if I had to guess it fuels your narrative so there's no surprise is there? The fact is that the price of trading of BCC at the time of China announcing ICO bans was lower relative to the price at the time that another poster (bek77) claimed the price was falling.. BCC is still relatively up (from the time of that news) *opposed All he said was "the price continues to fall", which in the current trend is true, if you want to talk about the longer trend then its pretty much sideways. You can pick arbitrary points to make it look any which way you like but I dont see the point in that. Relative to what? Falling from what? You must see some point as you selectively chose to ignore the trading price for a global "normalized" price, yet you fail to use that same global approach to the market as a whole when the ICO China ban slammed the market, and here BCC is up... Today is the 9th, the trading price is near what it was on the 6th, that is 3 days ago. Both of which are ABOVE the price it was at at the time of the ICO ban, which if we note the whole market tanked as a whole some $30+ Billion... That you chose to minimize said poster, and nitpick what I'm saying says plenty... carry on Look, if you cant see current trends thats on you, you cant just pick two points, draw a line between them and call it a trend. I dont think I ever denied that the ICO ban dropped the market, as did the Chinese exchange (fake) news but I fail to see the relevance to the current and/or long/mid term trend, you are too fixated on a momentary anomaly, something of which you cant get any meaningful data from. The simple fact is the price is indeed falling and the current trend is a downward one, whether you like it or not. My personal expectation, if you care, is it will start to level out over the next 24 hours and continue its longer term sideways trend but I see no sign of an upward trend at the moment, anythings possible but based on the charts and not being aware of any major news in the next few days thats how I see it. If you think its on an up trend more power to you, I just dont see it at all.
|
|
|
|
|