|
Catswold
|
 |
December 08, 2013, 01:53:12 PM |
|
This guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=126619I'm trying to see on getting one made without him incase he doesn't fix it soon. There might be a working Block Explorer out there but I don't know of any yet. All I've been hearing as that they are working on the issue. Expect the price to sky rocket once it's fixed! Who is the owner of the blockchain?
Until this gets resolved, there's no sense in mining the coin. I am not interested in wasting my GPU mining a coin that has no value. Without that block explorer, SBC is pointless. I've switched back to LTC mining until this gets resolved. It better happen fast, in the crypto-currency world, this could quickly kill a great coin with an already dodgy reputation (whether deserved or not) due to the original fumbled start-up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 08, 2013, 01:59:40 PM |
|
Until this gets resolved, there's no sense in mining the coin. I am not interested in wasting my GPU mining a coin that has no value. Without that block explorer, SBC is pointless.
I've switched back to LTC mining until this gets resolved. It better happen fast, in the crypto-currency world, this could quickly kill a great coin with an already dodgy reputation (whether deserved or not) due to the original fumbled start-up.
It's just a block explorer. Do you even know what a block explorer does? It has no effect on the value of the coin. |
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1122
|
|
December 08, 2013, 02:47:02 PM |
|
Blockchain explorers matter.
I mean yes, the blockchain is the same, and equally secure, whether anyone serves it on the web or not. The software works whether anyone explains how or not. The logo doesn't contribute anything to the ideas or the protocol or the security. Bugs can get fixed even if the dev team never responds via email to a single complaint.
But the existence of a web-based blockchain explorer, like a good website and a good logo and good support and a responsive dev team, helps to inspire confidence. I'd consider it to be important enough that the code to do it should be part of the "standard" sources package for an altcoin, and having a blockchain explorer on the web would ideally be one of the things you do starting on day one when you launch an altcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
GigaCoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
Giga
|
|
December 08, 2013, 02:51:19 PM |
|
This guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=126619I'm trying to see on getting one made without him incase he doesn't fix it soon. There might be a working Block Explorer out there but I don't know of any yet. All I've been hearing as that they are working on the issue. Expect the price to sky rocket once it's fixed! Who is the owner of the blockchain?
the price already skyrocketed anyway block explorer or not. but yeah would be nice to have it back on, |
|
|
|
Kane49
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 08, 2013, 02:57:39 PM |
|
This guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=126619I'm trying to see on getting one made without him incase he doesn't fix it soon. There might be a working Block Explorer out there but I don't know of any yet. All I've been hearing as that they are working on the issue. Expect the price to sky rocket once it's fixed! Who is the owner of the blockchain?
the price already skyrocketed anyway block explorer or not. but yeah would be nice to have it back on, Mine will be up soon |
|
|
|
|
JohnyCrypt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:07:17 PM |
|
Voted! We have a commanding lead. But if you haven't voted, please still do. |
|
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:10:32 PM |
|
Until this gets resolved, there's no sense in mining the coin. I am not interested in wasting my GPU mining a coin that has no value. Without that block explorer, SBC is pointless.
I've switched back to LTC mining until this gets resolved. It better happen fast, in the crypto-currency world, this could quickly kill a great coin with an already dodgy reputation (whether deserved or not) due to the original fumbled start-up.
It's just a block explorer. Do you even know what a block explorer does? It has no effect on the value of the coin. Are you sure you do? It goes to the very basis of trust. Crypto-coins success and value lies in the ability of those asked to use them to trust that they are getting what they believe they are getting. Without the ability to verify transactions, addresses, etc. Clearly it is considered important enough for the coin to be delisted from Crypto-Currency Market. A little less cheerleading and fanboyism, and a little more brutal honesty is needed here. I like the coin--hell, I've been mining it full-tilt-boogey for a week--but I also understand and can see the pitfalls and potholes ahead, and the ability of the people to trust, implicity, in the coin is likely the difference between success and failure. Now, if you can respond without the defensiveness and simply state why you believe I (and Crypto-Currency Market, and a lot of others) are wrong, then perhaps something other than bickering can happen here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kane49
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:18:45 PM |
|
Public Block explorer  http://185.16.61.172/chain/StableCoinClearly it is considered important enough for the coin to be delisted from Crypto-Currency Market.
Coinmarketcap simply can't get any data without a block explorer and instead of displaying bogus they choose to display nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
ak84
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:24:44 PM |
|
can someone give me step by step instructions for how to backup my wallet?
This is my first time with crypto currency ever, and I don't want to lose my 1SBC hehe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JohnyCrypt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:26:27 PM |
|
Public Block explorer http://185.16.61.172/chain/StableCoinClearly it is considered important enough for the coin to be delisted from Crypto-Currency Market.
Coinmarketcap simply can't get any data without a block explorer and instead of displaying bogus they choose to display nothing. Looks good. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
oncebitcoinedtwiceshy
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:33:25 PM |
|
can someone give me step by step instructions for how to backup my wallet?
This is my first time with crypto currency ever, and I don't want to lose my 1SBC hehe.
Basically: 1. With wallet open go to the File menu and select Backup wallet... option 2. Pick a place to save the backup to and give it a name 3. Keep it somewhere safe (or a few copies and a few places). By places I mean not on the same hard drive/SSD/computer, stick it on some removable media. Also recommend encrypting your wallet if you haven't done so. A few searches on this forum will give plenty more info. |
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 08, 2013, 03:58:31 PM |
|
Public Block explorer http://185.16.61.172/chain/StableCoinClearly it is considered important enough for the coin to be delisted from Crypto-Currency Market.
Coinmarketcap simply can't get any data without a block explorer and instead of displaying bogus they choose to display nothing. Nice. I've reposted this to the coinmarketcap thread. |
|
|
|
|
haggis
|
|
December 08, 2013, 04:27:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sejnt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2013, 05:52:47 PM |
|
Please consider limiting the "count" parameter, I think I can provide any number now and slow down the site. Also if it's a VPS/dedicated I would recommend switching to nginx, it's taking really much less resources in my case. |
|
|
|
|
xIronCrossx
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 08, 2013, 06:00:58 PM |
|
Just a quick question on the difficulty, what exactly will be done to prevent places like middlecoin always jumping on and skyrocketing it? (A few pages back Artos mentioned changing it, but what does that mean?)
|
BTC - 1Comr6M3WohRK94Wi1PVTV8szhxjzLd9yd
|
|
|
Sejnt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2013, 06:12:05 PM |
|
Sejnt, I added the link to the Polish site on stablecoin.de. Cheers
Ok, that's nice I fixed the slider, now I just need to translate the "Mixing and Broadcast nodes" tab. |
|
|
|
|
Kane49
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 08, 2013, 06:19:39 PM
Last edit: December 08, 2013, 06:35:51 PM by Kane49 |
|
Thanks alot, i appreciate it ! Please consider limiting the "count" parameter, I think I can provide any number now and slow down the site. Also if it's a VPS/dedicated I would recommend switching to nginx, it's taking really much less resources in my case. Yeah i will limit the display size to like 100, as the server is multithreaded large requests dont slow down alot but no one needs to look at 2000 hashes simulatenously anyway I will research nginx a bit,i was under the impression that the performance gain between apache + fastcgi and nginx + fastcgi were minimal. The true bottleneck here is the SQL-Connection On another note: were back on coinmarketcap ! |
|
|
|
|
|
