Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 11:17:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How many BottleCaps do you own?
None - 86 (39.1%)
1-1k - 30 (13.6%)
1k-10k - 28 (12.7%)
More than 10k - 76 (34.5%)
Total Voters: 220

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 219 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bottlecaps 2.1 UPDATE REQUIRED - HARDFORK JULY 4 2014 to 200% Annual PoS  (Read 388604 times)
Walking Glitch
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250

Amateur Professional


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 02:49:09 PM
 #841

You might just want to wait until after noon, when the old versions are kicked and the new versions are the only ones mining.

Then, sadly... redownload the whole DB again, deleting everything except your config file and your wallet.dat...

Once you hit block 72000, stop the client/wallet... wait for it to actually die... and save everything it created, except the config and wallet... into a folder called "backup". Then, if you do get on the wrong chain... (let it try and try... you may get the wrong one at first, but it should eventually hit the correct one... if it does not, then just delete what it downloaded, and paste your backup data back into your wallet folder, so you start again from 72000.)

Eventually one of these connections will lock and begin working for you. (I hope.)

I shouldn't have to, it should just connect and download the longer chain. It's connected to several peers with it, so there's no reason why it shouldn't, except that either they didn't actually test it before releasing it and bugs creeped in, or they are just incompetent...
1714130238
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714130238

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714130238
Reply with quote  #2

1714130238
Report to moderator
1714130238
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714130238

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714130238
Reply with quote  #2

1714130238
Report to moderator
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714130238
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714130238

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714130238
Reply with quote  #2

1714130238
Report to moderator
1714130238
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714130238

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714130238
Reply with quote  #2

1714130238
Report to moderator
ISAWHIM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 03:03:04 PM
 #842

Just got an odd ipv6 addr... (2001:0:5ef5:79fd:1cd3:64c:add1:6b8c)

[
{
"addr" : "92.5.104.42:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751282,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376744432,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78102,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "50.137.233.14:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751281,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376745877,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78125,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "115.76.11.1:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751281,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376746046,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78127,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:1cd3:64c:add1:6b8c]:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751281,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376750607,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78205,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

Seems to be connecting fine to it... and it has the correct height, for the moment. Not all IPV4's can actually connect to IPV6 though. Lucky me, my ISP and router auto-convert. Since my ISP's modem doesn't actually have IPv6 ability.
Thrash
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519
Merit: 253



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 04:06:03 PM
Last edit: August 17, 2013, 04:17:15 PM by Thrash
 #843

Is it to the point where we should be dropping the old clients now?

ISAWHIM you mentioned a limit of 8 connections. While resyncing this morning I showed 13 or 14 connections and then when I hit block 78000 or so it dropped to 2 connections.

Currently I am bouncing between 2 and 3 connections and do not understand why I cannot get more. I am soloing and keeping a close eye on it.

Edit: can't type
Petr1fied
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 04:24:13 PM
Last edit: August 17, 2013, 04:34:24 PM by Petr1fied
 #844

Is it to the point where we should be dropping the old clients now?

The code has a timestamp of 1376758800 which is 17:00 GMT and as EST is currently GMT-4 (Daylight savings) it actually kicks in at 13:00 EST, not 12:00 EST.

Also you won't necessarily drop them, if you're already connected to them and they're not deemed as misbehaving (same chain as you) you'll likely stay connected to them unless you restart your client after the deadline. Peers who continue to use the old version will run out of peers using v1.4.1 soon enough though and they'll likely end up on their very own unsupported fork.
BitJohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1001

@Bit_John


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 04:48:01 PM
 #845

Just got an odd ipv6 addr... (2001:0:5ef5:79fd:1cd3:64c:add1:6b8c)

[
{
"addr" : "92.5.104.42:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751282,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376744432,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78102,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "50.137.233.14:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751281,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376745877,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78125,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "115.76.11.1:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751281,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376746046,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78127,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:1cd3:64c:add1:6b8c]:7685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1376751281,
"lastrecv" : 1376751280,
"conntime" : 1376750607,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 78205,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

Seems to be connecting fine to it... and it has the correct height, for the moment. Not all IPV4's can actually connect to IPV6 though. Lucky me, my ISP and router auto-convert. Since my ISP's modem doesn't actually have IPv6 ability.

Huh I haven't seen that in a peers file before. Kinda neat i guess its not special but interesting to see one. Wonder if the UPNP will help open up more connections as well we shall see as the chain gets healthy again.
ISAWHIM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 05:30:47 PM
Last edit: August 17, 2013, 05:43:38 PM by ISAWHIM
 #846

That was odd... I had three good connections... Then, I unlocked my wallet and they all disappeared and it took a connection with a starting height that was 2000 lower than the newest fork.

(The chain I was on, with that ipv6 connection forked and everyone started dropping-off and now I am seeing more "-1" start-heights on the version 70000 client 1.4.1.)

Funny thing is... the peers sending the wrong blocks are in the list of peers connected to the chain with the correct height...

I am getting -1 from about 12 on the 25 in the list, and everything from 75000 to 76000 to 77000 to 78000 from them. They are all version 1.4.1 (70000)

IP: 188.252.16.109

reports as -1 block-height, and it is the one that the wallet keeps connecting to, over and over.
butjust41day
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 05:42:59 PM
 #847

That has been my warning sign all along watch the connections and if they started dropping out it would turn out I was on the wrong chain.
ISAWHIM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 05:44:16 PM
 #848

That has been my warning sign all along watch the connections and if they started dropping out it would turn out I was on the wrong chain.

That is the funny thing... this list is the list from the correct chain. But they are all giving me 78280 as the height, but I can see them at the height of 78415...

Like I said before, they are mining away and not telling anyone what they are building. They are isolating themselves from us, and feeding us the wrong block-heights. (I assume it is an array issue or something like that now. Are you using arrays that start at 0 but sending us 1-x not 0-x... or they are just sending corrupted data that can't be used?)

They tell us, "hey I am at block 78415", then we say, "great, send it!", then they say "Screw you, this is my block-list, get your own!", and kill our connection. Leaving us talking to the guy building his own chain which is shorter and 300 blocks behind. (Dramatic explanation. lol)
butjust41day
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 05:50:39 PM
 #849

That has been my warning sign all along watch the connections and if they started dropping out it would turn out I was on the wrong chain.

That is the funny thing... this list is the list from the correct chain.

Well often enough it was from one of the lists posted or from the OP. Who knows how many forks there have been now. Some most likely ended quick when vigilant miners jumped off them right away (if I suddenly dropped to a few nodes I would bail out and reload the block chain). I'm looking forward to seeing how things work out over the next 24 to 48 hours.

It seemed though sometimes it was hard to get back on the right chain without opening and closing the client multiple times. As if it would reach a point where my connections were giving conflicting information (chains) so it would just stop loading.
ISAWHIM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 05:56:29 PM
 #850

The list I am using is right from the block-chain explorer list of connections...
http://bottlecaps.kicks-ass.net/block_crawler.php
http://bottlecaps.kicks-ass.net/peers.php

The peers list...

YES... finally... fifth time's a charm! (Got it again. But It will be lost again, I assume. I have lost the chain five times so far.)

I still only have 1 to 2 connections... which is what is causing the splits, I am sure... we keep branching if we all only have one or two other connections to talk to, and we can't communicate to one another.

Are you sure someone didn't change an IRC relay room to chr-code UTF-8 or something, instead of an (ISO-8859-1) standard format? Or could it be buggin on the ipv6 formatted IP's, trying to relay those to computers that just can't connect to them.

I need some sleep before work... my head hurts.
Walking Glitch
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250

Amateur Professional


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 07:34:01 PM
 #851

After re-downloading the chain four times, connected to only nodes with the longer chain, it still connects to other nodes with the forked chain and downloads that one instead, and then ignores the longer one. I recommend everyone dump this coin, it's worthless.
mullick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 08:11:07 PM
 #852

At work currently. The archive below will get you synced to the correct chain up to block 78500 roughly. Peers list has been cleared from all nodes. Once you are on the right chain you should stay now

https://mega.co.nz/#!Ud02GZTZ!ScpN8gc-YB5EFqUpOKATmhl3bCUGLv1Zf9uH8ip-PvM
Walking Glitch
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250

Amateur Professional


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 08:27:20 PM
 #853

At work currently. The archive below will get you synced to the correct chain up to block 78500 roughly. Peers list has been cleared from all nodes. Once you are on the right chain you should stay now

https://mega.co.nz/#!Ud02GZTZ!ScpN8gc-YB5EFqUpOKATmhl3bCUGLv1Zf9uH8ip-PvM

If someone wants to upload that somewhere that has no reference to mega in it's name, I would greatly appreciate it. I refuse to even consider touching mega with a barge pole.
Jaden
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 08:30:16 PM
 #854

What's the current block height on the right chain? http://cap.coinmine.pl is currently on 78522. Is that correct?
butjust41day
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 09:10:35 PM
 #855

Have no idea....I was definitly on the"right chain earlier"....closed my wallet.....opened my wallet with port forwarding jumped from 8 to 45 nodes and ended up with a different number of blocks then what is showing at http://bottlecaps.kicks-ass.net/block_crawler.php.

It seems as soon as I allow more nodes to connect I'm screwed.
mullick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 17, 2013, 09:16:51 PM
 #856

At work currently. The archive below will get you synced to the correct chain up to block 78500 roughly. Peers list has been cleared from all nodes. Once you are on the right chain you should stay now

https://mega.co.nz/#!Ud02GZTZ!ScpN8gc-YB5EFqUpOKATmhl3bCUGLv1Zf9uH8ip-PvM

If someone wants to upload that somewhere that has no reference to mega in it's name, I would greatly appreciate it. I refuse to even consider touching mega with a barge pole.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0V-7FME2rcyQnQyMXZRSkZPajg/edit?usp=sharing

Ill look into everything more when I get home in a few hours. Think now we just need to get everyone on the right chain
Thrash
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519
Merit: 253



View Profile
August 17, 2013, 09:25:23 PM
 #857

What's the current block height on the right chain? http://cap.coinmine.pl is currently on 78522. Is that correct?

Looks like your behind the chain by 30 blocks or so. At 4:22 CST I show 78560.
Choadmeyer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 495
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 18, 2013, 01:41:17 AM
 #858

bottlecraps  Angry
Jaden
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 18, 2013, 01:45:17 AM
 #859

We're stilling mining away: http://cap.coinmine.pl

Hope we're on the right chain.
Thrash
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519
Merit: 253



View Profile
August 18, 2013, 02:25:20 AM
 #860

We're stilling mining away: http://cap.coinmine.pl

Hope we're on the right chain.

I think you are wasting your hashes. The chain you are on look like it is way off from http://bottlecaps.kicks-ass.net/block_crawler.php which is supposed to be the holy grail.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 219 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!