|
byt411
|
 |
May 19, 2014, 08:28:43 PM |
|
Website problems are CloudFlare issues again. When I use real web server IP all pages are loading correctly and quickly and everything's fine on the server. This is also reason why my monitoring didn't alert me and it was byt411 who let me know (thanks!) - I am monitoring/alerting several things on the servers but am not monitoring wether website is accessible from outside and/or wether CloudFlare is having problems. Recent tweets from them confirm that they have issue in Europe and US: 20 min ago: https://twitter.com/CloudFlareSys/status/4684823123471892485 min ago: https://twitter.com/CloudFlareSys/status/468486508664483841All things said, mining is of course not affected. No problem Terk. I'm always glad to help, I've been using CleverMining since beta, and I think it's awesome, so I'm always glad to help. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
antimater
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2014, 09:08:52 PM |
|
Sites all working again. Thanks for the swift action Terk  . |
|
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
May 19, 2014, 09:10:42 PM |
|
Sites all working again. Thanks for the swift action Terk . Confirmed on my end too. Charts are back up, everything is working perfectly. Thanks for the quick fix, Terk! |
|
|
|
|
highwalker
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 5
|
|
May 19, 2014, 10:17:06 PM |
|
Not yet on my end, perhaps the CF server is different for me based on location... will report back once it goes back up...
|
|
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
May 20, 2014, 04:22:54 AM |
|
Not yet on my end, perhaps the CF server is different for me based on location... will report back once it goes back up...
What country are you in? If you tell us that will help greately. Also, there seems to be some region wide DNS problems going on. |
|
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:41:43 AM |
|
Hi guys I know this issue was from the beginning of clever but slowly got better but are still higheer than other pools on average. THe rejected shares are on average quite high on the other pools .
Since the MH/BTC was low I recently pointed at waffle, and I am now getting 1-2Mhs Extra because of the lack of rejected.
I like clever thoughl and will jump on when the profitability increases. But I am still not happy about the rejections, just curios does waffle have something you dont which is causing alot less rejects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
May 20, 2014, 08:24:26 AM |
|
gtraah, read the first part of the OP of this thread please.
|
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
|
May 20, 2014, 01:27:02 PM |
|
gtraah, read the first part of the OP of this thread please.
Yeh I did, What I am saying is nothing to do with this, I know about those untracked shares etc.... I am using CPUminer for my Grids and Sgminer for my GPUs. What I am checking is the rejected MHs on the poolside compare to the REjected MH/s to the other pools side... Also my Total MH/s is lower by around 1.5mhs on Clever than on waffle, when doing some calculations that 1.5mhs equalls roughly the same percentage of Rejects I am getting with clever.. FOr example If I check my poolside rejects on waffle I will see this 0.5 - 1.80% All the time Some times A LITTLE over... But with clever my rejects on poolside are never this low. Then when I look at the last 24hr average reject rate is always between 5-10% , I never see these rejects with waffle ... Id rather mine here but I am just wondering why this has been always the case PS: My POOLSIDE overall Accepted MH for Waffle is 1.5Mhs Higher than Clever... And this is due to the difference in rejected shares, if you want to see what I am talking about point your miner there just to see the reject differences and the accepted/rejected Mh/s differences. You will see what I am talking about. |
|
|
|
|
highwalker
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 5
|
|
May 20, 2014, 04:46:31 PM |
|
byt - sorry, it got resolved for me too, it was my web browser at that time (Chrome) and after restarting it, everything works!
|
|
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
May 20, 2014, 04:51:16 PM |
|
gtraah, read the first part of the OP of this thread please.
Yeh I did, What I am saying is nothing to do with this, I know about those untracked shares etc.... I am using CPUminer for my Grids and Sgminer for my GPUs. What I am checking is the rejected MHs on the poolside compare to the REjected MH/s to the other pools side... Also my Total MH/s is lower by around 1.5mhs on Clever than on waffle, when doing some calculations that 1.5mhs equalls roughly the same percentage of Rejects I am getting with clever.. FOr example If I check my poolside rejects on waffle I will see this 0.5 - 1.80% All the time Some times A LITTLE over... But with clever my rejects on poolside are never this low. Then when I look at the last 24hr average reject rate is always between 5-10% , I never see these rejects with waffle ... Id rather mine here but I am just wondering why this has been always the case PS: My POOLSIDE overall Accepted MH for Waffle is 1.5Mhs Higher than Clever... And this is due to the difference in rejected shares, if you want to see what I am talking about point your miner there just to see the reject differences and the accepted/rejected Mh/s differences. You will see what I am talking about. We all have miners pointed at CleverMining. Also, you must know that pools can only track hashrate based on accepted shares, and it isn't that accurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
_Crash_
|
|
May 20, 2014, 09:03:56 PM |
|
Scrypt-Based Mining now is just generally dead. I don't see the point anymore, even if you have Mh/s, you're still losing a LOT with electricity costs.
Some people have access to really cheap or even free electricity. True, however my single card rig (303KH/s) uses 240W solid when mining. I have it on for 9 hours each day during the night since mining scrypt is so unprofitable ~ at least for me anyway. Its around £9 a month now that I'm doing this minus a couple pound due to my solar panels which are grid tied. Pick up an R9 270 yo! Coupled with a Sempron 145 you can have a low power single rig pushing 430+ Kh/s and fairly low temps...should be under 175w! Also GOLD rated PSU or better helps a bunch. Sounds like a plan! Cheers!  |
MiningSpace.net - MULTI-COIN / MULTI-POOL :: Miners Paid TX Fees! :: Europe :: Most Profitable Pool! :: Gigabit Connectivity :: 0% Fee!
|
|
|
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
3D Printed!
|
|
May 20, 2014, 09:29:50 PM |
|
Scrypt-Based Mining now is just generally dead. I don't see the point anymore, even if you have Mh/s, you're still losing a LOT with electricity costs.
Some people have access to really cheap or even free electricity. True, however my single card rig (303KH/s) uses 240W solid when mining. I have it on for 9 hours each day during the night since mining scrypt is so unprofitable ~ at least for me anyway. Its around £9 a month now that I'm doing this minus a couple pound due to my solar panels which are grid tied. Pick up an R9 270 yo! Coupled with a Sempron 145 you can have a low power single rig pushing 430+ Kh/s and fairly low temps...should be under 175w! Also GOLD rated PSU or better helps a bunch. Sounds like a plan! Cheers! I had just checked my 3x 270 scrypt rig with my watt-meter and it was pulling +/-550W from the wall (3x 270, Sempron145, 4GB ballistix sport, 2.5" 500GB 7200 WDD Black and a single 140mm case fan) roughly 1.25 Mh/s with sub 70 degree temps and almost no HWE |
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
May 20, 2014, 09:45:50 PM |
|
Scrypt-Based Mining now is just generally dead. I don't see the point anymore, even if you have Mh/s, you're still losing a LOT with electricity costs.
Some people have access to really cheap or even free electricity. True, however my single card rig (303KH/s) uses 240W solid when mining. I have it on for 9 hours each day during the night since mining scrypt is so unprofitable ~ at least for me anyway. Its around £9 a month now that I'm doing this minus a couple pound due to my solar panels which are grid tied. Pick up an R9 270 yo! Coupled with a Sempron 145 you can have a low power single rig pushing 430+ Kh/s and fairly low temps...should be under 175w! Also GOLD rated PSU or better helps a bunch. Sounds like a plan! Cheers! I had just checked my 3x 270 scrypt rig with my watt-meter and it was pulling +/-550W from the wall (3x 270, Sempron145, 4GB ballistix sport, 2.5" 500GB 7200 WDD Black and a single 140mm case fan) roughly 1.25 Mh/s with sub 70 degree temps and almost no HWE What PSU are you using? Are they undefvolted or overclocked? |
|
|
|
|
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
3D Printed!
|
|
May 20, 2014, 10:01:44 PM |
|
Scrypt-Based Mining now is just generally dead. I don't see the point anymore, even if you have Mh/s, you're still losing a LOT with electricity costs.
Some people have access to really cheap or even free electricity. True, however my single card rig (303KH/s) uses 240W solid when mining. I have it on for 9 hours each day during the night since mining scrypt is so unprofitable ~ at least for me anyway. Its around £9 a month now that I'm doing this minus a couple pound due to my solar panels which are grid tied. Pick up an R9 270 yo! Coupled with a Sempron 145 you can have a low power single rig pushing 430+ Kh/s and fairly low temps...should be under 175w! Also GOLD rated PSU or better helps a bunch. Sounds like a plan! Cheers! I had just checked my 3x 270 scrypt rig with my watt-meter and it was pulling +/-550W from the wall (3x 270, Sempron145, 4GB ballistix sport, 2.5" 500GB 7200 WDD Black and a single 140mm case fan) roughly 1.25 Mh/s with sub 70 degree temps and almost no HWE What PSU are you using? Are they undefvolted or overclocked? Currently they are on a Corsair TX750 but I am debating which PSU to upgrade to next since the TX750 is only bronze rated...I was running a Raidmax 850AE on my first scrypt rig that I sold and I run Corsair CS750M's on pairs of Antminer S1's. No voltage changes on any of my cards (as of yet) and only slight overclocking (+100-150 mHz) and NO changes to the memory clock. |
|
|
|
jpchrist
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
16Q3R8NAfK63DvkTUGgLdPScyMU8uSAJUH
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:34:20 AM |
|
Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs?  |
|
|
|
|
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
3D Printed!
|
|
May 21, 2014, 03:27:26 AM |
|
Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs? No scrypt Asic's here |
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
May 21, 2014, 06:20:34 AM |
|
Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs? No scrypt Asic's here There are many whales with huge datacenters full of gridseeds here. |
|
|
|
|
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
3D Printed!
|
|
May 21, 2014, 06:48:24 AM |
|
Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs? No scrypt Asic's here There are many whales with huge datacenters full of gridseeds here. I was talking about my equipment, apologies for the confusion mate  |
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
May 21, 2014, 07:12:49 AM |
|
Just a general question.... Is everyone currently mining here on ASICs? Or are there still some die-hard GPU hold outs? No scrypt Asic's here There are many whales with huge datacenters full of gridseeds here. I was talking about my equipment, apologies for the confusion mate I was just answering the original question. I am mining on a GPU rig. |
|
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
|
May 21, 2014, 11:11:12 AM |
|
gtraah, read the first part of the OP of this thread please.
Yeh I did, What I am saying is nothing to do with this, I know about those untracked shares etc.... I am using CPUminer for my Grids and Sgminer for my GPUs. What I am checking is the rejected MHs on the poolside compare to the REjected MH/s to the other pools side... Also my Total MH/s is lower by around 1.5mhs on Clever than on waffle, when doing some calculations that 1.5mhs equalls roughly the same percentage of Rejects I am getting with clever.. FOr example If I check my poolside rejects on waffle I will see this 0.5 - 1.80% All the time Some times A LITTLE over... But with clever my rejects on poolside are never this low. Then when I look at the last 24hr average reject rate is always between 5-10% , I never see these rejects with waffle ... Id rather mine here but I am just wondering why this has been always the case PS: My POOLSIDE overall Accepted MH for Waffle is 1.5Mhs Higher than Clever... And this is due to the difference in rejected shares, if you want to see what I am talking about point your miner there just to see the reject differences and the accepted/rejected Mh/s differences. You will see what I am talking about. We all have miners pointed at CleverMining. Also, you must know that pools can only track hashrate based on accepted shares, and it isn't that accurate. No I meant at waffle to see if your accepted vs Rejected changes vs Clever.. |
|
|
|
|
|
