[ANN][PRESALE]⭐ REPU ⭐ - Smart reputation managment - Pre-ICO Soon🚀🚀

[Amelie Poulain]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

[1714056424]

1714056424

[1714056424]

1714056424

[kraterion]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

[belechau]

Many have commented and asked for something like a Repu demo, but I believe there is some complexity to accomplish this, the Team would need Real Profiles to apply, or their analysis would be worthless, perhaps a test system with paid volunteers to provide their data. It's really complex, I hope for demo videos that would be satisfying for now.

[rjp55]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

You can manipulate IMDB rating system by gathering a group angry people and support of social media, if you have a group like this on your back, you can give lots of 1 rating to film and decrease the overall rating of the film..

I think REPU devs should hire a manager in here to provide info or answer questions about the project.

[hanshammer]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

It will depend on people to people how they rate others. I am just very interested what will happen to people who have very bad ratings. I hope they will not get isolated from the society which causes even more troubles.

[tudor_simion]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

IMDB is an evaluation platform that only concerns the film industry. It's not just movies when it's REPU. Of course rating is influenced by everyone's expectations. To give an example, As for a movie, it depends on what gender they prefer. And with REPU, evaluations will the same , influenced by everyone's expectations.
Let's take the example, a waiter in a restaurant. Some can only evaluate the waiter just for how they were served.Others can do the evaluation for the time they were served  Or for some, could count human face. It would be good that, besides the evaluation made, to have a possibility to leave the opinion of the evaluated person.And someone to check the ratings.

Now you ask yourself how can they check them?

Simple. Whoever evaluates on the REPU platform, should have a real profile, and in turn be checked and evaluated in turn.

[ImTotya]

I think it’s a nice way to reward investors to offer an early access to the closed beta. I’m really curious to see how the platform will work and how the REPU team will developp the project in the future.

Sure thing.. however if there would be a demo already available I think they would get funding a lot easier.

I agree with you. Nowadays a lot of cheating and projects must now not only to promise but also to show the results to convince investors!

[helloal]

I think it’s a nice way to reward investors to offer an early access to the closed beta. I’m really curious to see how the platform will work and how the REPU team will developp the project in the future.

Sure thing.. however if there would be a demo already available I think they would get funding a lot easier.

I agree with you. Nowadays a lot of cheating and projects must now not only to promise but also to show the results to convince investors!

I think we are sort of seeing that reflected in the market as well. Those that joined crypto in the past months looking for quick gains are now learning that prices can actually go down and that they should DYOR

[Je.hitler]

I think it’s a nice way to reward investors to offer an early access to the closed beta. I’m really curious to see how the platform will work and how the REPU team will developp the project in the future.

Sure thing.. however if there would be a demo already available I think they would get funding a lot easier.

I agree with you. Nowadays a lot of cheating and projects must now not only to promise but also to show the results to convince investors!

I think we are sort of seeing that reflected in the market as well. Those that joined crypto in the past months looking for quick gains are now learning that prices can actually go down and that they should DYOR

It's hard to imagine how the platform will be integrated and how it will work from the top to the end. As they say we should wait until 2-3 Quarter to test public beta version of the platform.

[imtiazmahmood]

every two days i am coming here and see here a lot of news and interest of community increasing. Repu project is unique and going successful. i think this is best time to invest on Repu. i also mention this project to my friends. they liked concept of Repu.

[CryptoCutie]

every two days i am coming here and see here a lot of news and interest of community increasing. Repu project is unique and going successful. i think this is best time to invest on Repu. i also mention this project to my friends. they liked concept of Repu.

yes Repu project is unique and going successful. A reputation management tool is very powerful if it working.

[MissedBTCtrain]

I think it’s a nice way to reward investors to offer an early access to the closed beta. I’m really curious to see how the platform will work and how the REPU team will developp the project in the future.

Sure thing.. however if there would be a demo already available I think they would get funding a lot easier.

I agree with you. Nowadays a lot of cheating and projects must now not only to promise but also to show the results to convince investors!

I think we are sort of seeing that reflected in the market as well. Those that joined crypto in the past months looking for quick gains are now learning that prices can actually go down and that they should DYOR

It's only good that we don't go up infinite. It gives people the time to cool down the hype and fomo. And it's a moment to educate yourself

[Yasemin]

I think it’s a nice way to reward investors to offer an early access to the closed beta. I’m really curious to see how the platform will work and how the REPU team will developp the project in the future.

Sure thing.. however if there would be a demo already available I think they would get funding a lot easier.

I agree with you. Nowadays a lot of cheating and projects must now not only to promise but also to show the results to convince investors!

I think we are sort of seeing that reflected in the market as well. Those that joined crypto in the past months looking for quick gains are now learning that prices can actually go down and that they should DYOR

It's hard to imagine how the platform will be integrated and how it will work from the top to the end. As they say we should wait until 2-3 Quarter to test public beta version of the platform.

With many blockchain projects/ICOs I really have my doubts because they seem too ambitious. I think many of them (for example healthcare) will be facing legal issues. But for a reputation/rating platform, I think it is easy to implement.

[Vansire]

Is Repu trying to replace all existing rating systems? Hasn't Google tried to do that, and failed at it? Or Facebook on their own platforms. What chance does Repu stand against those giants? I think those companies have too much at stake to allow a different competitor in their territory.

[PS92]

Project status reports like that is totally needed at this stage of the project. Well done  . Please publish it regulary!
Just to hope that you working hard is not enough to invest.

Totally agree with you. If the information are not regularly updated then the project will lose its audience(

I concur! Regular updates (preferably bi-monthly) are a must!

[turkandjaydee]

Is Repu trying to replace all existing rating systems? Hasn't Google tried to do that, and failed at it? Or Facebook on their own platforms. What chance does Repu stand against those giants? I think those companies have too much at stake to allow a different competitor in their territory.

Really?  is there any source to read about that?
I want to see what was their plan and what was their rating systems looks like.

[lvsca]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

IMDB is an evaluation platform that only concerns the film industry. It's not just movies when it's REPU. Of course rating is influenced by everyone's expectations. To give an example, As for a movie, it depends on what gender they prefer. And with REPU, evaluations will the same , influenced by everyone's expectations.
Let's take the example, a waiter in a restaurant. Some can only evaluate the waiter just for how they were served.Others can do the evaluation for the time they were served  Or for some, could count human face. It would be good that, besides the evaluation made, to have a possibility to leave the opinion of the evaluated person.And someone to check the ratings.

Now you ask yourself how can they check them?

Simple. Whoever evaluates on the REPU platform, should have a real profile, and in turn be checked and evaluated in turn.

agree with you, every one on this platform should have real profile for evaluated the reputation. but, everything can be manipulated, such as angry people can made group that will give reputation for cash. this is the problem for devs

[Frickeladm]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

IMDB is an evaluation platform that only concerns the film industry. It's not just movies when it's REPU. Of course rating is influenced by everyone's expectations. To give an example, As for a movie, it depends on what gender they prefer. And with REPU, evaluations will the same , influenced by everyone's expectations.
Let's take the example, a waiter in a restaurant. Some can only evaluate the waiter just for how they were served.Others can do the evaluation for the time they were served  Or for some, could count human face. It would be good that, besides the evaluation made, to have a possibility to leave the opinion of the evaluated person.And someone to check the ratings.

Now you ask yourself how can they check them?

Simple. Whoever evaluates on the REPU platform, should have a real profile, and in turn be checked and evaluated in turn.

agree with you, every one on this platform should have real profile for evaluated the reputation. but, everything can be manipulated, such as angry people can made group that will give reputation for cash. this is the problem for devs

look at how elegant Steam is handling their own reputation system. There are overall reviews and recent review now just to filter out shitstorms about recent updates. Good move i think

[Piggy]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

IMDB is an evaluation platform that only concerns the film industry. It's not just movies when it's REPU. Of course rating is influenced by everyone's expectations. To give an example, As for a movie, it depends on what gender they prefer. And with REPU, evaluations will the same , influenced by everyone's expectations.
Let's take the example, a waiter in a restaurant. Some can only evaluate the waiter just for how they were served.Others can do the evaluation for the time they were served  Or for some, could count human face. It would be good that, besides the evaluation made, to have a possibility to leave the opinion of the evaluated person.And someone to check the ratings.

Now you ask yourself how can they check them?

Simple. Whoever evaluates on the REPU platform, should have a real profile, and in turn be checked and evaluated in turn.

agree with you, every one on this platform should have real profile for evaluated the reputation. but, everything can be manipulated, such as angry people can made group that will give reputation for cash. this is the problem for devs

look at how elegant Steam is handling their own reputation system. There are overall reviews and recent review now just to filter out shitstorms about recent updates. Good move i think

Agree a reputation system should give you an overview, cannot be just the number, no matter what, somebody will always give the minimum score

[jonnytracker]

Me to, never heard about IMDB manipulation. Also a quick google does not shows a problem with the votes.
And in my opinion most time they fit.
You got any examples?

IMDB - this good example, and I think this rating platform objectively assesses the films! Although of course I've heard about the cases of manipulation, but these were single instances and they are suppressed.

When we speak about movies in my opinion it's also a matter a personal tastes. Maybe one movie is rated with 5 star but I don't like it or it's too overvalued

IMDB is an evaluation platform that only concerns the film industry. It's not just movies when it's REPU. Of course rating is influenced by everyone's expectations. To give an example, As for a movie, it depends on what gender they prefer. And with REPU, evaluations will the same , influenced by everyone's expectations.
Let's take the example, a waiter in a restaurant. Some can only evaluate the waiter just for how they were served.Others can do the evaluation for the time they were served  Or for some, could count human face. It would be good that, besides the evaluation made, to have a possibility to leave the opinion of the evaluated person.And someone to check the ratings.

Now you ask yourself how can they check them?

Simple. Whoever evaluates on the REPU platform, should have a real profile, and in turn be checked and evaluated in turn.

agree with you, every one on this platform should have real profile for evaluated the reputation. but, everything can be manipulated, such as angry people can made group that will give reputation for cash. this is the problem for devs

look at how elegant Steam is handling their own reputation system. There are overall reviews and recent review now just to filter out shitstorms about recent updates. Good move i think

Agree a reputation system should give you an overview, cannot be just the number, no matter what, somebody will always give the minimum score

I think they need to come up with a smart algo besides just scoring and ranks . Another internal rep for abusers of the system. Those who abuse the system gets penalty or something to avoid misuse