Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 08:01:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 [233] 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079977 times)
hasher87
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:44:20 AM
 #4641

still rising...we will see 0.004 in a couple of minutes
I don't think we can reach 0.004 without more good news.
and "amazing company!"
1713513670
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713513670

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713513670
Reply with quote  #2

1713513670
Report to moderator
1713513670
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713513670

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713513670
Reply with quote  #2

1713513670
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
carpetbagger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250


You can trust me, I have an avatar


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:54:27 AM
 #4642

still rising...we will see 0.004 in a couple of minutes
I don't think we can reach 0.004 without more good news.
and "amazing company!"
and Chinese girl gifs!

Keep clam & hodl on
mfalme
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:55:29 AM
 #4643

Seems like the "wall" is set at .003850ish


 Cool


Im cool with that for now
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 11:14:49 AM
 #4644

This stock is going up! I have already bought back in as I think its impossible at this point for the price to go below 0.0034. I'm so happy. Smiley
dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2013, 11:20:09 AM
 #4645

For the test run we opted for QFP packaging, 44 pin, no exposed heat pad, here is a small preview :

I was wondering: why is the "labcoin" so pixelated?

Till I realized that the picture is zoomed. This might be a proper size comparison:



They seem to come rolled ready for a pick and place machine like here: http://youtu.be/OQY3Y8shBY8?t=3m28s

drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 11:31:02 AM
 #4646

For the test run we opted for QFP packaging, 44 pin, no exposed heat pad, here is a small preview :

I was wondering: why is the "labcoin" so pixelated?

Till I realized that the picture is zoomed. This might be a proper size comparison:



They seem to come rolled ready for a pick and place machine like here: http://youtu.be/OQY3Y8shBY8?t=3m28s

Smaller means better. I think we will be hitting 0.004 in minutes!
limbaugh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 11:38:02 AM
 #4647


Smaller means better. I think we will be hitting 0.004 in minutes!


I doubt it, at least until we know the chips actually work.


AngelSky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 537



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 11:49:27 AM
 #4648

Seems like the "wall" is set at .003850ish


 Cool


Im cool with that for now

Yup, it means no more bubble for now. That's good to keep the share price stable if there are no news atm. Let's wait for the next step.
dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2013, 01:32:35 PM
 #4649

The LQFP44 package is 10x10mm actually. Your comparison seems ok then. Non-standard warning label on the cigarette pack though Cheesy.

Yes, I assumed it would be roughly 10x10 mm. A cigarette pack should have a length of 86 mm. I'm sure it's not 100 % accurate, but it was only intended to provide some comparison anyway. Wink

Zubilica
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 837
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 01:58:22 PM
 #4650

no one is trading since the rise of btc price
carpetbagger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250


You can trust me, I have an avatar


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 02:08:45 PM
 #4651

The LQFP44 package is 10x10mm actually. Your comparison seems ok then. Non-standard warning label on the cigarette pack though Cheesy.

Yes, I assumed it would be roughly 10x10 mm. A cigarette pack should have a length of 86 mm. I'm sure it's not 100 % accurate, but it was only intended to provide some comparison anyway. Wink

well the text was pixellated simply because it's high resolution photo, then non vector labcoin logo added in graphics manipulation program..when did they change size to 10x10 from 6.5 x 6.5- - can you post the link where it says that?

I thought they blew up and printed out the shitty low res logo on paper and laid the chips on that. Then took the photo.

Keep clam & hodl on
twentyseventy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 02:09:21 PM
 #4652

The LQFP44 package is 10x10mm actually. Your comparison seems ok then. Non-standard warning label on the cigarette pack though Cheesy.

Yes, I assumed it would be roughly 10x10 mm. A cigarette pack should have a length of 86 mm. I'm sure it's not 100 % accurate, but it was only intended to provide some comparison anyway. Wink

well the text was pixellated simply because it's high resolution photo, then non vector labcoin logo added in graphics manipulation program..when did they change size to 10x10 from 6.5 x 6.5- - can you post the link where it says that?

I thought they blew up and printed out the shitty low res logo on paper and laid the chips on that. Then took the photo.

Pretty sure that this is the low-tech answer, everyone
AngelSky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 537



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 02:14:33 PM
 #4653

no one is trading since the rise of btc price

Week-end and holidays. At least there is no selling-out today. Anyway, it would be stupid to sell-all, exchange your btc=>usd and ask yourself 2 months later: "wtf did i do. BTC is now 2xx USD, labcoin is now 0.005+".
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 02:40:46 PM
 #4654

The LQFP44 package is 10x10mm actually. Your comparison seems ok then. Non-standard warning label on the cigarette pack though Cheesy.

Yes, I assumed it would be roughly 10x10 mm. A cigarette pack should have a length of 86 mm. I'm sure it's not 100 % accurate, but it was only intended to provide some comparison anyway. Wink

well the text was pixellated simply because it's high resolution photo, then non vector labcoin logo added in graphics manipulation program..when did they change size to 10x10 from 6.5 x 6.5- - can you post the link where it says that?

I thought they blew up and printed out the shitty low res logo on paper and laid the chips on that. Then took the photo.

Pretty sure that this is the low-tech answer, everyone

yes looks like u right. shame fabrizio cant afford photoshop still using GIMP

what are you guys predictions on the specifications? bearing in mind other teams who received chips some time ago, and those that are due to receive very shortly  have squeezed about 3.5% to 9% of what labcoins devs have aimed for on same process node and highest demonstrated performance using 5 year newer technology, full custom, hand routed design, 756 2xsha256 cores realisticall achieve more like 30%-60% of what labcoin grp claim? simulation is not reality

anybody has heard of the term "thermal resistance" in context of chip packaging?

I like this answers from core dev

Quote
How can you fit 16 cores on 6.5x6.5 ? How many cores on average per chip, what is your assumption The cores we have fit are not classical "unrolled cores",the cores as we mean them are the result of our engineering effort. i'll pass the questions i can't reply to the lead developer

Quote
How is it possible to create chips with a such much better performance than the competitors. You've arranged them to fit more on the same size? For that to be possible, not only each Labcoin core would have to be ~42% smaller [65/130*(6.52)/(7.12)] than each BFL core but also the Labcoin chip would magically operate at a higher frequency (300MHz vs 250MHz) while keeping the same power draw... rolled cores instead of unrolled, sea-of-hashers approach. as in sea-of-gates. you can google this term and find out more about what it means technically

dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2013, 03:02:52 PM
 #4655

when did they change size to 10x10 from 6.5 x 6.5- - can you post the link where it says that?

They didn't. According to LAB the die size is 6.5 x 6.5 mm and I assumed the size of a QFP44 package is rougly 10 x 10 mm.

Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:16:53 PM
 #4656

when did they change size to 10x10 from 6.5 x 6.5- - can you post the link where it says that?

They didn't. According to LAB the die size is 6.5 x 6.5 mm and I assumed the size of a QFP44 package is rougly 10 x 10 mm.


maybe you got confused like labcoin did, easy mistake to make


reserved

From your website: 0.18 um (micrometers) /180nm (nanometers) die size custom design.  Huh
Maybe you meant feature size.

Sorry, some typos here and there, will be fixed shortly. Thanks for the head-up. I clearly meant feature size.

I'm not one of the engineers but i'm in charge of creating the text contents you are reading, so you may encounter some small quirks like that one, the text will be fixed properly anyways in due time.

EDIT : Fixed all instances of the typo.

Cheers


    "300M*16=4.8G, 0.8*16=12.8W, Area=130,0000*16=2080,0000, make the utilization ratio to 50%, the chip size will be about 4160,0000um2, about 6.5mm x 6.5mm"


Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2013, 03:58:40 PM
 #4657

I did another size comparison, for those of us who don't smoke Tongue



Although... is the 10mm the width of the package or the width all the way to the tips of the pins? If so it would actually be even smaller in comparison to the penny...

Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:29:05 PM
 #4658



We're due for another selloff soon.

 Grin
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:38:55 PM
 #4659



We're due for another selloff soon.

 Grin

In your dreams, we are going above 0.004 in a matter of hours.
lammedraak
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:50:32 PM
 #4660


In your dreams, we are going above 0.004 in a matter of hours.

Around 130k shares to be bought before we hit 0.004

http://bitcoinstats.nl/LABCOIN_script/create_graphs/html/LABCOIN_ORDERS.gif
Pages: « 1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 [233] 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!