|
zgrdyg
|
 |
January 29, 2018, 08:38:49 PM |
|
I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.
Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.
Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale. So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number. By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper. but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea. I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
BY_ATOM
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:40:48 PM |
|
The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.
Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected.  This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus! |
|
|
|
Herad Hedid
Member
 Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 11
Altair VR. Next-gen Blockchain VR Wikipedia
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:42:10 PM |
|
I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.
Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.
Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale. So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number. By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper. but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea. I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me. You are right maybe it would have been better for them to built an alpha of the platform in advance. This would create a lot more confidence. |
|
|
|
|
rjp55
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:43:47 PM |
|
The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.
Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected. This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus! a diversified nationality team structure is always good i think, when expansion needed these people can bring onboard their country's best in their areas. Good job. |
|
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:45:37 PM |
|
I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.
Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.
Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale. So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number. By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper. but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea. I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me. I don't think 5 eth is really anything for big investors. Yes, it is a long-term project but regardless of it, if big investors believe their vision they can invest way more than 5 eth. |
|
|
|
Bolovich
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:51:02 PM |
|
The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.
Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected. This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus! a diversified nationality team structure is always good i think, when expansion needed these people can bring onboard their country's best in their areas. Good job. I always like to have people of different nationalities since they give you a different point of view. |
|
|
|
|
the_donald
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:55:29 PM |
|
thanks for sharing this. I'm glad it's getting some attention now. I'm waiting for the big sites to get involved. |
|
|
|
|
CryptoCutie
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:55:56 PM |
|
Great future stuff, the blockchain technology can significantly simplify and secure the work with the health data.
|
|
|
|
|
pizza_dev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
|
|
January 29, 2018, 08:56:11 PM |
|
The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.
Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected. This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus! a diversified nationality team structure is always good i think, when expansion needed these people can bring onboard their country's best in their areas. Good job. I always like to have people of different nationalities since they give you a different point of view. I totally agree. It is very interesting what others think. |
|
|
|
|
|
CHRISBIN702
|
|
January 29, 2018, 09:27:13 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
|
Not for sale.........
Why, how much you got?
|
|
|
tudor_simion
Member
Offline
Activity: 349
Merit: 12
|
|
January 29, 2018, 09:33:31 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
I do not think he should be in trouble with other ICOs related to the health industry! I think they should only see their project and make it better than the others. From my point of view it is one of the future. But they can also give us a response on this. |
|
|
|
Bolovich
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
January 29, 2018, 10:13:53 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
I do not think he should be in trouble with other ICOs related to the health industry! I think they should only see their project and make it better than the others. From my point of view it is one of the future. But they can also give us a response on this. I think they should focus on their project being successful, because if the idea works they will not have to worry about the competition. |
|
|
|
|
lobat999
|
|
January 29, 2018, 10:32:58 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
I do not think he should be in trouble with other ICOs related to the health industry! I think they should only see their project and make it better than the others. From my point of view it is one of the future. But they can also give us a response on this. I think they should focus on their project being successful, because if the idea works they will not have to worry about the competition. Correct. In the long run, a good project quality will gain a very supportive community and investors and its needs serious DEV commitment to do that. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoCutie
|
|
January 29, 2018, 10:37:12 PM |
|
this project will works and makes a great goal also for sure. It is better than the others eHealthy icos at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
January 29, 2018, 10:47:08 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
I do not think he should be in trouble with other ICOs related to the health industry! I think they should only see their project and make it better than the others. From my point of view it is one of the future. But they can also give us a response on this. I think they should focus on their project being successful, because if the idea works they will not have to worry about the competition. Correct. In the long run, a good project quality will gain a very supportive community and investors and its needs serious DEV commitment to do that. Those who are interested in EHealth really need to understand the importance of the project and how great it will be after its Ico, and be aware that it should join in relying on the long term for the return that we know will not be short. I hope to make a lot of money and support them until the next stages |
|
|
|
|
|
cmg12
|
|
January 29, 2018, 11:09:49 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
I do not think he should be in trouble with other ICOs related to the health industry! I think they should only see their project and make it better than the others. From my point of view it is one of the future. But they can also give us a response on this. I think they should focus on their project being successful, because if the idea works they will not have to worry about the competition. Correct. In the long run, a good project quality will gain a very supportive community and investors and its needs serious DEV commitment to do that. Those who are interested in EHealth really need to understand the importance of the project and how great it will be after its Ico, and be aware that it should join in relying on the long term for the return that we know will not be short. I hope to make a lot of money and support them until the next stages Yep, everyone who want to invest in this project should thing long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
PS92
|
|
January 29, 2018, 11:19:11 PM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
I do not think he should be in trouble with other ICOs related to the health industry! I think they should only see their project and make it better than the others. From my point of view it is one of the future. But they can also give us a response on this. I think they should focus on their project being successful, because if the idea works they will not have to worry about the competition. Correct. In the long run, a good project quality will gain a very supportive community and investors and its needs serious DEV commitment to do that. Those who are interested in EHealth really need to understand the importance of the project and how great it will be after its Ico, and be aware that it should join in relying on the long term for the return that we know will not be short. I hope to make a lot of money and support them until the next stages I think patience will be rewarded in this instance |
|
|
|
Frank37
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
January 30, 2018, 12:11:34 AM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
If a project is really good, other ICOS will follow or copy. This is normal and competition is something which they can handle. |
|
|
|
|
helloal
|
|
January 30, 2018, 01:11:53 AM |
|
I'm curious what the devs think about other health industry related ICOs going on right now. It's a popular field.
If a project is really good, other ICOS will follow or copy. This is normal and competition is something which they can handle. Not necessarily blockchain specific, but in the white paper, there is a summary of its competitors eg Google Health |
|
|
|
|
