@enemy (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
|
|
December 09, 2018, 07:27:07 PM |
|
Z-ENEMY 1.27 From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)IMPORTANT:For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 415+) http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspxPerformance improvements:Up to +3-4% for x16r/s and hex, +6-8% Bitcoin Diamond, 1-3% on others (x17, bitcore, c11, sonoa, etc...) on GTX 10x0 cards please leave feedback in our channel Discord https://discord.gg/JTZm3raWindows:Cuda 10.0(For 10x0 & 20x0 cards, new drivers ver 411+): https://mega.nz/#!cHgBxQYI!pzCN-7zy13QpqLwSFudn5Ees5_Y94j6FxxY0E9I85zwCuda 9.2 (For 10x0 cards and drivers over ver 397+): https://mega.nz/#!JLgnACCY!OyCDkfWbX6ThXmX3bpstMSGzm5bwAhnNUdQfMU3IIs8Cuda 9.1 (For 10x0 cards and drivers over ver 388+): https://mega.nz/#!QfoDHaYT!OImf-3gLwKTtQPTh_El_WQqobkLZ0AiO0tyQLI1NupsLinux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu):Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!MOw1FAIT!5fEbe0pefdUVcVCJ2un9Adg8A8e94P3AOoHm6ehzFHQCuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!IL4zyKDB!YQyzPzsbdAjEfbQJtZLZqhRX9Rzy-rrf-dOsylMZYG4Cuda 10.0 : https://mega.nz/#!RCpx2aib!BWjkLh1E_3HTnX42sZSNRdZoYDTDCpZiGcuxTv5-XTc
|
RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
swogerino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 1248
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
|
|
December 14, 2018, 01:17:22 PM |
|
I see you were doing great in Betterhash but now I see you have a dedicated thread so I am going to try it today and I think this will be my definitive switch. I was doing 0.9 dollars daily with my rig in Nicehash and with your miner in Betterhash am doing 1.5 dollars.
|
| | | | | | | ███▄▀██▄▄ ░░▄████▄▀████ ▄▄▄ ░░████▄▄▄▄░░█▀▀ ███ ██████▄▄▀█▌ ░▄░░███▀████ ░▐█░░███░██▄▄ ░░▄▀░████▄▄▄▀█ ░█░▄███▀████ ▐█ ▀▄▄███▀▄██▄ ░░▄██▌░░██▀ ░▐█▀████ ▀██ ░░█▌██████ ▀▀██▄ ░░▀███ | | ▄▄██▀▄███ ▄▄▄████▀▄████▄░░ ▀▀█░░▄▄▄▄████░░ ▐█▀▄▄█████████ ████▀███░░▄░ ▄▄██░███░░█▌░ █▀▄▄▄████░▀▄░░ █▌████▀███▄░█░ ▄██▄▀███▄▄▀ ▀██░░▐██▄░░ ██▀████▀█▌░ ▄██▀▀██████▐█░░ ███▀░░ | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
rimcash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 17, 2018, 07:42:47 AM Last edit: December 17, 2018, 08:21:28 AM by rimcash |
|
Hey @enemy, having problems running on the latest Centos 7.
I get the following error using 1.28 cuda 10 version: "error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
"ldd z-enemy" gives me:
./z-enemy: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by ./z-enemy) ./z-enemy: /lib64/libcurl.so.4: no version information available (required by ./z-enemy) linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff694a3000) libcurl.so.4 => /lib64/libcurl.so.4 (0x00007f44877a7000) libjansson.so.4 => /lib64/libjansson.so.4 (0x00007f448759a000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f448737e000) libcudart.so.10.0 => /usr/local/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.10.0 (0x00007f4487104000) libcuda.so.1 => /lib64/libcuda.so.1 (0x00007f4486011000) libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found ...
I happen to have libcrypto.so.1.0.2k in /usr/lib64, so I created a symbolic link. Issuing again "ldd z-enemy" I get:
./z-enemy: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by ./z-enemy) ./z-enemy: /lib64/libcurl.so.4: no version information available (required by ./z-enemy) ./z-enemy: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./z-enemy) linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffea01a5000) libcurl.so.4 => /lib64/libcurl.so.4 (0x00007fd124140000) libjansson.so.4 => /lib64/libjansson.so.4 (0x00007fd123f33000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fd123d17000) libcudart.so.10.0 => /usr/local/cuda/lib64/libcudart.so.10.0 (0x00007fd123a9d000) libcuda.so.1 => /lib64/libcuda.so.1 (0x00007fd1229aa000) libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x00007fd122549000) ...
Any way to fix this? Please!
|
|
|
|
du44
|
|
December 17, 2018, 10:58:12 AM |
|
So, new version and 3.5% less hashrate at different pools for x16r, x16s, x17 algos. When you will finally begun to print real hashrate to the console? I have tested t-rex and cryptodredge - they are producing same hashes at the console and pool side.
|
hello
|
|
|
jebidia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 161
Merit: 1
|
|
December 17, 2018, 03:50:40 PM |
|
Anyone know if this is the fastest x17 miner at the moment?
|
|
|
|
du44
|
|
December 17, 2018, 04:13:11 PM |
|
Anyone know if this is the fastest x17 miner at the moment?
I've made some tests, for me t-rex gives more coins and does better hashrate at the pool
|
hello
|
|
|
jebidia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 161
Merit: 1
|
|
December 17, 2018, 04:17:11 PM |
|
Thank you
|
|
|
|
1.2-GIGAHASH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 20, 2018, 06:09:13 PM |
|
Hi, Please, add --back-to-main-pool-sec parametr. If i use failover pools, i need [back-to-main-pool-sec]
|
|
|
|
kagami_
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
MWEdFS1Fkmq6nA5Zz6QsbULXCC15bv1qR4
|
|
December 24, 2018, 01:42:57 PM |
|
I've noticed a big performance boost (at least for x16r) over the last couple of releases and better stability over the long term. Thanks (even though yall getting a fee! ) and nice job to Z-Enemy & DK. Mind me asking what (briefly) it was in the codethat made such a big performance boost over the last couple of releases? May have even been just this most recent one but I think I was a release or two behind when I updated. Keep up the good work would love to see more and more performance boosts.
|
|
|
|
kagami_
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
MWEdFS1Fkmq6nA5Zz6QsbULXCC15bv1qR4
|
|
December 24, 2018, 01:44:20 PM |
|
After 1.20 I don't see any visible optimiztions (around 1%) at the pool side at x16r x16s x17 algos but in console input it's grown up to 10%. It's your own marketing steps or what? You became good painters, not optimizers. Some time ago I moved to t-rex miner. I see 2-3% increase in console and a bit more, than 10% in the 24h hash curve with 30 rigs testing. Stop to deceive people and print fair hashrate to console.
Just curious... what do you mean the fair hashrate? That's not the real hashrate in the console? I realize they get a fee. But it's confusing how they take that fee.
|
|
|
|
aspect
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2019, 06:29:07 AM |
|
interesting... windows release 1.28 tests positive for Win32/Occamy.C trojan (in Windows Defender), while 1.27 and previous versions do not.
|
|
|
|
Mr.Spider703
Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 27
http://radio.r41.ru
|
|
January 02, 2019, 06:31:55 AM |
|
interesting... windows release 1.28 tests positive for Win32/Occamy.C trojan (in Windows Defender), while 1.27 and previous versions do not.
where you download 1.28 version?
|
|
|
|
aspect
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2019, 06:43:26 AM |
|
interesting... windows release 1.28 tests positive for Win32/Occamy.C trojan (in Windows Defender), while 1.27 and previous versions do not.
where you download 1.28 version? From the announce post - Windows Defender stops the above 1.28 archive in its tracks. Whereas 1.27 is just fine.
|
|
|
|
HFreeman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 1
|
|
January 02, 2019, 12:07:51 PM |
|
Any Update for X16RT ?
|
|
|
|
|