CryptoDredge 0.27.0 — CUDA Miner

[flameelement]

Hi,
How to run power consumption?
Regards.

[1714138437]

1714138437

[1714138437]

1714138437

[1714138437]

1714138437

[1714138437]

1714138437

[1714138437]

1714138437

[1714138437]

1714138437

[nitrobg]

Your performance figures on Neoscrypt are a little optimistic...

Using latest nVidia drivers, I get 1230 Mh/s on my 1080's at +110/+500 (vs 1330-1390 advertised above). Intensity at default (6).

...is anyone able to tell me what I'm doing wrong here or is the advertised speed really bogus? Or at 130% pl with 200+ overclocks?...  

Increase the intensity. Excavator 1.4.4a is still the best miner for neoscrypt.

[Vispilio]

How much do you ideally undervolt with CryptoDredge when mining Lyra2Rev2 ?.. Some people go as low as 65 % - 70 %, claiming it's the most efficient, while the

majority prefers 75% - 80%. Of course the lower you go on voltage, you can squeeze more Core overclocking from your cards, but with the proviso that

too much OC causes lots of bad shares, so I would be very interested if anyone found an optimal MSI configuration for this particular miner

[Zorg33]

How much do you ideally undervolt with CryptoDredge when mining Lyra2Rev2 ?.. Some people go as low as 65 % - 70 %, claiming it's the most efficient, while the

majority prefers 75% - 80%. Of course the lower you go on voltage, you can squeeze more Core overclocking from your cards, but with the proviso that

too much OC causes lots of bad shares, so I would be very interested if anyone found an optimal MSI configuration for this particular miner

You simply cannot compare PL % settings of different cards.
Percentages don't tell shit, because it is relative to the TDP set in the BIOS of the particular card.

Card A has TDP 250W (average 1080Ti with AC) and card B has TDP of 280W (1080Ti with LC).
70% means 175W for card A and 196W for card B.
It's obvious that card B will perform faster (if the clock/voltage curve is similar, but that also differs adding more complexity to the problem)

The same logic also applies for Core and Mem clock offsets. +100  means nothing, because 0% GPU clock can be anywhere between 1500 and 2000MHz.
So please stop comparing them among different cards, makes no sense.
You have to compare the exact clocks.

[Vispilio]

You simply cannot compare PL % settings of different cards.
Percentages don't tell shit, because it is relative to the TDP set in the BIOS of the particular card.

Card A has TDP 250W (average 1080Ti with AC) and card B has TDP of 280W (1080Ti with LC).
70% means 175W for card A and 196W for card B.
It's obvious that card B will perform faster (if the clock/voltage curve is similar, but that also differs adding more complexity to the problem)

The same logic also applies for Core and Mem clock offsets. +100  means nothing, because 0% GPU clock can be anywhere between 1500 and 2000MHz.
So please stop comparing them among different cards, makes no sense.
You have to compare the exact clocks.

I agree, and that's a good point, but for whatever reasons, both on windows and linux programs like SMOS, a rig runs more stably when you apply a singular OC setting across

the board for all cards attached to that rig. That's why I prefer to initially shoot for general and modest OC settings that would yield efficient results across a wide variety of

card parameters; on top of that, if you really want to tinker with a particular GPU, you can always finetune it further...

[cryptodredge]

Downloads
Windows Download (CUDA 9.2 version)
Linux Download (CUDA 9.2 version)
Mirror on GitHub (CUDA 9.1/9.2 version)

Release 0.8.3 - (August 7, 2018)

• Fix TCP and WebSocket connections used for API
• Fix Lyra2z performance on 1070 Ti and P104-100 graphics cards

Happy mining!
The CryptoDredge Team.

[sumit.mathur101]

Hello, is there any diff between cuda 9.1 and cuda 9.2?

[cryptodredge]

Hello, is there any diff between cuda 9.1 and cuda 9.2?

The difference is not significant. The cu9.2 version faster cu9.1 by about 0.7% (depend on GPU and algorithm)
Tested on 1060 and Phi2

[cryptodredge]

How to set the intensity of the first graphics card 3 and the second 6?

No way. As a workaround for this issue, you might use a few CryptoDredge instances with -d option.
e.g.:

Code: (first.bat)

CryptoDredge -a <ALGO> -o stratum+tcp://<POOL> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p <OPTIONS> -d 0 -i 3

Code: (second.bat)

CryptoDredge -a <ALGO> -o stratum+tcp://<POOL> -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p <OPTIONS> -d 1

Can we expect this option? this is very important

The task was created for this feature. Stay tuned.

[cryptodredge]

0.8 to 0.8.2 was a big boost on lyra2z for the gtx1070 (2500 kh/s to 3200 kh/s)

However, 0.8 to 0.8.2 the hashrate regressed on lyra2z for the gtx1070ti (3300 kh/s to 2700 kh/s)

love the improvements.
However since 0.8.2 my 1070 greatly outperforms my 1070ti's on Lyra2z.

1070 avg hash 3954 KH/s
1070ti avg hash 3220 KH/s

any ideas how? I've got 4 different 1070ti's and none come close to my normal 1070....

Could you check v0.8.3?

[cryptodredge]

Some users reported hashrate drops for upper end cards like 1080 TI on 0.8.2, should we wait for future releases for improvements on 1080 TI ?..

Also what Overclock settings would you recommend for 1080 TI when mining Lyra2Rev2 ?..


All the Best

That's strange. We didn't do any changes on Lyra2REv2 since 0.4.1 version. We'll check it sooner or later.

[cryptodredge]

CD .6 and up are no longer working on PHI2 after fork...please advise

Cryptodredge has problems with Lux's smart contracts.

We'll try to fix it as soon as possible. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Hello, PHI2 works great.
question. you can make under the algoritm HEX, it's possible, you would be the first))))

Thanks for your suggestion. Could you provide the specification of the HEX algo?

coin xDNA "Hex" -Algo
the algorithm is new, only this coin has this algo, you would become a leader, the xDNA community is very large, the algorithm "Hex" only for video cards
https://github.com/XDNA-Core/ccminer-hex

Thank you for the information. We will take it into account in the future.

[cryptodredge]

Hi,
How to run power consumption?
Regards.

I'm sorry but I meant by the power consumption monitoring the console output

[elkiki1]

thanks for the api fix  

here some bench result for 8.3 cuda9.2 windows version on various cards at TDP 60% cc+100/+150 mc-500 :

https://preview.ibb.co/dK2n0e/phi2.png
https://preview.ibb.co/dxeBRK/skein.png
https://preview.ibb.co/njeZfe/tribus.png
https://preview.ibb.co/dWbEfe/neoscrypt.png
https://preview.ibb.co/fKtc0e/lyra2z.png
https://preview.ibb.co/hwqkmK/lyra2v2.png
https://preview.ibb.co/nm0RRK/allium.png

[cryptodredge]

thanks for the api fix  

here some bench result for 8.3 on various cards at TDP 60% cc+100/+150 mc-500 :

...

Thanks. I'm sure others will find your results very helpful.

[ggillies]

WOW!!!!!  Phi2 on 0.8.3 is SMOKING fast!!!  I'm at 9.8 MH/s per card for my 1080tis ...  Holy COW!

[terryborg]

Downloads
Windows Download (CUDA 9.2 version)
Linux Download (CUDA 9.2 version)
Mirror on GitHub (CUDA 9.1/9.2 version)

Release 0.8.3 - (August 7, 2018)

• Fix TCP and WebSocket connections used for API
• Fix Lyra2z performance on 1070 Ti and P104-100 graphics cards

Happy mining!
The CryptoDredge Team.

The API now run good and smoothly with awesome miner.

Good job.

thanks

[sabercrypto]

WOW!!!!!  Phi2 on 0.8.3 is SMOKING fast!!!  I'm at 9.8 MH/s per card for my 1080tis ...  Holy COW!

how about power consumption?

[bruutje]

0.8 to 0.8.2 was a big boost on lyra2z for the gtx1070 (2500 kh/s to 3200 kh/s)

However, 0.8 to 0.8.2 the hashrate regressed on lyra2z for the gtx1070ti (3300 kh/s to 2700 kh/s)

love the improvements.
However since 0.8.2 my 1070 greatly outperforms my 1070ti's on Lyra2z.

1070 avg hash 3954 KH/s
1070ti avg hash 3220 KH/s

any ideas how? I've got 4 different 1070ti's and none come close to my normal 1070....

Could you check v0.8.3?

It's better now thanks, but the 1070 is still doing much better than the 1070ti's 

[08:35:47] INFO  - GPU0 Gigabyte GTX 1070 Ti : 3395KH/s (Avr 3399KH/s) : 22.32KH/W : T=67C Fan=80%
[08:35:47] INFO  - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1070 Ti : 3405KH/s (Avr 3407KH/s) : 22.47KH/W : T=66C Fan=80%
[08:35:47] INFO  - GPU2 Zotac GTX 1070 Ti : 3383KH/s (Avr 3386KH/s) : 23.55KH/W : T=66C Fan=80%
[08:35:47] INFO  - GPU3 Gigabyte GTX 1070 Ti : 3405KH/s (Avr 3399KH/s) : 22.40KH/W : T=66C Fan=80%
[08:35:47] INFO  - GPU4 MSI GTX 1070 : 3973KH/s (Avr 3981KH/s) : 23.20KH/W : T=63C Fan=80%
[08:35:47] INFO  - GPU5 Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB : 2833KH/s (Avr 2829KH/s) : 21.35KH/W : T=65C Fan=80%
[08:35:47] INFO  - Total hashrate 20.40MH/s

[sumit.mathur101]

Is it possible to set PL/tdp in bat file? without MSI afterburner? like in ccminer we can use --plimit , is there anything similar here that we can use?