interlagos
|
|
October 13, 2012, 12:10:02 AM |
|
It all started here in this thread 1 year ago! Happy birthday Litecoin!
|
|
|
|
foo
|
|
October 13, 2012, 04:58:50 AM |
|
|
I know this because Tyler knows this.
|
|
|
Greedi
|
|
October 14, 2012, 12:12:16 AM |
|
0.7.0 come on!
If you are thinking in BTC's 0.7.0, then.. our 0.6.3 are BTC 0.7.0's .. they just took our stuff into there
|
|
|
|
AndyRossy
|
|
October 14, 2012, 12:23:20 AM |
|
Can someone compare LTC to PPCoin for me? I dont understand PP coin, it seems like the more you hold it the more it's worth, so if the devs premined I rather not use it.
Look at charts on proofofstake.com People here claimed the dev had premined 10m+ and other crazy stuff, so I made a chart from block history, it's all a farce. As for 0.7.0, coblee is a good guy, and good dev imho, but hasnt posted here in over a month. I think he's too busy with other stuff. Maybe one of the other devs could branch it?
|
|
|
|
coblee (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1351
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
|
|
October 14, 2012, 08:24:07 AM |
|
Can someone compare LTC to PPCoin for me? I dont understand PP coin, it seems like the more you hold it the more it's worth, so if the devs premined I rather not use it.
Look at charts on proofofstake.com People here claimed the dev had premined 10m+ and other crazy stuff, so I made a chart from block history, it's all a farce. As for 0.7.0, coblee is a good guy, and good dev imho, but hasnt posted here in over a month. I think he's too busy with other stuff. Maybe one of the other devs could branch it? Yeah, I've been busy. I will work on getting another Litecoin client released soon. Oh yeah, happy birthday to Litecoin!
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1474
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
|
October 14, 2012, 08:26:33 AM |
|
Can someone compare LTC to PPCoin for me? I dont understand PP coin, it seems like the more you hold it the more it's worth, so if the devs premined I rather not use it.
Look at charts on proofofstake.com People here claimed the dev had premined 10m+ and other crazy stuff, so I made a chart from block history, it's all a farce. As for 0.7.0, coblee is a good guy, and good dev imho, but hasnt posted here in over a month. I think he's too busy with other stuff. Maybe one of the other devs could branch it? Yeah, I've been busy. I will work on getting another Litecoin client released soon. Oh yeah, happy birthday to Litecoin! Keep in touch man...
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 19, 2012, 11:02:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Gladamas
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.
|
|
October 19, 2012, 11:37:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
November 02, 2012, 12:59:01 AM |
|
Is there an app like btcticker.appspot.com that converts any USD amount into LTC and vice-versa, based on BTC-E or whatever exchange?
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
November 16, 2012, 10:07:19 AM |
|
Anyone want to trade 0.04 BTC for my 7.2079095 LTC private key? Lf68pByt1BybfyLJTeZQiaNhHotR7fEDF6
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
Liquid
|
|
November 16, 2012, 10:59:36 AM |
|
Send me the LTC ill give you 0.04 BTC What is your BTC address my LTC address is in my sig
|
Bitcoin will show the world what hard money really is.
|
|
|
bruj0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2012, 11:21:58 AM |
|
Anyone any ideas whats happened with LTC forums?
|
|
|
|
pyra-proxy
|
|
November 16, 2012, 11:50:37 AM |
|
Helped you all out wish there was a devcoin option but instead I asked for my tix count to boost the litecoin numbers: Alt-Coin Special: I will donate 10% of my operating margin (~2.4 BTC) to the development of the ALT-COIN (Namecoin, Solidcoin or Litecoin) which sells the most tickets, so support your alt-coin and buy in Namecoin (49 sold), Litecoin (187 sold) or Solidcoin (188 sold) today! You guys need to grab up 39 or 40 more ish to secure a coblee/litecoin victory so cheers :-)
|
|
|
|
Liquid
|
|
November 16, 2012, 12:46:18 PM |
|
Anyone any ideas whats happened with LTC forums?
Looks down
|
Bitcoin will show the world what hard money really is.
|
|
|
Greedi
|
|
November 16, 2012, 12:48:20 PM |
|
Sorry, Having some problems.. Status will come soon..
|
|
|
|
Greedi
|
|
November 16, 2012, 04:41:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyena
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015
|
|
November 29, 2012, 06:59:42 AM |
|
Let's say 2 persons wish to trade LTC and BTC without central authority or middle man. Also, they don't trust each other. If this has already been talked somewhere then sorry for bringing it up here but otherwise here's my idea:
Create some functionality or a program that sends out BTC/LTC only after it has received a certain amount from a specified address. For example sending 1 BTC in hope of receiving 170 LTC is a too high risk. Instead the BTC guy sends only 0.01 BTC and waits for the other party to send back 1.7 LTC. The LTC guy uses the same automation and sends back 1.7 LTC every time it receives 0.01 BTC. They repeat the procedure until the value has been exchanged.
The automation would be configurable so that as the percentage of exchanged value increases the amount of each transaction also would increase to speed up the procedure. If at any point one party tries to cheat and stop sending the value back the other party only loses a microscopic amount.
What do you think? Would that system be useful? Or maybe in the future?
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 29, 2012, 05:00:42 PM |
|
Let's say 2 persons wish to trade LTC and BTC without central authority or middle man. Also, they don't trust each other. If this has already been talked somewhere then sorry for bringing it up here but otherwise here's my idea:
Create some functionality or a program that sends out BTC/LTC only after it has received a certain amount from a specified address. For example sending 1 BTC in hope of receiving 170 LTC is a too high risk. Instead the BTC guy sends only 0.01 BTC and waits for the other party to send back 1.7 LTC. The LTC guy uses the same automation and sends back 1.7 LTC every time it receives 0.01 BTC. They repeat the procedure until the value has been exchanged.
The automation would be configurable so that as the percentage of exchanged value increases the amount of each transaction also would increase to speed up the procedure. If at any point one party tries to cheat and stop sending the value back the other party only loses a microscopic amount.
What do you think? Would that system be useful? Or maybe in the future?
That might be useful, but it still relies on a middle man (or program in this case, but you still have to trust the programmer and operator).
|
|
|
|
Hyena
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015
|
|
November 29, 2012, 08:22:36 PM |
|
obviously that software would have to be open source edit: it's more like a simple automation script because one could do this kind of transferring manually if he wanted to. Making 100 transactions manually would just be a way too much. Transaction fees could be problem but at trading sites you're going to pay to the site.
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 29, 2012, 08:39:25 PM |
|
obviously that software would have to be open source edit: it's more like a simple automation script because one could do this kind of transferring manually if he wanted to. Making 100 transactions manually would just be a way too much. Transaction fees could be problem but at trading sites you're going to pay to the site. There still has to be trust in the operator. Open source isn't read only.
|
|
|
|
|