dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 16, 2014, 12:17:12 PM |
|
Quick note:
After I updated the database for CAP on cap.cryptocoinexplorer.com, I updated the client with your updates.
I am not sure if this change was intentional or not, but the "flags" field when a block is POS now reads "proof-of-stake stake-modifier".
Most coins just read "proof-of-stake". I modified the database loader to understand the modified flag, though I do not like having customized code for a coin. One of the main points for developing CCE3 was to completely eliminate that need.
Just let me know if it is going to stay that way, or when you change it back so I can adjust the code accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
tricass
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 394
Merit: 250
Crypto enthusiast
|
|
May 16, 2014, 01:29:06 PM |
|
i also downloaded the 1.5.2 and it is not syncing not a single connection and i added the nodes to the conf file
Yeah no issues syncing on my wallet having the same issue, adding addnode=cap.nodes.btcrypt.net:7685 to my conf now, and get this synced up! UPdate - this works perfectly, syncing up now! This did not work for me. I needed more nodes so added these and am now syncing.... listen=1 addnode=50.137.233.14 addnode=69.10.44.115 addnode=192.64.86.238 addnode=cap.nodes.btcrypt.net:7685 addnode=72.78.100.7 addnode=216.155.142.154 addnode=50.117.78.242 addnode=46.105.118.226 addnode=67.210.249.29 addnode=23.251.65.46 addnode=37.187.73.182 addnode=84.200.17.107 addnode=nodes.btcrypt.net
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 16, 2014, 02:56:37 PM Last edit: May 16, 2014, 03:33:33 PM by presstab |
|
i also downloaded the 1.5.2 and it is not syncing not a single connection and i added the nodes to the conf file
Yeah no issues syncing on my wallet having the same issue, adding addnode=cap.nodes.btcrypt.net:7685 to my conf now, and get this synced up! UPdate - this works perfectly, syncing up now! Mind posting your conf file content? i have added the above, but still nada. thanks. I haven't confirmed this in the source code, but someone else further back in the thread posted saying that their client only began to sink when the .conf was named BottleCaps.conf not bottlecaps.conf - I am not sure if this has any truth to it, but that is what I am using too and only have a single addnode and it syncs right away. Edit - found this in the source code, not sure whether this means that it must have the right capitilization or not, but it is there init.cpp line 222 " -conf=<file> " + _("Specify configuration file (default: BottleCaps.conf)") + "\n" +
|
|
|
|
NuShrike
|
|
May 16, 2014, 03:41:40 PM |
|
Some of my nodes not recently posted (from Bottlecaps.conf on Win7): addnode=202.60.68.65 addnode=173.192.30.91 addnode=37.187.28.68 addnode=142.4.219.23 addnode=54.186.69.238 addnode=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:289b:1e6d:b95e:87e2] addnode=72.52.231.153 addnode=[2001:0:5ef5:79fb:30bf:21b5:a9e8:a252] addnode=[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:3860:27e1:9fc7:22fd] addnode=68.96.116.162 addnode=50.149.31.242 addnode=84.200.17.249 addnode=118.127.61.68 addnode=23.252.65.46 addnode=212.83.191.197 addnode=173.192.180.226 addnode=144.76.33.10 addnode=70.98.114.237 addnode=2.101.76.175 addnode=24.255.59.102
Less likely to still exist going down the list.
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 16, 2014, 03:51:14 PM |
|
addnode=84.200.17.249 Used to be the CCE3 test server. The CAP daemon for CCE is now on 84.200.17.107. Feel free to use it (22 connections right now). I have given Tranz a domain to use as a seed node that points to this address if he wants to use it
|
|
|
|
ElTomeko27
|
|
May 16, 2014, 03:55:56 PM |
|
Guys I v got a warning in my wallet "WARNING: Checkopint it too old. Redownload Blockchain. If warning persist contact the Development Team" What is wrong??
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 16, 2014, 04:06:07 PM |
|
Guys I v got a warning in my wallet "WARNING: Checkopint it too old. Redownload Blockchain. If warning persist contact the Development Team" What is wrong??
This happened to me too. Try restarting the client and waiting for a few minutes and see if it goes away. That is what worked for me.
|
|
|
|
ElTomeko27
|
|
May 16, 2014, 04:27:37 PM |
|
Guys I v got a warning in my wallet "WARNING: Checkopint it too old. Redownload Blockchain. If warning persist contact the Development Team" What is wrong??
This happened to me too. Try restarting the client and waiting for a few minutes and see if it goes away. That is what worked for me. True, now its seems to be ok. ETA new wallet ver.??
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 16, 2014, 04:47:18 PM |
|
Guys I v got a warning in my wallet "WARNING: Checkopint it too old. Redownload Blockchain. If warning persist contact the Development Team" What is wrong??
This happened to me too. Try restarting the client and waiting for a few minutes and see if it goes away. That is what worked for me. True, now its seems to be ok. ETA new wallet ver.?? I think Tranz said something like 30 days from now. Then it will be 30 days from the release until hard fork occurs.
|
|
|
|
sheffters
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
May 16, 2014, 06:30:53 PM |
|
Cap.nodes.btcrypt.net is down at the moment.
Kernel patch and other updates have somehow borked the scrypt and x11 wallets so none of them start. Bitcoin / primecoin wallets still running, so #headscratch
I need to rebuild it. Will do over the weekend.
S.
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
May 16, 2014, 09:02:01 PM |
|
Quick note:
After I updated the database for CAP on cap.cryptocoinexplorer.com, I updated the client with your updates.
I am not sure if this change was intentional or not, but the "flags" field when a block is POS now reads "proof-of-stake stake-modifier".
Most coins just read "proof-of-stake". I modified the database loader to understand the modified flag, though I do not like having customized code for a coin. One of the main points for developing CCE3 was to completely eliminate that need.
Just let me know if it is going to stay that way, or when you change it back so I can adjust the code accordingly.
No this shouldn't be this way. When I issue getblock on a PoS block I get flags of just proof-of-stake. Which RPC command is giving you that?
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 16, 2014, 11:06:09 PM Last edit: May 16, 2014, 11:22:16 PM by dreamwatcher |
|
Quick note:
After I updated the database for CAP on cap.cryptocoinexplorer.com, I updated the client with your updates.
I am not sure if this change was intentional or not, but the "flags" field when a block is POS now reads "proof-of-stake stake-modifier".
Most coins just read "proof-of-stake". I modified the database loader to understand the modified flag, though I do not like having customized code for a coin. One of the main points for developing CCE3 was to completely eliminate that need.
Just let me know if it is going to stay that way, or when you change it back so I can adjust the code accordingly.
No this shouldn't be this way. When I issue getblock on a PoS block I get flags of just proof-of-stake. Which RPC command is giving you that? <Edited due to new information> Nevermind, I think figured it out and it was on my end and a change i need to make to all the explorers. For example: /bottlecapsd getblock 0c7ca959f024fd3978baac766f3e926296ba34bda1355cb402378c1cc7c23ae4 { "hash" : "0c7ca959f024fd3978baac766f3e926296ba34bda1355cb402378c1cc7c23ae4", "confirmations" : 585, "size" : 455, "height" : 452151, "version" : 4, "merkleroot" : "1f2f9f4f861d19be465b6fdf66b93f62b9b6281bfa669531a9d55797ffaf215c", "mint" : 0.03334700, "time" : 1400241722, "nonce" : 0, "bits" : "1e00ffff", "difficulty" : 0.00390625, "previousblockhash" : "209aaa5a4590a2ff500a9ddd8aed2828443c7b6ae61d254d47127c3f0c3d2135", "nextblockhash" : "000000001ae348915add9d6e7d573d29aee634b9968bd623177cb542c8210694", "flags" : "proof-of-stake stake-modifier", "proofhash" : "0000023cabb7b7d4415132b8ac57444941c6d46ca396faed5907d6d2324ebd3d", "entropybit" : 0, "modifier" : "ead1ba8ee00e2648", "modifierchecksum" : "64b1e979", "tx" : [ "b5f3336d507f4e325083e0f3ad9102df626ab6a11879cc2df27874468ef1f7ae", "8376612bc7d03dfd735c7fb6728ee6d5aecd939c55c0ba516812dffc9dda758f" ], "signature" : "3045022001d5c9ac9b2eafe69c49431557d26ef29ff25a59310b301b0bae095fdfb086c8022100a239bfe23dda210aa3fc48a983ec7510ed68275206aead86d33960bfe384f910" }
The block before it reports a different modifier and the blocks after report the same modifier. The "stake modifier" is an extra flag indicating that the stake modifier has been switched. Anyway, a simple change in the check condition from == "proof-of-stake" to != "proof-of-work" solves the issue and this has helped me find a bug that I need to patch on all explorers.
|
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
May 17, 2014, 05:07:11 AM |
|
5hrs sync, 10 sec load. Good by me!
|
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
|
May 17, 2014, 05:17:30 AM |
|
any working pool on last version ?
|
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
May 17, 2014, 03:44:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
presstab
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 17, 2014, 04:16:01 PM |
|
Wow I thought this would be much more complicated. This is the most important updates in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1052
May the force bit with you.
|
|
May 17, 2014, 05:40:34 PM |
|
It's great to see these updates rolling in. Great job, guys! Does anyone have an opinion about dropping the instances of camel case from BottleCaps? I know it is minor, but it tends to confuse people when they create a .conf file and it must be named BottleCaps.conf as opposed to Bottlecaps.conf or bottlecaps.conf. And a question for Tranz: When you compile the QT for Windows, do you go the route of including all the separate .dll files in a zip or do you go with something like Gitian? I have my preference, but I am just curious. Once I am done, it will be 1 static exe, no dlls.
|
|
|
|
tokyoghetto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 17, 2014, 06:06:25 PM Last edit: May 17, 2014, 06:58:51 PM by tokyoghetto |
|
i personally don't use cryptocointalk, I don't know about other members. This new development might lose momentum if the discussion is moved IMO.
|
|
|
|
|