[ANN][ICO]CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [HARDCAP REACHED!]

[theleaf]

I am waiting for news about the launch of the platform and hope that the price will rise. Recently, the price of tokens upsets me.

I want to give you some important advice - don't sell your tokens until next year. I think that the maximum price of the token will be when people begin to use the platform.

great advice, functional products release next year with business integrating Credits platform? who will be the users?

[theleaf]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Those guys approaching you in the CREDITS channel on telegram have probably nothing to do with CREDITS itself. They are scammers and they also wait for victims in other TG channels.

Very true and a very good point. It's possible, but the motivation for what I've seen appears to be designed to create buzz, similar to how the U.S. election was hacked.  Here again, my point is also that anything Russian or related to Russia is tainted due to recent world events in the U.S. in the UK and in Syria.  It puts a bad taste in people's mouths and minds for anything Russian.

If Credits wants to redeem itself, they can start by using more polished English speaking people when using the English language to communicate ANYTHING TO THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD.  Otherwise they look like total idiots in the PR sense.  No one in the West, wants to hear from a Russia ANYTHING right now.  Russia is openly despised right now on the world's stage, so it's stupid to underline that ethnicity in any way, under the present circumstances.

On the positive side, this is actually a good time to buy Credit$, because of the negative news cycle. This is when you want to buy. Also, my suspicion is that Binance doesn't care about anything but profits, generally, and Credits is one of the best sellers on KuCoin, so they must be chomping at the bit to list it. Binance doesn't want to list a true scam, but with their decentralized platform coming out this year anyway, it won't make much difference what they list on their centralized exchange, as it will be the wild West on their decentralized platform, regardless. So why be too picky now?

Everytime Credits$ dips below 0.50 cents, people rush in to buy it, which is not typical of most of the ICO's that we've seen launched during the bear market.

This is stupid hypothesis, not interested in politics but what Credits can do is to focusing on whatever its doing, which is building a strong, robust Credits blockchain technology that can creates a better world. If you read about fb/google/amazon, they had lots of ups and downs, more failures and success, yet, overcoming these obstacles and focusing on the fundamentals that set them apart from the others

[theleaf]

Credits fellow - showed excellent speed, provided the alpha version at the fundraising stage, reached a high level of hype ... But soon there will be several new interesting interlocutors and interest in CREDITS will begin to fade ... For example, Seele, NKN, YUGGDRASH and others .. .

All mentioned still have a long time until their Betas, testnets and mainnets. Time is very important in crypto space, half a year of a difference can mean that the project stalls or fails.

Time is important in crypto space, but you cant rush technology development, like the age of internet, takes years to revolutionize the internet industry with mass adoption

[sebastian787]

The paid shillers and scam supporters decided to get our from their holes again to praise credits.
Credits has no value thats why they try to create fake hypes everyday with fake accounts and bots, paid shillers sharing stupid updates, and scam supporters that invested on credits and they do everything possible to convince newcomers to invest on this project so they can get a better price for their investment.
They dont care if you get scammed. They just care for their investment so you should not value their opinion and their future advises.

Here is a full review / research about credits for everyone to check and decide if he wants to invest his money or not.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3172280.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3300356.0

[Traderbtcc]

Regardless of the endless fuds surrounding Credits, I still think it should be left to prove itself. It's been said that the developers are amateurs, agreed. But I believe that's one of the main reasons for holding a crowdsale in the first place ~ to bring in new talents. The technology the team is building is still at infant stages. Criticizing it now isn't the best thing to do.

[NS-Soul]

Regardless of the endless fuds surrounding Credits, I still think it should be left to prove itself. It's been said that the developers are amateurs, agreed. But I believe that's one of the main reasons for holding a crowdsale in the first place ~ to bring in new talents. The technology the team is building is still at infant stages. Criticizing it now isn't the best thing to do.

Its normal to the projects some of them doesn't have a good experience on it but they are in that field and waiting to do this kind of programs. I think its not bad and it is good to know if they are doing their best to this or they just waiting for the hype or price matters. I don't wanna judge them and just leave it to them.

[bertak]

Credits fellow - showed excellent speed, provided the alpha version at the fundraising stage, reached a high level of hype ... But soon there will be several new interesting interlocutors and interest in CREDITS will begin to fade ... For example, Seele, NKN, YUGGDRASH and others .. .

Seele
Development of Seele is in the initial stage. They have nothing but white paper. Therefore, Seele is not a competitor for CREDITS

[sebastian787]

Regardless of the endless fuds surrounding Credits, I still think it should be left to prove itself. It's been said that the developers are amateurs, agreed. But I believe that's one of the main reasons for holding a crowdsale in the first place ~ to bring in new talents. The technology the team is building is still at infant stages. Criticizing it now isn't the best thing to do.

If they are amateurs and you agree then you also agree that they are feeding sh*ts about 1ml TPS etc. So whats the point of supporting a project that is sharing stupid updates everyday to create a hype as it CANT create hype by presenting VALUE?

[sebastian787]

Regardless of the endless fuds surrounding Credits, I still think it should be left to prove itself. It's been said that the developers are amateurs, agreed. But I believe that's one of the main reasons for holding a crowdsale in the first place ~ to bring in new talents. The technology the team is building is still at infant stages. Criticizing it now isn't the best thing to do.

Its normal to the projects some of them doesn't have a good experience on it but they are in that field and waiting to do this kind of programs. I think its not bad and it is good to know if they are doing their best to this or they just waiting for the hype or price matters. I don't wanna judge them and just leave it to them.

I agree. Dont judge them, leave them to work but also you should not praise them with future moon prices and saying that they are something special as many accounts here say so.
Simple as that.
If there is value they will survive. If not they should just stop operating with fake updates and stupid news everyday.

[KimberlyGB]

Regardless of the endless fuds surrounding Credits, I still think it should be left to prove itself. It's been said that the developers are amateurs, agreed. But I believe that's one of the main reasons for holding a crowdsale in the first place ~ to bring in new talents. The technology the team is building is still at infant stages. Criticizing it now isn't the best thing to do.

Its normal to the projects some of them doesn't have a good experience on it but they are in that field and waiting to do this kind of programs. I think its not bad and it is good to know if they are doing their best to this or they just waiting for the hype or price matters. I don't wanna judge them and just leave it to them.

I agree. Dont judge them, leave them to work but also you should not praise them with future moon prices and saying that they are something special as many accounts here say so.
Simple as that.
If there is value they will survive. If not they should just stop operating with fake updates and stupid news everyday.

I think news should be compulsory, but not only about platform advancement, but also about product creation. Best of all, the team's work displays the price of the token on the exchange.

[manazmej]

Regardless of the endless fuds surrounding Credits, I still think it should be left to prove itself. It's been said that the developers are amateurs, agreed. But I believe that's one of the main reasons for holding a crowdsale in the first place ~ to bring in new talents. The technology the team is building is still at infant stages. Criticizing it now isn't the best thing to do.

Its normal to the projects some of them doesn't have a good experience on it but they are in that field and waiting to do this kind of programs. I think its not bad and it is good to know if they are doing their best to this or they just waiting for the hype or price matters. I don't wanna judge them and just leave it to them.

I agree. Dont judge them, leave them to work but also you should not praise them with future moon prices and saying that they are something special as many accounts here say so.
Simple as that.
If there is value they will survive. If not they should just stop operating with fake updates and stupid news everyday.

I think news should be compulsory, but not only about platform advancement, but also about product creation. Best of all, the team's work displays the price of the token on the exchange.

you correctly argue and I fully agree with this, product should always be in first place, but I'm sure that the team knows what it does.

[sebastian787]

Credits fellow - showed excellent speed, provided the alpha version at the fundraising stage, reached a high level of hype ... But soon there will be several new interesting interlocutors and interest in CREDITS will begin to fade ... For example, Seele, NKN, YUGGDRASH and others .. .

Seele
Development of Seele is in the initial stage. They have nothing but white paper. Therefore, Seele is not a competitor for CREDITS

Seele and credits have many things in common.
One of them is that both were promoted by the crypto clown Suppoman, the scam ico promoter.

[hazenyc]

Damn after 2 years here in this forum and have invested and participated on almost 50 coins I am now a shiller and paid poster for Credits this is  an ongoing project I need to support this project because I invested huge here some just can't take it.

Shilling a project would be done best if you put some effort into your posts and demonstrate why Credits is a buy for you. Not just saying "I need to shill this because I am all in".

[Mkmanik]

I want to start node for this coin.what is the minimum requirements for start node? I already visited this https://credits.com/en/Home/Node but there is no information about the minimum coin for starting node.

[amintek15]

so many weeks have passed, you come back and you still see sebastian posting all the time the same old shit..
anyway, CS is not really reacting to growing market but it's the same for many new coins so to early to take any bad conclusion.

[simongoat]

I keep seeing ads websites that are trying to get me to buy credits. Is there any reason why credits needs to do loads of advertising with Google Ads?

[remol]

Sebastian's reason of living is only spreading FUD on Credits...And it works...Why don't you spread FUD about EOS that still don't have working product after all this time, and all this money raised?

Waiting for your answer

[sebastian787]

I keep seeing ads websites that are trying to get me to buy credits. Is there any reason why credits needs to do loads of advertising with Google Ads?

They have no value to present so they do their best to convince everyone that they are something special by advertising their coin in every possible way all day long.
Advertisement without value is just thin air.

[sebastian787]

Sebastian's reason of living is only spreading FUD on Credits...And it works...Why don't you spread FUD about EOS that still don't have working product after all this time, and all this money raised?

Waiting for your answer

Its like saying to police that catches you for stealing "why dont you catch everyone that steals".
Im not spreading fud. If you dont like my language you can ignore me and just praise your token as all the shillers here.
As about EOS or whatever you are asking.
At least EOS have more than 5000 commits and more than 100 contributors so you have nothing to compare here. Check how many credits have.
Show me ONE developer that is working on credits and we can actually see his work. There is none.
So next time you tell me about fud or stuff like that, just be sure you have something valuable to share about credits and not just stupid updates and fake hypes as everyone else.

[therat]

I keep seeing ads websites that are trying to get me to buy credits. Is there any reason why credits needs to do loads of advertising with Google Ads?

That's how the next no.1 blockchain moonlambo x1000 return outstanding blockchain revolution eth killer works. It's fueled by the hype and insanely cheap marketing tricks, along with pointless daily articles, dev updates and other meaningless stuff. This is a fucking disgrace. It might compete with Bunnytoken at best, considering those two are taking the same approach 'buy now its gonna moon soon' lol.