Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 12:58:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake]  (Read 115738 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
coin@coin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 26, 2014, 11:21:25 PM
Last edit: September 02, 2014, 12:48:18 AM by coin@coin
 #1581

I hope you guys can fix ADT. it would be a shame to see it go...
1714611483
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714611483

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714611483
Reply with quote  #2

1714611483
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714611483
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714611483

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714611483
Reply with quote  #2

1714611483
Report to moderator
1714611483
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714611483

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714611483
Reply with quote  #2

1714611483
Report to moderator
ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
August 26, 2014, 11:47:29 PM
 #1582

anyone else with nodes? none of these seem to work for me

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
techbytes
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054


Point. Click. Blockchain


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 01:11:59 AM
 #1583

anyone else with nodes? none of these seem to work for me

Try these two:

addnode=68.98.232.190:44312
addnode=64.34.49.151:44312


-tb-

ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 03:27:34 AM
 #1584

Ok thanks Tech. Connected Up. Now to wait for it to start syncing

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
eureka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 301
Merit: 250


网络·自由·客


View Profile WWW
August 28, 2014, 01:22:26 PM
 #1585

Ok thanks Tech. Connected Up. Now to wait for it to start syncing

Thank your help.

dac.xyz 
对数字货币深度思考:http://8btc.com/thread-109365-1-1.html
n0xn
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 29, 2014, 06:22:59 PM
 #1586

How's it going? Smiley
ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
August 29, 2014, 06:37:26 PM
 #1587

didnt sync at all although it connected to peers. need to figure out why but havent had much free time recently

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
zackclark70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000

ADT developer


View Profile
August 30, 2014, 11:56:31 AM
 #1588

.

Crestington
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1024



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 06:35:10 AM
 #1589

didnt sync at all although it connected to peers. need to figure out why but havent had much free time recently

bitcoin seeder
ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
August 31, 2014, 12:05:58 PM
 #1590

didnt sync at all although it connected to peers. need to figure out why but havent had much free time recently

bitcoin seeder

seeder shouldnt stop the client from downloading blocks

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
Crestington
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1024



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 07:30:49 PM
 #1591

didnt sync at all although it connected to peers. need to figure out why but havent had much free time recently

bitcoin seeder

seeder shouldnt stop the client from downloading blocks

Connecting to nodes on a lower Blockchain does stop it from downloading blocks as well as being able to stake before being fully synced.

 Setup 5-6 more nodes, edit the list to only include the trusted nodes, set up seed nodes, reduce the Staking deviation time from 2 hours to 10 minutes, make the client not stake unless fully synced and possibly even remove the POW altogether since it's a security risk.

The main problem here is that the Staking is too far out so no one is Staking their Coins and Zack doesn't want to open up the wallet with large amount of coins because it will Stake at maximum weight all at once and cause a fork.

You could send coins to private nodes to Stake and run the network and tunnel in through SSH, each transaction represents a block of coins that will Stake once matured so Zack could use his transaction program to equalize the Staking and have those coins helping to run the network.

You also need coin control, it's pretty much essential to Proof of Stake so you can manage all your blocks of coins so that you don't have thousands of small transactions all trying to hash their stake, not succeeding and slowing down your system.
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
August 31, 2014, 11:03:02 PM
 #1592

The main problem here is that the Staking is too far out so no one is Staking their Coins and Zack doesn't want to open up the wallet with large amount of coins because it will Stake at maximum weight all at once and cause a fork.

Wouldn't setting reservebalance to (total_balance - smallest_unspent_output) generate a maximum of one PoS block? And continue gradually reducing the reserve if weight is insufficient. Unless there's only a few gigantic unspent outputs rather than multiple smaller ones?

BTW, I presume the 100k hard fork has been postponed?
Crestington
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1024



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 10:43:26 AM
Last edit: September 01, 2014, 11:19:15 AM by Crestington
 #1593

The main problem here is that the Staking is too far out so no one is Staking their Coins and Zack doesn't want to open up the wallet with large amount of coins because it will Stake at maximum weight all at once and cause a fork.

Wouldn't setting reservebalance to (total_balance - smallest_unspent_output) generate a maximum of one PoS block? And continue gradually reducing the reserve if weight is insufficient. Unless there's only a few gigantic unspent outputs rather than multiple smaller ones?

BTW, I presume the 100k hard fork has been postponed?

No, I mean that the minimum Stake is 15 days so people forget about it and keep their Wallets closed and so with a minimum amount of reward is so small that there is no incentive in order to have your coins in your wallet and Staking so network security becomes low and localized into clusters of coins Staking all at once and with POW mining also with small incentive and Staking before being synced, there are a number of issues here at work. A fork could be created by shunting POS Blocks until it becomes POW only and then have a majority of the hashrate.

(total_balance - smallest_unspent_output) wouldn't really work unless you were over the maximum stake period and alot of coins are often so small that they will never Stake, your smallest unspent output in this case could be dust. It would probably be better something along the lines of (total_balance - (smallest_unspent_output > 1000 * COIN))

Would it continually produce just one POS? I think it would just unlock one block unless scripted to do so, you should try this and tell us how you go with it.
coinbloke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 12:30:15 AM
 #1594

any real development or is this being abandoned now?
cryptmebro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 786
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 12:48:45 AM
 #1595

any real development or is this being abandoned now?

Who knows. Zack isn't around anymore. Time for someone else to take over. I don't have the time nor qualifications to.
coinbloke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 12:53:54 AM
 #1596

so is there any hope? Ahmed? Zack have you really left us?
zackclark70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000

ADT developer


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 11:44:40 PM
 #1597

so is there any hope? Ahmed? Zack have you really left us?

i am still here i just have a lot of stuff going on at the moment i am keeping watch of this thread and replying to all pms and skype messages

techbytes
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054


Point. Click. Blockchain


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 11:49:14 PM
 #1598

Since you are keeping watch, what is next on the agenda?


-tb-

zackclark70
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000

ADT developer


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 11:50:56 PM
 #1599

Since you are keeping watch, what is next on the agenda?


-tb-

geting a patch sorted so that big wallets dont cause forks and hopfuly imploment the new POS prameters that were meant to take afect at block 100k

coinbloke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 06, 2014, 12:55:07 AM
 #1600

that's good to hear but is anyone actually capable of doing something to get this finally on track?
Pages: « 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!