BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes)

[slovakia]

    old topic

[thesnat21]

  old topic

I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange

[slovakia]

  old topic

I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange

its inactive.....

[vahtis]

C-cex seems to be stuck on block 80744?

There is a problem with all coins on C-Cex, see: https://c-cex.com/?id=ws

I think Yuriy is on a weekend vacation, so it will be back to normal on Monday or Tuesday.

Everything is wrong there. Candlesticks missing, api returning wrong volumes and deposits not working.
Yesterday the whole site was down for a while

I think c-cex is problem itself ...

Looks like site is working again.

[vahtis]

  old topic

I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange

At least c-cex link directs to old topic.

[slovakia]

yes CCEX linking to old forum  

Snat21 explorer is syncing  http://explorer.biblepay.org/

[thesnat21]

  old topic

I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange

its inactive.....

Inactive but quite a lot of views.

We will try to get C-Cex to update their link.

[lembang]

  old topic

I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange

its inactive.....

there are many reasons why this might change the team better and maybe it will further develop the project itself and it seems that many old topics are still being discussed because maybe the project is interesting or the price is a differentiator

[sunk818]

The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'.  I never did like that possibility. 

If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay.

[MIP]

The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'.  I never did like that possibility. 

If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay.

It seems like a two-edged sword for me, if they can join they will have to buy BBP to stake, but on the other side if they add up a lot of RAC, the profitability of PoDC mining will fall, and some miners could leave and sell their stake...

In the final balance I think that allowing all teams will be better than keeping blacklists, but I may be wrong in my appreciation.

[slovakia]

The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'.  I never did like that possibility.  

If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay.

+1

im for new GRC/BYTEBALL users on BBP.....but with staking system ... all users on these 2 coins is very smart

[thesnat21]

If we want to debate the merits of blacklist/no blacklist I think the better place to do that is the "official forums" https://forum.biblepay.org

Someone start a topic and we can talk over the pros/cons.   I wont block-censor-delete unless they violate the community guidelines

[SVK Noko]

  old topic

I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange

Probably the name of the topic is much more attractive than the new one.

[SVK Noko]

The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'.  I never did like that possibility.  

If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay.

It seems like a two-edged sword for me, if they can join they will have to buy BBP to stake, but on the other side if they add up a lot of RAC, the profitability of PoDC mining will fall, and some miners could leave and sell their stake...

In the final balance I think that allowing all teams will be better than keeping blacklists, but I may be wrong in my appreciation.

THE MAIN EFFORT SHOULD BE BBP NETWORK GROWING. DONT LOOK AT THE PROFIT. IF BBP NETWORK WILL GROW PRICE AND BBP VALUE IN GENERAL WILL RAISE TOO.

And who decided to blacklisted these two Groups Was there any discussion in BBP forum? Maybe yes I dont remember that.

[thesnat21]

If we want to debate the merits of blacklist/no blacklist I think the better place to do that is the "official forums" https://forum.biblepay.org

Someone start a topic and we can talk over the pros/cons.   I wont block-censor-delete unless they violate the community guidelines

Follow-Up,  

Rob e-mailed me saying the current discussions on this topic violated his guidelines (primarily because they violated investor perception).

My thoughts:

I will reiterate This discussion should be moved over to the official forums, as to not muddy this thread, and will help organize the thoughts.


 Let's work to keep this thread more for informational/support/investor updates.

I do appreciate all your input, I don't expect anything on this topic will change in the immediate future.

[alk]

cex has [BBP] Biblepay    block 80744    wallet 1010509
so if it is 1.1.5.9 then it is actual

problem is that all wallets are off now, so there is some global problem

I just bought some amount of BBP on c-cex and transferred them to my wallet

[cuarc001]

I tend to come across the old thread when doing searches more often than this thread. That is probably why it has so many hits as well. Just a thought.

[noxpost]

While I have no strong opinion on whether or not Biblepay Central is still listed as an active community website, I do want to point out that on this page:
https://www.biblepay.org/cryptoguru/#team

We mistakenly list Lichtsucher's site as a ".com" rather than a ".org" - probably worth a quick update there.

[zthomasz]

While I have no strong opinion on whether or not Biblepay Central is still listed as an active community website, I do want to point out that on this page:
https://www.biblepay.org/cryptoguru/#team

We mistakenly list Lichtsucher's site as a ".com" rather than a ".org" - probably worth a quick update there.

I updated it from .com to .org ... should I make it a live link to the site?

https://www.biblepay.org/cryptoguru/#team

[inblue]

If we want to debate the merits of blacklist/no blacklist I think the better place to do that is the "official forums" https://forum.biblepay.org

Someone start a topic and we can talk over the pros/cons.

This discussion should be moved over to the official forums, as to not muddy this thread, and will help organize the thoughts.

I disagree. This thread needs to be posted to as often as possible. Here is why: probably around 90% of people who stumbled upon BiblePay did so by finding this thread on this forum. The other 10% are masternode sites, airdrop, etc. Rob has also directed traffic to the BBP forum a lot of times and most of the time it's completely legitimate, when there is a need for some really in-depth discussion or a proposal thread etc. And I am all for that, for the BBP forum to have more posts as well, it's good for community buildup and so on.

But I think we should never steer away from this thread, because this is how people find BiblePay. Think about it, someone new can't possibly go to forum.biblepay.org as their first touch with BiblePay. It's for people already in the game who know the link, have an account etc. (While I'm at it, I think accounts should not have to be manually verified by the admin, just put a recaptcha and it's fine). This thread is how we stand out from others, I follow a lot of threads and much higher market cap coins don't have nearly as much posts as we do, therefore we gain free exposure this way, and it shows how active of a community we are.

So I think we should not move just about any discussion to the "invisible" forum, or else what would happen is that only the old members would be active on the BBP forum, this thread would be less active and therefore less findable, which would lead to lowering the member count, as some old members would slowly leave over time and not enough new ones would come. The BBP forum should definitely be more content rich than this thread, but it's sort of a level 2 for newcomers, to discover and dig through after they could find us in the first place.