[ANN][ICO]CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [HARDCAP REACHED!]

[lee cooper]

The Blockchain technology for the financial industry and the internet of things.
and Kredit platform offers solutions for low speed and high transaction coasts extending the potential of this project with an algorithm for processing and maintaining transaction-based solutions.

[1714729419]

1714729419

[1714729419]

1714729419

[zulkarnaen]

It took CREDITS team only five days to visit two major blockchain conferences in China and the UAE. Find the details out in our new article.🛫🌏
Link: https://medium.com/@credits/credits-team-at-aprils-most-notable-blockchain-conferences-d9444571e99a

Among the teams of crypto-currency projects there are few such ones that regularly remind themselves of themselves. Constant conferences and good news, this is what we need! Very interesting, thanks to the project.

The teams of Credits project are really professional, they never stop to promote and build their platform. I think that'is one of the reasons this project is a good choice for future. And now, let's wait for other good news from the team

[sebastian787]

I was not involved in the semi-hype - haha why you brought me in your black list? lol )))  - you're wrong baby - I recently went to this topic as a potential investor and my account is much older than yours. Your own fault that started insulting all participants, thereby you baited me into a symmetrical response in your address. You're a little baby!

Damn after 2 years here in this forum and have invested and participated on almost 50 coins I am now a shiller and paid poster for Credits this is  an ongoing project I need to support this project because I invested huge here some just can't take it.

Don't pay attention to this and stop feed troll. His "black list" is Mickey Mouse one. Even admins have noticed this and locked it for posting.

I dont want to disappoint you but its ME who locked the thread because you, fake accounts, paid shillers, and the army around credits would ruin the topic as it happens always with stupid posts.
I can understand you are angry because credit's popularity is vanishing and the percentage of your profit from your investment is going lower every day, while the other coins are growing, and you want to blame someone for this failure.
You should only blame yourselves for presenting fake hypes everyday and no value.

Also im sure all of you, you are watching other projects growing and you are thinking that you are missing some good profit and you are between the line of selling credits and investing somewhere else or holding wishing for a better price soon. We all have been there.  
Thats why value is important and fake hypes are for projects that sooner or later are going to fail.

[skladnikov]

The paid shillers and scam supporters found a new way to create a hype on the blood bath that credits is facing.
They created a youtube account showing a video about some high TPS achievement.
"A miracle" as the conspiracy guy above said.

I was not involved in the semi-hype - haha why you brought me in your black list? lol )))  - you're wrong baby - I recently went to this topic as a potential investor and my account is much older than yours. Your own fault that started insulting all participants, thereby you baited me into a symmetrical response in your address. You're a little baby!

You already know why you are included in the list. Check you own comments on credits topic.

From your side i insulted someone.
From my side i PROPERLY replied to guys that came here just to tell me to "f*ck off" and then disappear.
As a smart a*s you are judging just my part on this.
So who cares about your side.

you provoked me when you got into my discussions with the words "your friends," so what's the answer you expected?, and my attitude to this project is quite skeptical - it can be seen from my messages, so you did not even analyze what I write. where arguments?, again baby fantazy?

[CoinMLS]

Can anyone help? I'm trying to exchange my pre-ICO tokens. I have followed the instructions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bUBAAp0scHLZ2Y9qkHgzzLgtbziy17BxxU9CU8jWxQ/edit

But the last step (the actual exchange) always fails, and I see it fails for most of the people who try but it does work for some people:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x87a0110ed1d09af6568392e77cedae95e5f3a674

One hint is that I see this error in Metamask before I even Submit the transaction to the blockchain:
Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code.

Here is my TX hash:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x64c1fab69f473111b46ece4291f32dd751a76f836b7ad40cebd83533eb5b9109

TIA

[sebastian787]

Can anyone help? I'm trying to exchange my pre-ICO tokens. I have followed the instructions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bUBAAp0scHLZ2Y9qkHgzzLgtbziy17BxxU9CU8jWxQ/edit

But the last step (the actual exchange) always fails, and I see it fails for most of the people who try but it does work for some people:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x87a0110ed1d09af6568392e77cedae95e5f3a674

One hint is that I see this error in Metamask before I even Submit the transaction to the blockchain:
Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code.

Here is my TX hash:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x64c1fab69f473111b46ece4291f32dd751a76f836b7ad40cebd83533eb5b9109

TIA

Ask from the team to help you with your issue.
Send them an email and contact them on telegram to solve it.
Also please inform us with any update regarding your issue.

[cheus]

Can anyone help? I'm trying to exchange my pre-ICO tokens. I have followed the instructions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bUBAAp0scHLZ2Y9qkHgzzLgtbziy17BxxU9CU8jWxQ/edit

But the last step (the actual exchange) always fails, and I see it fails for most of the people who try but it does work for some people:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x87a0110ed1d09af6568392e77cedae95e5f3a674

One hint is that I see this error in Metamask before I even Submit the transaction to the blockchain:
Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code.

Here is my TX hash:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x64c1fab69f473111b46ece4291f32dd751a76f836b7ad40cebd83533eb5b9109

TIA

Hi, write to one of our tech support here in Telegram chat https://t.me/creditscom
All IDs of technical support specialists for today @kav87, @ILYA_TRUE, @AntonKuliev

[Smitten_Semi_Cameroon]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

[aioc]

Can anyone help? I'm trying to exchange my pre-ICO tokens. I have followed the instructions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bUBAAp0scHLZ2Y9qkHgzzLgtbziy17BxxU9CU8jWxQ/edit

But the last step (the actual exchange) always fails, and I see it fails for most of the people who try but it does work for some people:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x87a0110ed1d09af6568392e77cedae95e5f3a674

One hint is that I see this error in Metamask before I even Submit the transaction to the blockchain:
Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code.

Here is my TX hash:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x64c1fab69f473111b46ece4291f32dd751a76f836b7ad40cebd83533eb5b9109

TIA

Hi, write to one of our tech support here in Telegram chat https://t.me/creditscom
All IDs of technical support specialists for today @kav87, @ILYA_TRUE, @AntonKuliev

As you can see this topic is not about the evolution of Credits anymore, why not lock this thread and create a new one and moderate it I understand that we need to hear all sides but it's coming to a point that we are disrespecting every one here its chaos here.

[therat]

Lol, firstly it was censorship all over telegram, then Reddit, now you asking to bring the communism in here too? Wow this was not expected at all to be honest...

[CoinMLS]

Can anyone help? I'm trying to exchange my pre-ICO tokens. I have followed the instructions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bUBAAp0scHLZ2Y9qkHgzzLgtbziy17BxxU9CU8jWxQ/edit

But the last step (the actual exchange) always fails, and I see it fails for most of the people who try but it does work for some people:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x87a0110ed1d09af6568392e77cedae95e5f3a674

One hint is that I see this error in Metamask before I even Submit the transaction to the blockchain:
Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code.

Here is my TX hash:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x64c1fab69f473111b46ece4291f32dd751a76f836b7ad40cebd83533eb5b9109

TIA

Ask from the team to help you with your issue.
Send them an email and contact them on telegram to solve it.
Also please inform us with any update regarding your issue.

I'll post the answer here just in case anyone needs it. There were multiple CS tokens and the instructions were for a different batch of CS tokens. The one I needed was https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pnll_F-0cfIWxlOKMJTP2zxFsPHim5C5a8sf5ZTioqc/edit

FYI, I did contact help and they gave me the first link to the wrong instructions. When I replied back about my problem it went unanswered for a month which is when I posted here. Vladimir did help me on Telegram, much thanks to him.

[urban.solinc]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Nice, "I have found evidence," but not showing it or describing it as vaguely as possible. I could also make up anything without any evidence.

[therat]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Nice, "I have found evidence," but not showing it or describing it as vaguely as possible. I could also make up anything without any evidence.

https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/86iwzr/credits_is_now_doing_illegal_marketing_showing/

https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/85ao9f/suppoman_advised_his_followers_to_get_into_the/

https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85rd9g/fake_and_scam_partnerships_the_cringe_with_this/

Dozens of newly created Youtube accounts with only video being an awesome Credits review and then making an article about that lol:  https://credits.com/en/Home/New_Ins/4396

Ads on facebook and on coinmarketcap saying 'buy now before it's too late', openly looking for paid shillers on social networks. https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/8bf3rh/you_can_now_get_paid_to_shill_this_shtcoin/?st=JFW3VL0Z&sh=152f460b

Need more evidence?

[urban.solinc]

Nice, "I have found evidence," but not showing it or describing it as vaguely as possible. I could also make up anything without any evidence.

https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/86iwzr/credits_is_now_doing_illegal_marketing_showing/

https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/85ao9f/suppoman_advised_his_followers_to_get_into_the/

https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85rd9g/fake_and_scam_partnerships_the_cringe_with_this/

Dozens of newly created Youtube accounts with only video being an awesome Credits review and then making an article about that lol:  https://credits.com/en/Home/New_Ins/4396

Ads on facebook and on coinmarketcap saying 'buy now before it's too late', openly looking for paid shillers on social networks. https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/8bf3rh/you_can_now_get_paid_to_shill_this_shtcoin/?st=JFW3VL0Z&sh=152f460b

Need more evidence?

So no more new news? I see. As for the points:

- Illegal marketing > The team has deleted that part of the presentation after they recognized it was a mistake. It did look suspicious at first, but the mention was very small (few people read it) and they didn't do anymore shilling after that.

- Suppoman > he does have some questionable calls, which can look like pump&dump. But he doesn't have that much influence to cause such a pump&dump (Chaincoin) by himself. And the FACT is that he shilled Chaincoin after IT ALREADY DID a 10x!, then it did another 10x after the call from Suppoman. So there was also some other big reason behind that pump. He also had some good calls in the past, which were certainly not P&D.

- Scam partnerships > indeed, there are many questionable companies in that list of potential users. But did you see the word "POTENTIAL" users? They don't have any actual partnerships yet and aren't trying to pretend/present it like they have. They started going to conferences just during the last few weeks and are trying to get partners, but the fact is that without the product you can't start with partnerships. At least they aren't trying to fake partnership like many, many other coins. And if the product is recognized as very good, they're going to be able to get partners/users. So in June they will be able to show them the product, but for now they only have pre-Beta.

[urban.solinc]

As you can see this topic is not about the evolution of Credits anymore, why not lock this thread and create a new one and moderate it I understand that we need to hear all sides but it's coming to a point that we are disrespecting every one here its chaos here.

Great idea! If i were in their shoes I would lock it and create new self-moderated one to communicate with normal on CREDITS progress and where I couldn't  listen to the babble of two blackmailers spreading FUD all around here (though both of them were send to ignore list   so that I can't see their nonsense). cheus, please. respond to this.

No, let them be, the censorship was one of the reasons Bitcoin was created. We will also see in the end who is right, we supporters or Fudders, only time will tell. They are going to hide in their hole if Credits are successful and we are going to lose money and learn a lot if they won't be successful.

[sebastian787]

As you can see this topic is not about the evolution of Credits anymore, why not lock this thread and create a new one and moderate it I understand that we need to hear all sides but it's coming to a point that we are disrespecting every one here its chaos here.

Great idea! If i were in their shoes I would lock it and create new self-moderated one to communicate with normal on CREDITS progress and where I couldn't  listen to the babble of two blackmailers spreading FUD all around here (though both of them were send to ignore list   so that I can't see their nonsense). cheus, please. respond to this.

Guys like you deserve no one to listen to your sh*ts and get banned from this industry.
Trying to create a self-moderated thread to shout mouths you f*cking scams?! Really?
Everyone listening here just read what they are asking. Thats their way to control things and ban everyone from here so they can keep creating fake hypes to convince more newcomers that will end up getting scammed for their personal gain.
Pathetic losers.

[Synthetic Ice]

Nice, "I have found evidence," but not showing it or describing it as vaguely as possible. I could also make up anything without any evidence.

https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/86iwzr/credits_is_now_doing_illegal_marketing_showing/

https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/85ao9f/suppoman_advised_his_followers_to_get_into_the/

https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85rd9g/fake_and_scam_partnerships_the_cringe_with_this/

Dozens of newly created Youtube accounts with only video being an awesome Credits review and then making an article about that lol:  https://credits.com/en/Home/New_Ins/4396

Ads on facebook and on coinmarketcap saying 'buy now before it's too late', openly looking for paid shillers on social networks. https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/8bf3rh/you_can_now_get_paid_to_shill_this_shtcoin/?st=JFW3VL0Z&sh=152f460b

Need more evidence?

So no more new news? I see. As for the points:

- Illegal marketing > The team has deleted that part of the presentation after they recognized it was a mistake. It did look suspicious at first, but the mention was very small (few people read it) and they didn't do anymore shilling after that.

- Suppoman > he does have some questionable calls, which can look like pump&dump. But he doesn't have that much influence to cause such a pump&dump (Chaincoin) by himself. And the FACT is that he shilled Chaincoin after IT ALREADY DID a 10x!, then it did another 10x after the call from Suppoman. So there was also some other big reason behind that pump. He also had some good calls in the past, which were certainly not P&D.

- Scam partnerships > indeed, there are many questionable companies in that list of potential users. But did you see the word "POTENTIAL" users? They don't have any actual partnerships yet and aren't trying to pretend/present it like they have. They started going to conferences just during the last few weeks and are trying to get partners, but the fact is that without the product you can't start with partnerships. At least they aren't trying to fake partnership like many, many other coins. And if the product is recognized as very good, they're going to be able to get partners/users. So in June they will be able to show them the product, but for now they only have pre-Beta.

The team changed terms as they wished, which is a big red flag.
You have a valid argument, but this is just the beginning.

[drwoo]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Those guys approaching you in the CREDITS channel on telegram have probably nothing to do with CREDITS itself. They are scammers and they also wait for victims in other TG channels.

[ATSgrowth]

Credits are doing very well, price on the exchanges is many times higher than the ICO price. But there are still doubters who do not believe in this technology.

[Smitten_Semi_Cameroon]

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Nice, "I have found evidence," but not showing it or describing it as vaguely as possible. I could also make up anything without any evidence.

Fair enough, but the actual evidence is hard to present, and admittedly is about as abstract as the project's 400k transactions per second video.  lol  

Give me a break, I've done nothing but boost the project here, so my credibility as a firm supporter should stand very clear.

Where there's smoke there's usually a fire someplace, and I can smell some smoke with respect to how Credits is handling its marketing and PR. They're not on fire to the point of total destruction and damnation, but when I smell smoke I just say it, I don't need to present the evidence that my nose encounters, generally.