DoloresHazed
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 02, 2014, 09:31:35 PM
Last edit: January 02, 2014, 10:20:19 PM by DoloresHazed |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:36:17 PM |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:38:56 PM |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated. wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" isI actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit.That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM |
|
|
|
|
|
stenkross
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:39:58 PM |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated. Here's a twist for you: The company doing the mining is: *drumroll* ... eAsic! Yep, the chips are done, but they keep telling Ken they are "delayed", so eAsic can hash with them first.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Ozymandias
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:40:44 PM |
|
I may have just broken my own nose due to extreme facepalm. I suppose it's time to take a wee bit of a break from this thread (though I'll likely just get sucked right back in). Have fun all!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:42:48 PM |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated. wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" isI actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit.That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM Not really. There is no definite: "It is not..." It also does not rule out the possibility that these are VMC machines. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:46:15 PM |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated. wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" isI actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit.That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM Not really. There is no definite: "It is not..." It also does not rule out the possibility that these are VMC machines. Besides the fact you just PM'd me and I told you unequivocally that they are not VMC Machines. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:49:55 PM |
|
Besides the fact you just PM'd me and I told you unequivocally that they are not VMC Machines.
Responded prior to getting your message. |
|
|
|
|
|
VinceSamios
|
|
January 02, 2014, 09:59:16 PM |
|
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil. I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit. Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated. wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" isI actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit.That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM Not really. There is no definite: "It is not..." It also does not rule out the possibility that these are VMC machines. Ignorance is bliss |
|
|
|
theBishop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 10:21:44 PM
Last edit: January 02, 2014, 10:34:52 PM by theBishop |
|
It is highly suspicious that someone like wiz claims to have never heard of ActiveMining when it is the top thread in 'Securities', with approaching one quarter of a million views. Ask yourself how many people in this community who frequent this forum and run Bitcoin mining pools have never visited the 'Securities' pages of bitcointalk. Then ask yourself of those who have visited 'Securities', how many will have magically missed the ActiveMining thread each end every time they have visited and would have no conscious memory or awareness of ActiveMining. Because of his outward refusal to post "It is not Active Mining" and his comment, "I'll just say I've never heard of Active Mining" I am extremely sceptical of wiz's honesty in this matter to say the least. When you have exhausted and can discount all other available explanations what you are left with has the greatest likelihood of being the truth, namely the Eligius mining pool's top miner is using multiple ActM units which are the 24TH miners described on the eAsic press release. It is merely a matter of time until Vigil is vindicated.  Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are. |
|
|
|
|
|
JoTheKhan
|
|
January 02, 2014, 10:35:56 PM |
|
Wow big conversation went on today. Guys, whether the mining on Eligius is Actm or not it does not matter. There are two problems. 1 We don't have access to our shares, we have no timeline to figure out when we will. Ken has dropped any information regarding shares 2 weeks ago and hasn't been keeping up since. 2. The miners are not pointing at the AcTM dividend address. This means if they are ACTM stuff, Ken is stealing from us or keeping us out of the loop, both of these are bad no matter how you spin it.
You guys are arguing that Ken will release good news before he opens up trading, well there is the good news right there. It hasn't been announced AND we are still not trading. It really isn't more complicated than that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
|
January 02, 2014, 10:38:06 PM |
|
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems! |
|
|
|
|
theBishop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 10:44:20 PM |
|
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems! And by others! |
|
|
|
|
|
Edser
|
|
January 02, 2014, 10:45:21 PM |
|
So because he denies the name, it must be true? Your logic if put to the test:
acknowledgement == true but skeptic
denial == true by denial
Well that explains religion, but doesn't actually have ties to reality.
Sure it is weird that he never heard of the name, but in no way either denying the name nor knowing the name constitutes the tides moving in and out more than owning an arbitrary mining pool. He stated he knows the owner but will neither confirm nor deny the owner. It was a redirect no doubt, but not answering does not logically make it true.
The lack of information as to where the actual units/chips/shares/etc is the one thing you should be concerned about. As Jo said, if they do exist and its being hidden, they are mining for pure profit before slowly shipping out units for max profit.
|
quote defcoin ==== LOL... oh no, the coin is dead cause $DEV doesn't live on BCT! When will you people learn that everything on here is completely irrelevant next to useless. Devs need to stop using it all together, only then can crypto begin to flourish. It's such a shame that people consider this shit hole to be the pinnacle of information when it comes to developments. I don't blame $DEV for not coming on here, and frankly I am embarrassed that I even check BCT myself.
|
|
|
theBishop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 11:05:01 PM |
|
This is a numbers game of probability and it is naive to think that deception is not the prevalent tool used by people on this forum to expand their wealth, protect their investments and maintain their influence. You simply can not trust anyone here as we are all competing against each other.
One other thing that must be understood about the more pressing issue of shares access is that there will be a very real and as of yet undisclosed reason to explain Ken's deafening silence here. He his clearly approaching an announcement regarding a decentralised trading platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitCsByBit
|
|
January 02, 2014, 11:40:35 PM |
|
This reminds me of the whole Labcoin saga.
No photos, no proof of any kind, lack of communication...Actually is seems to be even worse, there are no two more weeks promises, and no one is able to have some fun and impulsively trade shares.
What happened to of all the ActM cheerleaders that "knew" that Labcoin was a scam? How come their scam radar is not going off?
|
Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
|
|
|
|
kleeck
|
|
January 02, 2014, 11:41:10 PM |
|
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems! And by others! If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it. I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
January 02, 2014, 11:42:15 PM |
|
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems! And by others! If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it. I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment. Then what equipment is it? |
|
|
|
|
theBishop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2014, 11:45:05 PM |
|
Quantify 'high' certainty please. Are you able to say 'total' certainty kleeck?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
|
January 02, 2014, 11:46:03 PM |
|
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems! And by others! If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it. I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment. Shilling for Terrahash's scam is what you consider a fine reputation? You must consider Pirateat40 a prince, and Inaba a pillar of the community. I guess for starters we can compare yours to mine. You won't show your face in public yet I will. |
|
|
|
|
|
