[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[cgladue]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

[gfuzz]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

sounds good!

[XxEnigmaticxX]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

so i read your post the other day about your results and it got my brain thinking. one of the problems with running a huge multi pool like CM or waffle is the ridiculous hashrate. if terk was to unleash the hashing power of CM on some of the newer coins it would cause a fork in a quick second. that amount of hashing power on a network that cannot sustain it will cause damage. Also because of the massive hashrate i feel that terk cannot and in turn us reap the benefits of a higher hash rate.  so i started thinking was maybe the solution was to spread out the hashrate. if people were able to set up their own multi pools and limit them say to something manageable maybe more and more people can see returns like you do.

just my thought.

[cgladue]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

so i read your post the other day about your results and it got my brain thinking. one of the problems with running a huge multi pool like CM or waffle is the ridiculous hashrate. if terk was to unleash the hashing power of CM on some of the newer coins it would cause a fork in a quick second. that amount of hashing power on a network that cannot sustain it will cause damage. Also because of the massive hashrate i feel that terk cannot and in turn us reap the benefits of a higher hash rate.  so i started thinking was maybe the solution was to spread out the hashrate. if people were able to set up their own multi pools and limit them say to something manageable maybe more and more people can see returns like you do.

just my thought.

this is true...

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

[byt411]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

so i read your post the other day about your results and it got my brain thinking. one of the problems with running a huge multi pool like CM or waffle is the ridiculous hashrate. if terk was to unleash the hashing power of CM on some of the newer coins it would cause a fork in a quick second. that amount of hashing power on a network that cannot sustain it will cause damage. Also because of the massive hashrate i feel that terk cannot and in turn us reap the benefits of a higher hash rate.  so i started thinking was maybe the solution was to spread out the hashrate. if people were able to set up their own multi pools and limit them say to something manageable maybe more and more people can see returns like you do.

just my thought.

this is true...

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

Well, you are completely correct. The hashrate is split up, if there are tiny coins that are profitable. Terk said this a while ago, every multipool (I think) does this.

[rodeoclownicp]

im the one getting .004 BTC/DAY/MH using my own profitability checking and analysis software.

.004 btc/day per MH??? Really! Sign me up... How can I get in on this prof/analysis software you keep mentioning?

I've been w/ CM for months now, and I'm not unhappy, but always looking for an edge. I constantly search for other profitable pools and CM seems to be consistently better or at least even on weekly/monthly basis.... right now  I have about 10.5 MH/s setup with 3.6+ more MH/s coming in the mail via GAWminer furys...

.004 is a game changer at this point. Share the wealth!  BTCBTCBTCBTC

so is poolwars pro where the.004btc per day per gh is? or is this what cgladue is creating?

[XxEnigmaticxX]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

so i read your post the other day about your results and it got my brain thinking. one of the problems with running a huge multi pool like CM or waffle is the ridiculous hashrate. if terk was to unleash the hashing power of CM on some of the newer coins it would cause a fork in a quick second. that amount of hashing power on a network that cannot sustain it will cause damage. Also because of the massive hashrate i feel that terk cannot and in turn us reap the benefits of a higher hash rate.  so i started thinking was maybe the solution was to spread out the hashrate. if people were able to set up their own multi pools and limit them say to something manageable maybe more and more people can see returns like you do.

just my thought.

this is true...

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

Well, you are completely correct. The hashrate is split up, if there are tiny coins that are profitable. Terk said this a while ago, every multipool (I think) does this.

so does he take a persentage of everyones hash rate and put that toward a coin? other wise if he just takes chuncks of hash rate from people there is a chance that some people wont mine some coin which means the profitabilty stats would be messed up. yeah probably takes a percentage of each users hash depending on coin diff. only way that makes sense to me.

[byt411]

Yes, please share 

i would need to "productionize it" if i were to share (aka license or sell) my mining recommendations and/or software ...

currently it is very specific to my setup and mining hardware, i dont know if i can commit to making it ready for the public right now i have very limited free time and i wouldnt want to release something that im not fully able to support ... but i will see, perhaps if my system holds up it would be worth it to charge a small fee of the mining proceeds for it ... ill re-evaluate the effort that would be needed to make it user friendly and more sutable for the public at large. 

so i read your post the other day about your results and it got my brain thinking. one of the problems with running a huge multi pool like CM or waffle is the ridiculous hashrate. if terk was to unleash the hashing power of CM on some of the newer coins it would cause a fork in a quick second. that amount of hashing power on a network that cannot sustain it will cause damage. Also because of the massive hashrate i feel that terk cannot and in turn us reap the benefits of a higher hash rate.  so i started thinking was maybe the solution was to spread out the hashrate. if people were able to set up their own multi pools and limit them say to something manageable maybe more and more people can see returns like you do.

just my thought.

this is true...

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

Well, you are completely correct. The hashrate is split up, if there are tiny coins that are profitable. Terk said this a while ago, every multipool (I think) does this.

so does he take a persentage of everyones hash rate and put that toward a coin? other wise if he just takes chuncks of hash rate from people there is a chance that some people wont mine some coin which means the profitabilty stats would be messed up. yeah probably takes a percentage of each users hash depending on coin diff. only way that makes sense to me.

No, he takes a percentage of the total pool hashrate at a coin, another percentage at another. The profits from these coins together averaged is your coin profitability.

[rodeoclownicp]

so is poolwars pro where the.004btc per day per gh is? or is this what cgladue is creating?

[Xenocyde]

It's cgladue's own algorythm.

[gtraah]

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

If there is some type of code/algorithm that does this maybe splits the TOP 10 most profitable coins and splits the hashrate, I recon the more hash the better if your doing 10 coins split.... If you do 2 or 3 then this is still huge hashrate spread..



PS: I have stopped mining here for the time being and I have had over 0.01 but some in unexchanged and unmature for 1-2days now has not moved .

[GolfCabalist]

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

If there is some type of code/algorithm that does this maybe splits the TOP 10 most profitable coins and splits the hashrate, I recon the more hash the better if your doing 10 coins split.... If you do 2 or 3 then this is still huge hashrate spread..



PS: I have stopped mining here for the time being and I have had over 0.01 but some in unexchanged and unmature for 1-2days now has not moved .

I had a similar situation, and I guess I "woke up" the payout process by doing a little bit of mining here on Saturday, before 9 pm EDT.

[gtraah]

with the huge hashrate terk has here he cannot mine the smaller more profitable coins (like in the < 1 difficulty range that i can) without a massive disruption to the blockchain and way over 51% hashing power.  so he is forced to either 1) take that massive hashrate and somehow split it into smaller chunks (perhaps mining several smaller coins at the same time, splitting the hashrate amung them) or 2) limiting himself to the larget difficulties and often less profitable coins.

If there is some type of code/algorithm that does this maybe splits the TOP 10 most profitable coins and splits the hashrate, I recon the more hash the better if your doing 10 coins split.... If you do 2 or 3 then this is still huge hashrate spread..



PS: I have stopped mining here for the time being and I have had over 0.01 but some in unexchanged and unmature for 1-2days now has not moved .

I had a similar situation, and I guess I "woke up" the payout process by doing a little bit of mining here on Saturday, before 9 pm EDT.

I dont feel like stopping my miners mining unless I have to , we shouldn't need to wake it up... this is most likely some bug if it keeps happening.

[Flep182]

I had a similar situation, and I guess I "woke up" the payout process by doing a little bit of mining here on Saturday, before 9 pm EDT.

That's (with a french word) BS

There are several coins that need exchanging through multiple exchanges after which some of them are manually added to the balance. If that hasn't happened for a few days or Terk had no time or there was no exchange possible yet.

[byt411]

I had a similar situation, and I guess I "woke up" the payout process by doing a little bit of mining here on Saturday, before 9 pm EDT.

That's (with a french word) BS

There are several coins that need exchanging through multiple exchanges after which some of them are manually added to the balance. If that hasn't happened for a few days or Terk had no time or there was no exchange possible yet.

They might also be already manually exchanged, but not recorded in the database.
I think the word you are looking for is très.

[rodeoclownicp]

It's cgladue's own algorythm.

then why the mentiom of paying for pro? is paying for pro still better off then clever

[Xenocyde]

It's cgladue's own algorythm.

then why the mentiom of paying for pro? is paying for pro still better off then clever

Never tried the pro version and can't find a comparison among the known multipool charts.

[gfuzz]

Would it be possible develop an alert from CM when we have hourly spikes in profitability? I ask because leasing a rig for extra hash power would make that lease instantly profitable.

For instance, today -June 3rd- CM had brief but enormous spikes in profitability:
http://www.clevermining.com/profits/24-hours

Hour 13 231% profit over litecoin
Hour 14 301% profit over litecoin

If I had known these spikes were happening in almost real time, I could have leased a rig for an hour, and while I wouldn't have had the full % benefit, I would have made some extra BTC. After the spike was gone / lease was up, I would continue hashing away with only my equipment, business as usual. Would this work or is it too volatile? Is the mining/trading of profitable coin only calculable after all transactions are complete?

Does this make sense to anyone else or am I dreaming about flying unicorns again?  

[chadwickx16]

Would it be possible develop an alert from CM when we have hourly spikes in profitability? I ask because leasing a rig for extra hash power would make that lease instantly profitable.

For instance, today -June 3rd- CM had brief but enormous spikes in profitability:
http://www.clevermining.com/profits/24-hours

Hour 13 231% profit over litecoin
Hour 14 301% profit over litecoin

If I had known these spikes were happening in almost real time, I could have leased a rig for an hour, and while I wouldn't have had the full % benefit, I would have made some extra BTC. After the spike was gone / lease was up, I would continue hashing away with only my equipment, business as usual. Would this work or is it too volatile? Is the mining/trading of profitable coin only calculable after all transactions are complete?

Does this make sense to anyone else or am I dreaming about flying unicorns again?  

Makes sense, but it's kind of like predicting the future; because AFAIK those stats are updated once the hour has ended.  You could try and chance it by renting a rig after one hour of crazy profitability hoping it would carry forward, like it did from hours 13-14. Or chance it after a long period of abysmal profitability hoping it rebounds. Pretty much find a Unicorn and you'll be fine. 

[gfuzz]

Would it be possible develop an alert from CM when we have hourly spikes in profitability? I ask because leasing a rig for extra hash power would make that lease instantly profitable.

For instance, today -June 3rd- CM had brief but enormous spikes in profitability:
http://www.clevermining.com/profits/24-hours

Hour 13 231% profit over litecoin
Hour 14 301% profit over litecoin

If I had known these spikes were happening in almost real time, I could have leased a rig for an hour, and while I wouldn't have had the full % benefit, I would have made some extra BTC. After the spike was gone / lease was up, I would continue hashing away with only my equipment, business as usual. Would this work or is it too volatile? Is the mining/trading of profitable coin only calculable after all transactions are complete?

Does this make sense to anyone else or am I dreaming about flying unicorns again?  

Makes sense, but it's kind of like predicting the future; because AFAIK those stats are updated once the hour has ended.  You could try and chance it by renting a rig after one hour of crazy profitability hoping it would carry forward, like it did from hours 13-14. Or chance it after a long period of abysmal profitability hoping it rebounds. Pretty much find a Unicorn and you'll be fine. 

Ahhh, I see. Worth me asking though, otherwise I'd think about it all night. Thanks for the reply chadwick...I sent you a PM