Bitcoin Forum
December 16, 2017, 12:14:43 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 243 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched!  (Read 1259412 times)
th3.r00t
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311



View Profile WWW
June 22, 2012, 06:51:58 PM
 #1781

Litecoin can you PM me your Reaper settings.
I have 6950 and I want to try LTC mining.  Cool

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
1513383283
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513383283

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513383283
Reply with quote  #2

1513383283
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513383283
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513383283

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513383283
Reply with quote  #2

1513383283
Report to moderator
1513383283
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513383283

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513383283
Reply with quote  #2

1513383283
Report to moderator
Litecoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 22, 2012, 07:48:32 PM
 #1782

Litecoin can you PM me your Reaper settings.
I have 6950 and I want to try LTC mining.  Cool

These settings should pull 475KH/s
worksize 256
aggression 19
threads_per_gpu 2
sharethreads 2
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 6144
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
June 22, 2012, 11:59:27 PM
 #1783

LTC mining is very profitable again.
HD 6950 will mine +400LTC/day which gives us 0.50BTC/day.
Thats very good.

I like LTC very much but when ASIC comes and all GPU miners go to LTC the depth is simply not there to sustain the price up like with SR and BTC.

So LTC will never be BTC alternative for GPU miners Cry

NMC is quite similar I think ... the money is in BTC right now.
Gladamas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.


View Profile
June 23, 2012, 12:02:07 AM
 #1784

LTC mining is very profitable again.
HD 6950 will mine +400LTC/day which gives us 0.50BTC/day.
Thats very good.

I like LTC very much but when ASIC comes and all GPU miners go to LTC the depth is simply not there to sustain the price up like with SR and BTC.

So LTC will never be BTC alternative for GPU miners Cry

NMC is quite similar I think ... the money is in BTC right now.

That is an interesting point I had not considered until now. GPU miners switching to Litecoin mining would drive CPU miners out for the most part, like what happened to Bitcoin.

1GLADMZ5tL4HkS6BAWPfJLeZJCDHAd9Fr3 - LQ6Zx8v7fHVBiDX5Lmhbp6oEDB7dUFjANu
GPG 0xF219D5BB3C467E12 - Litecoin Forum
ShadowAlexey
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 973



View Profile
June 23, 2012, 04:44:22 AM
 #1785

Dont get too excided, there is much more than x10 possible cpu miners on planet, and performance diff is less than x10,so is not so drammatic)

My Bitmessage address: BM-Bc9dpmehK1ihtgHgXKVypTsDwmL4czMx .
฿: 1ShadowAM654zohrsjeso5pf9Sr4x4uYd Ł: LShadowAUpAy4r3yb2skZDe4vWFrLMNGtT ₪: 4ShadowA3DqkGv5zjLukcm88wSzvhbatsk
smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072


LEALANA Monero Physical Silver Coins


View Profile
June 23, 2012, 05:08:08 AM
 #1786

LTC mining is very profitable again.
HD 6950 will mine +400LTC/day which gives us 0.50BTC/day.
Thats very good.

I like LTC very much but when ASIC comes and all GPU miners go to LTC the depth is simply not there to sustain the price up like with SR and BTC.

So LTC will never be BTC alternative for GPU miners Cry

NMC is quite similar I think ... the money is in BTC right now.

Yeah that can change pretty quickly buddy.

███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.        SMOOTHIE'S HEALTH AND FITNESS JOURNAL          History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA  PHYSICAL MONERO COINS 999 FINE SILVER.
 
th3.r00t
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311



View Profile WWW
June 23, 2012, 06:09:01 AM
 #1787

These settings should pull 475KH/s
worksize 256
aggression 19
threads_per_gpu 2
sharethreads 2
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 6144

Such high intensity give me a lot of stales/invalids - ~8%

At factory clocks (6870 and 6950) and intensity 16 I got ~575kH/s and ~1% stale.

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
Litecoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 23, 2012, 10:25:40 AM
 #1788

These settings should pull 475KH/s
worksize 256
aggression 19
threads_per_gpu 2
sharethreads 2
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 6144

Such high intensity give me a lot of stales/invalids - ~8%

At factory clocks (6870 and 6950) and intensity 16 I got ~575kH/s and ~1% stale.

Litecoinpool pays for stale shares. If someone finds a block and after this you submit your share, calculated from the old 'job', it's considered stale and is wasted.
However, that is normal and you still get paid for it.

And those two cards you have there. Can pull 800KH/s.
Gladamas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.


View Profile
June 23, 2012, 07:10:37 PM
 #1789

So I started Reaper and it said that reaper.conf was missing, even though it was in the same folder as reaper.exe? (Yes, it is reaper.conf, not reaper.conf.txt.)

1GLADMZ5tL4HkS6BAWPfJLeZJCDHAd9Fr3 - LQ6Zx8v7fHVBiDX5Lmhbp6oEDB7dUFjANu
GPG 0xF219D5BB3C467E12 - Litecoin Forum
Litecoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 23, 2012, 10:46:06 PM
 #1790

So I started Reaper and it said that reaper.conf was missing, even though it was in the same folder as reaper.exe? (Yes, it is reaper.conf, not reaper.conf.txt.)

Delete your old folder and download it again. You only have configure your config file to get it working.
Gladamas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.


View Profile
June 23, 2012, 11:12:08 PM
 #1791

So I started Reaper and it said that reaper.conf was missing, even though it was in the same folder as reaper.exe? (Yes, it is reaper.conf, not reaper.conf.txt.)

Delete your old folder and download it again. You only have configure your config file to get it working.

Thanks, that got it working again for the first two runs, but then it had the same error (reaper.conf not found). I even replaced reaper.conf with the original version and it still said that.

1GLADMZ5tL4HkS6BAWPfJLeZJCDHAd9Fr3 - LQ6Zx8v7fHVBiDX5Lmhbp6oEDB7dUFjANu
GPG 0xF219D5BB3C467E12 - Litecoin Forum
th3.r00t
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311



View Profile WWW
June 24, 2012, 07:01:08 AM
 #1792

Litecoinpool pays for stale shares. If someone finds a block and after this you submit your share, calculated from the old 'job', it's considered stale and is wasted.
However, that is normal and you still get paid for it.

And those two cards you have there. Can pull 800KH/s.

Tweaked a bit and at intensity 18 and 5770@1100 mem got 750 kh/s with 1-3% stale

Thanks for info Litecoin!

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
Tachikoma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile WWW
June 24, 2012, 09:54:14 AM
 #1793

Is there room for more then one crypto-currency in the online world?

For instance; I have a web-hosting operation. What if I decide to accept 20 payments a week in Litecoin where I would pay users the current USD-LTC times two. At this moment the LTC/USD is 0.00514, so I would offer 0.01028. Of course it would dip into my own profits but it would encourage users to get more involved in Litecoin. If enough Litecoin supporting merchants would join me in such a system we could give Litecoin more value then it has now, right? Could this lead to greater adoption? And if so would this hurt bitcoin in any way?

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks | Bytesized Seedboxes BTC/LTC supported
Greedi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


LitecoinTalk


View Profile WWW
June 24, 2012, 10:11:52 AM
 #1794

Is there room for more then one crypto-currency in the online world?

For instance; I have a web-hosting operation. What if I decide to accept 20 payments a week in Litecoin where I would pay users the current USD-LTC times two. At this moment the LTC/USD is 0.00514, so I would offer 0.01028. Of course it would dip into my own profits but it would encourage users to get more involved in Litecoin. If enough Litecoin supporting merchants would join me in such a system we could give Litecoin more value then it has now, right? Could this lead to greater adoption? And if so would this hurt bitcoin in any way?

+1 i'm in!

LitecoinTalk - Sign up today!
Try out LTC-Aarade!
Buy Shares!
Litecoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 24, 2012, 11:11:37 PM
 #1795

As the price went up to 0.00181 BTC, we can say its 3 times more profitable than BTC GPU mining.
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176


RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME


View Profile
June 25, 2012, 08:28:56 AM
 #1796

LTC mining is very profitable again.
HD 6950 will mine +400LTC/day which gives us 0.50BTC/day.
Thats very good.

I like LTC very much but when ASIC comes and all GPU miners go to LTC the depth is simply not there to sustain the price up like with SR and BTC.

So LTC will never be BTC alternative for GPU miners Cry

NMC is quite similar I think ... the money is in BTC right now.

That is an interesting point I had not considered until now. GPU miners switching to Litecoin mining would drive CPU miners out for the most part, like what happened to Bitcoin.

Not exactly, what happened with Bitcoin is that GPU miners made CPU mining impossible by increasing the difficulty by orders of magnitude.

If all those GPU's jump on LTC it will increase the difficulty yes, but it not by as great an amount. You will still be able to mine with a CPU just very slow. Mining bitcoin with a CPU though would be more like waiting for the Sun to burn out.

more or less retired.
interlagos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 497


View Profile
June 26, 2012, 10:15:34 AM
 #1797

We just had our own historic "pizza for LTC" event:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90019.0

Bright future for Litecoin!
Tachikoma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2012, 11:41:03 AM
 #1798

Is the litecoin development still active? I believe the lastest commit was like three months ago.

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks | Bytesized Seedboxes BTC/LTC supported
Luceo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


Per aspera ad astra!


View Profile
June 26, 2012, 12:37:18 PM
 #1799

Can't seem to compile:

Code:
util.cpp:975:41: warning: ignoring return value of ‘size_t fwrite(const void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
make: *** [obj/util.o] Error 1

Using Arch Linux 64-bit. Someone earlier had the same issue but it was passed over.

Tachikoma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2012, 01:16:05 PM
 #1800

Can't seem to compile:

Code:
util.cpp:975:41: warning: ignoring return value of ‘size_t fwrite(const void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
make: *** [obj/util.o] Error 1

Using Arch Linux 64-bit. Someone earlier had the same issue but it was passed over.

That looks like a warning, nothing else in there?

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks | Bytesized Seedboxes BTC/LTC supported
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 243 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!