carnitastaco
|
|
January 25, 2018, 04:52:17 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions
|
|
|
|
CathalG (OP)
|
|
January 25, 2018, 04:55:14 PM Last edit: January 25, 2018, 05:20:16 PM by CathalG |
|
What about hardcap and softcap for this project? are there any figures or some information on this?
Our targets are: soft cap - $60.000.000; hard cap - $100.000.000.
|
|
|
|
Xelpherpolis
|
|
January 25, 2018, 04:58:26 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions So it turns out with each transfer a commission will be charged?
|
|
|
|
CathalG (OP)
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:02:40 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
Token A-TOKEN is an investment. It is intended to raise funds for the implementation of our project. Token Z-TOKEN token is utilitarian. It serves to pay for AraneoBit services and cross-border transfers. It's price is fixed and amounts to $2.
|
|
|
|
carnitastaco
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:03:02 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions So it turns out with each transfer a commission will be charged? Oh sure. But this commission will be significantly different from the commissions of banks or other companies that are engaged in transfers
|
|
|
|
Xelpherpolis
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:10:45 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions So it turns out with each transfer a commission will be charged? Oh sure. But this commission will be significantly different from the commissions of banks or other companies that are engaged in transfers I just thought that this service would be devoid of any commissions, because money transfers are handled by hand, without additional intermediaries.
|
|
|
|
Nyur
Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:15:05 PM |
|
Wow, what an amazing project! The development team looks professional with a set of different and skills. Good luck with the pre-ICO.
|
|
|
|
CathalG (OP)
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:15:16 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions So it turns out with each transfer a commission will be charged? Oh sure. But this commission will be significantly different from the commissions of banks or other companies that are engaged in transfers I just thought that this service would be devoid of any commissions, because money transfers are handled by hand, without additional intermediaries. Money transfers are always free of charge for AraneoBit users. At the first stage of development, the sender pays only $2 (1 Z-TOKEN) for the information about the counterparty of the counter offer. In the second step, the sender pays 1 Z-TOKEN for the information about the counter offer for currency exchange. As you can see, the commission for cross-border transfer in the AraneoBit system will be significantly lower than in the classical payment systems.
|
|
|
|
carnitastaco
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:16:06 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions So it turns out with each transfer a commission will be charged? Oh sure. But this commission will be significantly different from the commissions of banks or other companies that are engaged in transfers I just thought that this service would be devoid of any commissions, because money transfers are handled by hand, without additional intermediaries. Of course, so it is, but nevertheless it is necessary to somehow coin its business. especially since transfers will be charged very small. Good service is worth it!
|
|
|
|
Xelpherpolis
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:22:04 PM |
|
So what's the difference between A-TOКEH and Z-TOКEH?
One token is intended for depositing and guaranteeing the transfer, another token is an internal crypto-currency, used to cover commissions of transactions So it turns out with each transfer a commission will be charged? Oh sure. But this commission will be significantly different from the commissions of banks or other companies that are engaged in transfers I just thought that this service would be devoid of any commissions, because money transfers are handled by hand, without additional intermediaries. Money transfers are always free of charge for AraneoBit users. At the first stage of development, the sender pays only $2 (1 Z-TOKEN) for the information about the counterparty of the counter offer. In the second step, the sender pays 1 Z-TOKEN for the information about the counter offer for currency exchange. As you can see, the commission for cross-border transfer in the AraneoBit system will be significantly lower than in the classical payment systems. I'm understood, thank you! I hope to get a good product, in this area for a long time there was no innovation I wish good luck to you with this project!
|
|
|
|
BTCdude007
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:29:34 PM |
|
As far as I understand, at the first stage all transactions will be carried out through usual messengers, telegrams, facebook and others. This will be coordinated and managed by a special bot. Right?
|
|
|
|
23coins
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:35:51 PM |
|
As far as I understand, at the first stage all transactions will be carried out through usual messengers, telegrams, facebook and others. This will be coordinated and managed by a special bot. Right?
Well, yes, so it is. The next stage is the implementation of its own messenger, which will allow to perform these operations.
|
|
|
|
BTCdude007
|
|
January 25, 2018, 05:43:09 PM |
|
As far as I understand, at the first stage all transactions will be carried out through usual messengers, telegrams, facebook and others. This will be coordinated and managed by a special bot. Right?
Well, yes, so it is. The next stage is the implementation of its own messenger, which will allow to perform these operations. But why not immediately realize your own messenger? Why do we need an intermediate stage using third-party instant messengers and a bot? What's the point?
|
|
|
|
CathalG (OP)
|
|
January 25, 2018, 06:08:29 PM Last edit: January 25, 2018, 08:39:33 PM by CathalG |
|
As far as I understand, at the first stage all transactions will be carried out through usual messengers, telegrams, facebook and others. This will be coordinated and managed by a special bot. Right?
Well, yes, so it is. The next stage is the implementation of its own messenger, which will allow to perform these operations. But why not immediately realize your own messenger? Why do we need an intermediate stage using third-party instant messengers and a bot? What's the point? We are testing the prototype of the Android application right now. But, when it comes to the actual use, we need to act smoothly and consistently.
|
|
|
|
BTCdude007
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:08:49 PM |
|
As far as I understand, at the first stage all transactions will be carried out through usual messengers, telegrams, facebook and others. This will be coordinated and managed by a special bot. Right?
Well, yes, so it is. The next stage is the implementation of its own messenger, which will allow to perform these operations. But why not immediately realize your own messenger? Why do we need an intermediate stage using third-party instant messengers and a bot? What's the point? We are testing the prototype of the Android application right now. But, when it comes to the actual use, we need to act smoothly and consistently. Already testing? It happens in a closed form, I understand it correctly? You did not plan to conduct open beta tests of your product or is it not acceptable?
|
|
|
|
vit0z
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:14:22 PM |
|
What about the dates of development and launch of your project? Can you find out the approximate dates and dates of this?
|
|
|
|
kolinko
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:22:16 PM |
|
What about the dates of development and launch of your project? Can you find out the approximate dates and dates of this?
This project will develop and enter the market in two stages. Each stage will have its own specific functionality. What kind of stage are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
vit0z
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:23:35 PM |
|
What about the dates of development and launch of your project? Can you find out the approximate dates and dates of this?
This project will develop and enter the market in two stages. Each stage will have its own specific functionality. What kind of stage are you talking about? Yes, I understood this, I would like to know about the approximate terms of each of these stages. When can I expect the implementation of this project?
|
|
|
|
CathalG (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:28:53 PM |
|
As far as I understand, at the first stage all transactions will be carried out through usual messengers, telegrams, facebook and others. This will be coordinated and managed by a special bot. Right?
Well, yes, so it is. The next stage is the implementation of its own messenger, which will allow to perform these operations. But why not immediately realize your own messenger? Why do we need an intermediate stage using third-party instant messengers and a bot? What's the point? We are testing the prototype of the Android application right now. But, when it comes to the actual use, we need to act smoothly and consistently. Already testing? It happens in a closed form, I understand it correctly? You did not plan to conduct open beta tests of your product or is it not acceptable? Yes, it's happening in a closed form. But we are considering the possibility of the open beta tests.
|
|
|
|
BigBank2018
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:29:09 PM |
|
Very interesting idea, but I'm interested in the legal aspect.
|
|
|
|
|