Bitcoin Forum
January 23, 2022, 07:29:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 ... 129 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC]  (Read 281247 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
FreeTrade
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1024



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 02:50:45 PM
 #1321

Are there updated binaries for Windows? Mine still says 0.8.52.0.  I jsut redownloaded from links on first post.

Yes - you might be getting a cached version. Try the Google link.

I'll change the file name too - that should help. Try -

http://www.memorycoin.org/downloads/memorycoin854.zip



HODLCoin ANN - 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.http://hodlcoin.com/
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1642966162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642966162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642966162
Reply with quote  #2

1642966162
Report to moderator
1642966162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642966162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642966162
Reply with quote  #2

1642966162
Report to moderator
Chida
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 02:53:53 PM
 #1322

hi,
When do you believe it is possible the minning every 6 minutes?

I think we're on a pretty good course for that. 10 blocks over the past 50 minutes or so. Difficulty around the 170/180 mark.

Right now our diff is 0008d86c2464a8c536fe1a8c536fe1a8c536fe1a8c536fe1a8c536fe1a8c5387

You'd expect to need 16x16x16x2 hashes per block . .

8192 per block

At 4 hashes per minute, that's about 34 hours.


Good Smiley
Rubick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 02:58:16 PM
 #1323

My wallet gets stuck at block 614... So, I stop mining, waiting for a pool and external miner.

Probably old branch.

Is there some forking going on here? I'm at block 615 at the moment, the last block was generated only a couple of minutes ago. Version 0.8.53.0.

I'll try with 0.8.54.0.
ig0tik3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 02:59:37 PM
 #1324

 0.8.54.0


getblockhash 619


0002396ed633e456fd9764c7c9dfc7b5480e35984005d77edb45cf3f14f49b79
nomullet
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:00:52 PM
 #1325

Stuck on 610 on linux with latest build:

 {
    "version" : 85400,
    "protocolversion" : 70001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 280.00080000,
    "blocks" : 610,
    "timeoffset" : 1,
    "connections" : 8,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00001890,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1387122711,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}
{
    "blocks" : 610,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.00001890,
    "errors" : "",
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespermin" : 3.24141026,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false
}
From top:

8656 nomullet     20   0 28.2g 1.1g 4860 S 797.3 14.1 525:43.86 bitcoind
radiumsoup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 255


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:01:14 PM
 #1326

Okay. Flash Fork at 607 - github updated. Binaries available shortly.

Not cool, man - you just effectively cut off those who took the time to upgrade due to the carefully and considerately planned announcement, in favor of those who happened to catch the thread just when you posted. :\

PGP fingerprint:   0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
Rubick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:05:55 PM
 #1327

I'm using client version 0.8.54.0 now, still stuck at block 615. According to the debug log, the client is connected to several nodes that report they have 620 blocks but my client makes no effort to catch up on the missing blocks!

I'm possibly on a fork because my block 615 differs from this one: http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/block/00017a2988f88953776c084b8010cbd74fd6c98e08d5cd834df786aed13acd09/
How can I get my client to load the correct chain?

edit: Seems like my client is on the wrong side of the fork at block 607, how can I fix this?
Orrechorre
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:06:55 PM
 #1328

any pool coming out? seems to difficult to solo mine

Dear GOD/GODS and/or MEMBERS OF SUPER-INTELLIGENT ALIEN CIVILIZATIONS: Please let CHAUL JHIN KIM win the NEW ZEALAND POWERBALL JACKPOT. He will use the money to set up his own RESEARCH LAB and find the CURES for CANCER and AGING! He will release the CURES into the PUBLIC DOMAIN! (a la Jonas Salk) EVERYONE regardless of wealth will no longer need to SUFFER! CHILDHOOD CANCER will also be HISTORY! Thank you! - A Faithful Believer. P.S. If anyone is reading this then please pray with me!
montecristo83
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:10:02 PM
 #1329

Stuck on 610 on linux with latest build:

 {
    "version" : 85400,
    "protocolversion" : 70001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 280.00080000,
    "blocks" : 610,
    "timeoffset" : 1,
    "connections" : 8,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00001890,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1387122711,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}
{
    "blocks" : 610,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.00001890,
    "errors" : "",
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespermin" : 3.24141026,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false
}
From top:

8656 nomullet     20   0 28.2g 1.1g 4860 S 797.3 14.1 525:43.86 bitcoind

This post solved my issues: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=370806.msg4024975#msg4024975

I ran these commands on my linux instances (I'm a linux newbie. Use at your own risk):

Code:
cd

cd .memorycoin

rm peers.dat

rm db.log

rm debug.log

rm memorycoin.conf

rm -r blocks

rm -r chainstate

I'm using client version 0.8.54.0 now, still stuck at block 615. According to the debug log, the client is connected to several nodes that report they have 620 blocks but my client makes no effort to catch up on the missing blocks!

I'm possibly on a fork because my block 615 differs from this one: http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/block/00017a2988f88953776c084b8010cbd74fd6c98e08d5cd834df786aed13acd09/
How can I get my client to load the correct chain?

edit: Seems like my client is on the wrong side of the fork at block 607, how can I fix this?

This post solved my issues: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=370806.msg4024975#msg4024975


More fun than being on the wrong fork. Smiley
Snard
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:10:43 PM
 #1330

Yes - you might be getting a cached version. Try the Google link.

I'll change the file name too - that should help. Try -

http://www.memorycoin.org/downloads/memorycoin854.zip

You may want to consider changing the version number on the executable as well.  Still says 0.8.52.0
Rubick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:13:22 PM
Last edit: December 18, 2013, 03:25:56 PM by Rubick
 #1331


Re-downloading the blockchain, sounds fun ... Guess I better waste my cpu cycles on some other useless stuff.
I don't get how one could think that doing a fork at 607 was a good idea when the chain was at 605 or something? So many ppl are cought in that fork because they trusted it would happen at 750 and they would be on the safe side since they updated already today...
Tamis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:26:10 PM
 #1332

I've lost 10% of my hpm !

Is this normal ?
mmx888
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:33:02 PM
 #1333

I need node pls give me ..

THX!!!
FreeTrade
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1024



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:33:16 PM
 #1334

Not cool, man - you just effectively cut off those who took the time to upgrade due to the carefully and considerately planned announcement, in favor of those who happened to catch the thread just when you posted. :\

I hear you. It was a difficult call. It looked to me that the blockchain had effectively halted and I was concerned that we'd never reach block 750. I had to act quickly in the interests of the coin. I think we're in a much better place now than if we had waited.

HODLCoin ANN - 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.http://hodlcoin.com/
jabbaah
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:37:15 PM
 #1335

"version" : 85400

getblockhash 629

00011254d00b698574d16a9c3c82d95fdfc14b40eee9229ee5bb8695703a2a04

★ ★ ★ ★ ★   Infinex  ✔  Masternode  ✔  Decentralised ✔ Instant Send   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
› › › › ›  JOIN US AT DISCORD    ★    ✔ ACTIVE DISCUSSION  ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬   ANN TELEGRAM MASTERNODE ONLINE  MNRANK  TWITTER  CRYPTOBRIDGE   ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
montecristo83
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:38:44 PM
 #1336

Not cool, man - you just effectively cut off those who took the time to upgrade due to the carefully and considerately planned announcement, in favor of those who happened to catch the thread just when you posted. :\

I hear you. It was a difficult call. It looked to me that the blockchain had effectively halted and I was concerned that we'd never reach block 750. I had to act quickly in the interests of the coin. I think we're in a much better place now than if we had waited.

For what it's worth, I think you made the right call. A lot of people were complaining about the excessive jumps in difficulty, and I believe many of us would simply stop mining because of that.

It would probably take more than 24 hours to get to block 750; with more and more people simply giving up on mining before reaching this block.
truckythin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 787
Merit: 501



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:40:50 PM
 #1337

It would probably take more than 24 hours to get to block 750; with more and more people simply giving up on mining before reaching this block.

give up! cannot play with luck since i have to pay the bill too  Undecided
radiumsoup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356
Merit: 255


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:42:41 PM
 #1338

Okay, can you try uncommenting (latest source) lines 136, 137

      //CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data();
      //EVP_cleanup();

and  271, 272

      //CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data();
      //EVP_cleanup();

Let me know if that helps please.
Thanks for addressing this.

Tired on source posted as of 30 minutes ago, I still get the same thing... 32mb per thread added to vmem every time the CPU dips (not exactly sure what's happening, probably finished with old work and starting new work?)

PGP fingerprint:   0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
Riseman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 690
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:43:04 PM
 #1339

Maybe a stupid question... Will this coin be listed on any cryptocurrency exchange someday? Is there any info or assumption on when will it happen and what the price might be?
Rubick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:44:19 PM
 #1340

Not cool, man - you just effectively cut off those who took the time to upgrade due to the carefully and considerately planned announcement, in favor of those who happened to catch the thread just when you posted. :\

I hear you. It was a difficult call. It looked to me that the blockchain had effectively halted and I was concerned that we'd never reach block 750. I had to act quickly in the interests of the coin. I think we're in a much better place now than if we had waited.

For what it's worth, I think you made the right call. A lot of people were complaining about the excessive jumps in difficulty, and I believe many of us would simply stop mining because of that.

It would probably take more than 24 hours to get to block 750; with more and more people simply giving up on mining before reaching this block.

It sure was the right choice to re-adjust the fork. But block 607? A higher block number would have given everyone a bit more time to react.
Pages: « 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 ... 129 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!