Just-Dice.com : Invest in 1% House Edge Dice Game

[petrescuerz]

Christmas is provably unfair.

HAHAHA doog i LOVE this quote  i'm telling my kids this if they ever complain about their gifts

Really wolf, you are only encouraging him!

[dooglus]

Deb and I may be offline a lot over the next 24h.

It's nothing to worry about.  We didn't run with the money.  Circumstances beyond our control, etc.

Back soon (if we even go away, that is).

[narayan]

Deb and I may be offline a lot over the next 24h.

It's nothing to worry about.  We didn't run with the money.  Circumstances beyond our control, etc.

Back soon (if we even go away, that is).

46,000 BTC just moved from 14o7zMMUJkG6De24r3JkJ6USgChq7iWF86 to 1566V9UFWeydENipsrtfnz9nf2YX51aFEH

http://blockchain.info/tx/80e3ea46947fbcb61d8cd3b2d16d56be972b84cad97ce7213b467867cb44a527



made you look

[dooglus]

Deb and I may be offline a lot over the next 24h.

It's nothing to worry about.  We didn't run with the money.  Circumstances beyond our control, etc.

Back soon (if we even go away, that is).

46,000 BTC just moved from 14o7zMMUJkG6De24r3JkJ6USgChq7iWF86 to 1566V9UFWeydENipsrtfnz9nf2YX51aFEH

http://blockchain.info/tx/80e3ea46947fbcb61d8cd3b2d16d56be972b84cad97ce7213b467867cb44a527



made you look

Good one. 

Looks like we'll not be going anywhere after all, too.

[Dabs]

I've already suggested to dooglus some time ago about server side implemented martingale sequences (built-in bot). He's taking time to implement it, but it's easy to do and provably fair since you set up very specific rules for it's execution and you don't change server or client seeds. The nonce just keeps going up.

[naphto]

I was suspicious firstly, but now the website is working great.
More than 4k btc profit


I wish I did not divested.

[molecular]

I was suspicious firstly, but now the website is working great.

The website has been working great all along. It's just that fortuna was getting drunk for a while.

[dooglus]

I just updated the first post in this thread with the 'base' amounts for each investor after today's commission run.

Also, there has been some confusion about the rate change from 5% to 10% that I announced last Sunday.  The rate change went into effect immediately *after* today's commission run, so all of the last 7 days since I announced the increase were charged at the old rate.

That seems like the fair way to do it, but some seemed to think that since I announced the increase an hour before last Sunday's commission run, the rate would change an hour before this Sunday's run, and so the whole week would be charged at 10%.  That's not how it works.  I only ever increase the rate after Sunday's commission run, and announce it before the previous Sunday's run to make sure there are 7 clear days of notice.

[IdealDarkness]

Strange. I always thought the house is always win. Some people win, but much more people lose. So, I invested some tiny BTC to check it, but after 3 days I have negative balance. So, any thoughts

[Jonny Heggheim]

Strange. I always thought the house is always win. Some people win, but much more people lose. So, I invested some tiny BTC to check it, but after 3 days I have negative balance. So, any thoughts

It goes up and down, but most up over time

[favdesu]

Strange. I always thought the house is always win. Some people win, but much more people lose. So, I invested some tiny BTC to check it, but after 3 days I have negative balance. So, any thoughts

I started with 0.1 (less is not worth your time imo) and have never been negative. right now I'm at ~2.5% profit

[IdealDarkness]

Since when? I started 0.52, but at 0.50056253 I divested all.

[Equilux]

Since when? I started 0.52, but at 0.50056253 I divested all.

The house always wins, in the long run, so you can lose money in the short term. I've been negative for a bit, but I've been up for a while now.

[IdealDarkness]

Since when? I started 0.52, but at 0.50056253 I divested all.

The house always wins, in the long run, so you can lose money in the short term. I've been negative for a bit, but I've been up for a while now.

Thats ok, but my fear is, my 0.52 won't be enough for the long run

[Equilux]

Since when? I started 0.52, but at 0.50056253 I divested all.

The house always wins, in the long run, so you can lose money in the short term. I've been negative for a bit, but I've been up for a while now.

Thats ok, but my fear is, my 0.52 won't be enough for the long run

Your 0.52 BTC won't get eaten faster then 520 BTC ... all investors share the profits and the losses equally. so if you lose half, everyone loses half, and if you are up 10% everyone is up 10%.

[narayan]

Since when? I started 0.52, but at 0.50056253 I divested all.

The house always wins, in the long run, so you can lose money in the short term. I've been negative for a bit, but I've been up for a while now.

Thats ok, but my fear is, my 0.52 won't be enough for the long run

Your 0.52 BTC won't get eaten faster then 520 BTC ... all investors share the profits and the losses equally. so if you lose half, everyone loses half, and if you are up 10% everyone is up 10%.

Which is very unfair. If I invest 10x your amount, I should get 10x the profits and losses.

[Equilux]

Since when? I started 0.52, but at 0.50056253 I divested all.

The house always wins, in the long run, so you can lose money in the short term. I've been negative for a bit, but I've been up for a while now.

Thats ok, but my fear is, my 0.52 won't be enough for the long run

Your 0.52 BTC won't get eaten faster then 520 BTC ... all investors share the profits and the losses equally. so if you lose half, everyone loses half, and if you are up 10% everyone is up 10%.

Which is very unfair. If I invest 10x your amount, I should get 10x the profits and losses.

You do actually, read what I said carefully. Thats what "10%" means.

[GeoRW]

Strange. I always thought the house is always win. Some people win, but much more people lose. So, I invested some tiny BTC to check it, but after 3 days I have negative balance. So, any thoughts

You didn't see anything yet. When big player was playing last month (and winning) I was down like 12%. If big players play the variance can be huge. But in the long run we should be up.

[dooglus]

You didn't see anything yet. When big player was playing last month (and winning) I was down like 12%. If big players play the variance can be huge. But in the long run we should be up.

Since a picture is worth a thousand words, I figure I'll save myself three thousand words and post three pictures.  These show the overall site profit over various timescales.  Notice how the 2nd image clearly shows over 5 days of really quite stable profit levels.  I think that's due to people gradually winning using martingale betting while others gradually lose, using more random strategies.  Those two groups of players cancel each other out until a martingale player has a big lose, which takes us up a step:

[shawshankinmate37927]

So, who was it that made that recent "contribution" of over 200 BTC to J-D's bankroll?