Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2019, 06:18:39 AM Last edit: September 17, 2019, 10:32:47 AM by Smartjag |
|
0.10.7.3 worked stable, with 0.10.7.4 there are again problems. The wallets loose over the day 3-4 times their blockchain. There are already more than 51% nodes 0.10.7.4 in the chain, but not all are correct recognized. And there are again crashing wallets, not so often like with 0.10.7.1, but it happens again.
|
|
|
|
ghzsymc2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 4
|
|
September 17, 2019, 07:12:34 AM |
|
0.17.0.3 worked stable, with 0.17.0.4 there are again problems. The wallets loose over the day 3-4 times their blockchain. There are already more than 51% nodes 0.17.0.4 in the chain, but not all are correct recognized. And there are again crashing wallets, not so often like with 0.17.0.1, but it happens again.
So far we haven't seen any crashes on our side But it will get stuck at a certain height and need to restart the wallet to fix it The reason for this phenomenon may be that the output POS is stuck I generated 1 POS block But it got stuck on one confirmation It has not been accepted on the net Using 7.4 is still not enough Many people are still using 7.3 Need to see more time
|
|
|
|
F0nzy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2019, 08:52:21 AM |
|
0.17.0.3 worked stable, with 0.17.0.4 there are again problems. The wallets loose over the day 3-4 times their blockchain. There are already more than 51% nodes 0.17.0.4 in the chain, but not all are correct recognized. And there are again crashing wallets, not so often like with 0.17.0.1, but it happens again.
And MN is always online, but only sometime got rewards. in 7.3 MN rewards was good, continous. In 7.4 not continous...
|
|
|
|
Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2019, 09:21:25 AM |
|
0.17.0.3 worked stable, with 0.17.0.4 there are again problems. The wallets loose over the day 3-4 times their blockchain. There are already more than 51% nodes 0.17.0.4 in the chain, but not all are correct recognized. And there are again crashing wallets, not so often like with 0.17.0.1, but it happens again.
And MN is always online, but only sometime got rewards. in 7.3 MN rewards was good, continous. In 7.4 not continous... Yes, we have the same problem.
|
|
|
|
|
ghzsymc2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 4
|
|
September 17, 2019, 11:26:26 AM |
|
0.17.0.3 worked stable, with 0.17.0.4 there are again problems. The wallets loose over the day 3-4 times their blockchain. There are already more than 51% nodes 0.17.0.4 in the chain, but not all are correct recognized. And there are again crashing wallets, not so often like with 0.17.0.1, but it happens again.
And MN is always online, but only sometime got rewards. in 7.3 MN rewards was good, continous. In 7.4 not continous... Yes, we have the same problem. When my wallet gets stuck though I need to reboot But my MN didn't go down My rewards were still allocated to me on time
|
|
|
|
Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2019, 11:48:06 AM |
|
We have 15 QRK MN running, the behaviour is different. Some are running without problems, at some it helps to restart at other it comes to "Missing" and we have to wait for 2 hours until we get rewards again.
We also have many other MN of other coins running, where all these problems do not exist.
Please come to a solution and a version that runs without big problems. We accept that updates and changes can cause problems, but with QRK the problem will soon be normal. We thought that version 10.7.3 would solve the problem, but now there are problems again with the new version. So it might be understandable that people are slowly switching from 7.3 to 7.4.
|
|
|
|
ghzsymc2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 4
|
|
September 17, 2019, 01:50:20 PM |
|
We have 15 QRK MN running, the behaviour is different. Some are running without problems, at some it helps to restart at other it comes to "Missing" and we have to wait for 2 hours until we get rewards again.
We also have many other MN of other coins running, where all these problems do not exist.
Please come to a solution and a version that runs without big problems. We accept that updates and changes can cause problems, but with QRK the problem will soon be normal. We thought that version 10.7.3 would solve the problem, but now there are problems again with the new version. So it might be understandable that people are slowly switching from 7.3 to 7.4.
I don't know how the developers designed it But at present, I can't see the node 7.0/7.2/7.3 in my 7.4 wallet I think it may need to be upgraded to 7.4 to stay on the main chain
|
|
|
|
Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2019, 02:25:34 PM |
|
We have 15 QRK MN running, the behaviour is different. Some are running without problems, at some it helps to restart at other it comes to "Missing" and we have to wait for 2 hours until we get rewards again.
We also have many other MN of other coins running, where all these problems do not exist.
Please come to a solution and a version that runs without big problems. We accept that updates and changes can cause problems, but with QRK the problem will soon be normal. We thought that version 10.7.3 would solve the problem, but now there are problems again with the new version. So it might be understandable that people are slowly switching from 7.3 to 7.4.
I don't know how the developers designed it But at present, I can't see the node 7.0/7.2/7.3 in my 7.4 wallet I think it may need to be upgraded to 7.4 to stay on the main chain Are you kidding me? I changed all MN and my wallet to 7.4 less than one hour after the message came that there is a new version 7.4. I already wrote this several times. All MNs are configured the same and have the same peers, they are only in different countries (Europe, Asia and America). With version 7.3 there were hardly any problems, with version 7.4 there are again many problems. Also from the beginning I only saw a part of my MN in the blockchain ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/qrk/#!network) under 7.4, although all MN are absolutely identical (except the private key of course). I explained this all already before in other posts. So maybe you should ask your developers what the problem is and not declare us for idiots.
|
|
|
|
loathy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2019, 02:51:04 PM |
|
FYI, left the wallet open 24hrs and the wallet did not synchronize! thats with 0.10.7.4!
had to reboot to sync it... pls fix this...
|
|
|
|
TeamElectric
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2019, 12:36:37 AM |
|
Three 0.10.7.4 masternodes synchronized and stable for 12 hours. 79 Masternodes Visible. The reducing connection count on Quark explorer could be an indication of the load being distributed more evenly through the network.
|
|
|
|
Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2019, 06:12:00 AM Last edit: September 18, 2019, 06:28:55 AM by Smartjag |
|
Three 0.10.7.4 masternodes synchronized and stable for 12 hours. 79 Masternodes Visible. The reducing connection count on Quark explorer could be an indication of the load being distributed more evenly through the network.
Yeah, now also our masternodes ran all night without any problems. Only the rewards are decreased, because of the increase of the number of masternodes. But here are too often too many problems and the developers don't really seem to know why. And for these problems, the ROI is getting to low now. There are more exciting masternodes.
|
|
|
|
ghzsymc2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 4
|
|
September 18, 2019, 12:14:40 PM |
|
We have 15 QRK MN running, the behaviour is different. Some are running without problems, at some it helps to restart at other it comes to "Missing" and we have to wait for 2 hours until we get rewards again.
We also have many other MN of other coins running, where all these problems do not exist.
Please come to a solution and a version that runs without big problems. We accept that updates and changes can cause problems, but with QRK the problem will soon be normal. We thought that version 10.7.3 would solve the problem, but now there are problems again with the new version. So it might be understandable that people are slowly switching from 7.3 to 7.4.
I don't know how the developers designed it But at present, I can't see the node 7.0/7.2/7.3 in my 7.4 wallet I think it may need to be upgraded to 7.4 to stay on the main chain Are you kidding me? I changed all MN and my wallet to 7.4 less than one hour after the message came that there is a new version 7.4. I already wrote this several times. All MNs are configured the same and have the same peers, they are only in different countries (Europe, Asia and America). With version 7.3 there were hardly any problems, with version 7.4 there are again many problems. Also from the beginning I only saw a part of my MN in the blockchain ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/qrk/#!network) under 7.4, although all MN are absolutely identical (except the private key of course). I explained this all already before in other posts. So maybe you should ask your developers what the problem is and not declare us for idiots. I believe this is a temporary problem caused by version switching I mentioned the need for more than 51% of the new version consensus Before POS is produced, 7.4 will have the problem of caton However, after POS output, 7.4 is stable, while caton's is 7.3 I don't have any problems with the catons anymore --- And 7.4 is our target (POW/POS+MN)
|
|
|
|
Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2019, 06:11:15 PM |
|
We have 15 QRK MN running, the behaviour is different. Some are running without problems, at some it helps to restart at other it comes to "Missing" and we have to wait for 2 hours until we get rewards again.
We also have many other MN of other coins running, where all these problems do not exist.
Please come to a solution and a version that runs without big problems. We accept that updates and changes can cause problems, but with QRK the problem will soon be normal. We thought that version 10.7.3 would solve the problem, but now there are problems again with the new version. So it might be understandable that people are slowly switching from 7.3 to 7.4.
I don't know how the developers designed it But at present, I can't see the node 7.0/7.2/7.3 in my 7.4 wallet I think it may need to be upgraded to 7.4 to stay on the main chain Are you kidding me? I changed all MN and my wallet to 7.4 less than one hour after the message came that there is a new version 7.4. I already wrote this several times. All MNs are configured the same and have the same peers, they are only in different countries (Europe, Asia and America). With version 7.3 there were hardly any problems, with version 7.4 there are again many problems. Also from the beginning I only saw a part of my MN in the blockchain ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/qrk/#!network) under 7.4, although all MN are absolutely identical (except the private key of course). I explained this all already before in other posts. So maybe you should ask your developers what the problem is and not declare us for idiots. I believe this is a temporary problem caused by version switching I mentioned the need for more than 51% of the new version consensus Before POS is produced, 7.4 will have the problem of caton However, after POS output, 7.4 is stable, while caton's is 7.3 I don't have any problems with the catons anymore --- And 7.4 is our target (POW/POS+MN) Thanks for the answers. The MN now seem to be running stable. Thanks for that! But now unfortunately another annoyance comes, which was announced, where I already pointed out the problem and now do it again: 980 or 1000 confirmations for a transfer to the Exchanges is too long. I.e. a transfer takes 8-9 hours. We actually wanted to set up a lot more QRK MN because we believe in the concept and history of QRK. But if we have to wait for 8-9 hours to sell the rewards , then unfortunately this is not interesting. In this time the price can change so much, or Exchanges can suspend the transfer and the trade, that this becomes more and more incalculable beside the past problems. FreiEXchange wrote that they do this only because of the recommendation of the QRK developers. Why don't you give advice to wait 5,000 or 10,000 confirmations? That would be much safer and nobody would trade or sell QRK again. You can't pass your problem with hackers on to the community and pass it on to stakeholders.
|
|
|
|
nuttynoah
|
|
September 18, 2019, 09:19:16 PM |
|
We have adviced our exchanges to reduce confirmations to between 50-100 for now. The previous high number was just a precaution for a temporary period.
|
|
|
|
TeamElectric
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2019, 01:17:21 AM |
|
Wallets and Masternodes now stable for +36 Hours. Can we have a response from AEX as to when Deposits and Withdrawals will resume? (with Sub 100 confirmations!)
|
|
|
|
ghzsymc2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 4
|
|
September 19, 2019, 01:52:02 AM |
|
Thanks for the answers. The MN now seem to be running stable. Thanks for that! But now unfortunately another annoyance comes, which was announced, where I already pointed out the problem and now do it again: 980 or 1000 confirmations for a transfer to the Exchanges is too long. I.e. a transfer takes 8-9 hours. We actually wanted to set up a lot more QRK MN because we believe in the concept and history of QRK. But if we have to wait for 8-9 hours to sell the rewards , then unfortunately this is not interesting. In this time the price can change so much, or Exchanges can suspend the transfer and the trade, that this becomes more and more incalculable beside the past problems. FreiEXchange wrote that they do this only because of the recommendation of the QRK developers. Why don't you give advice to wait 5,000 or 10,000 confirmations? That would be much safer and nobody would trade or sell QRK again. You can't pass your problem with hackers on to the community and pass it on to stakeholders. [/quote] Every problem will be solved It takes time Quark have lost a lot in it's long sleep If there is something you feel you need to improve You can leave a message. We will enhance them in sequence
|
|
|
|
Smartjag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2019, 12:23:46 PM |
|
Thanks for the answers. The MN now seem to be running stable. Thanks for that! But now unfortunately another annoyance comes, which was announced, where I already pointed out the problem and now do it again: 980 or 1000 confirmations for a transfer to the Exchanges is too long. I.e. a transfer takes 8-9 hours. We actually wanted to set up a lot more QRK MN because we believe in the concept and history of QRK. But if we have to wait for 8-9 hours to sell the rewards , then unfortunately this is not interesting. In this time the price can change so much, or Exchanges can suspend the transfer and the trade, that this becomes more and more incalculable beside the past problems. FreiEXchange wrote that they do this only because of the recommendation of the QRK developers. Why don't you give advice to wait 5,000 or 10,000 confirmations? That would be much safer and nobody would trade or sell QRK again. You can't pass your problem with hackers on to the community and pass it on to stakeholders. Every problem will be solved It takes time Quark have lost a lot in it's long sleep If there is something you feel you need to improve You can leave a message. We will enhance them in sequence [/quote] Unfortunately there are now problems with the transfers. First our transfer was not booked at FreiExchange. After the correction the coins cannot be transferred. FreiExchange has set our wallet to "maintenance" and now wants to talk to your devs. You will understand that this does not increase our trust.
|
|
|
|
TeamElectric
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2019, 01:45:04 PM Last edit: September 19, 2019, 02:00:04 PM by TeamElectric |
|
After running for 48 hours 3 masternodes now stuck on block 7242799 needing a restart to continue.
When restarting masternode:
23:53:04  Sync in progress. Must wait until sync is complete to start Masternode
|
|
|
|
nuttynoah
|
|
September 19, 2019, 02:20:20 PM |
|
Freiexchange contacted me earlier and i have passed on the details to the dev.
|
|
|
|
|