Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 11:01:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 355541 times)
enmaku
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 07:21:52 PM
 #1301

is namecoin mining dead at this point?

I notice that role:disable is being used now in latest c00w pool.cfg.

With the current exchange rates, I'd say yes.

Had nmc-mining enabled (bitparking) for ~18 hrs, and while my efficiency in terms of NMC was 135%, after exchange to BTC it came out to 65%

I blame this in part on the extreme youth of namecoin. If namecoin had a GUI it'd be more popular, if there were an exchange that was better looking and (more importantly) easier to use it'd be more popular. It's kind of sitting right now where bitcoin sat a year ago. I think it's got potential but it needs a lot of work still. That said, I'm hoarding every namecoin I mine just in case... Not like they're worth much of anything right now anyway  Grin
1710846074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846074
Reply with quote  #2

1710846074
Report to moderator
1710846074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846074
Reply with quote  #2

1710846074
Report to moderator
1710846074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846074
Reply with quote  #2

1710846074
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710846074
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710846074

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710846074
Reply with quote  #2

1710846074
Report to moderator
burp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 07:39:19 PM
 #1302

What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine,  if namecoin shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty then mine namecoin, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value Cheesy
enmaku
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 07:41:58 PM
 #1303

What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine namecoin if shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value Cheesy

The problem isn't really on the mining/supply side of the fence, there's just not that much demand.

also, is anyone else having problems with polmine again? I updated to the regex above and still get 10^10 shares.
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 07:44:56 PM
 #1304

What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine namecoin if shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value Cheesy

The problem isn't really on the mining/supply side of the fence, there's just not that much demand.

also, is anyone else having problems with polmine again? I updated to the regex above and still get 10^10 shares.

for me this works fine

api_address:http://polmine.pl/?action=statistics
role:mine 
api_method:re
api_key:; </b> <br/>([ 0-9]+)<br/>
api_strip:' '

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
c00w (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 08:19:49 PM
 #1305

The configuration in the trunk for polmine works...

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 09:11:42 PM
 #1306

wow, just had a jawbreak with last release, nice work ppl. wish I had 10 bitcoins for every one of you making this real Smiley

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 09:29:09 PM
 #1307

I got a question, is bitHopper only meant to have 1 miner connected to it per instance of bitHopper? Like say if I wanted to use bitHopper with all my miners would I have to make accounts for each one and have separate instances of bitHopper for each or can I just point all my miners to bitHopper?

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 09:37:57 PM
 #1308

I got a question, is bitHopper only meant to have 1 miner connected to it per instance of bitHopper? Like say if I wanted to use bitHopper with all my miners would I have to make accounts for each one and have separate instances of bitHopper for each or can I just point all my miners to bitHopper?

I have two computers and only one instance of bithopper running and its flawless.  Just use the local ip of the machine running bithopper instead of "localhost".

I drink it up!
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 09:39:54 PM
 #1309

3 computers, 11 miners all pointing to bithopper.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 09:57:39 PM
 #1310

Awesome, thanks. But it's got me wondering though. Could it possibly be more profitable if each had its own account and instance of bitHopper? I'm not 100% with how hopping works so forgive me if I'm horribly wrong lol.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 10:34:39 PM
 #1311

not horribly wrong but yeah it wouldn't help much. flower's fork has slicing that [is | will be] in the main trunk.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
ahitman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 302
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 11:07:47 PM
 #1312

not horribly wrong but yeah it wouldn't help much. flower's fork has slicing that [is | will be] in the main trunk.
How does one enter payouts into the system now that the web interface has changed to include the cool graphs? I used to be able to enter into the white boxes on the page, but now they are gone.

Bitcoin client integration would be killer. Thanks.
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 102


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 11:09:00 PM
 #1313

I'm concerned by the number of stales I am getting on bitHopper.  It is running LP, right?  I'm getting around 2-3% stales on most sites, including btcguild (backup), which without bitHopper my stales were < 1%
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 11:14:07 PM
 #1314

So I am guessing we are the reason that the polmine website and thus the polmine stats keep crashing?  Anyone want to tell them to publish stats through json api?

I drink it up!
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 11:16:23 PM
 #1315

So I am guessing we are the reason that the polmine website and thus the polmine stats keep crashing?  Anyone want to tell them to publish stats through json api?

hehe good one, you go first

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 11:18:33 PM
 #1316

I'm concerned by the number of stales I am getting on bitHopper.  It is running LP, right?  I'm getting around 2-3% stales on most sites, including btcguild (backup), which without bitHopper my stales were < 1%

give us a little more detail, what miner do you use and stuff

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 102


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 11:20:22 PM
 #1317

phoenix miner 1.50, and the latest version of bitHopper
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2011, 11:24:44 PM
 #1318

i use phoenix too with phatk kernel and had same issues until realized it was not the proxy but job pre-fetching
I'm using queue 2 (-q 2) not 5 (default), requests work lots faster and submits in time
switching cost you shares too so expect some eff. loss although LP is active

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


moOo


View Profile
July 28, 2011, 12:07:36 AM
 #1319

Code:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Users\cow\Desktop\Mining\c00w-bitHopper-july27\bitHopper.py", line 44
9, in <module>
    main()
  File "C:\Users\cow\Desktop\Mining\c00w-bitHopper-july27\bitHopper.py", line 44
5, in main
    reactor.run()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1162, in r
un
    self.mainLoop()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in m
ainLoop
    self.runUntilCurrent()
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 793, in ru
nUntilCurrent
    call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
  File "C:\Users\cow\Desktop\Mining\c00w-bitHopper-july27\pool.py", line 160, in
 update_api_servers
    if info['role'] in update:
exceptions.KeyError: 'role'

what did i do this time?

mooo for rent
bigbeerjr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 28, 2011, 12:13:29 AM
 #1320

mtred should work by default. Are you using the latest version?

.....

Any hints on how to adjust/troubleshoot the lag detection? For whatever reason mtred is always marked as lagged out for me  Sad
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!