bb
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2011, 05:28:50 PM |
|
[19:26:47] RPC request [[]] submitted to mtred Error in json decoding, Server probably down
[19:26:47] Server change to arsbitcoin, telling client with LP [19:26:47] LP Call arsbitcoin.com:8344/LP [19:26:47] RPC request [[]] submitted to arsbitcoin
I can't submit to mtred. Anybody else?
|
|
|
|
gno
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2011, 05:51:41 PM |
|
[19:26:47] RPC request [[]] submitted to mtred Error in json decoding, Server probably down
[19:26:47] Server change to arsbitcoin, telling client with LP [19:26:47] LP Call arsbitcoin.com:8344/LP [19:26:47] RPC request [[]] submitted to arsbitcoin
I can't submit to mtred. Anybody else? I'm getting the "error in json decoding" but it appears I'm submitting shares to mtred
|
|
|
|
muyoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2011, 05:52:53 PM |
|
I am sorry to you guys who disabled bitcoins.lc. I got in on 4 blocks this morning already.
Edit: Make that 5 blocks.
|
I drink it up!
|
|
|
Clipse
|
|
July 18, 2011, 05:57:50 PM |
|
And yet some more errors [19:56:22] RPC request [[]] submitted to mtred [19:56:23] LP triggered from server mtred [19:56:23] Reading LP Response failed
I dont see anyone else reporting in here similar errors yet I find it hard to believe that I am the only one getting these. Did you all update to the latest git version ?
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
muyoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2011, 05:59:56 PM |
|
I am sorry to you guys who disabled bitcoins.lc. I got in on 4 blocks this morning already.
Edit: Make that 5 blocks.
really or that are faked stats ? 296 136898 532 540 540 340 18 Jul 16:15:20 1 h 17m 295 136888 1 120 599 1 130 838 18 Jul 14:57:53 2h 40m 294 136877 2 646 739 2 682 072 18 Jul 12:17:49 6h 59m 293 136840 4 905 846 4 995 134 18 Jul 05:18:46 14h 5m 292 136739 75 365 77 056 17 Jul 15:13:33 13m 29s 291 136737 3 133 727 3 299 934 17 Jul 15:00:04 12h 42m Actually looks like 4 blocks. I think they just set the shares in their API to 126,183 so that is why I thought it was a new block. Did get payment on 4 blocks though. Damnit, have to re-disable bitcoins.lc until they stop playing games with the shares. Absolutely need to implement something that stops mining at a pool when their shares remain static from one poll to another. I have been really lucky and caught btcguild, bitp.it and not bitcoins.lc within minutes of them setting static share counts, but I won't always be able to catch it.
|
I drink it up!
|
|
|
zybron
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2011, 06:02:39 PM |
|
And yet some more errors [19:56:22] RPC request [[]] submitted to mtred [19:56:23] LP triggered from server mtred [19:56:23] Reading LP Response failed
I dont see anyone else reporting in here similar errors yet I find it hard to believe that I am the only one getting these. Did you all update to the latest git version ? I'm running the latest GIT version but not seeing anything like that. Maybe you're having connection issues?
|
|
|
|
muyoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2011, 06:06:30 PM |
|
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO multipoll hopper still can work on bitcoins.lc Multipoll hopper? How does it work when bitcoins.lc is apparently setting their shares to a static number of 126,183?
|
I drink it up!
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 18, 2011, 06:49:05 PM |
|
So all I can think if you dont have issue with previous code, you havnt updated bithopper today. Nope and considering that cow said I did no work this weekend. So the same as friday. that earlier I did not expect to update. Thanks for the the fixes though as I plan to update.
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
Clipse
|
|
July 18, 2011, 06:51:03 PM |
|
So all I can think if you dont have issue with previous code, you havnt updated bithopper today. Nope and considering that cow said I did no work this weekend. So the same as friday. that earlier I did not expect to update. Thanks for the the fixes though as I plan to update. He did make some changes about 12hrs ago to most of the core py files, since then ive had these issues. Afaik the changes are mostly reoganizing code.
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 18, 2011, 07:07:43 PM |
|
Afaik the changes are mostly reoganizing code. cool, I'll give it a bit more time before I update then. I like some of the changes flower did and hope those two get merged. If not not a big deal. any thought to hopping some namecoin pools during the big difficulty change coming up?
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 18, 2011, 07:12:25 PM |
|
1) Issues with core code specifically Nonetype errors? I'm looking at it. Its a bug. It doesn't appear for me but I'm checking my logs. It may be a screwy debug versus non debug issue which is always annoying.
2) more pools? Stats? The core rewrite was so I could actually get the database working correctly. I'm going to hold off on that and add more pools so I can get bitp.it working again as well as triple mining and nofee. rfcpool as well if I have the time.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
muyoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 18, 2011, 07:13:06 PM |
|
Looks like bitcoins.lc statistics are back working again. We will see if they hold up. 2) more pools? Stats? The core rewrite was so I could actually get the database working correctly. I'm going to hold off on that and add more pools so I can get bitp.it working again as well as triple mining and nofee. rfcpool as well if I have the time. Awesome. The loss of bitp.it was a big hit as they gave out massive payments.
|
I drink it up!
|
|
|
Clipse
|
|
July 18, 2011, 07:14:16 PM |
|
Afaik the changes are mostly reoganizing code. cool, I'll give it a bit more time before I update then. I like some of the changes flower did and hope those two get merged. If not not a big deal. any thought to hopping some namecoin pools during the big difficulty change coming up? Just to give you an idea, flowers is using the version before reoganizing of code and Im have 0 issues as I reported having with latest git pull version. Only common difference is the versions.
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 18, 2011, 07:37:11 PM |
|
Merged mining does look cool, but requires a change to the namecoin blockchain and server, I'll be interested to see if it goes off smoothly.
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 18, 2011, 08:30:50 PM Last edit: July 18, 2011, 08:46:01 PM by c00w |
|
1) nonetype issues? Switching issues? Pretty much every other issue with the latest version? I broke the delagger again. latest version should have it fixed.
EDIT: And I added triplemining.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
hawks5999
|
|
July 18, 2011, 08:51:41 PM Last edit: July 18, 2011, 09:03:53 PM by hawks5999 |
|
bitp.it removed total from leaderboard.
edit: nevermind - i see code isn't looking at that...
edit: actually, this isn't working for bitp.it. bithopper is showing like 120k shares but if you add up all the shares from the leaderboard they are 1.16 Million.
|
■ ▄▄▄ ■ ███ ■ ■ ■ LEDGER WALLET ████ ■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■ LEDGER WALLET Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Decentralized. Open. Secure.
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 18, 2011, 08:52:11 PM Last edit: July 18, 2011, 09:14:17 PM by paraipanakos |
|
Let's wait and see how it can be implemented first. Just read the whole merged mining thread and I'm not convinced. If I ever want to mine for nmc's could easy jump to a pool or mine solo, no problem with that, but implement it at pool level it's another thing. My total hashing power it's a constant I cannot change without spending some money on hardware, if some pool merge mines and asks me if I want that then I would be diminishing my bitcoin income with something not widely accepted and equally priced, new risk I would not easily take. Leaving aside block-chain compatibilities I think it could be done but only based on popular acceptance, not imposed. I know that domain names of namecoin have a price tag set by it's developers (like fees in bitcoin) and will not be changed to soon, correct me if I'm wrong. Will wait and see what happens until then let's mine some bitcoins Thanks c00w for your efforts, I just started studying python more in depth since bithopper.
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
Clipse
|
|
July 18, 2011, 09:03:07 PM |
|
lol disable bitpit again, the monkey is readin this thread and removed total from leaderboard.
rofl!!
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
hawks5999
|
|
July 18, 2011, 09:05:23 PM |
|
is Eclipse still nerfed?
|
■ ▄▄▄ ■ ███ ■ ■ ■ LEDGER WALLET ████ ■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■ LEDGER WALLET Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Decentralized. Open. Secure.
|
|
|
|