ChuckOne
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:38:17 PM |
|
Somebody wanna buy trash? AssetID = 13909058817312512041
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:38:28 PM |
|
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Let's vote. Perhaps one topic could put a post linking to the other and be locked rather than have two topics for the same thing? (not going to suggest who should do what - maybe you guys can work that out together)
Let's vote. (.)(.)
Let's poke. edit: No, really. What's this Ninja in Pajamas about? Please clarify the proposal! I suggest that any matters that involve protocol changes be approved by a unanimous vote of the tech committee. Most people would not have the expertise to balance the factors involved in making the right decision. If the tech committee cannot reach unanimous agreement, then we must assume that there is some unacceptable risk factor. The decision should be based solely on technical basis, not on any philosophical or other grounds. As far as what issues go to the tech committee, I think we can use a definition similar to pornography, if it looks like something for the tech committee it must be something for the tech committee. We will know it when we see it. What about things like deciding whether to add a new functionality into NXTcore? i can see a situation where some people just wouldnt want it for a nontechnical reason. Since people wouldnt be forced to use any new function, I think as long as the tech is sound, a majority forum vote will suffice to get it added. James
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:39:22 PM |
|
wow, so its expected that NXT drops as BTC drops, but doge is rising despite BTCs drop
winter olympics. Thursday should be close to current peak
|
|
|
|
BloodyRookie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:41:54 PM |
|
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
The problem is whether a different hash can apply to essentially "the same" tx (apparently at the moment - it can). No
|
Nothing Else Matters NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:42:10 PM |
|
Great to have you James! Let me dream for a second... NXT (incl. AE & TF) + zerocoin functionality + atomic crosschain transactions... mind -> blown I've got more ideas, but cant post it here
|
|
|
|
BloodyRookie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:43:04 PM |
|
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
It includes signature bytes. No. Here is the method getHash from Transaction.java (version 0.6.2): String getHash() { if (this.hash == null) { byte[] arrayOfByte = getBytes(); for (int i = 64; i < 128; i++) { arrayOfByte = 0; } this.hash = Convert.convert(Crypto.sha256().digest(arrayOfByte)); } return this.hash; }
|
Nothing Else Matters NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:45:30 PM |
|
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
It includes signature bytes. No. Here is the method getHash from Transaction.java (version 0.6.2): String getHash() { if (this.hash == null) { byte[] arrayOfByte = getBytes(); for (int i = 64; i < 128; i++) { arrayOfByte = 0; } this.hash = Convert.convert(Crypto.sha256().digest(arrayOfByte)); } return this.hash; } It's hash, not id. Edit: It's another hash.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:47:48 PM |
|
We discuss proposals (and maybe could use NXT vote for opinion overview) and then the devs decide. If devs make shit, community hopefully won't use new version. There is no other way now and in the future, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:51:14 PM |
|
Nxt has very clever devs and technology. But Doge more popular. WHY so???Is doge's marketing better? Very disappointing...
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:51:40 PM |
|
Nxt has very clever devs and technology. But Doge more popular. WHY so???Is doge's marketing better? Very disappointing...
What a useless strange post.
|
|
|
|
fmiboy
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:52:05 PM Last edit: February 11, 2014, 10:21:58 PM by fmiboy |
|
Update ClieNXTversion 0.0.5e AE testnet changelog: * added Update table context menu for main Assets table. * added better search for Asset Exchange * added output label front progress bar (now no need to close all windows to see console outputs, last output will be displayed right front of progress bar in Status bar of main window) * removed plain text sending from AM * fixed various reported bugs, please report bugs if you experience * well, created easy to use version for all 3 major platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux) ---- downloads---- Windows: https://bitbucket.org/fmiboy/clienxt/downloads/clienxt_005e_Windows.zip 927.4 KB Mac: https://bitbucket.org/fmiboy/clienxt/downloads/clienxt_005e_Linux.zip 1.8 MB Linux: https://bitbucket.org/fmiboy/clienxt/downloads/clienxt_005e_Linux.zip 927.6 KB nb: mac version is same as Linux, ./clienxt.run & on terminal. ---- Report bugs/features---- https://bitbucket.org/fmiboy/clienxt/issues?status=new&status=openplease update if issue still persist. any support is appreciated, translators, donators 13792774143018875909 edit: removed peers and blocks update that most likely cause lagging, but there is still waiting time, when we have more and more issued assets. thinking how to optimize this to get better performance. thanks
|
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:53:51 PM |
|
Nxt has very clever devs and technology. But Doge more popular. WHY so???Is doge's marketing better? Very disappointing...
What a useless strange post. Cry from the heart
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:55:00 PM |
|
my gif posts are much better
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:55:15 PM |
|
Nxt has very clever devs and technology. But Doge more popular. WHY so???Is doge's marketing better? Very disappointing...
What a useless strange post. Cry from the heart Let's use a meme for Nxt promotion? What about The Most Interesting Man In The World?
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 11, 2014, 07:59:02 PM |
|
Let's use a meme for Nxt promotion? What about The Most Interesting Man In The World?
+1
|
|
|
|
Forobitcoins
|
|
February 11, 2014, 08:00:06 PM |
|
Is it possible for multiple users to share a part of a "secret phrase"? a client can be programmed to the users to share the "secret phrase"
example
phrase mjknbjsksadbjkndbq87huhsadbhiuhudia
client1 mjknbjsk client2 adbjkndb client3 jkndbq87 client4 huhsadb client5 hiuhudia
for the "blockchain" is an account but we have 5 nodes? is it possible?
|
Sorry for my broken English XD
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 08:00:15 PM |
|
Nxt has very clever devs and technology. But Doge more popular. WHY so???Is doge's marketing better? Very disappointing...
What a useless strange post. Cry from the heart Let's use a meme for Nxt promotion? What about The Most Interesting Man In The World? Like this:
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
|
February 11, 2014, 08:01:24 PM |
|
Recently bought some GummyBear. Great. I could even cancel an order without a problem.
So, as it appears the API works for me.
Only the client seems to be very laggy. I think, I will look into writing one myself.
Btw.: I recommend the finest TRASH on earth: AssetID = 13909058817312512041
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 08:03:07 PM |
|
Is it possible for multiple users to share a part of a "secret phrase"? a client can be programmed to the users to share the "secret phrase"
example
phrase mjknbjsksadbjkndbq87huhsadbhiuhudia
client1 mjknbjsk client2 adbjkndb client3 jkndbq87 client4 huhsadb client5 hiuhudia
for the "blockchain" is an account but we have 5 nodes? is it possible?
If u need a multisig then Account Control solves this problem.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 11, 2014, 08:03:32 PM |
|
Let's use a meme for Nxt promotion? What about The Most Interesting Man In The World?
We should find the guy and do video promos with him!
|
|
|
|
|