|
Vigil
|
 |
September 04, 2013, 02:09:37 AM |
|
This stuart chode is a toolbox from hell. STFU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 02:13:35 AM |
|
The fact is, if anyone followed my advice and sold ActM to buy LC they would have made a profit. If they would have followed your advice and held ActM, they would have seen the price of their shares plummet.
Lol ever heard of a self-fulfilling prophecy? Part of the reason for the ACtM sell off was YOUR fecking constant Trolling. FIVE days off it, incessant. You must have told people 200 times to sell ACtM - on the Official ACtM thread! You have no respect for loyal ACtM shareholders or the company employees. You can speculate all you want, that's business, but going on the Official thread for FIVE friggin days solid, bombarding it with epic posts, telling people to sell is just bad form. So when it happens on here, in a stock you have money in, you get a bit shitty. You can't handle a taste of your own medicine is that it? I've only been on here for an hour, see how you feel 5 days from now lol. fyi not everyone who has day traded or invested in stocks before is an 'investment banker'. However by the sounds of your returns you should be one. Seriously good bit of investing. Impressive, but I will pray as I go to sleep tonight that you loose it all.  Jebus dude. Calm down. If you become too tedious you'll just end up ignored by everyone. No he didn't piss me off, he helped knock 30% off everyones holdings, that's the issue. If I can in some way return the favour over this next week or so then I certainly will.
Well, you can't. That's why we're laughing at you. The argument against ActM is pretty strong. The argument against Labcoin is... pretty weak. That's why ActM is down and Labcoin isn't. Now go ahead and laugh about how poor I am but I'll be the one laughing in a couple of months
For some reason I imagined you screaming this at me, tears, the whole lot.  It's called projection dude. LC will go down to .001 per share while ACTM is on the way to .01
You guys are going to have to come up with something creative if you expect this to work. You can't just say "the price will go down!" without coming up with an argument as to why it will. |
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
|
September 04, 2013, 02:33:22 AM |
|
How about no mining in a week. And no mining in 6weeks?
I think that will do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 02:56:39 AM |
|
How about no mining in a week. And no mining in 6weeks?
I think that will do it.
And, what exactly are you going to do if Labcoin does start mining in the next week or two? That's the problem with these predictions - if they're wrong you end up looking like an idiot. You know that, right? |
|
|
|
|
eve
|
|
September 04, 2013, 03:14:52 AM |
|
How about no mining in a week. And no mining in 6weeks?
I think that will do it.
Yes, is scary to know they just disappear, no news and updates, no asic chips and miners, and all those road show are full of Bs and Lies. |
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2013, 04:05:55 AM |
|
Sorry if this has been discussed...
If each chip is rated at 4.7Gh/s @ 12.8W. Wouldn't that mean they could run a 5W USB single chip stick at ~ 1.8GH/s for ~$3 USD + markup?
|
|
|
|
|
|
demzie
|
|
September 04, 2013, 04:39:05 AM |
|
How about no mining in a week. And no mining in 6weeks?
I think that will do it.
Yes, is scary to know they just disappear, no news and updates, no asic chips and miners, and all those road show are full of Bs and Lies.Again? Every week? |
|
|
|
|
|
eve
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:12:03 AM |
|
Sorry if this has been discussed...
If each chip is rated at 4.7Gh/s @ 12.8W. Wouldn't that mean they could run a 5W USB single chip stick at ~ 1.8GH/s for ~$3 USD + markup?
What's the point of $3 or even $1 per asic chip when they have nothing "0" Zero things to show, vaporware. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:13:59 AM |
|
Sorry if this has been discussed...
If each chip is rated at 4.7Gh/s @ 12.8W. Wouldn't that mean they could run a 5W USB single chip stick at ~ 1.8GH/s for ~$3 USD + markup?
What's the point of $3 or even $1 per asic chip when they have nothing "0" Zero things to show, vaporware. What is it exactly that compels you to straight up lie like this? They obviously have something to show, their fucking chips. For the test run we opted for QFP packaging, 44 pin, no exposed heat pad, here is a small preview :  |
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:26:21 AM |
|
^The two packages are different. Look at the raised parts in the plastic where the chips sit. There is no way to know what those chips are, they could have been ordered from Mouser.com.
Not trying to troll, just sayin.
|
|
|
|
|
carpetbagger
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
You can trust me, I have an avatar
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:37:48 AM |
|
  I'm totally trying to troll |
♔ Keep clam & hodl on
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:44:41 AM |
|
^The two packages are different. Look at the raised parts in the plastic where the chips sit. There is no way to know what those chips are, they could have been ordered from Mouser.com.
Not trying to troll, just sayin.
The chips look different because one of them is upside down. Seriously people.  |
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:45:10 AM |
|
^The two packages are different. Look at the raised parts in the plastic where the chips sit. There is no way to know what those chips are, they could have been ordered from Mouser.com.
Not trying to troll, just sayin.
*sigh* this has been gone over. One chip is upside-down. They are the same chips. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
September 04, 2013, 05:48:44 AM |
|
^The two packages are different. Look at the raised parts in the plastic where the chips sit. There is no way to know what those chips are, they could have been ordered from Mouser.com.
Not trying to troll, just sayin.
*sigh* this has been gone over. One chip is upside-down. They are the same chips. *sigh* again, misdirection regarding my statement again - strawman. First, I didn't say the chips weren't the same. I said the packaging wasn't the same, which it clearly is not. Then I said, that there really isn't any way to know that these are special ASIC chips, they could be any qfp 44pin chips. But if the packaging is different (and it is), then these are likely either not the same chips or they are the same chips but from different reels which used different packaging. |
|
|
|
|
carpetbagger
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
You can trust me, I have an avatar
|
|
September 04, 2013, 06:04:07 AM |
|
Zoom in to the packaging, it is the same. They have come from a slab and you can see they've been snipped off. The pack on the right was snipped a little rougher.
|
♔ Keep clam & hodl on
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 06:04:33 AM |
|
*sigh* again, misdirection regarding my statement again - strawman.
First, I didn't say the chips weren't the same. I said the packaging wasn't the same, which it clearly is not. Then I said, that there really isn't any way to know that these are special ASIC chips,
... But if the packaging is different (and it is), then these are likely either not the same chips or they are the same chips but from different reels which used different packaging. Or they are in the same packaging and you just never developed the cognitive ability of object permanence and unable recognize the something as being the same when they are flipped over. Seriously, it's hard to believe you're not trolling here, because it doesn't actually seem possible for someone not to be able to understand the concept that things look different when they've been flipped over. |
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
September 04, 2013, 06:07:58 AM |
|
Zoom in to the packaging, it is the same. They have come from a slab and you can see they've been snipped off. The pack on the right was snipped a little rougher.
They. Are. Not. The. Same. Package. Look carefully at the raised interior portion of the package. Seriously, it's hard to believe you're not trolling here, because it doesn't actually seem possible for someone not to be able to understand the concept that things look different when they've been flipped over. The chips may be flipped but the packages are not flipped over. Both have the side which seats the chips facing up. This is so easy to see that anyone who denies it must be trolling. Again, I am not talking about the chips but their plastic package reels which have been cut-off the main reel. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 06:10:03 AM |
|
Zoom in to the packaging, it is the same. They have come from a slab and you can see they've been snipped off. The pack on the right was snipped a little rougher.
Wait... do you mean then when he's saying packaging he's refering to the cut tape, and not the plastic lqfp44 packages. Because normally when someone talks about packaging, I'm assuming they're talking about the packagingAs far as cut tape it looks like someone put some scotch tape on one of the plastic covers to keep it in place, which wasn't necessary on the other. |
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2013, 06:10:49 AM |
|
If they wanted to cheat, they would've shown the same packages. No cheaters will make such obvious mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
September 04, 2013, 06:12:55 AM |
|
Zoom in to the packaging, it is the same. They have come from a slab and you can see they've been snipped off. The pack on the right was snipped a little rougher.
Wait... do you mean then when he's saying packaging he's refering to the cut tape, and not the plastic lqfp44 packages. Because normally when someone talks about packaging, I'm assuming they're talking about the packagingAs far as cut tape it looks like someone put some scotch tape on one of the plastic covers to keep it in place, which wasn't necessary on the other. jesus christ. There is no need to derail the observation with some semantic technicality. There is no scotch tape, those are the covers which hold the chips in their package. Additionally, the chips are not the same size in this image. One is a couple milimeters larger. |
|
|
|
|
|
