|
thesnat21
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 4
|
|
November 05, 2018, 02:02:22 PM |
|
I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange
|
|
|
|
slovakia
|
|
November 05, 2018, 03:29:39 PM |
|
I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange its inactive.....
|
|
|
|
vahtis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2018, 03:30:31 PM |
|
C-cex seems to be stuck on block 80744?
There is a problem with all coins on C-Cex, see: https://c-cex.com/?id=wsI think Yuriy is on a weekend vacation, so it will be back to normal on Monday or Tuesday. Everything is wrong there. Candlesticks missing, api returning wrong volumes and deposits not working. Yesterday the whole site was down for a while I think c-cex is problem itself ... Looks like site is working again.
|
|
|
|
vahtis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2018, 03:31:18 PM |
|
I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange At least c-cex link directs to old topic.
|
|
|
|
|
thesnat21
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 4
|
|
November 05, 2018, 03:44:36 PM |
|
I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange its inactive..... Inactive but quite a lot of views. We will try to get C-Cex to update their link.
|
|
|
|
lembang
|
|
November 05, 2018, 05:42:15 PM |
|
I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange its inactive..... there are many reasons why this might change the team better and maybe it will further develop the project itself and it seems that many old topics are still being discussed because maybe the project is interesting or the price is a differentiator
|
|
|
|
sunk818
|
|
November 05, 2018, 06:17:11 PM |
|
The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'. I never did like that possibility.
If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay.
|
|
|
|
MIP
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 362
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2018, 06:58:52 PM |
|
The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'. I never did like that possibility.
If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay. It seems like a two-edged sword for me, if they can join they will have to buy BBP to stake, but on the other side if they add up a lot of RAC, the profitability of PoDC mining will fall, and some miners could leave and sell their stake... In the final balance I think that allowing all teams will be better than keeping blacklists, but I may be wrong in my appreciation.
|
|
|
|
slovakia
|
|
November 05, 2018, 08:00:36 PM |
|
The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'. I never did like that possibility.
If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay. +1 im for new GRC/BYTEBALL users on BBP.....but with staking system ... all users on these 2 coins is very smart
|
|
|
|
thesnat21
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 4
|
|
November 05, 2018, 08:18:31 PM Last edit: November 05, 2018, 09:38:36 PM by thesnat21 |
|
If we want to debate the merits of blacklist/no blacklist I think the better place to do that is the "official forums" https://forum.biblepay.orgSomeone start a topic and we can talk over the pros/cons. I wont block-censor-delete unless they violate the community guidelines
|
|
|
|
SVK Noko
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 267
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2018, 09:07:01 PM |
|
I wonder what is so interesting that is keeping the old topic so active? Strange Probably the name of the topic is much more attractive than the new one.
|
|
|
|
SVK Noko
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 267
Merit: 0
|
|
November 05, 2018, 09:11:02 PM |
|
The only thing so far I dont like about the proposal is what West mentioned about 'double dipping'. I never did like that possibility.
If you have to stake BBP to earn PoDC rewards, it is not "double-dipping" for free. I'd argue that GridCoin users are the ideal crossover because they understand crypto already. Blacklisting the team gives them little incentive to join BiblePay. It seems like a two-edged sword for me, if they can join they will have to buy BBP to stake, but on the other side if they add up a lot of RAC, the profitability of PoDC mining will fall, and some miners could leave and sell their stake... In the final balance I think that allowing all teams will be better than keeping blacklists, but I may be wrong in my appreciation. THE MAIN EFFORT SHOULD BE BBP NETWORK GROWING. DONT LOOK AT THE PROFIT. IF BBP NETWORK WILL GROW PRICE AND BBP VALUE IN GENERAL WILL RAISE TOO. And who decided to blacklisted these two Groups Was there any discussion in BBP forum? Maybe yes I dont remember that.
|
|
|
|
thesnat21
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 4
|
|
November 05, 2018, 09:38:17 PM Last edit: November 05, 2018, 09:51:39 PM by thesnat21 |
|
If we want to debate the merits of blacklist/no blacklist I think the better place to do that is the "official forums" https://forum.biblepay.orgSomeone start a topic and we can talk over the pros/cons. I wont block-censor-delete unless they violate the community guidelines Follow-Up, Rob e-mailed me saying the current discussions on this topic violated his guidelines (primarily because they violated investor perception). My thoughts: I will reiterate This discussion should be moved over to the official forums, as to not muddy this thread, and will help organize the thoughts. Let's work to keep this thread more for informational/support/investor updates. I do appreciate all your input, I don't expect anything on this topic will change in the immediate future.
|
|
|
|
alk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2018, 12:15:55 AM |
|
cex has [BBP] Biblepay block 80744 wallet 1010509 so if it is 1.1.5.9 then it is actual
problem is that all wallets are off now, so there is some global problem
I just bought some amount of BBP on c-cex and transferred them to my wallet
|
|
|
|
cuarc001
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2018, 02:33:19 AM |
|
I tend to come across the old thread when doing searches more often than this thread. That is probably why it has so many hits as well. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
noxpost
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 235
Merit: 3
|
|
November 06, 2018, 02:10:22 PM |
|
While I have no strong opinion on whether or not Biblepay Central is still listed as an active community website, I do want to point out that on this page: https://www.biblepay.org/cryptoguru/#teamWe mistakenly list Lichtsucher's site as a ".com" rather than a ".org" - probably worth a quick update there.
|
|
|
|
zthomasz
Member
Offline
Activity: 489
Merit: 12
|
|
November 06, 2018, 03:59:06 PM Last edit: November 06, 2018, 04:15:10 PM by zthomasz |
|
While I have no strong opinion on whether or not Biblepay Central is still listed as an active community website, I do want to point out that on this page: https://www.biblepay.org/cryptoguru/#teamWe mistakenly list Lichtsucher's site as a ".com" rather than a ".org" - probably worth a quick update there. I updated it from .com to .org ... should I make it a live link to the site? https://www.biblepay.org/cryptoguru/#team
|
|
|
|
inblue
|
|
November 06, 2018, 06:32:03 PM |
|
If we want to debate the merits of blacklist/no blacklist I think the better place to do that is the "official forums" https://forum.biblepay.orgSomeone start a topic and we can talk over the pros/cons. This discussion should be moved over to the official forums, as to not muddy this thread, and will help organize the thoughts.
I disagree. This thread needs to be posted to as often as possible. Here is why: probably around 90% of people who stumbled upon BiblePay did so by finding this thread on this forum. The other 10% are masternode sites, airdrop, etc. Rob has also directed traffic to the BBP forum a lot of times and most of the time it's completely legitimate, when there is a need for some really in-depth discussion or a proposal thread etc. And I am all for that, for the BBP forum to have more posts as well, it's good for community buildup and so on. But I think we should never steer away from this thread, because this is how people find BiblePay. Think about it, someone new can't possibly go to forum.biblepay.org as their first touch with BiblePay. It's for people already in the game who know the link, have an account etc. (While I'm at it, I think accounts should not have to be manually verified by the admin, just put a recaptcha and it's fine). This thread is how we stand out from others, I follow a lot of threads and much higher market cap coins don't have nearly as much posts as we do, therefore we gain free exposure this way, and it shows how active of a community we are. So I think we should not move just about any discussion to the "invisible" forum, or else what would happen is that only the old members would be active on the BBP forum, this thread would be less active and therefore less findable, which would lead to lowering the member count, as some old members would slowly leave over time and not enough new ones would come. The BBP forum should definitely be more content rich than this thread, but it's sort of a level 2 for newcomers, to discover and dig through after they could find us in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|