- and morphers says exactly about a small fee for acces to the artwork (not just information or idea). You want a free content.. good luck. But the autor of the artwork wants (and deserves) a small compensations for his work. It would be wonderful, if Nxt could help with this.
Nope, not about a small fee for access he says. For copyright - for monopoly on information itself (that almost impossible to achieve w/o strongest dictatorship). Small fee for access, but free information: pay to see, free to use what u saw (read/heard/knew). Information freedom incompatible with copyright (fully compatible with secrets of any kind).
But the autor of the artwork wants (and deserves) a small compensations for his work.
I disagree with disposition.
Nobody has right to certainly monetize anything he creates (or says he created, it's important), only freedom to monetize. And harmonic ways exist: donations + paid access (specialist's hours of work/subscription/tikets/etc). Alas, but still there's a copyrigt as a (inharmonic, ofc) way around... Not everyone's thinking hard about this.
Whole concept of deserved things always failing (when regulator of "fairness" fails).
That would take $90,000,000,000. I doubt that occurs.
Magnitudes less. Threr's no way all NXTs'll be for sale at any point. Market supply stricly bounded.
$200? $500? $1000? A dozen swimsuit models?
Everybody has their price
Very big mistake. Say, tommorow NXT'll cost a ten times more. I'll smile. 2 days - 100x, I sell some (X%) and buy something. 3 days - 1kx, x/10%... and so on. There's no way all NXT's be for sale, cos it's bad strategy, there'll be plenty of bad players, but part'll act smart - no sense in giving away a owned limited liquid resource at once. Everyone (of survivers) will start to balance their incomes and outcomes and
never sell reserves w/o some critical situation.
Also, how do we prevent spamming when there are no fees? Maybe we should have different fees on different parallel blockchains.
0.1 NXT for main chain ASAP (in-thread voting with well-weighted opinions of members of community). Later: let's see. For different chains: let's see for chain at first
Penalties. At least it was part of BCNext's idea that we should penalize accounts who don't forge. I don't see a problem here as long as we talk about proper penalty. Not allowed to forge for the next 1440 blocks seems fair.
Fair... Fair. FAIR. Arghh, everytime somebody says "fair" on purpose a kitten dies in healthy capitalistic world. We'd care less about "fariness". Goal of penaltizng? To prevent malicious block creation (when big stake's taking time to secretly forge bad chain) and to stmulate to forge (both potentially penalized and potential winners of penalties for others).
Other cryptocurrency wallets believed to have been vulnerable to Pony theft are:
Anoncoin BBQcoin Bytecoin Craftcoin Devcoin Digitalcoin
Fastcoin Feathercoin Florincoin Franko Freicoin GoldCoin
I0coin Infinitecoin Ixcoin Junkcoin Litecoin Luckycoin
Mincoin Namecoin NovaCoin Phoenixcoin PPCoin Primecoin
Quarkcoin Tagcoin Terracoin Worldcoin Yacoin Zetacoin
Nice not to see NXT here
All depends on how u keep and how often use your private key. Digital keeping, using at alltime-Net-connected computer that used for plenty businesses? Trojan/keylogger-vulnerable. Ofc, less vulnerable than having non-encrypted /Roaming/****coin/wallet.dat, bit still a reason to manage risks.