|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
veebee
|
 |
January 24, 2014, 03:39:45 AM |
|
|
My account was hacked , i have recovered it but the person promoted straight disgusting trash lust ico.. i do not and would never support that
|
|
|
sensecrack
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2014, 03:42:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
January 24, 2014, 03:42:59 AM |
|
LTC markets show the coin is low value only. I would put on BTC and LTC markets. This does not have huge minting really. I'm not sure about that. When I see a coin is trading at 0.0000001, I see a bunch of zeros, and that gives me the impression of low value. When it gets hard to count the zeros, I think it looks better in the LTC market. Have you think why anyone not open mBTC market? microcoin on the microBTC market, sounds great  |
|
|
|
|
|
veebee
|
|
January 24, 2014, 03:43:18 AM |
|
doesnt exist otherwise id have put it on there |
My account was hacked , i have recovered it but the person promoted straight disgusting trash lust ico.. i do not and would never support that
|
|
|
busoni
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
|
|
January 24, 2014, 05:34:34 AM |
|
I don't know how many people ran up against this, but there was a high minimum price set on new MRC orders at Poloniex--this was a mistake, and it has been corrected now.
|
Poloniex.com - Fast crypto exchange with margin trading, advanced charts, and stop-limit orders
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
January 24, 2014, 05:52:18 AM |
|
I don't know how many people ran up against this, but there was a high minimum price set on new MRC orders at Poloniex--this was a mistake, and it has been corrected now.
Yes. Now it seems working. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.V
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:10:30 AM |
|
I don't know how many people ran up against this, but there was a high minimum price set on new MRC orders at Poloniex--this was a mistake, and it has been corrected now.
It happens on every coin when it 1st hit the market. some one sells their own coins to themselves at a very high price then tries to dump their stash at the high price on anyone else foolish enough to follow. |
BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:28:28 AM
Last edit: January 24, 2014, 06:42:25 AM by halibit |
|
I don't know how many people ran up against this, but there was a high minimum price set on new MRC orders at Poloniex--this was a mistake, and it has been corrected now.
It happens on every coin when it 1st hit the market. some one sells their own coins to themselves at a very high price then tries to dump their stash at the high price on anyone else foolish enough to follow. I think he mean there was error and can't make trade under 0.00001 price and its now corrected. But also I think it's true what you say about first trades. |
|
|
|
|
|
Del137
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:42:26 AM |
|
Sadly MRC/BTC not existed, for me MUCH harder to calculate with MRC/LTC lol Its easy to calculate in Satoshi's 1, 10, 100, 1000 Satoshies is Ok. And i also dont like LTC also (with ASICS, hackers steals selling dumps etc).. |
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:46:37 AM |
|
Sadly MRC/BTC not existed, for me MUCH harder to calculate with MRC/LTC lol Its easy to calculate in Satoshi's 1, 10, 100, 1000 Satoshies is Ok. And i also dont like LTC also (with ASICS, hackers steals selling dumps etc).. Yes, best should be if there is mBTC market when price is under satoshi. LTC market is made only because it makes more trades. BTC vs mBTC no need to exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
Del137
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:48:33 AM |
|
I hardly can imagine someone sell MRC less than 1 satoshi, anyone?  I buy it all ) PS compare MRC with total DOGE (damn i had to compare with it LOL) minting, its the same 100 kkk, and capitalisation sooner or later decide it... Also MRC much fair in mining, so much more rate wow |
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:53:55 AM |
|
I hardly can imagine someone sell MRC less than 1 satoshi, anyone? I buy it all ) Well, Me too  But other point; I like price can move at least 1% steps. |
|
|
|
|
|
bykardinal
|
|
January 24, 2014, 06:56:42 AM |
|
ye) we like doge but better with all parameters) sux that 99% people are idiots and buying dogecoins. Only in our stupid world dogecoin can have some success, but i hope its temperary success i dont want buy something goods for stupid memecoin in future |
|
|
|
|
Last1212
|
|
January 24, 2014, 07:15:23 AM |
|
ye) we like doge but better with all parameters) sux that 99% people are idiots and buying dogecoins. Only in our stupid world dogecoin can have some success, but i hope its temperary success i dont want buy something goods for stupid memecoin in future What is the problem? Start buiyng MRC!!! What is your offer? |
Some donate will be good))))))
LTC: LLEhzonntRjo4pLqaw93ZQzw8Qdx3HQ2k7 DOGE: DCty26Yk5kbG2NfoknoyY3UajPzsmbhXP9
WDC: WYJW8RYrc3C8K7duaAWqs8YayMLLNEkWBC CAT: 9nJcehD9dkcsrrVmJxnLJRFc61158nTvvP
|
|
|
sensecrack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2014, 11:32:23 AM |
|
Continue the sync problem. sometimes i'm lucky to have one active conection to microcoin network ,run getpeerinfo , 19:22:04

getpeerinfo
19:22:04

[
{
"addr" : "72.23.74.210:4444",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390562523,
"lastrecv" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390562523,
version" : 0 , "subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
,but in backward pages, the right version is 70000,is something wrong? |
|
|
|
|
lexeich
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2014, 12:48:48 PM |
|
Continue the sync problem. sometimes i'm lucky to have one active conection to microcoin network ,run getpeerinfo , 19:22:04

getpeerinfo
19:22:04

[
{
"addr" : "72.23.74.210:4444",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390562523,
"lastrecv" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390562523,
version" : 0 , "subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
,but in backward pages, the right version is 70000,is something wrong? my getpeerinfo. mybe it helps
16:46:05

getpeerinfo
16:46:05

[
{
"addr" : "27.54.84.232:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567565,
"lastrecv" : 1390567565,
"conntime" : 1390549864,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48919,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "46.109.35.182:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567554,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390549870,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48920,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "72.23.74.210:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567554,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390549893,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48920,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.251.34.142:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390550026,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48927,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.134.81.196:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567554,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390550076,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48929,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "88.91.195.184:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390550077,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48929,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.2.160.225:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567555,
"conntime" : 1390550083,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48929,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "72.230.148.202:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567565,
"conntime" : 1390559530,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 49271,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
|
|
|
|
|
sensecrack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2014, 01:11:33 PM |
|
Continue the sync problem. sometimes i'm lucky to have one active conection to microcoin network ,run getpeerinfo , 19:22:04

getpeerinfo
19:22:04

[
{
"addr" : "72.23.74.210:4444",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390562523,
"lastrecv" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390562523,
version" : 0 , "subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
,but in backward pages, the right version is 70000,is something wrong? my getpeerinfo. mybe it helps
16:46:05

getpeerinfo
16:46:05

[
{
"addr" : "27.54.84.232:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567565,
"lastrecv" : 1390567565,
"conntime" : 1390549864,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48919,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "46.109.35.182:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567554,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390549870,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48920,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "72.23.74.210:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567554,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390549893,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48920,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.251.34.142:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390550026,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48927,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.134.81.196:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567554,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390550076,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48929,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "88.91.195.184:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567564,
"conntime" : 1390550077,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48929,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.2.160.225:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567555,
"conntime" : 1390550083,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 48929,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "72.230.148.202:4444",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390567564,
"lastrecv" : 1390567565,
"conntime" : 1390559530,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 49271,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
There are so many difference in same peer, reason don't sync? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
forgetme
|
|
January 24, 2014, 01:34:50 PM |
|
In my opinion i strongly think that until we don't the famigerated block height 160k, price will never go up, but from that moment ahead price per coin will increase exponentially and following an absolute upward trend. It's obvious because of the reward constantly reducting till the second clue moment in this cryptocoin's life, that will be the block since reward will become 1000 steady.. The inflaction/deflaction of this coin is absolutely simple and clear but at the same time it's so smart to let almost, not everyone, but a very lot of people gain good amount of coins till the lip of the upward block reward wave. Till that moment, if the coin request doesn't increase massively (no reason for this at this moment, maybe if some marketing strategies it's applied in the short term this could happen) or MicroCoin doesn't hit a big exchange price will stay "quite low" because of the chance for everyone to get it mining, isn't it so obvious? But since block reward become less and less more constantly the price per coin will follow an inverse uptrend wave compared to blocks height! So take your conclusion..  |
|
|
|
|
|
