[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[matjas]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

It's a private round, majority of ICOs have higher min contributions at this stage probably because this round is mainly for institutional investors and whales. I'm sure during the main ICO the requirements will be much lower.

[1715292959]

1715292959

[1715292959]

1715292959

[1715292959]

1715292959

[1715292959]

1715292959

[1715292959]

1715292959

[niklasmato]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

probably because it's a serious long term project for real investors willing to take a risk for big reward. now I agree that I would like the minimum lower , but one of the disadvantage of having more investors, is market fluctuation of the token price.

After reading bits and pieces of the whitepaper I'm pretty sure this can turn out to be a huge project, but it will take time.. There are so many technologies involved and so many things that need to be done. A big ICO is needed, but for the people who can invest and wait this can turn out to be a project with a huge ROI.

[helloal]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

probably because it's a serious long term project for real investors willing to take a risk for big reward. now I agree that I would like the minimum lower , but one of the disadvantage of having more investors, is market fluctuation of the token price.

After reading bits and pieces of the whitepaper I'm pretty sure this can turn out to be a huge project, but it will take time.. There are so many technologies involved and so many things that need to be done. A big ICO is needed, but for the people who can invest and wait this can turn out to be a project with a huge ROI.

I think this project will be more attractive as a community/societal enhancing contribution, rather than having a huge ROI. This project have big goals, and will be doing things slowly step by step.

[matjas]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

probably because it's a serious long term project for real investors willing to take a risk for big reward. now I agree that I would like the minimum lower , but one of the disadvantage of having more investors, is market fluctuation of the token price.

After reading bits and pieces of the whitepaper I'm pretty sure this can turn out to be a huge project, but it will take time.. There are so many technologies involved and so many things that need to be done. A big ICO is needed, but for the people who can invest and wait this can turn out to be a project with a huge ROI.

I think this project will be more attractive as a community/societal enhancing contribution, rather than having a huge ROI. This project have big goals, and will be doing things slowly step by step.

It can be both: development of a healthcare system and good ROI, I think it mostly depends on the team performance, they have all the tools, they seem to have experience, we'll see how they will use it.

[king_of_alts]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

It's a private round, majority of ICOs have higher min contributions at this stage probably because this round is mainly for institutional investors and whales. I'm sure during the main ICO the requirements will be much lower.

This is the reason. They want to attract bigger investors in this private sale round. Bigger investors also get bigger discounts.

[Piggy]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

probably because it's a serious long term project for real investors willing to take a risk for big reward. now I agree that I would like the minimum lower , but one of the disadvantage of having more investors, is market fluctuation of the token price.

After reading bits and pieces of the whitepaper I'm pretty sure this can turn out to be a huge project, but it will take time.. There are so many technologies involved and so many things that need to be done. A big ICO is needed, but for the people who can invest and wait this can turn out to be a project with a huge ROI.

I think this project will be more attractive as a community/societal enhancing contribution, rather than having a huge ROI. This project have big goals, and will be doing things slowly step by step.

It can be both: development of a healthcare system and good ROI, I think it mostly depends on the team performance, they have all the tools, they seem to have experience, we'll see how they will use it.

Agree there are the chances for a successful project here. It just need to be get it done.

[jonnytracker]

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

[Je.hitler]

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

For the moment will be a software platform, i say for the moment because we don`t know the plans after the final step in the roadmap.

[CryptoCutie]

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

[omwibya]

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

[cantdecide]

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

[Yasemin]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

[Axcel-m]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

Very high requirements. But I can understand your approach to avoid the smaler investors and to force the bigerone to get in counntact with you before the huge amount of invest.
Will there be other requirenemts for small investors in future?

[viljy]

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

There are no devices there. There will be a database of medical knowledge, a patient's medical history, available to any doctor and probably the most neural network for diagnosis, as well as remote diagnostics, probably based on some test with questions.

[matjas]

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

Very high requirements. But I can understand your approach to avoid the smaler investors and to force the bigerone to get in counntact with you before the huge amount of invest.
Will there be other requirenemts for small investors in future?

There are different requirements for other stages. I haven't found min investment, but prices and discounts (if any) are in the whitepaper.

[belechau]

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

[Piggy]

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

[Jay2408]

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

When looking at around 30 pages of their whitepaper about legal aspects I think that they are fully aware of all rules and regulations they have to comply with.

[batako]

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

[Je.hitler]

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

Of course it will be win-win, but at the beginning it will be needed a platform that gives good results and only then to expand to hardware area.