Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2017, 03:46:10 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 211 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched!  (Read 1149182 times)
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
April 18, 2012, 11:05:33 PM
 #1601

Can anybody help me out here ?

I am getting this error on Mac OS X 10.5.8 :

Dyld Error Message:
  Symbol not found: __ZNKSt13bad_exception4whatEv
  Referenced from: /Applications/Litecoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Litecoin-Qt
  Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib

Also related thread without solution : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55105

No. Help yourself =)

If you don't have anything constructive to say then please abstain from posting it.

I really am banging my head against the wall here ...

I googled and there seems to be no solution at all.

Where can I try older versions of litecoind for Mac ?

I am not even trying to run the GUI just the litecoind headless daemon.

Also is there such thing like a bitcoin-mining-proxy but for Litecoin getworks ?

Thank you !
1508773570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508773570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508773570
Reply with quote  #2

1508773570
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Cosbycoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
April 19, 2012, 06:53:32 PM
 #1602

Can anybody help me out here ?

I am getting this error on Mac OS X 10.5.8 :

Dyld Error Message:
  Symbol not found: __ZNKSt13bad_exception4whatEv
  Referenced from: /Applications/Litecoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Litecoin-Qt
  Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib

Also related thread without solution : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55105

No. Help yourself =)

If you don't have anything constructive to say then please abstain from posting it.

I really am banging my head against the wall here ...

I googled and there seems to be no solution at all.

Where can I try older versions of litecoind for Mac ?

I am not even trying to run the GUI just the litecoind headless daemon.

Also is there such thing like a bitcoin-mining-proxy but for Litecoin getworks ?

Thank you !


As much as you've trolled this forum I think you need some help on your own bro!

Bonpay
Global Blockchain Solution for Financial Freedom
Initial Token Sale ■■■ Whitepaper ■■■ Official thread ■■■ Slack
Bonpay Wallet & Сard - reliable bridge between crypto and fiat world
■■■ Always stay one step ahead ■■■
EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
April 26, 2012, 06:42:10 PM
 #1603

I pulled today the latest version. Code compiles fine but now I get:

 EXCEPTION: NSt8ios_base7failureE       
CAutoFile::read : end of file       
litecoin in Runaway exception   

I did clean up the ./litecoin directory but I still get the same exception.


While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
pooler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 694


View Profile
April 26, 2012, 09:28:10 PM
 #1604

I pulled today the latest version. Code compiles fine but now I get:

 EXCEPTION: NSt8ios_base7failureE      
CAutoFile::read : end of file      
litecoin in Runaway exception    

I did clean up the ./litecoin directory but I still get the same exception.

I got the same error after upgrading. I even tried clearing the .litecoin folder and re-downloading the blockchain, but kept getting the same error. I had to go back to commit 2170487 and restore the wallet from a backup.

Unfortunately I haven't had the time to investigate the issue, but the problem seems to lie in one of the April 24/25 commits.

EDIT: ali1234 fixed this bug today in commit dda31c7. It should now be safe to use the latest version from the GitHub repository.
Note that if you have run the buggy code you will have to redownload the blockchain.

BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 07:10:35 AM
 #1605

Hi, I found an old litecoin wallet of mine and trying to use it. The problem is that I see that is loaded with about 100 ltc, but all transactions are unconfirmed. I tried to delete everything but the wallet in the roaming folder and downloaded the blockchain again, but the balance and transactions remain with zero confirmations, so I cannot use it. Any idea?
Tachikoma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile WWW
May 01, 2012, 09:24:14 AM
 #1606

So I started mining some litecoins to test it out yesterday and used a pool to get started. The pool send 30LC to my specified address but somehow the transactions are not showing up in my client (while the chain is synchronized). This is the address in question.

Does anybody have any idea why my client won't register it?

Edit
And of course a minute after I create a post the transactions somehow come in. Nevermind! Smiley

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks | Bytesized Seedboxes BTC/LTC supported
pooler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 694


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 10:17:45 AM
 #1607

The pool send 30LC to my specified address but somehow the transactions are not showing up in my client (while the chain is synchronized).
[...]

Edit
And of course a minute after I create a post the transactions somehow come in. Nevermind! Smiley

The reason for the delay is that it can take a few minutes before a transaction is included in a block (i.e. before the transaction gets 1 confirmation).

BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
Tachikoma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile WWW
May 01, 2012, 10:39:59 AM
 #1608

The pool send 30LC to my specified address but somehow the transactions are not showing up in my client (while the chain is synchronized).
[...]

Edit
And of course a minute after I create a post the transactions somehow come in. Nevermind! Smiley

The reason for the delay is that it can take a few minutes before a transaction is included in a block (i.e. before the transaction gets 1 confirmation).

Good suggestion, however the first transaction was send 8 hours ago at the time of my post, that should have been long enough to get one confirmation Wink

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks | Bytesized Seedboxes BTC/LTC supported
Scott J
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 12:02:27 PM
 #1609

I'm struggling to see any downsides to Litecoin when compared to Bitcoin.

The extra coins I see as a positive, as it allows more people to get involved.

The faster block speed is a great advantage IMO.

I guess my question is, what makes Bitcoin better than Litecoin other than being the first of the two to get acceptance?

Gavin Andresen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
May 01, 2012, 01:02:41 PM
 #1610

I guess my question is, what makes Bitcoin better than Litecoin other than being the first of the two to get acceptance?
Network effect.

More developers are working on Bitcoin, there are more interesting projects, more useful tools, more documentation at places like bitcoin.stackexchange.com, etc. And that all builds on itself.

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
Etlase2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 01:43:28 PM
 #1611

I'm struggling to see any downsides to Litecoin when compared to Bitcoin.

The extra coins I see as a positive, as it allows more people to get involved.

The faster block speed is a great advantage IMO.

4x the coins doesn't allow more people to get involved, it allows people to have 4x the coins.
The faster block speed isn't any real advantage, you just have to wait for 4x the confirmations. Two and a half minutes is still way too long for a POS transaction.

Quote
I guess my question is, what makes Bitcoin better than Litecoin other than being the first of the two to get acceptance?

I suppose that Litecoin changed virtually nothing of import from Bitcoin and expected something to happen.

tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
May 01, 2012, 03:12:46 PM
 #1612

the number of confirmations is the same as for bitcoin.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
Etlase2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 06:31:06 PM
 #1613

The number of confirmations to accept a transaction is up to the user. Assuming an identical hashrate, it would take 24 confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 confirmations in bitcoin. And one confirmation in litecoin is 4 times easier to reverse than one confirmation in bitcoin. There is no advantage here.

Scott J
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 06:33:59 PM
 #1614

Thanks for clearing that up - I thought the Bitcoin/Litecoin confirmations were just as strong.

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 07:05:50 PM
 #1615

The number of confirmations to accept a transaction is up to the user. Assuming an identical hashrate, it would take 24 confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 confirmations in bitcoin. And one confirmation in litecoin is 4 times easier to reverse than one confirmation in bitcoin. There is no advantage here.
Have a read - some of the later comments about confirms etc. may help enlighten you Smiley
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51504.0

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
Etlase2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 07:39:08 PM
 #1616

Have a read - some of the later comments about confirms etc. may help enlighten you Smiley
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51504.0

There is no advantage here.

Quote
Most transactions in the block-chain are small and having to wait for an hour or more for a small transaction to be accepted is definitely one of the issues that makes wider adoption of Bitcoin difficult.

How does waiting 10 minutes vs. an hour make any difference to a small transaction? Are you going to sit around waiting at McDonald's for 10 minutes before they let you have your food? No. This can be solved outside of the protocol, and has already been. You assume your conclusion is true without any evidence ("begging the question").

Quote
However, it WILL reduce variance.

So will 30 second blocks.

Quote
Reality: online bitcoin transaction are too slow.

Reality Opinion

Cosbycoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
May 01, 2012, 08:24:43 PM
 #1617

The number of confirmations to accept a transaction is up to the user. Assuming an identical hashrate, it would take 24 confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 confirmations in bitcoin. And one confirmation in litecoin is 4 times easier to reverse than one confirmation in bitcoin. There is no advantage here.

This all depends upon the current total network hash rate. I believe this is true given how young litecoin is in comparison to bitcoin.

=) gotta start somewhere!

Bonpay
Global Blockchain Solution for Financial Freedom
Initial Token Sale ■■■ Whitepaper ■■■ Official thread ■■■ Slack
Bonpay Wallet & Сard - reliable bridge between crypto and fiat world
■■■ Always stay one step ahead ■■■
Etlase2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 08:33:33 PM
 #1618

That's why I said "assuming an identical hashrate"... It is true if the hash rates are (qualitatively) identical. As it is now, you probably need 100+ confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 bitcoin confirmations. Possibly way more, I don't know.

Cosbycoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
May 01, 2012, 08:35:24 PM
 #1619

That's why I said "assuming an identical hashrate"... It is true if the hash rates are (qualitatively) identical. As it is now, you probably need 100+ confirmations in litecoin to equal 6 bitcoin confirmations. Possibly way more, I don't know.

Yup and each litecoin is worth about 1200 times less than bitcoin. So I'd say based on those ratios it is secure for its tiny market value in comparison to BITCOIN

Bonpay
Global Blockchain Solution for Financial Freedom
Initial Token Sale ■■■ Whitepaper ■■■ Official thread ■■■ Slack
Bonpay Wallet & Сard - reliable bridge between crypto and fiat world
■■■ Always stay one step ahead ■■■
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 08:55:16 PM
 #1620

Have a read - some of the later comments about confirms etc. may help enlighten you Smiley
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51504.0

There is no advantage here.

Quote
Most transactions in the block-chain are small and having to wait for an hour or more for a small transaction to be accepted is definitely one of the issues that makes wider adoption of Bitcoin difficult.

How does waiting 10 minutes vs. an hour make any difference to a small transaction? Are you going to sit around waiting at McDonald's for 10 minutes before they let you have your food? No. This can be solved outside of the protocol, and has already been. You assume your conclusion is true without any evidence ("begging the question").
Well, if you had bothered to read "later comments about confirms" ...

Quote
Quote
However, it WILL reduce variance.

So will 30 second blocks.
Again - read the thread - it's all discussed there - the first post is how I started it ...
The aim was to enlighten you on what you clearly missed with your comments, I'm not gonna spoon feeding that thread to you.

Quote
Quote
Reality: online bitcoin transaction are too slow.

Reality Opinion
Whatever Tongue

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 211 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!