Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[fullhdpixel]

All clubs rely on the owners' capital first since it can't be established without it.  Then possibly they get loans from the banks to extend the fund while promoting the club and looking for sponsors.  Of course, they need to invest in players and training facilities to improve this player performance to attract more sponsors.  I agree, that for a club to flourish it needs a solid revenue with that the club should perform well in their matches, best if they become champion, to get more fans for shirt sales, match ticket sales, sponsors, tv ads deal, and so on.  Capital can get them started but sales and sponsors will keep the club ongoing and the key to that is their match performance and marketing team.

I do agree that clubs do use owners money to a certain degree, but not all that much at all times, plus the debt makes them grow in value which is the way they make money. So, let's assume that your club worths 500 million if you wanted to sell right now, if you get a 100 million debt, but the team now worths 750 million, that's a profit.

It's not the traditional way of thinking about "profit", because usually profit is the money that you put into your pocket, but clubs are usually profiting the by going up in value.

This is why Newcastle and Everton are growing bigger by doing all of these, they are not after making a profit directly, they are after making the club go huge, so that if one day they want to sell, they can sell it for an insane profit later on.

[1714507551]

1714507551

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Like always @seleme.

There is no golden rules, you will hit some multiplier depending on how much spin you're made. That's only an assumption and don't take really serious, same like slot example : in pragmatic average spin around 100-130 spin. If you don't get any scatter more than the average spin with 200-300 more spin, that's mean you're on cold section (should not continue).

Same happen like plinko, and other game : "Previous spin/roll never increase your chance or win for the next spin" ~XD Feel bads for you mate.

[Raflesia]

Official Mirrors

So we have a number of sites which are in fact the official mirrors of stake.com. I never knew the list was quite big.
Does these mirror sites are hosted on different servers but they point to the same database ?

It seems so, still referring to the same database. So many choices are given because at any time someone who is offline can access it using other online mirror sites. With the same database and you will stay in the same position as when you last used the previous mirror site.
For example, if you are using Stake.bet and suddenly it goes Offline, then use Stake.games or what is available written Online.

I'm having trouble on the main site with stake.com but with the mirror site it makes it easier for me to choose which one can be used easily and yes of course it goes to the same database.
I saw the mirror link is now back online all including stake.bet.

It's good to gamble from stake.com, there are many mirror links that we use with convenience, but still this goes to the main domain site that is often used by many people.

[Symphonized]

"We've got a fun fight night ahead of us with some amazing scraps and we cannot wait for all of it to go down" 👊



#UFCAustin preview 📰

https://stake.com/blog/ufc-kattar-vs-emmett

[Jody.Drummer]

I'm having trouble on the main site with stake.com but with the mirror site it makes it easier for me to choose which one can be used easily and yes of course it goes to the same database.
I saw the mirror link is now back online all including stake.bet.

It's good to gamble from stake.com, there are many mirror links that we use with convenience, but still this goes to the main domain site that is often used by many people.

For now, the alternative used by Stake.com is indeed quite effective. Instead of not giving other options, then to minimize losses due to down site. With the availability of mirror sites, it can be easier. Until everything is back to normal, then there is nothing to worry about, because the list of mirror sites is still the same referring to the main Stake.com database.

[panjul07]

What was max ball drops on 15 pins plinko to hit 620x plinko?
Currently over 50k drops on this seed and exclusively playing plinko but still no shot after 4800x loss. Insane loss streaks for small multiplier on house games...

Here we go again, dropped over 80k balls no shot.
Originals never been so bad, it has supposed to hit 5 times atm.

What a bad luck. If I were you, I would have changed the seed more than 20 times for 80k balls as I have never used single seed for more than 10k
I know how it feels and I think you should change the way you play plinko, at least do some variations by changing the row and the seed.
Sticking on one row and one seed is not good IMO, you may get bad luck in 620x but you may get better luck in other row 420x or 1000x.

[Text]

I'm always trying to not lose more than $2-$3 in one session, but, well, I'm a human, I'm not perfect, so, sometimes I lose $5-$6 before I stop. The particular time you are asking about, I lost a bit above $2.

Today after reading your reply, and remembering that Blue Samurai Challenge is still on, I went to Stake to try my luck again. This time with wagering just $0.75

~snip

 I almost hit the target, 70x:
 
~snip
 
 But not quite. Maybe I'll try again later, we still have 3 days left.

Thanks for the reply, oh I thought you spent like double-digit. I'm just afraid to lose all my balance if ever luck is not beside me. Still want to have experience in this game and of course to make my try on the challenge. I'll just set up a limit like 400 spins as mentioned by @Dewi Aries with the 0.03 base bet so I can just risk $12.

[Kakmakr]

What was max ball drops on 15 pins plinko to hit 620x plinko?
Currently over 50k drops on this seed and exclusively playing plinko but still no shot after 4800x loss. Insane loss streaks for small multiplier on house games...

Here we go again, dropped over 80k balls no shot.
Originals never been so bad, it has supposed to hit 5 times atm.

Well, I am currently on 300k spins on Plinko with no "Max" hit, so I feel your pain. I also find that the money needed to wager has also been "nerfed" to make it useless to wager for a higher return on "Weekly" and "Monthly" (Yes, they did say that people who mostly wager on original games, will get less "Weekly" & "Monthly" ..... but they did not say that the wagering has also been nerfed) 

Check your "Live Stats" when you wager..... it will slowly feed in the beginning, because I suspect the algorithm used to determine if you are wagering does not detect at the start that you are wagering.... but once it does detect that, it goes into aggressive feeding mode... and it will destroy your remaining balance. (Note : It is only been tested by myself and some of my friends)

pS : There are a difference between "wagering" and just playing. (Those who do this, will understand) 

[Bitinity]

-------

Thanks for the reply, oh I thought you spent like double-digit. I'm just afraid to lose all my balance if ever luck is not beside me. Still want to have experience in this game and of course to make my try on the challenge. I'll just set up a limit like 400 spins as mentioned by @Dewi Aries with the 0.03 base bet so I can just risk $12.

As long as I remember the average reward for such challenge is less than $10 because there are hundred users who meet the target eventually. So risking more than the average reward is basically not a good decision if you ask me. It is better if set your limit no more than the average reward for similar challenge. Lets look at the current replies, there are more than 300 replies in the challenge's thread. So it is clear that you'll not get more than $10 for the challenge, and it might be lower again at the end of the challenge since there are still few days for users to complete the challenge. However, if you want to play to try the game and your main purpose is not for the challenge, you are fine to go with any amount.

[fullhdpixel]

This is why I do not think that Everton will be amazing right away. However, we should remember that Everton is still a premier league team, even if the relegate, they are still in EPL and that is still awesome.

Yes,,, never thought they would be amazing, they definitely bought themselves and thought they could do magic but money is not everything too, they forgot to change the mentality as well!

I would say that money "is" everything, they just decided to use that money for a different thing. Look at Newcastle recently for example, Everton is definitely not as rich as them, but instead of rebuilding the stadium, Newcvastle went and bought players and overpaid them but took them out of relegation level and put them into a good place, Everton could have opted out of the new stadium and could have bought players as well and got good results. But Everton decided they would rather use the money for something that is long term, and that is why I think they are going to just get better. Having a bigger revenue is certainly a great step forward.

[OgNasty]

I'm seeing Stake sponsoring videos for some of my favorite social media influencers recently.  This has me wondering what other influencers they might be sponsoring that I have no idea about.  I don't see announcements when Stake sponsors Nelk or Stevewilldoit videos.  Is there a place somewhere that we could go to review all the influencers being sponsored by Stake and maybe links to their various channels or videos?  I'd think Stake has to be spending a pretty penny on sponsorships these days, so it seems logical they'd want a way to promote all their sponsored stars.  Does this exist and I'm just unaware? 

[Jody.Drummer]

I'm seeing Stake sponsoring videos for some of my favorite social media influencers recently.  This has me wondering what other influencers they might be sponsoring that I have no idea about.  I don't see announcements when Stake sponsors Nelk or Stevewilldoit videos.  Is there a place somewhere that we could go to review all the influencers being sponsored by Stake and maybe links to their various channels or videos?  I'd think Stake has to be spending a pretty penny on sponsorships these days, so it seems logical they'd want a way to promote all their sponsored stars.  Does this exist and I'm just unaware? 

You are right, I also tried to search all social media but couldn't find it. Maybe it's Stake.com way of keeping it behind the scenes and only sending private messages to each influencer. So it's not like a planned thing. I think it's one of the most common methods. And apparently, not a few new influencers, YouTubers, and streamers also use the Stake.com attribute.

[Dewi Aries]

-------

Thanks for the reply, oh I thought you spent like double-digit. I'm just afraid to lose all my balance if ever luck is not beside me. Still want to have experience in this game and of course to make my try on the challenge. I'll just set up a limit like 400 spins as mentioned by @Dewi Aries with the 0.03 base bet so I can just risk $12.

As long as I remember the average reward for such challenge is less than $10 because there are hundred users who meet the target eventually. So risking more than the average reward is basically not a good decision if you ask me. It is better if set your limit no more than the average reward for similar challenge. Lets look at the current replies, there are more than 300 replies in the challenge's thread. So it is clear that you'll not get more than $10 for the challenge, and it might be lower again at the end of the challenge since there are still few days for users to complete the challenge. However, if you want to play to try the game and your main purpose is not for the challenge, you are fine to go with any amount.

It's true I always participate here the average reward is $4-6 + bonuses for verified accounts there is an additional bonus if you finish in the top 10
I suggest better hunting challenges in sports fewer participants and higher rewards so far less than 50 participants , sometimes the task is very easy like this week try to check here .

[Symphonized]

Don't forget about this Weekly Boost:

VIP weekly boost: https://playstake.io/bonus?code=BoostWeekly1806ahGB2
VIP weekly boost total: $8,977,466!




Get yourself a punter who knows their UFC 😍

[barbara44]

It is sometimes just your unlucky period and we have that all the time. I mean it doesn't mean that you will keep having that at all times, it just means that we need to survive that tough time and then we could have a great period as well.

You may go 500k times without a single max, but then you could wager 1k times and hit it twice, both of these are not impossible and I believe that the unlucky part usually gets a lot more attention because it is a lot more common. You can't have max win at all times, that is why it is max hit and it is a rare thing, so it is more likely to not hit it when you gamble hundreds of thousands of time, whereas when you hit it, it is "expected" after a while.

[Text]

As long as I remember the average reward for such challenge is less than $10 because there are hundred users who meet the target eventually. So risking more than the average reward is basically not a good decision if you ask me. It is better if set your limit no more than the average reward for similar challenge. Lets look at the current replies, there are more than 300 replies in the challenge's thread. So it is clear that you'll not get more than $10 for the challenge, and it might be lower again at the end of the challenge since there are still few days for users to complete the challenge. However, if you want to play to try the game and your main purpose is not for the challenge, you are fine to go with any amount.

I was tempted every time I see this kind of challenge, of course, I take a look at the requirements if there is a possibility that I can complete and qualify for the contest. But if the minimum bet and/or required minimum multiplier to hit is higher for a typical small gambler then I just skip it.

Thanks for the tip, now I know.

But you know, I still try the challenge, unfortunately, I didn't hit the minimum multiplier to qualify but still make a little profit.

[leea-1334]

At this stage maybe Villa is a bit better? They may look similar right now given the latest season ending, but Villa seems like an overall better team for the long term, the yhave the players for it. I believe that Everton will get better a bit later. I am imagining its going  to be like 5 seasons of Villa finishing better or at least "should" finish better, and after 5 seasons its going to be Everton finishing better or at least "should" finish better.

Why? Because Villa is a better overall team according to me right now, I might be wrong, I could be proven otherwise, and odds will show if I am wrong or not. But Everton just made a huge chunk of revenue maker for themselves, which should mean that over course of next decade, they will slowly get better and better each year probably.

Yes,,, I do agree. Villa look much better, they have a proper manager who has proven himself and won honors already in Scotland (take into account he did an Invincibles season there AFTER 10 years domination from Celtic) whereas Lampard has almost nothing to his name except a squad at Chelsea he could not do much.

But Everton do have finances and a big fan base and a lot of talent that Ancelotti proved were actually good.

I do agree. But I disagree on points above of relegation and who has 'better' chance.

[Slow death]

Villa and Everton are equally not at risk, so not sure why you say it like this. You realize Everton only relegated TWO times in their history and the last time was 1950?

Villa relegated in 1987, and then in 2016 and stayed there until 2018. How long you watching EPL?

look at what i said, villa has a good coach and made good signings, now look at verton, everton coach Is frank lampard and i haven't seen (at least for now) great signings at everton, now look at others teams and ask yourself:

How far can everton go this season? Can they be 1 to 10 or 10 to 15 or will they be in the last 5 fighting to not be relegated? just look at all the teams and you'll understand what I'm trying to say

Well as I pointed out the stats and history show the proof. Villa was relegated 5 seasons ago. Yes they got good players now but we also saw teams self destruct trying to buy quality without having a good foundation. I still say Everton and Villa are more or less equal in terms of relegation risk and position. I did look at all the teams and well,,, I guess we will find out anyway this coming season. I do like Villa a lot for sure, so if they get into Europe spot that would be very nice as well.

well the first everton game will be against arsenal, friendly game, we will be able to see how lampard prepared everton for this season. I don't expect much from everton this season but they might surprise me. In the case of Aston Villa I hope that this season they manage to finish in a position that is better than last season, of course it will not be easy because this season they have Tottenham, they have Manchester United, they have the arsenal that are teams that will surely fight a lot to occupy positions 3 to 6. one that for me the first to third position will be occupied by City, Liverpool and chelsea

[panjul07]

Don't you feel like missing main multiplier on previous row after changing plinko rows?
Changing seed? Maybe yeah changing rotating client seed can change my luck but it is under question this seed will take 100k drops to hit 1000x plinko or not 🤔

Missing main multiplier means that your main target is not to make profit but to hit the multiplier only?
I dont think it is wise if your main target is to hit the multiplier only and just to test the probability of hitting the target in specific number of bets in single seed.
Of course we have our own preferences on how to play, but I would not stick into single seed and single row when I play plinko.
For me variation is needed, not only in plinko but also in other games such as dice, mines, keno, etc.

[Jody.Drummer]

I was tempted every time I see this kind of challenge, of course, I take a look at the requirements if there is a possibility that I can complete and qualify for the contest. But if the minimum bet and/or required minimum multiplier to hit is higher for a typical small gambler then I just skip it.

Thanks for the tip, now I know.

But you know, I still try the challenge, unfortunately, I didn't hit the minimum multiplier to qualify but still make a little profit.

Other times you might be lucky. It is not easy to find a high multiplier. Even I can't maximize the game this week as expected. But as we can do with the minimum bet, it provides a little entertainment to not get too past the weekend.76 wins compared to 312 losses is not really a cover. If I were in your position, what I often do is stop for a while and will not try to play until I have a more commensurate capital.