Bitcoin Forum
November 28, 2021, 11:45:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC]  (Read 281247 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
srwt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 12:46:57 PM
 #1961

Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.

That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.

Try this:

minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4

Confirm. I try to load my i7 930 (no AES) and it shows 0.8 hpm. Still overwatch it.

1638143113
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638143113

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638143113
Reply with quote  #2

1638143113
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638143113
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638143113

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638143113
Reply with quote  #2

1638143113
Report to moderator
1638143113
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638143113

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638143113
Reply with quote  #2

1638143113
Report to moderator
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 12:50:01 PM
 #1962

When using the mmc2.0 minerd cpu miner, you *must* set your --thread parameter to a power of 2. (2,4,8,16,32 etc)

I have a dual 6c/12T xeon machine, and it would not run if i set each batch file --thread parameter to 12 to match the logical cores.

Setting it to --thread 16 per batch file worked and didnt appear to inhibit the performance of each node, even though each node was overspecced 4 threads.
stas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 12:54:01 PM
 #1963

Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.

That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.

Try this:

minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4

My hardware and software is fine for other cpu mining, ie. PTS, XPM, scrypt jane, etc. This is the first time I ever had an issue cpu mining.

If you see in my older posts, I did have the cmd line done right for the bat file. Might be an issue with the bigger miners finding shares too fast for my cpu's to compete.

I use two regular PC's 2-3 years old... and they mine OK.

seraphim_bts
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:08:20 PM
 #1964

I just posted my application for CSO.
My plan is to create a team of supporters, so there's always someone available.
More info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1653
Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:17:41 PM
 #1965

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:20:06 PM
Last edit: December 26, 2013, 01:46:04 PM by atp1916
 #1966

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

Should benefit quite a bit.  I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.

Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:

Amazon cc2.8 Large
[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min

3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.
Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:27:51 PM
 #1967

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?

Should benefit quite a bit.  I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.

Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:

x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min

3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right? I set Minerd to 4 threads.

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:30:09 PM
 #1968

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.
seraphim_bts
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:34:23 PM
 #1969

My 3570k gets around 2hpm. I think it's running at stock speed, but I can't say for sure at the moment because I'm not at home.
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:38:07 PM
 #1970

About to add the results of a Amazon cc2.8 large instance.
Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:38:52 PM
 #1971

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
seraphim_bts
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:44:26 PM
 #1972

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.

It's not low.
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:47:21 PM
 #1973

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.
Nullu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:49:23 PM
 #1974

Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<<snip>>

Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.

It's not low.

Ah ok. I'm used to khash rates. Cheesy

BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
aorith
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:51:18 PM
 #1975

I got a 3570k @ 4.4GHz = 2.36hpm

BTC: 1Pc2BrecisYLZ2FSFEgCn16ogTHjopqEey  LTC: LM1XBHF8Ccv2vdgh3kqCqPaGkWGhzRMxjw
NXT: 3946500435546198781
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 01:53:19 PM
 #1976

wow, HT makes that much of a difference?  Shocked
kbhutto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 02:16:51 PM
 #1977

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

$2.400 per Hour???

█████████████████████████████████████████████████
██                ▄▄▄███████▄▄                 ██
██             ▄███▀▀        ▀▀▄               ██
██▄▄███████▀  ███▀                             ██
██▀█▄▄       ███▀   ▐███████▄    ▄██▄          ██
██  ▀███▄▄▄ ███▌    ▐██    ██    ▀██▀          ██
██      ▀▀█████▌    ▐███████▀           ▀▀██▄▄ ██
██          ███▌    ▐██ ▄▄▄                 ▀████
██           ███▄   ▐██  ▀██▄ ▀▀▀███████████▀▀ ██
██            ████▄             ▄█▀            ██
██             ▀████▄▄▄     ▄▄██▀              ██
██                ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀                ██
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
VIRTUAL WORLDS
BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
D I S C O R D    
M E D I U M    
G I T B O O K     
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 02:19:00 PM
 #1978

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

$2.400 per Hour???

Naw, @ .456/h
kbhutto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 02:23:09 PM
 #1979

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

$2.400 per Hour???

Naw, @ .456/h

Which Instance Type? I am seeing $2.400 per Hour for On-Demand Instances.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████
██                ▄▄▄███████▄▄                 ██
██             ▄███▀▀        ▀▀▄               ██
██▄▄███████▀  ███▀                             ██
██▀█▄▄       ███▀   ▐███████▄    ▄██▄          ██
██  ▀███▄▄▄ ███▌    ▐██    ██    ▀██▀          ██
██      ▀▀█████▌    ▐███████▀           ▀▀██▄▄ ██
██          ███▌    ▐██ ▄▄▄                 ▀████
██           ███▄   ▐██  ▀██▄ ▀▀▀███████████▀▀ ██
██            ████▄             ▄█▀            ██
██             ▀████▄▄▄     ▄▄██▀              ██
██                ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀                ██
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
VIRTUAL WORLDS
BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
D I S C O R D    
M E D I U M    
G I T B O O K     
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 26, 2013, 03:47:05 PM
 #1980

Amazon paid Spot instance, cc2.8 Large.


As a cautionary note to anyone who may even think about abusing the free $200 AWS credit using fake/temp CC numbers, don't even bother.  

Amazon considers that "deliberate" theft of service and has been sending law enforcement to peoples' doors.  


Also, 1.286k CAT coins for sale.
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!