So many people emulating quark
first the algo so many coins adopted
now the name
I'm hoping that company is looking into fixing their broken code already. What the latest word with that?
Pacatum need to get this sorted asap.
I agree - their official stance is that they had tried to solve it before but were unable to replicate the issues - Max however was able to himself replicate them when he looked into the community member's reported issues. However they did not communicate this and then were apparently in China the last several weeks without access to easy communication and didn't realize that we still had issues... They have told me they are looking into it currently however I have not heard anything solid back yet.
Thanks for the update on this vic. Keep on to them to get this fixed or return the funding.
Failing either or those we will start a dedicated thread to pacatum and sadly that will cause vast damage to their company if they were serious about building a name for themselves in the crypto arena.
Thats the beauty of dealing with internet based companies when you have forums ..google loves forum threads
Perhaps max himself should communicate directly with them to point out these specific issues and help them replicate them. Seems perfectly sensible solution to me.
I would really like to see a more transparent community driven leadership for quark develop I mean we have quite a few motivated people here we need to work together and keep the community involved and keep this thread near page 1.
Be good if we have some positive developments in the next week.
Why are we reinventing the wheel I see a few projects forking off of other stable projects? is it because we do not want to perform a coins swap? or were we trying for something new that has not been done already in an opensource project here? excuse my lack of technical knowledge if this is a ridiculous question.
What has pacatum coded for us if it did work?
I personally am not against anon and think an option of anon transactions is a benefit so i would have no issue having quark become a copy of a great project like pivx. I mean pivx loved quark algo we love what they how they have come on since then. We can give them full credits on the OP ... why can we not fork this project? or are things not quite this simple?
Quark is a famous and aged project seeing it at 60 sats is a ludicrous.
Although now if anyone wants back it this is the time to make sure you get back in.
I will buy all any quark you don't want for 60 sats lol PM me and you will be sending first.