[ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake]

[tittiecoiner]

You guys are so funny. You were crying for someone to fix the coin, continuing the development. And as soon as someone is willing to help, you start crying like 6yo's...no, you don't get the premine. No, you don't get access to xxx. Just do the work we weren't able to do and get your ass out of our project.

You better would do some research or ask the right questions instead of only checking if the account is a newbie account.
Good luck with your successful project.

[1714647881]

1714647881

[1714647881]

1714647881

[1714647881]

1714647881

[portice]

It's been a "who has the biggest penis" around these parts for over a year now.....

[Crestington]

You guys are so funny. You were crying for someone to fix the coin, continuing the development. And as soon as someone is willing to help, you start crying like 6yo's...no, you don't get the premine. No, you don't get access to xxx. Just do the work we weren't able to do and get your ass out of our project.

You better would do some research or ask the right questions instead of only checking if the account is a newbie account.
Good luck with your successful project.

No it isn't that at all, it's that they asked to have the repo, download links, and premine handed over which is a risk to people who own the Coin. If they want to do work on it then just do it and suggest what you want for reward from Zack and let him manage that or if he can't manage the premine then there are many escrow that can handle it and use it from an unbiased point of view. Lots of newbies have snuck in stuff into download links or sourcecode or simply dump all the premine and disappear.....

This might be a newbie account that I created to manage new coins but I am not new to developing altcoins or to Bitcointalk.
I understand that the community would be cautious and as such I wish you all good luck with ADT.

I only want to see things get on track here and help ADT get well, if you are actually serious about wanting to take over ADT then why not just outlay what you want to do with it? All I've seen is "I'm going to fix it, just hand over all of it"

All you'd need to do is to just do it and settle the terms.....

[Crestington]

I wish I could say more but I can't. I understand that trust is a serious issue within digital currency... spot the irony, however ADT is dead.
I am not asking you to had over a Bitcoin or a Dogecoin.

We are not going to step in and then just be the team who fixed ADT and then goodbye see you later. I already made that mistake with Banksycoin and got 0 to show for it.

If my team and I are going to fix this coin I will take over full development and all resources. I am community focused and hold a good name in the altcoin space. Once myself and my team have established our place within the ADT community as the lead Dev team we will contact the community from our main BitcoinTalk account, at this stage our current coin/coins are a conflict of interest.

What I plan to do is bring ADT back to life, give it a purpose and make it spendable. I'm not going to say more than that, if that is not enough for you then as I mentioned before... All the best.

I can't really speak for Zack or even ADT for that matter but just want to see things run smoothly, I'm not sure how it would be a conflict of interest to run multiple Coins, lots of developers work on more than one Coin.

[mrbodz]

i have no problem with someone else doing work on ADT and i wish you every success. I wont hand over the repo mainly since

a) i do the code reviews along with several others.
b) cryptsy and other services use our repo and so its only right that we make sure all the code submitted is good.

So aslong as any commit is made and a PR made. In most cases i'll look over and merge it the same day (or suggest improvements or commit them myself where appropriate)

Ahmed

[mrbodz]

i have no problem with someone else doing work on ADT and i wish you every success. I wont hand over the repo mainly since

a) i do the code reviews along with several others.
b) cryptsy and other services use our repo and so its only right that we make sure all the code submitted is good.

So aslong as any commit is made and a PR made. In most cases i'll look over and merge it the same day (or suggest improvements or commit them myself where appropriate)

Ahmed

Well so you are the reason why this coin is broken then... Since you agreed on the changes,

I think I've seen enough here to not want to be involved here anymore. Tooo much shortsightedness and from the looks of it a bunch of kids.

I'm not the reason the coin is broken. I agreed on the changes made by one of the other developers. Zack didnt agree with the removal of PoW. which caused enough issues in itself. They were also his choice of parameters.

Ahmed

[Crestington]

i have no problem with someone else doing work on ADT and i wish you every success. I wont hand over the repo mainly since

a) i do the code reviews along with several others.
b) cryptsy and other services use our repo and so its only right that we make sure all the code submitted is good.

So aslong as any commit is made and a PR made. In most cases i'll look over and merge it the same day (or suggest improvements or commit them myself where appropriate)

Ahmed

Well so you are the reason why this coin is broken then... Since you agreed on the changes,

I think I've seen enough here to not want to be involved here anymore. Tooo much shortsightedness and from the looks of it a bunch of kids.

Pfft, a kid runs and hides when faced with challenges......

That's like the third time you've threatened to run away in as many days because of some even slight criticism and acting like your this shit hot coding team when you can't even use your real account or outlay any plans or ideas other than "give me everything, we will fix it" 

[mrbodz]

I've just had a chat with mullick and we stumbled onto CAP and then onto ADT.

I think i know what the issue with ADT going onto its own fork. Which actually is an issue from CGB surprisingly. Will get a patch put up and see if it fixes the issues.

(All thanks goes to mullick for the fix he did for CAP)

@Crestington. I dont have a coin dev box anymore, you mind compiling win wallets for me for testing?
Ahmed

[Crestington]

I've just had a chat with mullick and we stumbled onto CAP and then onto ADT.

I think i know what the issue with ADT going onto its own fork. Which actually is an issue from CGB surprisingly. Will get a patch put up and see if it fixes the issues.

(All thanks goes to mullick for the fix he did for CAP)

@Crestington. I dont have a coin dev box anymore, you mind compiling win wallets for me for testing?
Ahmed

Sure I can do that, they won't be with all the bells and whistles but will get the job done, send me a link to the repo and I'll see if I can build it.

[cryptmebro]

How would I go about setting up a permanent node for ADT? I wouldn't mind setting up 1 or 2 depending on price. One in the eastern hemisphere, and one in the west, if that matters.

[mrbodz]

I've just had a chat with mullick and we stumbled onto CAP and then onto ADT.

I think i know what the issue with ADT going onto its own fork. Which actually is an issue from CGB surprisingly. Will get a patch put up and see if it fixes the issues.

(All thanks goes to mullick for the fix he did for CAP)

@Crestington. I dont have a coin dev box anymore, you mind compiling win wallets for me for testing?
Ahmed

Sure I can do that, they won't be with all the bells and whistles but will get the job done, send me a link to the repo and I'll see if I can build it.

Great, thanks man

[mrbodz]

How would I go about setting up a permanent node for ADT? I wouldn't mind setting up 1 or 2 depending on price. One in the eastern hemisphere, and one in the west, if that matters.

Just run a copy of the daemon.

Add the following lines into your config file:

maxconnections=1000
irc=1 (not neccesary but i find its better)

Then post your IP Address and i can include your nodes inside the source code

Ahmed

[n0xn]

I am now fully synced, Can I help in any way?
is the coin working now ?

[n0xn]

And who is in control? I still miss 500 000 000 coins who got lost. can zack or who ever is in control please contact me in pm

[Cryptco]

ADT is dead

zack has abandoned ADT

Cryptsy will delist ADT soon



Summary - zackclark70    
Last Active:    March 05, 2015, 07:53:08 PM

ADT1 is broken, ADT2 is broken - the code is messed up and zack {call himself 'ADT Developer'} can't fix it! No progress the past 9 months

 

[Crestington]

Don't know what to say, I would think Zack would want to see it going and seek out some help. It would be worth it to do something with it being listed on cryptsy but needs someone to give it direction and maybe spend some money to fix it.

[mrbodz]

money isnt needed. the fix is known. just someone with the know how and time to patch it

Ahmed

[Crestington]

money isnt needed. the fix is known. just someone with the know how and time to patch it

Ahmed

In what way? If the fix is known then can't it just be pushed to source?

[mrbodz]

yep. just needs someone to actually push it. (I've been super busy lately)

This is the patch: https://github.com/bottlecaps-foundation/bottlecaps/commit/27411468365d0c72cc07c85c905a4dbe642e9820

Ahmed

[Cryptco]

yep. just needs someone to actually push it. (I've been super busy lately)

This is the patch: https://github.com/bottlecaps-foundation/bottlecaps/commit/27411468365d0c72cc07c85c905a4dbe642e9820

Ahmed

 

"r3wt commented on 2741146 on 26 Sep 2013"
 Fix self-forking issues, caused by minimum proof-of-stake calculation

..."all proof of stake coins need to add"`??
It's  is still up to date?