limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:32:27 AM |
|
keep holding labcoin. this growth is natural.
also i applaud labcoin on building pcbs AFTER getting chips so less time is spent hashing when speed is everything. it isn't like they had the exact specifications and could build the boards ahead of time to save time where the entire stock is based on rapid deployment.
you and I both know, PCB should be in hands before chips finish packaging, sure maybe some little problems with it. but it should be there dreamers are keep dreaming.. Unfortunately, it is apparent the Labcoin team is in over their head. Good luck all..
|
|
|
|
creativex
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:32:51 AM |
|
Someone needs to check their sarcasm detector.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:45:42 AM |
|
keep holding labcoin. this growth is natural.
also i applaud labcoin on building pcbs AFTER getting chips so less time is spent hashing when speed is everything. it isn't like they had the exact specifications and could build the boards ahead of time to save time where the entire stock is based on rapid deployment.
you and I both know, PCB should be in hands before chips finish packaging, sure maybe some little problems with it. but it should be there dreamers are keep dreaming.. Unfortunately, it is apparent the Labcoin team is in over their head. Good luck all.. Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Sell! Buy! Are you sure you're not schizophrenic?
|
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:47:14 AM Last edit: September 03, 2013, 12:58:34 AM by dexX7 |
|
Sorry what statement? "there is no news for a week, hence the chart takes precedent"
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:50:36 AM |
|
Short as a verb means to sell short. You obviously don't know anything.
Pedantic arsehole. You know I didn't say 'short sell'. I said short (yes a verb WELL DONE!) as in 'go short' as in SELL. Prick. No. First of all you were replying to someone who replied to someone who didn't even have the stock, and had nothing to sell. Second of all short always means to take a short position. You can call it 'pedantic' if you want, but a failure to understand the semantics of the word 'short' indicates a severe lack of 'investment' knowledge. Interestingly, there are actually some put options available for you to buy. My guess is you have absolutely no idea how options work, since you're an idiot.
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:51:42 AM |
|
Isn't there only 10 days between now and when they are supposed to begin hashing? why do we need news? Any sell-off at this point is going to be the result of panic induction by a whale or two.
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:53:12 AM |
|
Isn't there only 10 days between now and when they are supposed to begin hashing? why do we need news? Any sell-off at this point is going to be the result of panic induction by a whale or two.
The real question is, how fast can you hit the sell button if they don't start hashing.
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:53:22 AM |
|
Short as a verb means to sell short. You obviously don't know anything.
Pedantic arsehole. You know I didn't say 'short sell'. I said short (yes a verb WELL DONE!) as in 'go short' as in SELL. Prick. No. First of all you were replying to someone who replied to someone who didn't even have the stock, and had nothing to sell. Second of all short always means to take a short position. You can call it 'pedantic' if you want, but a failure to understand the semantics of the word 'short' indicates a severe lack of 'investment' knowledge. Interestingly, there are actually some put options available for you to buy. My guess is you have absolutely no idea how options work, since you're an idiot. i'd put puts down, if i thought market would behave predictable and rationally to developments, so far it's not been the case Isn't there only 10 days between now and when they are supposed to begin hashing? why do we need news? Any sell-off at this point is going to be the result of panic induction by a whale or two.
The real question is, how fast can you hit the sell button if they don't start hashing. simple sell at a gain right now, sleep soundly at night..f5 on 10th sept..for minimized risk
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 03, 2013, 12:58:20 AM |
|
Short as a verb means to sell short. You obviously don't know anything.
Pedantic arsehole. You know I didn't say 'short sell'. I said short (yes a verb WELL DONE!) as in 'go short' as in SELL. Prick. No. First of all you were replying to someone who replied to someone who didn't even have the stock, and had nothing to sell. Second of all short always means to take a short position. You can call it 'pedantic' if you want, but a failure to understand the semantics of the word 'short' indicates a severe lack of 'investment' knowledge. Interestingly, there are actually some put options available for you to buy. My guess is you have absolutely no idea how options work, since you're an idiot. i'd put puts down, if i thought market would behave predictable and rationally to developments, so far it's not been the case Isn't there only 10 days between now and when they are supposed to begin hashing? why do we need news? Any sell-off at this point is going to be the result of panic induction by a whale or two.
The real question is, how fast can you hit the sell button if they don't start hashing. simple sell at a gain right now, sleep soundly at night..f5 on 10th sept..for minimized risk Agreed, but there will be bag holders is that happens.
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:01:45 AM |
|
Agreed, but there will be bag holders is that happens.
If the company shares are priced higher than its actual value then there is going to be a bagholder no matter what. It is just a question of who and when.
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:02:29 AM |
|
My analysis - how about multiple rejections and four red engulfing candles you retard!! Are you blind? Holy fuck what a clown.
See what I mean? When you get to what he's actually talking about, he's a complete lunatic. No better then astrology. The flailing insults to anyone who doesn't agree with his batshit nuttery is interesting. The thing is he's actually a ActiveMining bag-holder. He's jealous and upset that Labcoin has done well while ActiveMining has been falling.
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:05:55 AM |
|
Here is what will happen. Labcoin will state: "We are hashing". stock price will jump up and then there will be a massive sell-off. Then everyone on here will be like "Oh, well, we really don't have any proof that they are hashing until they start paying dividends - that is the real news."
Every step of the way, everyone anticipates news, Labcoin gives it, and then everyone downplays the significance of the news, and says "the next announcement is the one that matters."
|
|
|
|
pheaonix
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
http://casinobitco.in/ A+ customer support
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:06:08 AM |
|
My analysis - how about multiple rejections and four red engulfing candles you retard!! Are you blind? Holy fuck what a clown.
See what I mean? When you get to what he's actually talking about, he's a complete lunatic. No better then astrology. The flailing insults to anyone who doesn't agree with his batshit nuttery is interesting. The thing is he's actually a ActiveMining bag-holder. He's jealous and upset that Labcoin has done well while ActiveMining has been falling. done well? they haven't done anything besides raise their share price through speculation.
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:10:46 AM |
|
Here is what will happen. Labcoin will state: "We are hashing". stock price will jump up and then there will be a massive sell-off. Then everyone on here will be like "Oh, well, we really don't have any proof that they are hashing until they start paying dividends - that is the real news."
Every step of the way, everyone anticipates news, Labcoin gives it, and then everyone downplays the significance of the news, and says "the next announcement is the one that matters."
+1 people are jumpy around here. they'll sell on no news, good news, bad news, whatever comes along. at some point, success can't be ignored (if it actually happens), at which time, the price will have already risen.
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:12:09 AM |
|
done well? they haven't done anything besides raise their share price through speculation. That's what I mean. The share price has gone up. This makes him angry because he owns ActM and not Labcoin. (oh, sorry it's gone down slightly in the past couple hours. boo-hoo. Compared to how much it's gone up in the past couple weeks who cares? This stuff is just noise as far as my overall profits are concerned)
|
|
|
|
bclcjunkie
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:17:40 AM |
|
+1000, also this place is getting serious troll infestation coz we keep feeding them... it amazes me how much time and effort FUDsters spend here trying their best to put down Labcoin... Doesn't anyone stop and think WHY... oh.. oh.. that's right... they are trying to help us from loosing our BTC before the big crash... oh.. oh.. I forgot... these noobs new to the bitcoin world really know what they're talking about and really care for us STRANGERS... Seriously, even if there was a big crash and it went all the way down to 0.001 that just puts most IPO investors back to square, back to where we started... nothing lost. Seriously just have a look at what's the reality here ActM and AM shares have gone south for one main obvious reason... They want Labcoin. This isn't FUD just have a read in their threads, their main topic is how they can sell their shares to make big profits buying Labcoin. edit: sorry forgot to mention... WHAT AN AMAZING COMPANY
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:25:41 AM |
|
Here is what will happen. Labcoin will state: "We are hashing". stock price will jump up and then there will be a massive sell-off. Then everyone on here will be like "Oh, well, we really don't have any proof that they are hashing until they start paying dividends - that is the real news."
Every step of the way, everyone anticipates news, Labcoin gives it, and then everyone downplays the significance of the news, and says "the next announcement is the one that matters."
question for anyone can help me answer plz 1) if labcoin bring on 3-4 TH in 1 week and you buy in today at market price- what $/GH rate are you paying? 2) if labcoin brings online 50TH the month after, and the share price has at least doubled from today market price as predicted by many here- what $/GH rate are you paying?
|
|
|
|
szmarco
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:37:30 AM |
|
Here is what will happen. Labcoin will state: "We are hashing". stock price will jump up and then there will be a massive sell-off. Then everyone on here will be like "Oh, well, we really don't have any proof that they are hashing until they start paying dividends - that is the real news."
Every step of the way, everyone anticipates news, Labcoin gives it, and then everyone downplays the significance of the news, and says "the next announcement is the one that matters."
question for anyone can help me answer plz 1) if labcoin bring on 3-4 TH in 1 week and you buy in today at market price- what $/GH rate are you paying? 2) if labcoin brings online 50TH the month after, and the share price has at least doubled from today market price as predicted by many here- what $/GH rate are you paying? Could you plz use your formula to evaluate the asicminer's price?
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:38:39 AM |
|
Here is what will happen. Labcoin will state: "We are hashing". stock price will jump up and then there will be a massive sell-off. Then everyone on here will be like "Oh, well, we really don't have any proof that they are hashing until they start paying dividends - that is the real news."
Every step of the way, everyone anticipates news, Labcoin gives it, and then everyone downplays the significance of the news, and says "the next announcement is the one that matters."
question for anyone can help me answer plz 1) if labcoin bring on 3-4 TH in 1 week and you buy in today at market price- what $/GH rate are you paying? 2) if labcoin brings online 50TH the month after, and the share price has at least doubled from today market price as predicted by many here- what $/GH rate are you paying? Could you plz use your formula to evaluate the asicminer's price? And ActM's as well. That would be fun to see.
|
|
|
|
radiumsoup
|
|
September 03, 2013, 01:39:38 AM |
|
Go take a quaalude and perhaps a brisk walk outside, have a cigarette or two, calm the hell down, and then come back and read this. I don't think you're going to catch on to the grander discussion until you lose the attitude, to be perfectly honest. I only know what you tell people by reading what you type - I cannot know what you intend to tell someone unless you express yourself in an understandable way.
[copious emotion-based vomit deleted for brevity] No shit sherlock. That's why I didn't use the phrase 'sell short' or 'short sell'. Again, short = to go short = sell. Got it yet? Fuck me. *Sigh* no, actually, to short (as a verb, the way you used it) does not = to sell. I thought we went over this already. They're not the same thing. They are different. Not equal. Unequal. Doubleplusunsame. >>>>>I hope that makes it clearer for you. I can link you to the motley fool if you'd like, Motley Fool? Fuck off! Stopped reading that 'for the masses' shit in the frigging nineties, motley fucking fool?! JESUS.
Stop right here if you understand that "to short" a stock is not the same thing as selling it. Thanks for taking the time to be unemotional about this. You may have unintentionally made a mistake, and now you're recanted. You've got it, congratulations. Let's move on. --- read below this line only if you think it's the same --- OK, then. If you still need the basics explained in easy-to-digest nuggets, this should be about as easy as it gets - it was written JUST for folks like you who use words they shouldn't use. At least one person already caught on to the subtle hint I gave you when I mentioned the motley fool... all you did was get even more pissy about it all. I mean, if you had intended (there's that word intent again... something I'm still not sure about in your case, since you still haven't explained away your improper use of the word "short" yet) to say that you wished shareholders would sell, but you accidentally used the word "short", then that's one thing. But you've doubled down twice now, insisting that you know what you're talking about... so I have to assume you are exactly the right audience for this article: Here you go.
|
PGP fingerprint: 0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
|
|
|
|