FloppyPurpleGherkin
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 306
Merit: 2
|
 |
September 15, 2018, 01:12:57 AM |
|
Dont use these links, They're probably a virus! Use the official links from post #1 only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 15, 2018, 07:37:23 AM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
....
New versions appear faster than they could be tested  Will try x16r and bitcore algo for the next several days Test config is the same: 6xGTX1080ti, Win10 x64. There is only one condition: power limit should not exceed 230W per GPU for me (PSU limitation) |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
September 15, 2018, 09:59:11 AM |
|
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
....
New versions appear faster than they could be tested Will try x16r and bitcore algo for the next several days Test config is the same: 6xGTX1080ti, Win10 x64. There is only one condition: power limit should not exceed 230W per GPU for me (PSU limitation) Yes  lol And thanks for your tests btw  |
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
September 15, 2018, 07:54:10 PM |
|
Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...
Have just tested 32vs64 bit on 1080ti's - no difference noticed, niether between 1.19 and 1.20. T-rex miner on the other hand now at least 15% faster in x16r, but way slower in lyra2z. |
|
|
|
|
msallak1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
September 15, 2018, 08:06:29 PM |
|
Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...
Have just tested 32vs64 bit on 1080ti's - no difference noticed, niether between 1.19 and 1.20. T-rex miner on the other hand now at least 15% faster in x16r, but way slower in lyra2z. What is your hashrate per 1080ti with z-enemy 1.20 and with t-rex 0.6.5? And for how long you have conducted the test? |
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
September 15, 2018, 08:29:31 PM |
|
Didn't have to test long since I can test 1080ti in parallel in both z-enemy with one 1080ti and t-rex with the other 1080ti. With z-enemy I have on avg. 22.620mhs with 1080ti and 17.290mhs with 1080 - these numbers are my personal calculations obviously, I get as high as 50.000mhs and as low as 13.000mhs with 1080ti depending on the sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
mininghope
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2018, 12:32:05 AM |
|
any one can get working Cuda 9.2 version in linux ?
i have ubuntu 16 , cuda 9.2 and the lastest linux nvidia drivers.
pls help
|
|
|
|
|
diemcizone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2018, 11:23:20 AM
Last edit: September 16, 2018, 02:25:18 PM by diemcizone |
|
which gpu shares incorrectly, does not show.
What I want to do is share the erroneous gpu.
For example:
GPU 1: Rejected share
GPU 2: Found share
|
|
|
|
|
mininghope
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2018, 07:15:40 PM |
|
I run your miner on HiveOS, mine x16r. 1080 ti, no OC, Power Limit 100%
When I run on 6 GPU, everything is fine. But when running on 12 GPU:
root @ miner8: ~ # uptime
01:26:25 up 36 min, 3 users, load average: 17.54, 15.16, 15.51
what is the version you use of the miner and cuda ? |
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
September 17, 2018, 02:57:44 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2018, 04:58:28 PM by tbearhere |
|
Does anyone know if the following ccminer flag works in z-enemy:
-N number
where -N is a flag specifying miner to display hashrate as an average over a number of shares submitted? I tried using -N 3600 (assuming 5 shares submitted per minute this will give me around a 12 hour average hashrate) But, I don't see any confirmation upon startup that this setting is being made, nor do I see any different numbers for hashrate. (I would think over the first couple hours hashrate would be a tiny # as shares build up).
Any thoughts?
This works great. I have mine set to --statsavg 6300 for even more accurate average hashrate readout. |
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1003
|
|
September 17, 2018, 03:03:39 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2018, 04:57:48 PM by tbearhere |
|
Didn't have to test long since I can test 1080ti in parallel in both z-enemy with one 1080ti and t-rex with the other 1080ti. With z-enemy I have on avg. 22.620mhs with 1080ti and 17.290mhs with 1080 - these numbers are my personal calculations obviously, I get as high as 50.000mhs and as low as 13.000mhs with 1080ti depending on the sequence.
Try this command for better average readout. --statsavg 6300 |
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
September 17, 2018, 10:05:11 PM |
|
Try this command for better average readout. --statsavg 6300
For now T-rex is obviously faster, so I'm not using Z-enemy to mine x16r anymore. But once new version arrives I'll test it using this command, thank you! |
|
|
|
|
jugger1028
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
|
|
September 19, 2018, 12:24:59 AM |
|
Didn't have to test long since I can test 1080ti in parallel in both z-enemy with one 1080ti and t-rex with the other 1080ti. With z-enemy I have on avg. 22.620mhs with 1080ti and 17.290mhs with 1080 - these numbers are my personal calculations obviously, I get as high as 50.000mhs and as low as 13.000mhs with 1080ti depending on the sequence.
Of course you would need to test long since some algos are "easy" and bring high hashrates and some algos are "hard" and bring low hashrates. Anything less than 24hours would be worthless because it's multi algo and you need to run the averages over 24hrs. |
Check out Trezarcoin @ Trezarcoin.com, book +VIP hotel stays with -20% discounts from Expedia by using $TZC to Pay, TrezarTravels.com to learn more!
|
|
|
OpenArtis
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 9
|
|
September 19, 2018, 09:11:39 PM |
|
Hello, are You ever planning to implement solo mining on Your miner? I'm asking because f. e. my rigs find 4 blocks/week but they mine in one week coins equal to 1 BR so I would like to give a try solo mining ...i have working solo miner but its not optimized and basically gives 2xless mining power |
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
September 19, 2018, 10:05:41 PM |
|
Of course you would need to test long since some algos are "easy" and bring high hashrates and some algos are "hard" and bring low hashrates. Anything less than 24hours would be worthless because it's multi algo and you need to run the averages over 24hrs.
Like I've said I've been testing z-enemy and t-rex at the same time on different rigs, so sequences were the same... So, no, I didn't have to test it for 24hours, even 5 minutes would have been enough. |
|
|
|
|
jugger1028
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
|
|
September 20, 2018, 12:06:48 AM |
|
Of course you would need to test long since some algos are "easy" and bring high hashrates and some algos are "hard" and bring low hashrates. Anything less than 24hours would be worthless because it's multi algo and you need to run the averages over 24hrs.
Like I've said I've been testing z-enemy and t-rex at the same time on different rigs, so sequences were the same... So, no, I didn't have to test it for 24hours, even 5 minutes would have been enough. Lol dude, I'm not even going to bother to extend this conversation when you're telling me that by testing for 5 mins on a multi algo like x16r you can tell one is faster than the other. It's just pure ignorance.. Have fun.. |
Check out Trezarcoin @ Trezarcoin.com, book +VIP hotel stays with -20% discounts from Expedia by using $TZC to Pay, TrezarTravels.com to learn more!
|
|
|
mrsalve01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
|
|
September 20, 2018, 01:44:30 AM
Last edit: September 20, 2018, 02:13:41 AM by mrsalve01 |
|
I got a question. How I know witch version to use with my rig. Cuda 9.1 or cuda 9.2?
|
|
|
|
|
jugger1028
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
|
|
September 20, 2018, 02:24:14 AM |
|
I got a question. How I know witch version to use with my rig. Cuda 9.1 or cuda 9.2?
it goes by which version of nvidia drivers you have... I think the 398+ versions have cuda 9.2 |
Check out Trezarcoin @ Trezarcoin.com, book +VIP hotel stays with -20% discounts from Expedia by using $TZC to Pay, TrezarTravels.com to learn more!
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
September 20, 2018, 07:33:03 PM |
|
Lol dude, I'm not even going to bother to extend this conversation when you're telling me that by testing for 5 mins on a multi algo like x16r you can tell one is faster than the other. It's just pure ignorance.. Have fun..
No point in this conversation indeed since u obviously can't read or don't understand what's written. |
|
|
|
|
|
