How will bounties do without Bounty Hunters?

[iwah]

There won't be anything like bounty if there were no bounty hunters, bounty exist because there were a lot of hunters going for these bounties, I think the right question should be, will project succeed if they didn't offer bounty hunting and I think that without bounty hunting, most projects won't have succeed because bounty spread the good message about projects.

[1714876095]

1714876095

[1714876095]

1714876095

[1714876095]

1714876095

[1714876095]

1714876095

[hardhouseinc]

I think hunters have an important role in the bounty campaigns and they should be taught how not to sell their rewards in the next seconds.

[cepot9]

the project team could have overcome this, that the bounty hunter had no extraordinary effect when the token entered the exchange and most all blamed the bounty hunter when the price dropped, even though the number of tokens allocated was not so large. greater allocation for teams and investors. if from a hunter bounty I think they (dev) can handle it. this is very blind

[valnd]

No campaign can be effective without the active participation of the bounty hunters, i think this mouse cat play will continue between the bounty hunters and project owners because both try to out smart eachother, this will continue untill there is some kind of strict rules or escrow service between them.

You are correct, escrow service will really be a game changer on the part of the bounty hunter though it has downsides but it will give bounties the assurance of getting their payment, I have seen some bounty managers working on the bounty escrow and i believe soon a lot will adopt it.

[Sendi blackspade team]

I think hunters have an important role in the bounty campaigns and they should be taught how not to sell their rewards in the next seconds.

it seems that it will be a little difficult, because we know for ourselves, bounty hunters only need money, especially like the current conditions where there are not many good price projects. surely bounty hunters will soon sell their fees after they are registered in exchange.

[Rengganis]

I observed that when bounty hunters joined the bounty campaign project, but following the rules that had been determined could increase the popularity of the project so that many investors could smell it, but I agreed more on the rule that was difficult to prevent hunter bounties so that other participants could join the bounty too.

[izanagi narukami]

IMO, they play the role for spreading information just like advertisement ads like fb or twitter.

Bounty need the hunter but they not need the hunter that only take the advantage of the bounty so that's why some bounty owner decide to require KYC to prove that the hunter really interest on the project. For me it's a great choice if you want to distributed fairly !

[rdewilde]

I also saw a lot of great projects succeed without bounty. Most of those projects are now in the top 100 in the coinmarket. If you want the project to succeed without the bounty, you have to have many big partners and many private investors

[vanya.pronin.1983]

Only when they are making such a great marketing that they do not need bounty hunters. There were a lot of projects that did not have a bounty and they ended successfully, but I think the bounty hunters are needed, especially on such a market.

[santino11]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?


 

How can be a campaign be bounty successful if there are no participants?
How will the campaign flow without any members?
Who will spread the words worldwide?
who will wear the signatures and avatar?
who will share the post on social media?

[kokrokok]

very difficult for the project to achieve success when doing ico because there are very few ads. so many investors do not know, but the project can be successful without the help of bounty hunters if they have partners who are very well known and have many communities

[hashpuppy]

technically the answer is yes. projects can do sold out without bounty hunters. it may be an internal arragement within a specific group. imagine how bitcoin succeed without bounty hunters? it is purely the project fundamentals and perfect timing.

Yes, I agree with you. Instead of running bounty campaigns, they can promote their project by many ways. However, I think running bounty campaigns is much cheaper and safer. In case the ICO do not success, they don't need to pay anything. While bounty hunters can help to promote their project a lot.

[sefirotius]

make it impossible they are everywhere hunters for the distribution of coins

[cryptobull3]

That then they need to do bounty hunters job by themselves , and Pay a lot of money in cash usually for advertisement in youtube channels or twitter channels and that wouldn't be as effective in my view .

[TUDOX]

First of all, without bounty hunters there will be no need for bounty program. Secondly, the ICO owners will spend more money in advertisements with low social media engagement.

[DeKingCrypto]

First of all, without bounty hunters there will be no need for bounty program. Secondly, the ICO owners will spend more money in advertisements with low social media engagement.

You are absolutely right. The projects will have to spend a lot of money, running advertisements, unfortunately many ICO projects don't look at this facts, they don't see bounty hunters as anything, they look at them as beggars.

[ken thung]

Successful projects are needed by the community and bounty hunters are one of the communities that need each other to be mutually beneficial, so far this has happened. So without bounty hunters, it would be difficult to build a good project and community.

[YoungMaster]

The existence of the bounty hunters is very necessary for a bounty, although it seems full of spammy things but they are very helpful in promoting the project which has given. Without them, an ico cannot maximize the token sales due to the lack of promotions.

[donass1]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?


 

This Is a bit funny. But it's called bounties because there are hunting the rewards. However, I sincerely do not agree with that general statement hunters sell of easily and dump the worth of tokens. Private investors are sometimes culpable too

[coinnumber]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?


 

The importance of hunters in every ICO project is not notifiable because no ICO will success without creating awareness by marketing the product. The notion that hunter are the cause of ICO coins price fall is what I will never believe, The main thing that affects the price of ICO coins is the private sale which normal go with 50% bonus or more and some team hurt their project them selves by bring the coin which supposed to be burned to exchange.